Citations

Background: Mismatch between osteochondral allograft (OCA) donor and recipient sex has been shown to negatively affect outcomes. This study accounts for additional donor variables and clinically relevant outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate whether donor sex, age, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and duration of graft storage affect clinical outcomes and failure rates after knee OCA transplantation. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients undergoing knee OCA transplantation between 2003 and 2018 were prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria consisted of primary OCA transplantation and minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient descriptive data and allograft donor sex, age, and graft storage time before implantation were collected. Patients were evaluated for reoperation, failure, and achievement of clinically significant outcomes for International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Reoperation was defined as subsequent surgical intervention of the transplanted allograft, including second-look arthroscopy for graft evaluation, debridement, and loose body removal. Failure was defined as revision of the primary OCA transplantation or conversion to arthroplasty. A Kaplan-Meier curve determined cumulative survivability of OCA transplantations, and log-rank testing was used to compare survivorship between groups. Stepwise regression analysis was utilized to evaluate associations between donor variables and achievement of clinically significant outcomes, reoperation, and failure. Results: A total of 372 patients undergoing OCA transplantation were included and followed for a mean 5.4 years (SD, 2.7; range, 2.0-16.3). Isolated OCA transplantation was performed in 45% of cases (169/372). A mismatch in donor and recipient sex was present for more female patients (90%) than male patients (10%; P < .001). Those who had a sex-mismatched graft more frequently underwent concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy ( P = .034). When controlling for patient sex, no other differences were seen between groups matched and mismatched by sex. Univariable and multivariable analysis found no significant difference in survival free from reoperation or failure on the basis of donor-recipient sex mismatch, donor age, or graft storage time before implantation. Conclusion: In contrast to previous historical data, no donor variables were associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients who underwent OCA transplantation. These data can help inform graft selection, expedient recipient selection, and outcome optimization after OCA transplantation.

ABSTRACTIntroduction/AimsGlucocorticoid (GC)‐related adverse reactions and risks are commonly seen during the treatment of immune‐mediated and inflammatory neuromuscular disorders. There is wide variation in the management of associated complications. The aim of this study is to develop international consensus guidance on the management of GC‐related complications in neuromuscular disorders.MethodsThrough the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), an international task force of 15 experts was convened to develop clinical guidance for the management of GC‐related complications in neuromuscular patients. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RAM) was used to develop consensus guidance statements. Initial guidance statements were crafted after a thorough literature review and were modified after anonymous panel input, with up to three rounds of voting via email to achieve consensus.ResultsStatements were developed and achieved consensus for general care, monitoring of patients while on GC, osteoporosis prevention, vaccinations, infection screening, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of GC‐related complications was emphasized.DiscussionThese formal consensus statements provide guidance to clinicians who use GC in the treatment of neuromuscular diseases regarding prevention and management of the more common associated adverse events and risks that arise with long and short‐term GC use and serve as a springboard for investigation and updates.

Abstract Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is focused on the relationship between an individual's genetic makeup and their response to medications, with the overarching aim of guiding prescribing decisions to improve drug efficacy and reduce adverse events. The PGx and genomic medicine communities have worked independently for over 2 decades, developing separate standards and terminology, making implementation of PGx across all areas of genomic medicine difficult. To address this issue, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Pharmacogenomics Working Group (PGxWG) was established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded ClinGen to initially create frameworks for evaluating gene–drug response clinical validity and actionability aligned with the ClinGen frameworks for evaluating monogenic gene–disease relationships, and a framework for classifying germline PGx variants similar to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) system for interpretation of disease-causing variants. These frameworks will leverage decades of work from well-established PGx resources facilitating buy-in among PGx stakeholders. In this report, we describe the background and major activities of the ClinGen PGxWG, and how this initiative will facilitate the critical inclusion of PGx into the larger context of genomic medicine.

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs) are heterogeneous stem cell malignancies characterized by poor prognosis and no curative therapies outside of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite some recent approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration, (eg, luspatercept, ivosidenib, decitabine/cedazuridine, and imetelstat), there has been little progress in the development of truly transformative therapies for the treatment of patients with MDS. Challenges to advancing drug development in MDS are multifold but may be grouped into specific categories, including criteria for risk stratification and eligibility, response definitions, time-to-event end points, transfusion end points, functional assessments, and biomarker development. Strategies to address these challenges and optimize future clinical trial design for patients with MDS are presented here.

DEK::AFF2 fusion nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (NKSCC) is an emerging entity in the sinonasal tract, temporal bone, and skull base. However, the clinical behavior of these tumors has not been well studied. Here, we report the largest cohort of DEK::AFF2 carcinomas to determine if morphology, mitotic rate, and/or Ki-67 IHC are associated with patient outcomes, including a comparison with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and independent patients. We solicited cases of molecularly or AFF2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) proven DEK::AFF2 SCC from surgical pathologists to collect patient demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Using representative H&E slides, we characterized the morphology and counted mitoses. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was performed. We also compared the DEK::AFF2 survival rates to those in a cohort of AFF2 IHC-negative HPV-associated and HPV-independent SCC. DEK::AFF2 carcinomas most commonly arose in the nasal cavity (13/30, 43%), and the average number of recurrences was 1.8 (range: 0 to 10). At the last follow-up, most patients were disease free (19/30, 63%) or were alive with disease (9/30, 30%). There was an average mitotic rate of 2 per 2 mm2 (range: 0 to 9) and Ki-67 proliferation rate of 26% (range: 3% to 60%). Local recurrence was common, but morphology, mitotic activity, and Ki-67 index were not associated with recurrence or survival. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, DEK::AFF2 patients had lower disease-free survival but otherwise had similar outcomes to conventional SCC patients. Our multi-institutional study shows that local recurrence is common in DEK::AFF2 fusion nonkeratinizing SCC patients, but patients have survival rates similar to conventional SCC. Despite showing a range of different features and proliferation rates, traditional grading by morphology, mitotic rate, and/or Ki-67 activity does not seem to be predictive of outcome.

ImportanceFenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repairs (F/BEVAR) have been adopted by many centers. However, national trends of F/BEVAR use remain unclear, particularly at sites who perform them without an US Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA)–approved investigational device exemption (IDE).ObjectiveTo quantify the use of F/BEVAR in the US and to determine if mortality was different at IDE vs non-IDE sites.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study examined 100% fee-for-service Medicare claims data from 2016 to 2023. Participants were patients who underwent endovascular treatment of the visceral aorta incorporating 2 or more visceral artery endoprostheses. Hospitals with vs without an IDE were identified using hospitals’ Employer Identification Number as a time varying exposure.ExposureF/BEVAR.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTrends in the center-level F/BEVAR case volume stratified by IDE status were assessed using cumulative incidence curves. Mortality outcomes at 30 days and 3 years were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for baseline patient characteristics.ResultsFrom 2016 to 2023, 8017 patients were treated with F/BEVAR at 549 hospitals. The median (IQR) age was 75.8 (71.3-80.8) years; 5795 patients (72.3%) were male and 2222 (27.7%) female. A total of 2226 F/BEVAR (27.8%) were performed at 22 hospitals with an IDE. The number of patients treated with F/BEVAR increased from 771 in 2016 to 1251 in 2023. The median (IQR) annual case volume per hospital was significantly higher at IDE sites (22.3 [11.0-30.4] vs 1.2 [1.0-2.0] cases/y; P &amp;lt; .001); 18 IDE sites (90.0%) and 20 non-IDE sites (3.7%) completed 9 or more cases per year. The 30-day mortality (3.0% vs 4.9%) but not 3-year mortality (26.0% vs 27.1%) was lower for patients treated at hospitals with vs without an IDE. After risk adjustment, both 30-day (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.69) and midterm mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) were lower for patients treated at IDE sites.Conclusions and RelevanceThe use of F/BEVAR is increasing across the United States, with the majority of cases being performed outside of IDE studies and at low-volume centers. F/BEVAR performed at non-IDE centers are associated with higher adjusted 30-day and midterm mortality. Transparent outcome reporting and identification of process measures from IDE sites may help achieve more equity in patient outcomes.

Introduction: The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program for breast cancer survivors (MBSR [BCs]) is a stress-reducing program designed to increase cognitive functioning through four meditational practices. This randomized clinical trial aimed to determine if improvements in cognitive functioning and perceived cognitive abilities achieved from the MBSR(BC) were mediated through increased mindfulness, decreased rumination, and decreased perceived stress. Methods: Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) who met inclusion criteria of stage I, II, or III BC and received either chemotherapy (CT) or both CT and radiation were randomized to either the 6-week MBSR(BC), or Breast Cancer Education Support (BCES) program, or to a usual care (UC) regimen. Analysis of covariance was first implemented to identify potential mediators, followed by a formal mediational analysis to evaluate the effects of MBSR(BC) on 6-, 12-, and 26-week outcomes. Results: After consent, 212 BCS were randomized to MBSR(BC) ( n = 91), BCES ( n = 90), or UC ( n = 31). The mean age was 56.5 and the majority of the BCS, 73.1%, were White and non-Hispanic. Results showed increases in “observing” as part of mindfulness as a potential mediator of MBSR(BC) effects on impairments on quality of life and logical memory at 6 months relative to UC. No mediation effects were identified for outcomes measured at 6 or 12 weeks and also when MBSR(BC) was compared with the BCES program. Discussion: These results partially supported our hypothesis that improvement in cognitive functioning would occur through increased mindfulness. Although few mediating relationships were identified, results showed a relationship between mindfulness and cognitive functioning. Both mediating relationships occurred through increases in “observing,” a subconcept of “mindfulness,” when compared to the MBSR(BC) with UC at 6 months. This study shows that mediators may help “optimize” clinical therapeutic treatment effects, thus contributing to the advancement of science. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov . Registration Number: NCT02786797.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a major risk after abdominal contouring surgery, impacting morbidity and mortality. Despite various preventative strategies, surgeons are cautious about using enoxaparin for extended postoperative periods. This study aims to determine if a 7-day postoperative course of enoxaparin increases bleeding risks compared with a single dose of intraoperative unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing abdominal contouring surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients who underwent abdominoplasty or panniculectomy from August 2017 to October 2023. Patients were split into 2 groups: Group 1 received 5000 units of intraoperative unfractionated heparin in addition to 7 days of postoperative enoxaparin (40 mg daily); group 2 received only the intraoperative heparin dose. Primary outcomes included bleeding events and VTE incidence. Secondary outcomes were seroma, infection, surgical site dehiscence, necrosis, drain duration, and reoperation rates. Results: The study included 121 patients (111 women, 10 men), with 61 patients in group 1 and 60 in group 2. The average age was 49 ± 12 years, and the average body mass index was 29.8 ± 5 kg/m². No cases of VTE were reported. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.9%) in group I and 2 patients (3.3%) in group 2, showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.66). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Our study of 121 patients undergoing either abdominoplasty or panniculectomy demonstrated that administering enoxaparin for 7 days postoperatively is safe and does not increase the risk of bleeding.

Multigene panel testing has allowed for the detection of a growing number of inherited pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in people at high risk of cancer, including endometrial cancer (EC). Hereditary syndromes associated with EC include Lynch syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. This manuscript provides the latest recommendations from the NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Endometrial, and Gastric on the screening and management of EC in patients at high risk for these syndromes, as well as the advantages and limitations of multigene panel testing. This manuscript also describes recent updates to these guidelines regarding de-implementation of colon cancer screening in individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, based on the most up-to-date evidence regarding the association between CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and colon cancer risk.