Back to Authors

Bering, Jamie L

0000-0001-6161-7088

Mayo Clinic

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdate, Arizona, USA.

Citations 3

Fear, Feeding, and the Gut: Nutrition Support Considerations in Adults with ARFID and Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Bering, Jamie , DiBaise, John K. , Bering, Jamie L

Nutrients | February 24, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 726

10.3390/nu18050726 Get It

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by persistent restriction or avoidance of food intake leading to clinically significant nutritional, medical, and/or psychosocial consequences, without associated body-image disturbance. Although historically described in pediatric populations, ARFID is increasingly recognized in adults, particularly among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Emerging data demonstrate a strong bidirectional relationship between ARFID and GI disease—especially disorders of gut–brain interaction—where fear of GI symptoms commonly drives restrictive eating, and chronic undernutrition may worsen GI motility, visceral sensitivity, and symptom severity, reinforcing a self-perpetuating cycle. Despite growing recognition of ARFID in adult gastroenterology patients, evidence guiding nutritional management and the use of nutrition support therapies in this population remains limited. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature on the epidemiology, clinical features, and nutritional consequences of ARFID in adults with GI disease, with a focus on screening and diagnostic considerations relevant to GI clinicians and principles of multidisciplinary management. Particular attention is given to the role of nutrition support therapies, including oral nutritional supplementation, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition. While oral strategies are foundational to nutritional rehabilitation, available evidence supporting enteral or parenteral nutrition in adults with ARFID is sparse and largely extrapolated from pediatric or retrospective studies. Expert guidelines caution against routine or prolonged use of invasive nutrition support due to risks of reinforcing food avoidance, medical complications, and poor long-term outcomes, recommending their use only in carefully selected, medically necessary, and time-limited circumstances. Overall, ARFID represents an underrecognized but clinically significant contributor to malnutrition and symptom burden in adult patients with GI disorders, underscoring the need for routine screening, individualized multidisciplinary care, and high-quality prospective research to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Roles, responsibilities, and opportunities for the nutrition support physician working with adults: A critical review
Mundi, Manpreet S. , Mechanick, Jeffrey I. , Patel, Jayshil J. , Newberry, Carolyn , Sankararaman, Senthilkumar , Rosenthal, Martin D. , Bering, Jamie , Katz, Jennifer, Stoppe, Christian , Mechanick, Jeffrey I. , Patel, Jayshil J , Rosenthal, Martin , Mohamed Elfadil, Osman , Bering, Jamie L , Katz, Jennifer , Stoppe, Christian , Martindale, Robert , McClave, Stephen A , Mundi, Manpreet S , Elfadil, Osman Mohamed , Martindale, Robert G. , McClave, Stephen A.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | July 3, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 816-835

10.1002/jpen.2790 Get It

AbstractThe dual burden of undernutrition and overnutrition requires a greater understanding and commitment to physician training and specialization in nutrition support. Despite the significant healthcare need and existence of organizations focused on nutrition support such as the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), physician involvement in the nutrition care of high‐risk patients remains low. In an ASPEN survey of members, inadequate training among physicians was reported along with significant barriers to involvement in nutrition support, such as insufficient protected time, reduced reimbursement and financial support, inadequate support from administrators or supervisors, as well as a nationwide reduction in number of nutrition support teams. These changes in the healthcare landscape prompted the ASPEN Physician Engagement Committee to develop a critical review focused on domains of nutrition risk assessment, enteral and parenteral access and support, scholarly activities, board certification, administrative responsibilities, education and training opportunities, coding, and reimbursement. The aim of this critical review is to capacitate physicians to engage in nutrition support and enhance their acumen in clinical nutrition to improve patient care and enrich personal and professional development.
Bone marrow oxalosis with pancytopenia in a patient with short bowel syndrome: Report of a case and review of the literature
Bering, Jamie , Wiedmeier, Julia E. , Sproat, Lisa , DiBaise, John K. , Bering, Jamie L , Wiedmeier-Nutor, Julia E

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | October 1, 2022 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 165-170

10.1002/jpen.2453 Get It

AbstractSystemic oxalosis is a condition in which calcium oxalate crystals deposit into various bodily tissues. Although this may occur as the result of a rare primary syndrome in which an error of glyoxylate metabolism causes an overproduction of oxalate, it is more often seen as a secondary process characterized by increased enteric oxalate absorption. Here, we describe a patient with short bowel syndrome on long‐term parenteral nutrition support who developed a unique manifestation of systemic oxalosis, leading to deposition of oxalate crystals within the bone marrow contributing to pancytopenia. In this report, in addition to reviewing the literature on this presumably rare manifestation of oxalosis, we also discuss its pathogenesis in the setting of short bowel syndrome and its management, including prevention.