Back to Authors

Irrgang, James J.

Mayo Clinic

University of Pittsburgh

Citations 2

The formal EU-US Meniscus Rehabilitation 2024 Consensus. An ESSKA-AOSSM-AASPT Initiative. Part I –Rehabilitation Management After Meniscus Surgery (Meniscectomy, Repair, Reconstruction)
Pujol, Nicolas , Giordano, Airelle O., Beaufils, Philippe , Monllau, Juan Carlos , Arhos, Elanna K. , Villa, Francesco Della, Goodloe, J. Brett , Irrgang, James J., Klosterman, Emma L. , Manske, Robert C. , Melick, Nicky van , Monson, Jill K. , Paterno, Mark V. , Piontek, Tomasz , Schmitt, Laura C. , Benjamin, C., Irrgang, James J. , Rambaud, Alexandre , Irrgang, James J , Arhos, Elanna K , Rambaud, Alexandre , Pujol, Nicolas , Giordano, Airelle O., Wong, Stephanie E. , Becker, Roland, Villa, Francesco Della, Klugarová, Jitka , Królikowska, Aleksandra , Krych, Aaron J. , LaPrade, Robert F. , Ostojić, Marko , Piontek, Tomasz , Perelli, Simone , Rambaud, Alexandre, Robinson, James Theodore , Senorski, Eric Hamrin , Snæbjörnsson, Thorkell , Tagliero, Adam J. , Prill, Robert

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy | May 12, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.26603/001c.137095 Get It

Purpose The aim of part-one of this EU-US consensus was to combine literature research and expertise to provide recommendations for the usage of rehabilitation (including physical therapy) of patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative meniscus lesions or acute meniscus tears (including meniscectomy, repair, or reconstruction). Prevention programs, non-operative treatment of acute tears and degenerative lesions, return to sports and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) will be presented in a part-II article. Methods This consensus followed ESSKA “formal consensus” methodology. For this combined ESSKA (European Society for Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopy), AOSSM (American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine), ASSPT (American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy) initiative, 67 experts (26 in the steering group and 41 in the rating group) from 14 countries (USA and 13 European countries) including orthopedic surgeons, sports medicine doctors and physiotherapists were involved. Steering group members established guiding questions, searched the literature, proposed statements. Rating group members assessed the statements according to a Likert scale and provided grades of recommendations reaching final agreement about rehabilitation of the knee after meniscus surgery. Final documents were then assessed by a peer review group to adress the geographical adaptability. Results The overall level of evidence of the literature was low. Of the 19 questions (leading to 29 statements), one received a grade A of recommendation, two a grade B, nine a grade C and 17 a Grade D. Nevertheless, the mean median rating of all questions was 8.2/9 (9 being the highest rating on a scale of 1-9) and the global mean rating was 8.4+/-0.2, indicating a high agreement. Rehabilitation depends on the type of lesion, the treatment performed and is the same after medial or lateral meniscus surgery. Rehabilitation after meniscectomy should follow a criterion-based rehabilitation protocol, based on milestones rather than a time-based protocol. After meniscus repair and reconstruction, rehabilitation should be progressed according to both time and criterion-based milestones. Conclusion Rehabilitation after meniscus surgery is a debated topic that may influence surgical outcomes if not optimally performed. This international formal consensus established clear, updated, and structured recommendations for both surgeons and physiotherapists treating patients after meniscus surgery. Level of Evidence I, Consensus.
The formal EU‐US Meniscus Rehabilitation 2024 Consensus: An ESSKA‐AOSSM‐AASPT initiative. Part I—Rehabilitation management after meniscus surgery (meniscectomy, repair and reconstruction)
Pujol, Nicolas , Giordano, Airelle O., Beaufils, Philippe , Monllau, Juan Carlos , Arhos, Elanna K. , Villa, Francesco Della, Goodloe, J. Brett , Irrgang, James J., Klosterman, Emma L. , Manske, Robert C. , Melick, Nicky van , Monson, Jill K. , Paterno, Mark V. , Piontek, Tomasz , Rambaud, Alexandre , Schmitt, Laura C. , Benjamin, C. , Irrgang, James J. , Irrgang, James J , Arhos, Elanna K , Rambaud, Alexandre , Pujol, Nicolas , Wong, Stephanie E. , Becker, Roland, Villa, Francesco Della, Klugarová, Jitka , Królikowska, Aleksandra , Krych, Aaron J. , LaPrade, Robert F. , Ostojić, Marko , Piontek, Tomasz , Perelli, Simone , Robinson, James Theodore , Senorski, Eric Hamrin , Snæbjörnsson, Thorkell , Tagliero, Adam J. , Benjamin, C. , Prill, Robert

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | May 12, 2025 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 3002-3013

10.1002/ksa.12674 Get It

Abstract Purpose The aim of part one of this EU‐US consensus was to combine literature research and expertise to provide recommendations for the usage of rehabilitation (including physical therapy) of patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative meniscus lesions or acute meniscus tears (including meniscectomy, repair, or reconstruction). Prevention programmes, non‐operative treatment of acute tears and degenerative lesions, return to sports and patient‐reported outcome measures will be presented in a part II article. Methods This consensus followed the European Society for Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)'s ‘formal consensus’ methodology. For this combined ESSKA, American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy initiative, 67 experts (26 in the steering group and 41 in the rating group) from 14 countries (US and 13 European countries), including orthopaedic surgeons, sports medicine doctors and physiotherapists were involved. Steering group members established guiding questions, searched the literature and proposed statements. Rating group members assessed the statements according to a Likert scale and provided grades of recommendations, reaching a final agreement about rehabilitation of the knee after meniscus surgery. Final documents were then assessed by a peer review group to address the geographical adaptability. Results The overall level of evidence in the literature was low. Of the 19 questions (leading to 29 statements), 1 received a Grade A of recommendation, 2 a Grade B, 9 a Grade C and 17 a Grade D. Nevertheless, the mean median rating of all questions was 8.2/9 (9 being the highest rating on a scale of 1–9). The global mean rating was 8.4 ± 0.2, indicating a high agreement. Rehabilitation depends on the type of lesion, the treatment performed and is the same after medial or lateral meniscus surgery. Rehabilitation after meniscectomy should follow a criterion‐based rehabilitation protocol, based on milestones rather than a time‐based protocol. After meniscus repair and reconstruction, rehabilitation should be progressed according to both time and criterion‐based milestones. Conclusion Rehabilitation after meniscus surgery is a debated topic that may influence surgical outcomes if not optimally performed. This international formal consensus established clear, updated and structured recommendations for both surgeons and physiotherapists treating patients after meniscus surgery. Level of Evidence Level I, consensus.