Landrum, Melissa

Abstract Background Genetic testing has traditionally been divided into molecular genetics and cytogenetics, originally driven by the use of different assays and their associated limitations. Cytogenetic technologies such as karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridization or chromosomal microarrays are used to detect large “megabase level” copy number variants and other structural variants such as inversions or translocations. In contrast, molecular methodologies are heavily biased toward subgenic “small variants” such as single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, and targeted detection of intragenic, exon level deletions or duplications. The boundaries between these approaches are now increasingly blurred as next-generation sequencing technologies and their use for genome-wide analysis are used by both disciplines, therefore eliminating the historic and somewhat artificial separation driven by variant type. Content This review discusses the history of genomic nomenclature across both fields, summarizes implementation challenges for the clinical genetics community, and identifies key considerations for enabling a seamless connection of the stakeholders that consume variant descriptions. Summary Standardization is naturally a lengthy and complex process that requires consensus building between different stakeholders. Developing a standard that not only fits the multitude of needs across the entities that consume genetic variant information but also works equally well for all genetic variant types is an ambitious goal that calls for revisiting this vision.

Abstract Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is focused on the relationship between an individual's genetic makeup and their response to medications, with the overarching aim of guiding prescribing decisions to improve drug efficacy and reduce adverse events. The PGx and genomic medicine communities have worked independently for over 2 decades, developing separate standards and terminology, making implementation of PGx across all areas of genomic medicine difficult. To address this issue, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Pharmacogenomics Working Group (PGxWG) was established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded ClinGen to initially create frameworks for evaluating gene–drug response clinical validity and actionability aligned with the ClinGen frameworks for evaluating monogenic gene–disease relationships, and a framework for classifying germline PGx variants similar to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) system for interpretation of disease-causing variants. These frameworks will leverage decades of work from well-established PGx resources facilitating buy-in among PGx stakeholders. In this report, we describe the background and major activities of the ClinGen PGxWG, and how this initiative will facilitate the critical inclusion of PGx into the larger context of genomic medicine.