Citations

Abstract Over 40% of cases of multiple myeloma (MM) are associated with translocations of the immunoglobulin heavy (IgH) chain gene gene. The t(4;14) translocation, present in ca. 20% of myeloma cases, results in the overexpression of two potential oncogenes, MMSET and FGFR3, via juxtaposition of their endogenous promoters to regulatory elements of the IgH locus. The presence of t(4;14), and MMSET overexpression, is an adverse prognostic factor in MM irrespective of FGFR3 expression. MMSET contains several conserved motifs found in proteins involved in chromatin function (PWWP, HMG, PHD domains) and in the epigenetic control of transcription (SET domain). Accordingly, we found that the two main isoforms of the MMSET protein exhibit exclusive nuclear localization in both transfected fibroblasts and myeloma cells carrying t(4;14). Towards our goal of defining the ability of MMSET to affect gene regulation and contribute to the disease pathogenesis, we found that the SET domain of MMSET possesses in vitro methyltransferase activity specific for core histones H3 and H4. Using a computational approach and theoretical extrapolation from the solved NMR structure of vSET, we identified residues in the active site of MMSET essential for catalysis, whose mutation drastically reduces enzymatic activity. Reporter assays using Gal4 fusion constructs showed that both the amino terminus of MMSET, containing the PWWP and HMG domains, as well as the SET-containing carboxy terminus act as transcriptional repressors. MMSET interacts physically and functionally with a number of known co-repressor molecules, such as HDAC1, HDAC2, Sin3a, and SIRT1, but not HDAC4 or HDAC6. As such, MMSET co-expression enhances HDAC1 and HDAC2-mediated repression in transcriptional reporter assays, and MMSET repression is partially relieved by the addition of an HDAC inhibitor. A yeast two hybrid screen identified a number of other functional partners of MMSET, including ZNF331/RITA (Rearranged in Thyroid Adenoma), a KRAB domain/zinc finger protein previously implicated in malignancy. MMSET and ZNF331 co-localize in the nuclei of transfected fibroblasts, co-immunoprecipitate, and display cooperative repression in reporter assays. Collectively, these data support the idea that MMSET is a biologically active, bifunctional transcriptional mediator acting as a HMT enzyme in chromatin remodeling and as a complex adaptor in the recruitment of repressor species. Presently we are modeling the biological effects of MMSET through a conditional overexpression system in a B cell line. While low levels of MMSET are ubiquitiously expressed, induction of high levels of MMSET expression in the B cell line is associated with growth suppression and G1 arrest. While paradoxical for a presumed oncoprotein, such actions have been observed for other disease-associated proteins such as Runx1/MTG8. In contrast, a myeloma cell line harboring t(4;14) proliferates in the presence of high level MMSET expression. RNAi-mediated knockdown of MMSET in these cells induces apoptotic cell death. This suggests that MMSET may be critical for growth and survival of myeloma cells. Profiling of gene expression changes in these systems should link the transcriptional and biological activities of MMSET.

Abstract Purpose: In a previous retrospective study, we have shown that 75% of gastric MALT lymphomas that did not respond to H. pylori eradication could be identified by detection of t(11;18)(q21;q21). The present study examined the value of t(1;14)(p22;q32) in prediction of the response of gastric MALT lymphomas to H. pylori eradication. Patients and Methods: A total of 111 patients with H. pylori-positive gastric MALT lymphoma, who were treated by H. pylori eradication, were screened for BCL10 involved chromosome translocation by BCL10 immunohistochemistry, followed by interphase FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The clinical presentation of 11 cases of MALT lymphoma including 6 from the stomach with known BCL10 involved chromosome translocation was reviewed. Results: Of the 111 cases of gastric MALT lymphoma treated by H. pylori eradication, 75 including 35 from the complete regression group and 40 from the non-responsive group, had adequate specimens for BCL10 immunohistochemistry. Two cases showed strong BCL10 nuclear staining in virtually all tumor cells, similar to that seen in those with t(1;14)(p22;q32). Both were from the H. pylori eradication non-responsive group. Although interphase FISH failed to show evidence of BCL10 gene break or amplification, one case showed an IGH break. This case also showed a high level of BCL10 mRNA expression, compatible to that seen in MALT lymphoma with t(1;14)(p22;q32). 9 of the 11 cases with known BCL10 involved translocation were at stage IIE or above, with three showing agressive clinical presentations. Conclusion: Gastric MALT lymphomas with strong BCL10 nuclear expression or t(1;14)(p22;q32) are mostly likely resistant to H. pylori eradication.

Abstract The dic(9;12)(p12;p11.2) has been described as a rare cytogenetic abnormality in pediatric precursor B-cell ALL. Initial studies suggested that the rearrangement is associated with a favorable outcome, and recent studies demonstrated the presence of a PAX5-ETV6 fusion gene was associated with this cytogenetic abnormality. Twenty cases with a cytogenetic dic(9;12) were identified in the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) cytogenetics databases. FISH analysis with the ETV6-RUNX1 (TEL-AML1) probes was done on 12 of these samples. Five cases were positive for fusion, indicating a cryptic t(12;21)(p13;q22), and also had loss of the ETV6 probe from the chromosome 12 not involved in the t(12;21). Seven cases were negative for fusion and had loss of an ETV6 signal, although one of the latter had a diminished ETV6 signal identified. To determine whether both PAX5-ETV6 and ETV6-RUNX1 rearrangements occurred in some patients, a diagnostic sample from each patient was analyzed by RT-PCR for the PAX5-ETV6 and ETV6-RUNX1 fusion genes. Primers from exon 3 of PAX5 and exon 3 of ETV6 were used for the PAX5-ETV6 analysis and from exon 5 of ETV6 and exon 4 of RUNX1 for the ETV6-RUNX1 analysis. Of the 20 cases, only 8 were RT-PCR positive for the PAX5-ETV6 fusion with the above primers; however, an additional 2 were RT-PCR positive with alternate primers, and all 10 of these were negative for the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion by RT-PCR. Of the remaining 10 patients, 9 were RT-PCR positive for the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion, including all of the ETV6-RUNX1 cases positive by FISH. The gene rearrangement associated with the dic(9;12) in these cases is not known. One patient was negative for both fusions by RT-PCR, negative by FISH for ETV6-RUNX1 rearrangement, yet had loss of an ETV6 signal. No cytogenetic differences could be seen between the 2 groups, either in the appearance of the dic(9;12) or in the other abnormalities identified. These results demonstrate the presence of two mutually exclusive dic(9;12) rearrangements in pediatric ALL; one associated with ETV6-RUNX1 rearrangement and one resulting in PAX5-ETV6 fusion. Both PAX5-ETV6 and ETV6-RUNX1 rearrangements are associated with a favorable prognosis. However, molecular analysis of the dic(9;12) patients must be performed to determine whether the dicentric chromosome results in PAX5-ETV6 fusion or whether the case has ETV6-RUNX1 fusion.

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are caused by mutations in molecules expressed at the neuromuscular junction. We report clinical, structural, ultrastructural, and electrophysiologic features of 4 CMS patients with 6 heteroallelic variants in AGRN , encoding agrin. One was a 7.9-kb deletion involving the N-terminal laminin–binding domain. Another, c.4744G>A — at the last nucleotide of exon 26 — caused skipping of exon 26. Four missense mutations (p.S1180L, p.R1509W, p.G1675S, and p.Y1877D) expressed in conditioned media decreased AChR clusters in C2C12 myotubes. The agrin-enhanced phosphorylation of MuSK was markedly attenuated by p.Y1877D in the LG3 domain and moderately attenuated by p.R1509W in the LG1 domain but not by the other 2 mutations. The p.S1180L mutation in the SEA domain facilitated degradation of secreted agrin. The p.G1675S mutation in the LG2 domain attenuated anchoring of agrin to the sarcolemma by compromising its binding to heparin. Anchoring of agrin with p.R1509W in the LG1 domain was similarly attenuated. Mutations of agrin affect AChR clustering by enhancing agrin degradation or by suppressing MuSK phosphorylation and/or by compromising anchoring of agrin to the sarcolemma of the neuromuscular junction.

Abstract Background: Niraparib is a selective poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, with the greatest clinical activity seen in tumors with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Pharmacologically, niraparib has demonstrated a wide volume of distribution and high cell membrane permeability. In breast and ovarian cancer xenograft mouse models, niraparib achieved tumor exposures that were 3.3 times greater than plasma exposure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity of single-agent niraparib in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. The relative concentration of niraparib in tumor versus plasma was also assessed. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, with HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated (germline or somatic) resectable breast cancer with a tumor size of ≥1 cm who had not received prior treatment for the current malignancy. Patients received niraparib 200 mg once daily for 2 months. At the end of 2 months, at their treating physician’s discretion, patients proceeded directly to surgery, received additional cycles of niraparib (maximum of 6 months), or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 2 months of treatment. Response was defined as a ≥30% reduction in tumor volume from baseline. Secondary endpoints included tumor response rate measured by ultrasound, quantified percent change in tumor volume measured by MRI or ultrasound, pathological complete response, and safety and tolerability. Additionally, niraparib concentrations were measured in tumor and plasma samples using qualified liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. As of June 2019, 18 patients had both an MRI and ultrasound scan at the end of month 2 and were evaluable for response. Ten patients are currently on treatment. The median age of patients was 43 years (range, 21-73). Fourteen patients had a BRCA1 mutation, 6 patients had a BRCA2 mutation, and 1 patient had both. Fifteen patients had TNBC, and 6 patients had hormone receptor-positive disease. All 18 response-evaluable patients had a clinical response after 2 months of treatment by at least one imaging modality; no patient experienced disease progression. Tumor response rate measured by MRI after 2 months of treatment was 89% (n/N = 16/18). Results measured by ultrasound were similar, with a 94% response rate at cycle 2 (n/N = 17/18). The median percent decrease in tumor volume after 2 months of treatment was 88% (range, 26-100%) and 89% (range, 23-100%) as measured by MRI and ultrasound, respectively. In the 5 samples measured thus far, niraparib concentrations in tumor biopsies after 2 months of treatment ranged from approximately 4-131-fold higher than those in corresponding plasma samples. Efficacy and tumor concentration data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea, fatigue, anemia, insomnia, and decreased appetite. The only drug-related grade ≥3 toxicity in ≥10% of patients was anemia (3 patients). Three patients had a dose reduction due to a TEAE; no patient discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Conclusion: Niraparib was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Niraparib achieved 4-131-fold higher concentrations in tumor than in plasma. Clinical trial information: NCT03329937. Funding: TESARO: A GSK Company (Waltham, MA, USA) sponsored the study. Citation Format: Hyo Han, Minetta C Liu, Erika Hamilton, Hanna Irie, Cesar A Santa-Maria, James Reeves, Andre Liem, Adrianna Milillo Naraine, Julie Nangia, David Page, Meghan Duncan, Ming Shan, Yongqiang Tang, Julie R Graham, Leif W Ellisen, Steven Isakoff, Laura Spring. Pilot neoadjuvant study of niraparib in HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated resectable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-03.

8000 Background: The diagnostic criteria for MM were revised in 2014, recategorizing ultra-high risk (i.e., 80% at two years) as active myeloma requiring therapy. The removal of patients at the highest risk of progression from the smoldering group requires reassessment of current risk stratification models. Methods: We designed a multicenter, retrospective study of SMM patients to develop a risk stratification model. Patients diagnosed with SMM on/after January 1, 2004 were included if they had no disease progression within 6 months, had baseline data from diagnosis (+/- 3 months), had a follow up of ≥1 year, and did not participate in a therapeutic trial of SMM. Various clinical and laboratory factors were explored to identify factors that predicted progression at 2 years. Univariate Cox regressions were run for each factor. For factors with p-values ≤ 0.25, optimal cut points were identified using Youden’s index. Binary factors were used in stepwise regression to fit multivariable Cox model and significant risk factors were determined (F-test). Results: Overall, 2004 patients were included (ages 26-93, 51% female). Factors independently associated with progression (optimal cutoffs) included: Serum M protein (2 g/dL), involved to uninvolved serum-free light chain ratio (20), and marrow plasma cell % (20%). Patients were stratified using the risk factors: Low- (0 factors), Intermediate- (1), and High-Risk (≥2). Previously used high risk markers such as Bence Jones proteinuria (≥500 mg/24 hours) and severe immunoparesis (50% decrease in uninvolved immunoglobulin levels) were both significant in univariate analysis, but were eliminated on step wise selection. Compared to the low risk group, intermediate- and high-risk groups had significantly higher rate of progression (Table). Within the high-risk group, having all 3 risk factors (n=61) versus 2 did not add to the model, with insufficient separation between 2 and 3 factors. Conclusions: We have developed a risk stratification model for SMM that incorporates revised cutoffs for previously used parameters (20/2/20) that can be universally applied. Additonal analysis are being conducted to develop models that utilize common cytogenetic abnormalities, as well as those without FLC given lack of availability of all tests across the world. [Table: see text]

6520 Background: We previously reported that alternative cutpoints and alternate categorical metrics to RECIST standards provided no meaningful improvement in OS prediction. Here, we sought to identify and validate continuous, longitudinal TM-based metrics for predicting OS. Methods: Data from 13 trials (1739 patients with sufficient imaging-based measurements from breast, lung or colon cancer) were randomly split (60:40) into training and validation datasets and landmarked at 12-weeks (w). Multiple candidate metrics that capture tumor curve trajectory were considered: first slope (or % change) from baseline to 6 w, last slope (or % change) from 6 w to 12 w, and indicator of increase (<5% (includes no increase or a decrease) vs. ≥5%) from the prior assessment (baseline to 6 w, 6 w to 12 w). Multivariable Cox models stratified by study and number of baseline target lesions (<3 vs. >3) and adjusted for baseline tumor burden (ratio of the sum of lesions/number of lesions) were fit for each tumor type. Predictive ability was assessed via concordance (c)-index (0.5: no association to 1.0: perfect association), and hazard ratios/p-values (HR/p). Results: Patients whose tumor size increased by at least 5% from the prior assessment, as well as whose tumors showed a positive slope (or % change) from 6 to 12 w (indicating tumor growth) had worse OS. The first slope (or % change) metric was less consistent, with an initial decrease in slope suggesting worse OS in some cases. Predictive ability of these metrics varied across tumor type with poorest prediction in Breast (Table). Conclusions: Continuous TM-based metrics performed no better than categorical RECIST metrics for OS prediction. [Table: see text]

8095 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and invariably relapses after initial therapy. There is no uniform approach to management of relapsed MM and is dictated by type of initial therapy and the response seen, and availability of new drugs. The outcomes associated with current approaches have not been systematically examined. Methods: We enrolled 383 patients (pts) with myeloma who had a documented relapse between Jan 2007 and June 2010, including 220 from Europe, 106 from Asia, and 31 from South America and 26 from North America. Time Zero (T0) was defined as date of treatment after first relapse. Results: Across the study, 61% were male and 49% were over 65 years at T0. ISS stage distribution at diagnosis included 26, 40 and 33% of patients in stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Among regimens used at first relapse; bortezomib (Btz) containing regimens were most common (54%), followed by lenalidomide (Len, 25%) and cyclophosphamide (21%). The overall response rate (>=PR) to first therapy after relapse was 58% including 14% with a CR. There was a progressive decrease in the response rates with successive regimen; 45%, 30% and 15% for regimens 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Len use was considerably lower in the Asian cohort, while Btz use was comparable across the regions. The median PFS from T0 was 13 mos and OS was 35 mos, for the entire cohort. The PFS to first salvage regimen was similar across the regions, while OS was shorter for the Asian and South American cohorts. In a univariate analysis, ISS stage 3, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities, history of plasma cell leukemia or extramedullary disease (EMD), bone marrow PC% > 33% and presence of renal insufficiency were all associated with a shorter PFS as well as shorter OS (P<=0.01). In a multivariate model, ISS stage 3 and presence of EMD were most associated with short OS. Conclusions: Median PFS for current second line regimens, typically containing Btz or Len appear to be 1 yr with an OS from first relapse of about 3 yrs. The OS from first relapse is nearly double that seen in a cohort of patients in first relapse prior to introduction of new drugs. Clear-cut regional differences can be seen in terms of patterns of drug use and likely reflect drug availability and healthcare costs.

Objectives Pancreatic resection is associated with postoperative morbidity and reduced quality of life (QoL). A systematic literature review was conducted to understand the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) landscape in early-stage pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods Databases/registries (through January 24, 2019) and conference abstracts (2014–2017) were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale/Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Searches were for general (resectable PC, adjuvant/neoadjuvant, QoL) and supplemental studies (resectable PC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire [QLQ] – Pancreatic Cancer [PAN26]). Results Of 750 studies identified, 39 (general, 22; supplemental, 17) were eligible: 32 used QLQ Core 30 (C30) and/or QLQ-PAN26, and 15 used other PROMs. Baseline QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL scores in early-stage PC were similar to all-stage PC reference values but lower than all-stage–all-cancer values. The QoL declined after surgery, recovered to baseline in 3 to 6 months, and then generally stabilized. A minimally important difference (MID) of 10 was commonly used for QLQ-C30 but was not established for QLQ-PAN26. Conclusions In early-stage PC, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 are the most commonly used PROMs. Baseline QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL scores suggested a high humanistic burden. Immediately after surgery, QoL declined but seemed stable over the longer term. The QLQ-C30 MID may elucidate the clinical impact of treatment on QoL; MID for QLQ-PAN26 needs to be established.