Citations

ABSTRACT Macrophages play a central role in determining the outcomes of healing, coordinating regeneration in some injuries and scar formation in others. In both cases, this coordination involves the cross-talk between macrophages and surrounding cells. But what drives the different cross-communication pathways to determine healing outcomes is not well known. In this study, we make use of the mouse digit tip amputation model, in which an amputation through the third phalangeal element (P3) is able to completely regenerate whereas an amputation through the second phalangeal element (P2) forms a scar. We identify a population of macrophages that is specific to the P3 regenerating digit. By integrating single-cell RNAseq, spatial transcriptomics, and metabolomic analyses, we show that this population localizes specifically to the growing bone front, express BMP ligands that drive downstream BMP activation in neighboring osteoblasts and is governed by a two-part metabolic switch involving increased fatty acid oxidation coupled with reduced glycolytic activity. This spatially restricted, BMP-expressing macrophage population is entirely absent in the scar-forming P2 injury, and our data indicate that environmental conditions unique to the regenerating digit are responsible for its emergence. Together these findings identify a regeneration-specific macrophage signaling center for patterned bone formation and suggest that targeting the metabolic conditions that drive this population could improve the efficacy of regenerative therapies.

Background The middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an endovascular route for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), meningioma, and refractory headaches. The third ARISE roundtable convened experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, industry, and regulatory agencies to develop consensus guidance on current evidence for MMA-based therapies Methods Over 50 experts participated in a multi-stakeholder discussion. Evidence from randomized and observational studies, early-phase interventional series, and preclinical work was reviewed. Breakout groups focused on four domains: (1) MMA embolization (MMAE) for CSDH, (2) preoperative embolization of meningiomas, (3) MMA-targeted therapies for headache, and (4) transvascular access for endovascular drainage of subdural hematomas. Consensus recommendations were developed by a writing committee Results Randomized trials support MMAE as an adjunct to surgery or medical management for selected patients with non-acute, symptomatic CSDH to reduce recurrence, progression, and reoperation. Evidence remains insufficient to support MMAE for acute or asymptomatic subdural hematomas. For meningioma, observational data suggest that preoperative embolization in experienced centers can reduce blood loss and operative time and may delay recurrence in large, hypervascular tumors with predominant dural or external carotid supply; primary embolization and intra-arterial oncologic therapies remain investigational. Early series of MMA-directed lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine, status migrainosus, and post-subarachnoid hemorrhage headache show short-term benefit, highlighting the need for controlled trials. Preclinical and first-in-human studies of combined MMAE and transvascular drainage for CSDH demonstrate high technical success, rapid radiographic and clinical improvement, and no early recurrences Conclusion The MMA represents a vascular pathway for an expanding spectrum of neurointerventional therapies.

Abstract Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults is associated with high mortality and poor functional outcomes. However, optimal management remains uncertain, as evidence comparing surgical and medical strategies is limited, heterogeneous, and extrapolated from younger populations. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes between surgical and medical management in this population. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to December 8, 2025. Studies including adults aged ≥60 years with TBI comparing surgical versus medical management were included. The primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome, while secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Pooled estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood and Hartung–Knapp adjustment. Results Sixteen cohort studies comprising 132,823 patients were included. Surgical management was not associated with improved favorable neurological outcomes at discharge, 3, 6, or 12 months. However, it was associated with longer LOS (MD = 6.35 days, 95% CI: 2.55 to 10.14; p < 0.01). No differences were observed in in-hospital, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month, or 24-month mortality. Notably, surgical management was associated with a reduction in 6-month mortality (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51–0.92; p = 0.02). Conclusions In older adults with TBI, surgical management was associated with reduced 6-month mortality and longer hospital LOS, but not with improved functional outcomes, highlighting a dissociation between survival and recovery. This dissociation has implications for clinical decision-making and patient and family counseling. Individualized decision-making that incorporates frailty, comorbidities, and potential reversibility of injury is essential, rather than relying solely on age. While this study represents the best available comparative evidence to date on surgical versus non-surgical management in older adults with TBI, findings should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity and low to very low certainty of the evidence. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the role of surgery in this population.

Importance Amblyopia is the leading cause of monocular decreased best-corrected vision in children. Early detection and intervention are key for optimal treatment outcomes; however, limited access to pediatric eye specialists may hinder timely care and affect visual outcomes. Given the shortage of specialty-trained eye care professionals in the US, there is need to support comprehensive eye care professionals who are willing to examine and treat children with amblyopia. Objective A panel from the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group synthesized relevant literature and incorporated consensus opinion where direct evidence was lacking to create the Amblyopia Navigator Decision-Support Instrument, a free, web-based amblyopia decision support tool for eye care professionals. Evidence Review The decisions related to optimal diagnostic measures, pass/refer criteria, and management recommendations were informed by 147 publications. In areas where direct evidence was lacking, guidance was supplemented with clinical trial protocols or existing professional guidelines. When data were conflicting or unavailable, recommendations were established through committee consensus. A single reviewer independently performed standardized (though not systematic) literature reviews to avoid missing pertinent recent publications. Findings Presented are the process used, supporting evidence, and recommendations for testing methods, refractive correction, amblyopia treatment options, treatment adjustments, and monitoring schedules. Conclusions and Relevance Because amblyopia is common and typically responds well to treatment, decision support tools that optimize its management could increase access to pediatric eye care by facilitating earlier detection, enabling broader participation of primary eye care professionals, and ultimately improving visual outcomes. Through this work and the development of the forthcoming free, web-based application version, Amblyopia Navigator Decision-Support Instrument, the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group has created decision support tools designed to assist optometrists and ophthalmologists in the care of children aged 3 to 17 years with amblyopia.

Introduction: Young-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) often presents at advanced stages and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to examine the epidemiology of young-onset Barrett’s esophagus (BE) using the TriNetX database. Methods: Young-onset BE patients (age 18 to younger than 50 y) with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 year before index BE diagnosis between 2014 and 2023 were included. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate incident-time trends, and logistic regression to assess for independent predictors of young-onset BE. Results: BE diagnosis was present in 76,691 (3.3%) of 2,337,786 patients that underwent EGD, of which 14,120 (18%) had prevalent young-onset BE. BE dysplasia/EAC was present in 6% of young-onset patients at initial diagnosis. Conventional BE risk factors also predicted young-onset BE: GERD (OR=2.4), White race (OR=2.4), male sex (OR=2.2), smoking (OR=1.2), and obesity (OR=1.1). Each additional risk factor increased the probability of BE prevalence by 74% in young patients versus 54% in older patients. The prevalence of young-onset BE was 4.5% with GERD and ≥3 additional risk factors, and 2.3% when ≥3 risk factors were present. Discussion: Young-onset BE accounts for 18% of all BE cases, demonstrates a striking 6% rate of dysplasia/neoplasia at initial diagnosis, and has a prevalence of 4.5% in those with GERD and ≥3 risk factors. These findings suggest that young-onset BE is an important patient population that merits further study. Additional studies are necessary to study the cost-effectiveness of BE screening in younger patients with multiple risk factors.