Jong, Daphne de

The mature splenic B‐cell lymphomas are an enigmatic group of lymphoid neoplasms that have long caused significant difficulty for the practicing pathologist due to overlapping diagnostic features among entities and the decreasing availability of splenic tissue for assessment. While some entities have highly characteristic and specific clinicopathological features (e.g. hairy cell leukaemia), others are substantially more difficult to recognise (e.g. splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma). At the same time, classification systems have been evolving, resulting in multiple changes to the boundaries among these entities and even the existence of some entities in their own right. Moreover, unbiased multi‐omic interrogation (whole genome/transcriptome sequencing, methylome) of the splenic B‐cell lymphomas over the past decade has given us significant insights into the underling biology of these neoplasms. We present a clinicopathological perspective on the historical, current and future state of the diagnosis and classification of splenic B‐cell lymphomas integrating multi‐omic data and highlighting areas of focus for the field in order to continue to strive to improve patient outcomes through accurate diagnosis.

Abstract Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent lymphoma accounting for approximately 20%–25% of all new non‐Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses in western countries. Whilst outcomes are mostly favorable, the spectrum of clinical phenotypes includes high‐risk groups with significantly inferior outcomes. This review discusses recent updates in risk stratification and treatment approaches from upfront treatment for limited and advanced stage follicular lymphoma to the growing options for relapsed, refractory disease with perspectives on how to approach this from a personalized lens. Notable gaps remain on how one can precisely and prospectively select optimal treatment for patients based on varying risks, with an anticipation that an increased understanding of the biology of these different phenotypes and increasing refinement of imaging‐ and biomarker‐based tools will, in time, allow these gaps to be closed.

Abstract Purpose: In a previous retrospective study, we have shown that 75% of gastric MALT lymphomas that did not respond to H. pylori eradication could be identified by detection of t(11;18)(q21;q21). The present study examined the value of t(1;14)(p22;q32) in prediction of the response of gastric MALT lymphomas to H. pylori eradication. Patients and Methods: A total of 111 patients with H. pylori-positive gastric MALT lymphoma, who were treated by H. pylori eradication, were screened for BCL10 involved chromosome translocation by BCL10 immunohistochemistry, followed by interphase FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The clinical presentation of 11 cases of MALT lymphoma including 6 from the stomach with known BCL10 involved chromosome translocation was reviewed. Results: Of the 111 cases of gastric MALT lymphoma treated by H. pylori eradication, 75 including 35 from the complete regression group and 40 from the non-responsive group, had adequate specimens for BCL10 immunohistochemistry. Two cases showed strong BCL10 nuclear staining in virtually all tumor cells, similar to that seen in those with t(1;14)(p22;q32). Both were from the H. pylori eradication non-responsive group. Although interphase FISH failed to show evidence of BCL10 gene break or amplification, one case showed an IGH break. This case also showed a high level of BCL10 mRNA expression, compatible to that seen in MALT lymphoma with t(1;14)(p22;q32). 9 of the 11 cases with known BCL10 involved translocation were at stage IIE or above, with three showing agressive clinical presentations. Conclusion: Gastric MALT lymphomas with strong BCL10 nuclear expression or t(1;14)(p22;q32) are mostly likely resistant to H. pylori eradication.