Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

12581 citation(s) found for "Vu, John A".

Considerations and pragmatic strategies for implementation of point of care testing for high sensitivity cardiac troponin into the acute care setting
Collinson, Paul, Christenson, Robert, Jafri, Lena , Jaffe, Allan S., Apple, Fred S. , Hammarsten, Ola , Omland, Torbjørn, Sandoval, Yader, Mills, Nicholas L., Buchan, Vanessa, Sandberg, Sverre , Aakre, Kristin M., Aakre, Kristin M , Collinson, Paul , Lam, Leo , Pickering, John W. , Christenson, Robert H. , Hoovels, Lieve Van , Cullen, Louise , Jaffe, Allan S. , Omland, Torbjørn , Sandoval, Yader , Mills, Nicholas L , Than, Martin , Aakre, Kristin M.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) | March 5, 2026 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1467-1478

10.1515/cclm-2026-0210 | PMID 41784012 Get It

Abstract A challenge in the implementation of rapid risk-stratification algorithms for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome is the turnaround time for cardiac troponin (cTn) from blood sampling to reporting of results. Measurement of cTn in whole blood using point of care (POC) offers a solution. There is lack of consensus on how these instruments should be assessed and deployed when implemented into routine practice. A pragmatic strategy is needed to balance the requirement for appropriate evaluation, validation and local verification of POC high sensitivity (hs) cTn assays whilst avoiding unnecessary duplication of previously conducted work using central laboratory assays. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Bio-Markers (IFCC C-CB) has developed an educational document to provide practical suggestions as to how hs-cTn POC assays may be implemented in acute health care settings and networks. The objective of this document is to provide a pragmatic framework for implementation of such systems. The article describes the validation and verification procedures and outlines what should be the responsibility of the manufacturers and provides recommendations on how a local verification may be undertaken before instruments are implemented into routine clinical practice.
Location of LMNA Variants and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiomyopathy
Castrichini, M, Ackerman, M J, Giudicessi, John, Castrichini, Matteo , Ackerman, Michael J. , Giudicessi, John R.

JAMA Cardiology | March 4, 2026 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 390

10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0014 | PMID 41779407 Get It

Association of Noninvasive Rejection Biomarkers with 10-year Kidney Allograft Survival
Taber, David, Heilman, Raymond L. , Poggio, Emilio, Kurian, Sunil Thuruthummal, Zhao, Lihui, Gebregziabher, Mulugeta , Kleiboeker, Steve, Friedewald, John J, Kurian, Sunil M. , Friedewald, John J. , Fleming, James N , Poggio, Emilio , Kurian, Sunil , Zhao, Lihui , Kleiboeker, Steve , Friedewald, John J , Taber, David, Poggio, Emilio D. , Marsh, Christopher L.

Kidney360 | March 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.34067/kid.0000001167 | PMID 41774503 Get It

Background The primary objective of this analysis was to assess the association between non-invasive biomarker results within the first 2-years post-kidney transplant and 10-year All Cause Graft Loss (ACGL). Methods CTOT-08 was linked with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to assess 10-year ACGL. Cox Regression was used to determine the association between gene expression profile (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) results and ACGL. A Cox Regression with time-varying covariates was used to test associations with ACGL with simultaneous and repeated biomarker results. Results The final landmarked Cox model included clinical acute rejection (aHR 2.58 (1,30,5.13) for 1 rejection, aHR 3.41 (1.07,10.85) for 2 rejections), diabetes (aHR 1.71 (0.99,2.96)), recipient age (aHR 1.02 (1.00,1.04)), the highest quartile of positive GEP (aHR 2.44 (1.45,4.10)) and the highest quartile of positive dd-cfDNA (aHR 2.91 (1.77,4.78)). In the time-varying model, having both biomarkers positive at the same time carried the greatest association with ACGL (aHR 4.29 (2.10,8.76)). Conclusions In this multicenter, prospective analysis of GEP and dd-cfDNA on patient and graft outcomes, an independent association with long-term ACGL was demonstrated. Further, a time-varying analysis demonstrated that two biomarkers with independent methodologies tested at the same time can provide more information than either one alone.
Structural Basis for C 8 methylation of 23S ribosomal RNA by Cfr
Esakova, Olga , Jung, James , Lee, Hyunwook , Cho, Sung Hyun , Alumasa, John N., Schwalm, Erica L. , Bauerle, Matthew , Hafenstein, Susan , Yu, Zhiheng, Booker, Squire J. , Esakova, Olga A , Alumasa, John , Hafenstein, Susan L , Booker, Squire J , Grove, Tyler L. , Yu, Zhiheng

No container title available | March 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.02.27.707579 | PMID 41867798 Get It

Abstract Cfr methylates C 8 of adenosine 2503 (A2503) in 23 S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and will also methylate C 2 of A2503 after methylating C 8 . C 8 methylation confers resistance to more than five classes of clinically used antibiotics, highlighting it as a worrisome mechanism of antibiotic resistance. Here, we report the structure of Cfr, determined by cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM). Despite its small size (∼36 kDa), we exploit a transient protein–RNA crosslink that forms during catalysis, which requires Cys105 to resolve. Using a Cfr Cys105Ala variant and an 87-nucleotide strand of rRNA, we isolate the crosslinked species and determine its structure to 3.0 Å resolution. Notably, the 87-mer rRNA adopts an L-shaped conformation characteristic of tRNAs, rather than the conformation it assumes in the ribosome. One Sentence Summary Cryo-EM structure of Cfr, a radical S-adenosylmethionine methylase that confers antibiotic resistance
Rescuing cancer immunotherapy with plasma exchange in bladder cancer 1 (ReCIPE-B1).
Tabiim, Anthony Jagri , Zarka, Jabra , Gicobi, Joanina K. , Gregory, Susanna, Becker, Nicole, Muniz, Miguel, Heath, Elisabeth I. , Sartor, Oliver, Pagliaro, Lance C. , Chaudhuri, Aadel A., Cheville, John, Orme, Jacob J. , Zarka, Jabra G , Tabiim, Anthony , Becker, Nicole A. , Rosen, Peter F. , Sartor, Oliver, Chaudhuri, Aadel A. , Childs, Daniel S. , Cheville, John C. , Lucien, Fabrice , Winters, Jeffrey L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.tps898 Get It

TPS898 Background: Enfortumab vedotin with pembrolizumab (EV/Pembro) is now first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) following the EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 trial, which demonstrated a 67.7% response rate and prolonged survival. However, ~35% of cancers exhibited primary resistance and most responders relapse within one year, with post-EV/Pembro therapies achieving < 15% response and median survival < 3 years. We previously showed that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removed soluble PD-L1 and other immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) blocking soluble factors from the blood and that this overcame ICI resistance. Combining TPE with EV/Pembro rechallenge may overcome acquired resistance and restore antitumor immunity. Methods: RECIPE-B1 [NCT07087860] is an open-label, randomized phase II trial enrolling 50 patients (1:1) with EV/Pembro-refractory la/mUC and ECOG 0–2. Arm A receives TPE on days 1–3 followed by EV 1.25 mg/kg IV plus pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 3 of each 21-day cycle for the first three cycles, then continues EV/Pembro alone from cycle 4. Arm B receives investigator’s-choice next-line standard of care (SOC) per NCCN guidelines. Tumor assessments occur at the end of cycle 4 (±28 days) and every 12 weeks thereafter; safety is monitored each cycle (CTCAE v5.0). The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, comparing TPE + EV/pembro versus SOC. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), and safety. Correlative studies evaluate circulating and urinary tumor DNA and exosomal biomarkers (including exosomal Nectin-4) as predictors of response and resistance. The trial is open at Mayo Clinic; as of September 2025, 2 of 50 patients have been enrolled, with planned accrual of ~2 patients/month and central coordination at Mayo Clinic and affiliates. Clinical trial information: NCT07087860 .
CAST-AI: Cystectomy after systemic therapy with ADC and immunotherapy.
Zarka, Jabra , Bering, Elisabeth, Flickinger, Lynn M. , Gregory, Susanna, Roberson, Daniel S. , Sharma, Vidit, Chaudhuri, Aadel A. , Khanna, Abhinav, Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Boorjian, S., Sartor, Alton Oliver, Cheville, John C. , Domingo-Doménech, Josep, Shah, Paras H., Orme, Jacob J. , Zarka, Jabra G , Bobek, Olivia , Roberson, Daniel S. , Sharma, Vidit, Pritchett, Joshua C. , Jang, Albert , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lucien, Fabrice , Ballman, Karla V. , Domingo‐Domenech, Josep

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.tps892 Get It

TPS892 Background: Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (Pembro) is now first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), yielding ~30% complete response (CR) rates; nevertheless, most patients (pts) progress within 1 year and median overall survival (OS) remains < 3 years. In muscle invasive bladder cancer, local consolidation after systemic therapy improves outcomes, suggesting that residual, treatment-refractory intravesical disease drives relapse. We hypothesize that cytoreductive cystectomy/nephroureterectomy (CC/U)—with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) as needed—can consolidate responses to EV/Pembro and extend benefit in regionally advanced or metastatic UC. CAST-AI prospectively evaluates this multimodal strategy and integrates correlative studies of exosomal Nectin-4 and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood and urine as predictive/MRD biomarkers. Methods: CAST-AI is a phase II, decentralized single-arm trial enrolling pts with histologically confirmed UC of the bladder or upper urinary tract with ≥N1 and/or M1 disease and ECOG PS 0–2 who are potential surgical candidates (planned n = 75). Treatment: EV 1.25 mg/kg IV D1 & D8 + Pembro 200 mg IV D1 q21d, ≥4 cycles; MDT permitted any time pre-surgery. Response assessments occur q9 weeks (±4) to 18 months, then q12 weeks (±4). Surgical eligibility requires: (A) fitness for surgery; (B) complete or partial response (CR/PR) or, for select low-burden/unmeasurable disease, urologist-adjudicated candidacy; (C) all distant sites addressed; and (D) procedure in pt’s best interest. Post-CC/U maintenance EV/Pembro is encouraged per clinical discretion and guided by definitive surgical pathology results, which provide true pathologic staging often unattainable through imaging after systemic therapy. Primary endpoint: 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: Objective response rate (ORR), CR rate, down-staging at CC/U, PFS, OS, and safety (using CTCAE). Exploratory endpoints: longitudinal exosomal Nectin-4 and ctDNA dynamics as MRD and early relapse indicators; tissue–blood–urine Nectin-4 concordance; pt-reported tolerability (using CIPN20). Key exclusions: > 20% variant histology or disallowed subtypes (e.g., micropapillary, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, neuroendocrine); prior chemotherapy for UC; contraindications to surgery/EV/ICI; or active uncontrolled comorbidities/infections. Status: Enrollment is open and ongoing, with 25 of 75 pts enrolled as of September 2025. The trial uses a decentralized model, allowing pts to receive EV/Pembro at their local facility, with central coordination, biospecimen shipping, and surgical evaluation at Mayo Clinic or affiliated sites. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06764095. Clinical trial information: NCT06764095 .
Dynamic investigator initiated enterprise (DIVINE) in prostate cancer: Randomized phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without short-course androgen deprivation and AR pathway inhibition in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate
Zarka, Jabra , Becker, Nicole A. , Gicobi, Joanina K. , Tabiim, Anthony, Heath, Elisabeth I. , Sartor, Alton Oliver, Park, Sean Sunghun, Ager, Casey, Andrews, Jack R. , Kase, Adam M. , YU, NATHAN Y., Vargas, C., Chaudhuri, Aadel A., Kim, Yohan, Cheville, John C. , Orme, Jacob J. , Tabiim, Anthony Jagri , Zarka, Jabra G , Tabiim, Anthony , Jang, Albert , Lucien, Fabrice , Childs, Daniel S. , Ager, Casey R. , Ballman, Karla V. , Chaudhuri, Aadel A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.tps283 Get It

TPS283 Background: Emerging evidence suggests that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can delay systemic therapy in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, the optimal timing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) initiation in this setting remains undefined. While deferred ADT following MDT may preserve quality of life, early short-course ADT/ARPI may eradicate micrometastatic disease and extend progression-free survival. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying PSMA-positive prostate cancer (PC) signals and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as real-time biomarkers of MRD and treatment response. Methods: DIVINE [NCT06378866] is an open-label, phase II, randomized trial enrolling men with omCSPC defined by 1–5 metastases (≥1 extrapelvic) on conventional imaging (CT/MRI and bone scan) and testosterone >100 ng/dL. PSMA PET may be obtained for correlative purposes but does not determine eligibility. Participants (N = 220) are randomized 1:1 to: Arm A (Early systemic): SBRT plus 6 months of ADT + ARPI. Arm B (Deferred systemic): SBRT alone with observation, reserving systemic therapy until radiographic progression not amenable to further SBRT (mrPD). SBRT is delivered per institutional standard; repeat SBRT is allowed until lesions become non-addressable. The primary endpoint, modified radiographic progression-free survival (mrPFS), is the time from randomization to death or radiographic progression not amenable to further MDT, defined by PCWG3 (bone) and modified RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) criteria on conventional imaging. Soft-tissue progression requires ≥ 20% increase in measurable disease or a new lesion; bone progression requires ≥ 2 new confirmed lesions. Secondary endpoints include OS, biochemical PFS, time to local and distant progression, and grade 3–5 adverse events during systemic therapy. Exploratory endpoints evaluate EV and ctDNA kinetics as MRD markers, correlation of PSMA-positive EV burden with outcomes, and duration of response after short-course ADT/ARPI. Correlative analyses will longitudinally quantify PSMA-positive EVs and ctDNA at baseline, on treatment, and at progression to define MRD dynamics and resistance patterns. The trial uses Pocock–Simon dynamic allocation by EV strata and metastatic burden to ensure balance across arms. The trial is open and actively enrolling across all Mayo Clinic sites; as of October 2025, 35 of the planned 220 patients have been accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT06378866 .