Gupta, Sounak

According to the current WHO classification, noninvasive germ cell neoplasia of the testis comprises germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), specific forms of intratubular germ cell neoplasia, and gonadoblastoma. Because type II germ cell tumors (GCT, type II) arise from GCNIS, accurate detection of precursor lesions is diagnostically important. In preparation for the 2024 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on genitourinary precursor lesions, which took place in Florence, Italy, an anonymous survey was distributed to ISUP members to assess current diagnostic practices regarding testicular precursor lesions. The literature and current WHO classification affirm the significance of precursor lesions in testicular tumours. Working Group 4—Precursor Lesions of the Testis—focused on their practical application by individual pathologists rather than establishing consensus from scientific data. There is strong agreement that GCNIS is the preferred and appropriate term for GCT precursor lesions and that its presence should be reported in cases of invasive GCT. Respondents also agree that “seminoma with intratubular nonseminoma” is the appropriate terminology for seminoma with an associated noninvasive nonseminomatous (embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, trophoblasts, or teratoma) component. Most pathologists prefer to use OCT3/4 as the primary immunohistochemical marker, and a panel was generally not considered necessary. No consensus is reached regarding the requirement for immunohistochemistry to confirm GCT precursor lesions in the testis. Three questions remain open: the value of subtyping intratubular lesions, the immunohistochemical approach to gonadoblastoma, and the criteria distinguishing Sertoli cell nodules from Sertoli cell tumors.

ABSTRACT Background Li Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary multi‐cancer syndrome caused by alterations in TP53 (MIM# 151623). Next generation sequencing (NGS) allows for the detection of TP53 variants at lower variant allele frequencies (VAFs). A TP53 variant with a VAF < 50% may represent mosaic LFS, aberrant clonal expansion (ACE), or possible circulating tumor DNA. Differentiation among these conditions is important for optimal patient management. Methods Genetic testing was performed using a custom gene panel, with an average read depth of 350× (range 166–553×). DNA extracted from four different tissues (blood, saliva, cultured skin fibroblasts, and colon) was sequenced. Results Here, we describe an adult female patient with a history of an adrenocortical neoplasm and osteosarcoma, diagnosed at 2 and 16 years of age, respectively. Testing of peripheral blood identified a pathogenic TP53 variant, c.733G>A, p.(Gly245Ser) (NM_000546.6); however, subsequent in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT‐M) did not identify this TP53 variant in any of nine embryos tested. Testing for possible mosaicism in the proband was performed on four different specimens, revealing variable VAFs of the TP53 variant (saliva: 44%; blood: 31%; cultured skin fibroblasts: 18%; and colon tissue: 9%). These results suggest a post‐zygotic event, consistent with mosaic LFS rather than ACE. Conclusion This case highlights the complexity of interpreting mosaic variants in the TP53 gene, and we propose a testing algorithm to aid in the delineation of this phenomenon when relaying cancer and reproductive risk information in the context of mosaicism.