Citations

Abstract Purpose The aim of part one of this EU‐US consensus was to combine literature research and expertise to provide recommendations for the usage of rehabilitation (including physical therapy) of patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative meniscus lesions or acute meniscus tears (including meniscectomy, repair, or reconstruction). Prevention programmes, non‐operative treatment of acute tears and degenerative lesions, return to sports and patient‐reported outcome measures will be presented in a part II article. Methods This consensus followed the European Society for Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)'s ‘formal consensus’ methodology. For this combined ESSKA, American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy initiative, 67 experts (26 in the steering group and 41 in the rating group) from 14 countries (US and 13 European countries), including orthopaedic surgeons, sports medicine doctors and physiotherapists were involved. Steering group members established guiding questions, searched the literature and proposed statements. Rating group members assessed the statements according to a Likert scale and provided grades of recommendations, reaching a final agreement about rehabilitation of the knee after meniscus surgery. Final documents were then assessed by a peer review group to address the geographical adaptability. Results The overall level of evidence in the literature was low. Of the 19 questions (leading to 29 statements), 1 received a Grade A of recommendation, 2 a Grade B, 9 a Grade C and 17 a Grade D. Nevertheless, the mean median rating of all questions was 8.2/9 (9 being the highest rating on a scale of 1–9). The global mean rating was 8.4 ± 0.2, indicating a high agreement. Rehabilitation depends on the type of lesion, the treatment performed and is the same after medial or lateral meniscus surgery. Rehabilitation after meniscectomy should follow a criterion‐based rehabilitation protocol, based on milestones rather than a time‐based protocol. After meniscus repair and reconstruction, rehabilitation should be progressed according to both time and criterion‐based milestones. Conclusion Rehabilitation after meniscus surgery is a debated topic that may influence surgical outcomes if not optimally performed. This international formal consensus established clear, updated and structured recommendations for both surgeons and physiotherapists treating patients after meniscus surgery. Level of Evidence Level I, consensus.

Abstract Rationale: The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension highlighted the importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), have been associated with morbidity and mortality in PAH, but the added value of HRQOL measures to validated risk prediction models remains unknown. Methods: Adults with RHC-proven PAH from the Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics (PVDOMICS) Study, a multi-center observational study, were included in this study. The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR) was used as a validation cohort. HRQOL was measured using the emPHasis-10 score, where higher scores reflect worse HRQOL. Noninvasive risk assessment was measured by REVEAL Lite 2 risk score, categorized into 3-strata. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model survival evaluating the interaction between risk strata and HRQOL scores, adjusting for age, sex, and incident diagnosis. Harrell's C-statistics were calculated to compare discriminative performance. Results: From the PVDOMICS and PHAR cohorts, 265 and 2671 individuals with PAH and complete emPHasis-10 and REVEAL Lite 2 scores were included. Both cohorts had similar demographics, with an average age of 52±13 and 56±16 years, 75% and 72% female, 81% and 75% White, in the PVDOMICS and PHAR cohorts respectively. Over 87% of PVDOMICS were prevalent cases of PAH, while in the PHAR half were incident. Most individuals (62%) in PVDOMICS were REVEAL Lite 2 low risk, with 16% intermediate and 22% high risk; by contrast, in PHAR 33% were low, 29% intermediate, and 38% high risk. REVEAL Lite 2 scores demonstrated weak to moderate correlation with emPHasis-10 scores in both cohorts (PVDOMICS r=0.48 p<0.001; PHAR r=0.33 p<0.001). Notably, the full range of emPHasis-10 scores were observed in the low-risk individuals across both cohorts. In the PVDOMICS adjusted Cox models, higher emPHasis-10 scores predicted poorer survival (p=0.047) particularly among low-risk individuals (interaction versus high-risk group p=0.08). Similar adjusted models in PHAR demonstrated emPHasis-10 to be a confounder (p=0.001) without significant interaction by risk strata (low vs high-risk interaction p=0.94), but the greatest change in median survival time was observed in the low-risk group (Figure 1). Addition of emPHasis-10 to REVEAL Lite 2 scores improved discrimination in predicting survival (PVDOMICS: C-statistic 0.71 vs 0.73; PHAR: C-statistic 0.67 vs 0.69). Conclusions: Across two multicenter cohorts of incident and prevalent PAH, HRQOL as measured by the emPHasis-10 score improved discrimination for survival, particularly among individuals with lower risk scores.

Abstract RATIONALE: Chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRD) confer higher risks from respiratory viral infections, hence CLRD patients are prioritized for influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccination. Nonetheless, vaccine deferral and declination remain common. Given that COVID-19 vaccination is particularly polarizing, and attitudes toward it may differ from other vaccines, we assessed COVID-19 vaccination behaviors and attitudes in adults with versus without CLRD and/or smoking history, which is strongly associated with CLRD risk. METHODS: We pooled data from 10 cohorts participating in the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) that collected pre-pandemic data on self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma or COPD. C4R assessed COVID-19 vaccination status through three waves of standardized questionnaires (2020-2022, 2021-2023, 2023-2024). Prompt COVID-19 vaccination was defined as self-report of receiving at least one COVID-19 vaccine by May 1, 2021. Cumulative COVID-19 vaccine count was self-reported on the Wave 3 Questionnaire. Vaccine attitudes and receipt of influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccines were self-reported on the Wave 1 or 2 Questionnaire. Age-adjusted Poisson regression was used to test associations of vaccination behaviors with CLRD and smoking status at the most recent pre-pandemic exam. RESULTS: Of 20,034 participants (pre-pandemic COPD, 9.3%; asthma, 11.7%; current smoking, 13.4%; former smoking, 36.3%), 64.2% reported prompt COVID-19 vaccination. Among the subset of 10,626 participants completing the Wave 3 Questionnaire in 2023-24, the median COVID-19 vaccine count was 3 (Q1:2, Q3:4). Compared to participants without CLRD, prompt vaccination was more likely in those with asthma (RR=1.04, 95%CI:1.01-1.07, p=0.008) and less likely with COPD (RR=0.94, 95%CI:0.91-0.98, p=0.001), but there were no differences in doses for asthma and COPD. Compared to never smokers, former smoking participants were more likely to receive prompt vaccination (RR=1.11, 95%CI:1.08-1.13, p<0.0001) and more vaccine doses (RR=1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.05, p=0.015); conversely, current smoking was inversely associated with prompt vaccination (RR=0.94, 95%CI:0.91-0.97, p=0.001) and was associated with fewer doses (RR=0.93, 95%CI:0.89-0.96, p<0.0001). Participants with CLRD versus without CLRD were more likely to report receiving influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, but they were more likely to believe that vaccines are unsafe or ineffective (figure). CONCLUSIONS: COPD was associated with lower likelihood of prompt COVID-19 vaccination. Current smoking was associated with both lower likelihood of prompt COVID-19 vaccination and a lower number of COVID-19 vaccine doses by 2023-24. These associations may be partly attributed to negative vaccine attitudes and beliefs. How the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced vaccine behaviors and attitudes merits additional study.

Abstract Introduction Resilient smokers, who maintain respiratory health despite smoking, remain poorly characterized. Airway epithelial cell gene expression in resilient smokers can provide insight into mechanisms and pathways that may protect smokers from developing smoking-related lung disease. The objective of this study is to identify genes and potential pathways associated with lung-related resilience. Methods Resilient smokers were defined based on a previously published multi-dimensional definition which includes the absence of: 1) spirometric airflow limitation, 2) symptoms (cough/sputum, dyspnea), 3) radiographic (HRCT) abnormalities, 4) exacerbations, and 5) an accelerated FEV1 decline. “Non-resilient” smokers had preserved spirometry but showed abnormalities in at least one domain of resilience. We analyzed airway epithelial brush samples from 21 resilient and 34 non-resilient smokers from SPIROMICS. Differential gene expression was performed using DESeq2 package in R, which estimates differential expression using generalized linear models. We adjusted for sequencing batch, age (continuous), race, gender, and current smoking status. While controlling for these covariates we evaluated differential gene expression between resilient and non-resilient smokers, the interaction between resilience and smoking status, and in each sub-category of resilient (absence of symptoms, radiographic abnormalities, exacerbations, and accelerated decline in FEV1). Results We identified 98 genes that were differentially expressed (FDR ≤0.1) when comparing resilient to non-resilient smokers, 20 of those genes were up regulated in resilient smokers (Figure 1). Notable genes included cadherin-12 (CDH12), aspartate beta-hydroxylase (ASPH), and protein kinase AMP-activated alpha 2 (PRKAA2). CDH12 is involved in cell adhesion and epithelial integrity. ASPH influences cell adhesion and signaling. PRKAA2 plays role in cellular homeostasis and stress response, which may be altered in non-resilient smokers, affecting cellular metabolism and inflammation. BPI folding containing family A member (BPIFA1) was significantly associated with smoking status in the interaction analysis, suggesting its role in modulating the impact of smoking on resilience. BPIFA1 has anti-microbial properties, regulates immune responses, and contributes mucosal surface protection. Sub-category analysis identified 17 genes associated with resilience to symptoms and 2 genes related to physiologic resilience (FEV1 decline), though no significant genes were associated with radiographic or exacerbation resilience. Conclusion Differential gene expression of airway epithelial cells identified distinct expression patterns between resilient and non-resilient smokers. Specifically, genes associated with epithelial cell adhesion, signaling, and cellular homeostasis were up regulated in resilient smokers. These findings suggest that resilient smokers may have transcriptomic profiles and potential mechanisms that mitigate the effects of cigarette smoke.

Abstract RATIONALE: Deferral and declination of the COVID-19 vaccine is correlated with many factors, including different health guidelines and difficulties accessing the vaccine. In the US, COVID-19 vaccines were made available in tranches of clinical risk starting in December 2020 and were available to all adults on April 19, 2021. In the post-pandemic period, repeating COVID-19 vaccination with updated formulations is broadly recommended. Given that the public health impact of vaccine allocation strategies depends on public acceptance of vaccination, we aimed to evaluate demographic, clinical and social correlates of (1) receiving at least one COVID-19 vaccine by May 1, 2021 (prompt vaccination) and (2) the total number of vaccine doses received (vaccine count) through 2023-2024. METHODS: The Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) is a prospective observational meta-cohort study comprising 14 extant NIH-funded population-based cohorts. C4R assessed COVID-19 vaccination using three waves of standardized questionnaires (2020-2021, 2021-2023, 2023-2024). Prompt vaccination was defined by participant self-report of vaccination before May 1, 2021; participants vaccinated after May1, 2021 were classified as non-prompt; participants with missing vaccination information were excluded. Vaccine count was defined by self-report on the 2023-2024 wave Questionnaire. Demographic, clinical and social factors were classified by self-report and/or objective measures from the most recent pre-pandemic cohort exam. Poisson models regressed either prompt vaccination or vaccine count on pre-pandemic factors. RESULTS: Of 17,866 participants (mean age, 6713 years; 60.1% female; 42.1% non-Hispanic White, 22.0% Black, 28.9% Hispanic/Latino, 3.4% American Indian, 2.3% South Asian, 1.4% East Asian), 11,481 (64.3%) reported prompt vaccination. Of the subset of 14,529 participants completing the Wave 3 questionnaire, the median vaccine count in 2023-24 was 3 (Q1, 2; Q3 4). Likelihood of prompt vaccination was higher with greater age, income, and education and with history of diabetes and hypertension; prompt vaccination was less likely with male sex, current smoking, and non-White race and ethnicity (table). Similar associations were observed with respect to vaccine count (table). CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse C4R cohort community-based sample, earlier and greater COVID-19 vaccination was associated with older age and several clinical comorbidities; in contrast, later and lesser vaccine uptake was observed among historically marginalized groups. Whether disparities in COVID-19 vaccination could contribute to disparities in post-COVID-19 conditions merits further investigation.

Abstract Rationale: SARS-CoV-2 infection may be associated with new or worsening respiratory symptoms that, if persistent, may contribute to “Long COVID.” Research is needed on the prevalence and risk determinants of Long COVID and related respiratory symptoms in adults with and without pre-existing obstructive lung disease or smoking history. Methods: C4R is a prospective, observational study that collected information on SARS-CoV-2 infection using standardized methods across 14 NIH-funded cohorts. The third wave of C4R questionnaires, administered June 2023 to January 2025, assessed self-reported Long COVID via the question, “Do you think that you are experiencing, or have ever experienced, what has been called “long COVID,” or symptoms related to COVID at least a month after your infection?” Questionnaires also assessed the presence (vs absence) of 22 symptoms that have been linked to Long COVID, including cough, shortness of breath, and post-exertional malaise. Pre-pandemic obstructive lung disease (COPD or asthma) and smoking status (ever/never) were harmonized from self-reported data collected at the most recent pre-pandemic cohort exam. Poisson regression was used to assess prevalence ratios (PRs) adjusting for age, sex, BMI, education, and pre-pandemic hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and depressive symptoms. PRs for respiratory symptoms were tested according to self-reported Long COVID and history of non-hospitalized or hospitalized infection; effect modification by pre-pandemic lung disease and smoking was assessed by multiplicative interaction terms and in fully stratified models. Results: Among 23,434 questionnaire respondents, 1,484 (6.3%) self-reported Long COVID, including 246/1,262 (19.5%) with pre-pandemic lung disease and 664/4,018 (16.5%) with smoking history. The adjusted PR for Long COVID was 1.17 (95%CI:0.99-1.39;P=0.06) comparing participants with/without lung disease and 1.17 (95%CI:1.04-1.32;P=0.01) comparing participants with/without smoking history. Respiratory symptoms were more prevalent in those with self-reported Long COVID, as well as in those with a history of hospitalized or non-hospitalized infection (Table). Associations were generally stronger in participants without pre-pandemic lung disease (p-interaction<0.05 for all comparisons). Respiratory symptoms were also more prevalent with a history of repeated, and pre-Omicron infections, and were less prevalent among participants vaccinated prior to their first infection; findings were similar even after excluding participants with self-reported Long COVID. Conclusions: Long COVID is common, particularly in adults with pre-existing COPD or asthma or smoking history. Long COVID and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including non-hospitalized infections, was associated with greater respiratory symptom burden. Whether SARS-CoV-2 infection or Long COVID are associated with development or progression of obstructive lung diseases warrants future studies.

Abstract Rationale: Current guidelines recommend a short course of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB). However, this approach has been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia recurrence. This meta-analysis aims to address inconsistencies in the literature and evaluate the efficacy of short-course versus long-course antibiotic therapy for VAP, particularly in cases due to NF- GNB. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short versus long courses of antibiotic therapy in patients with VAP. The primary outcomes were the risk of all-cause mortality and pneumonia recurrence. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4, with risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) as effect measures. Results: Our pooled analysis included seven RCTs. There was no significant difference in all- cause mortality between short- and long-course antibiotic regimens (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.18; Figure 1). However, a short course of antibiotics increased the incidence ofpneumonia recurrence, particularly in patients with VAP due to NF-GNB (RR 1.64; 95% CI: 1.18-2.29; Figure 1). There were no significant differences between the two regimens regarding the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.01 days; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.53 days), ICU (MD 0.10 days; 95% CI: -1.00 to 1.20 days) and hospital stay (MD -0.63 days; 95% CI: -3.18 to 1.91 days), or subsequent infection with or acquisition of resistant organisms (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.63-1.24). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that while a short course of antibiotics increases the risk of pneumonia recurrence in NF-GNB VAP, it does not impact mortality compared to a longer course. The clinical significance of the increased recurrence of pneumonia remains uncertain, as it did not result in worse clinical outcomes. A practical approach incorporating validated clinical criteria and biomarker thresholds to guide the duration of antibiotic therapy may be more effective for patients with NF-GNB VAP. Larger RCTs are needed to drawdefinitive conclusions in this population.

Abstract Rationale: Although guidelines recommend the use of provocative testing to diagnose pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) that is unapparent at normal resting right heart catheterization (RHC), the incremental value of provocative testing is unknown. We aim to evaluate the incremental diagnostic capability of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), fluid challenge (FC) or invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) to unmask PVH using previously defined hemodynamic cutoffs. Methods: We included subjects from the NHLBI-funded Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics (PVDOMICS) study. Our analysis included patients with World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 2 disease (G2PH) and G2PH comparators (WSPH Group 2 phenotype without a diagnosis of PH) as determined by the PI or adjudication panel. We then applied a protocol-driven provocative approach based on the feasibility of modalities available in most catheterization labs. Using a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) cutoff of >15, frequencies were identified for subjects based on resting PCWP and with iNO. Frequencies were also identified for: those who received FC with a PCWP cutoff of ≥18 or those who received iCPET with PCWP cutoff of >20 (upright) or >25 (supine). Results: There were 419 subjects identified with WSPH Group 2 disease (Figure). Roughly half were found to have a PCWP >15 during resting RHC (N = 207). Of the remaining subjects with a resting PCWP ≤15 (N = 150), 42 subjects were found to have a PCWP >15 with iNO administration (40.0%). Of the remaining 63 subjects with PCWP ≤15 following iNO administration, nearly half (N = 26, 48.0%) demonstrated a PCWP ≥18 following FC while 8 subjects (14.8%) demonstrated an elevated PCWP following iCPET. Conclusions: There is a high proportion of G2PH patients (∼35%) who appear hemodynamically similar to precapillary PH at rest. Inhaled nitric oxide vasodilatory challenge unmasks G2PH in many patients. In situations where iNO does not disclose the G2PH phenotype, provocation with FC or iCPET can be useful as a supplementary provocative maneuver. Future directions will focus on agnostically assessing the utility of provocation based on grouping subjects by resting hemodynamics as well as assessing the use of provocation in other forms of PH.

Abstract Rationale: Prior studies report association between pulmonary artery (PA) dilation on computed tomography (CT) imaging and pulmonary hypertension (PH). These studies predate expansion of PH hemodynamic diagnostic criteria and do not report patient mortality. As such, little is known about the presence of vascular changes in mild PH or their association with survival. We sought to investigate these relationships in individuals without significant parenchymal lung disease. Methods: We obtained CT images for subjects with group 1 or 2 PH, disease comparators, and healthy controls enrolled in the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics (PVDOMICS) study. We used Osirix imaging software to measure the main, left, and right PA (MPA, LPA, and RPA) and MPA:aorta (PA:Ao) ratio by diameter and cross-sectional area at locations consistent with prior studies. We evaluated associations with mortality and mean PA pressure (mPAP) using multivariable Cox and linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± SD. Results: We identified 558 subjects (59 controls, 138 comparators, and 361 PH [267 group 1, 94 group 2]). 79 subjects had mPAP < 21 mmHg, 39 had mPAP 21-24 mmHg, and 371 had mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Increased MPA, LPA, and RPA diameter and area, PA:Aodia, and PA:Aoarea were associated with decreased survival (all p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. First versus third quantiles of all measurements were associated with mortality, with adjusted hazard ratio of 2.99 [95% CI 1.77, 5.05] for MPA diameter (2.84 vs 3.82 cm), 3.74 [2.07, 6.74] for MPA area (7.26 vs 12.74 cm2) and 5.24 [2.58, 10.66] for LPA area (4.55 vs 7.03 cm2). All measures significantly increased alongside PH severity from mPAP < 20 to 21-24 to ≥ 25 mmHg (see figure 1 for MPA diameter). All measures positively correlated with mPAP, including MPA diameter (ρspearman = 0.55) and PA:Aodia (ρ = 0.56). After multivariable adjustment, Q1 to Q3 increments in MPA diameter and PA:Aodia were associated with mPAP increase of 12.5 [10.7, 14.4] and 13.9 [11.9, 15.8] mmHg, respectively. BMI showed no correlation with PA size (ρ = 0.076 for MPA area, -0.051 for PA:Aodia). Conclusions: PA size increases alongside PH severity using updated hemodynamic criteria and is associated with incremental increases in PA pressure and mortality. LPA dilation demonstrates particularly strong association with mortality. PA size does not correlate with BMI. These novel findings enhance our understanding of vascular changes across the PH disease spectrum.

Abstract A 77-year-old female with history of a right lower lobe adenocarcinoma (pT1a, pN0) underwent right lower lobectomy in August 2023, which subsequently was complicated by a bronchopleural fistula at the level of the right lower lobe bronchial stump. This led to a chronic hydropneumothorax, including a fungal empyema requiring placement of a 14-French thoracostomy tube and prolonged antimicrobial treatment over the next year. In June 2024 she underwent bronchoscopy, with application of argon plasma coagulation (APC) to cauterize the immediate area abutting the bronchopleural fistula and Gore VBX stent placement from the bronchus intermedius to the right middle lobe bronchus, bypassing the right lower lobe bronchial stump. There was no air leak immediately after that procedure and she continued with a 14-French thoracostomy tube in place for empyema drainage. Unfortunately, within the next 10 days the stent migrated requiring replacement. About a month later in July, 2024 the second stent was removed and revealed a persistent defect at the level of the bronchial stump with no apparent regression in size relative to the images captured prior to the initial bronchial stent placement. Under the expanded access pathway, a size 5 Spiration endobronchial valve was placed within the fistula in the right lower lobe bronchial stump (Figure 1). At the conclusion of the bronchoscopy procedure, a recruitment maneuver was performed while the suction on the thoracostomy tube was briefly increased to -40 cm H2O suction and no air leak was evident. The next CT chest 2 weeks later showed substantial improvement of the right hydropneumothorax. The air leak never returned and the thoracostomy tube was removed once the fluid drainage became negligible. The patient's dyspnea gradually improved and she was able to wean off supplemental oxygen. A follow-up CT chest 3 months later demonstrated a very small residual right pleural effusion with no gas component and stable positioning of the endobronchial valve. The multidisciplinary team involved in the patient's care intend to maintain the endobronchial valve in position indefinitely.