Back to Authors

Garcia, Jacqueline S

0000-0003-2118-6302

Mayo Clinic

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Citations 3

Advancing drug development in myelodysplastic syndromes
McGraw, Kathy L. , Cunningham, Lea, Kim, Nina , Jen, Emily Y. , Ehrlich, Lori A. , Aplan, Peter D. , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Foran, James M. , Zeidan, Amer M., Scott, Bart L. , Buckstein, Rena , Tinsley-Vance, Sara, Verma, Amit , Wroblewski, Tanya, Pavletic, Steven Z. , Zeidan, Amer M. , Verma, Amit , Kim, Nina , Jen, Emily Y , Ehrlich, Lori A , Aplan, Peter D , Garcia, Jacqueline S , Komrokji, Rami S , Sekeres, Mikkael A , Scott, Bart , Verma, Amit , Zeidan, Amer M , Mina, Alain , Calvo, Katherine R. , Garcia, Jacqueline S. , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Komrokji, Rami S. , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Norsworthy, Kelly J.

Blood Advances | December 30, 2024 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1095-1104

10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014865 Get It

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs) are heterogeneous stem cell malignancies characterized by poor prognosis and no curative therapies outside of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite some recent approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration, (eg, luspatercept, ivosidenib, decitabine/cedazuridine, and imetelstat), there has been little progress in the development of truly transformative therapies for the treatment of patients with MDS. Challenges to advancing drug development in MDS are multifold but may be grouped into specific categories, including criteria for risk stratification and eligibility, response definitions, time-to-event end points, transfusion end points, functional assessments, and biomarker development. Strategies to address these challenges and optimize future clinical trial design for patients with MDS are presented here.
Proposals for revised International Working Group–European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis
Tefferi, Ayalew , Barosi, Giovanni , Hernández‐Boluda, Juan Carlos , Bose, Prithviraj , Döhner, Konstanze , Gangat, Naseema , Garcia, Jacqueline S. , Gisslinger, Heinz , Gupta, Vikas , Harrison, Claire , Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Mora, Barbara , Odenike, Olatoyosi, Pardanani, Animesh , Patel, Anand , Pemmaraju, Naveen , Rampal, Raajit K. , Sirhan, Shireen , Vachhani, Pankit , Vannucchi, Alessandro M., Barbui, Tiziano , Hernández-Boluda, Juan Carlos , Bose, Prithviraj , Gangat, Naseema , Garcia, Jacqueline S , Gupta, Vikas , Hexner, Elizabeth , Hobbs, Gabriela S , Koschmieder, Steffen , Kuykendall, Andrew , Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Mascarenhas, John , Masarova, Lucia , Mesa, Ruben , Oh, Stephen T , Patel, Anand , Pemmaraju, Naveen , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Szuber, Natasha , Vachhani, Pankit , Barbui, Tiziano , Passamonti, Francesco , Ellis, Martin H. , Gotlib, Jason , Guglielmelli, Paola , Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Hobbs, Gabriela , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Koschmieder, Steffen , Kröger, Nicolaus , Mascarenhas, John , Masárová, Lucia , Mesa, Ruben A. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Oh, Stephen T. , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Szuber, Natasha , Talpaz, Moshe

Blood | August 8, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1813-1820

10.1182/blood.2024025802 Get It

Abstract With emerging new drugs in myelofibrosis (MF), a robust and harmonized framework for defining the severity of anemia and response to treatment will enhance clinical investigation and facilitate interstudy comparisons. Accordingly, the lead authors on the 2013 edition of the International Working Group–European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria in MF were summoned to revise their document with the intent to (1) account for gender-specific differences in determining hemoglobin levels for eligibility criteria; (2) revise the definition of transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA) based on current restrictive transfusion practices; and (3) provide a structurally simple and easy to apply response criteria that are sensitive enough to detect efficacy signals (minor response) and also account for major responses. The initial draft of the 2024 IWG-ELN proposed criteria was subsequently circulated around a wider group of international experts and their feedback incorporated. The proposed articles include new definitions for TDA (≥3 units in the 12 weeks before study enrollment) and hemoglobin thresholds for eligibility criteria (<10 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men). The revised document also provides separate (TDA vs non-TDA) and graded (major vs minor response) response criteria while preserving the requirement for a 12-week period of screening and observation on treatment.
Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy
Harrison, Claire , Garcia, Jacqueline S. , Somervaille, Tim C. P. , Foran, James M. , Verstovšek, Srđan , Jamieson, Catriona , Mesa, Ruben A. , Ritchie, Ellen K., Tantravahi, Srinivas K., Vachhani, Pankit , O'Connell, Casey L., Harb, Jason, Hutti, Jessica E., Holes, Leanne, Masud, Abdullah A., Nuthalapati, Silpa, Potluri, Jalaja, Pemmaraju, Naveen , Harrison, Claire N , Mesa, Ruben , Komrokji, Rami S , Pemmaraju, Naveen , Verstovsek, Srdan , Garcia, Jacqueline S , Somervaille, Tim C.P. , Foran, James M , Jamieson, Catriona , Ritchie, Ellen K., Tantravahi, Srinivas K., Vachhani, Pankit , O'Connell, Casey L., Harb, Jason, Hutti, Jessica E., Holes, Leanne, Masud, Abdullah A., Nuthalapati, Silpa, Potluri, Jalaja

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1671-1680

10.1200/jco.21.02188 Get It

PURPOSE Targeting the BCL-XL pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-XL/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609 ). METHODS Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 109/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR35) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety. RESULTS High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR35 was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR35 of 13.8 months. TSS50 was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%). CONCLUSION The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR35, improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.