Citations

ABSTRACT Objective Management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. Very small VSs represent a pivotal group: on one hand, they pose the least risk to the patient from the perspective of being small; yet, not recommending treatment may result in missing a critical window for achieving the best outcome. This debate fundamentally hinges on whether treatment improves upon the natural history of the disease. There is an unproven assumption that very small tumors behave similarly to the broader observed population. To address this central question, we conducted a multicenter retrospective review to compare the natural history of tumor growth and hearing for patients with very small VS (1–3 mm) with a referent cohort with larger tumors. Methods All patients diagnosed with sporadic VS 1–3 mm were reviewed at 3 large skull base referral centers and compared with a referent cohort of patients with tumors > 3 mm. Tumor growth‐free survival rates, treatment‐free survival rates, and rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results In total, 123 patients with very small VS and a referent cohort of 326 patients were studied. Seventeen patients with very small VS experienced tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 2.6–5.1), demonstrating a median growth rate of 1.0 mm per year (IQR 0.9–1.8). In comparison, 167 of the patients in the referent cohort experienced tumor growth at a median of 1.7 years after diagnosis (IQR 0.8–3.1). Tumor growth‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 84% (75–93, 39) and 45% (40–52, 100), respectively ( p < 0.001). Six patients with very small VS underwent treatment after tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 3.2–3.8), compared with 138 patients in the referent cohort at a median of 2.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.4–3.6). Treatment‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 92% (86–98, 55) and 54% (49–61, 125), respectively ( p < 0.001). Among the 105 patients with very small VS and class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 3 progressed to class D. Comparatively, among the 225 patients in the referent cohort with class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 70 progressed to class D at a median of 2.6 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.0–4.8). Rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis were 96% (92–100, 28) for patients with very small VS and 65% (57–73, 70) for the referent cohort ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The natural history of tumor growth and hearing for very small VS diverges favorably from the cumulative natural history data and provides a more appropriate benchmark to compare clinical outcomes of upfront surgery or radiosurgery for this population. At 5 years after diagnosis, 96% of very small VS maintained class A, B, or C hearing and only 8% received treatment for growth within this multicenter cohort. Cumulatively, these data substantiate initial wait‐and‐scan management via size threshold surveillance in this population. Level of Evidence 3.

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss is frequently misunderstood by communication partners and healthcare providers of patients with hearing loss alike, leading to gaps in counseling, medical adherence, and empathy. Hearing loss simulation is a technique that can clarify patient experience by illustrating how hearing loss affects daily listening and speech discrimination. The current research explores the influences of a web-based hearing loss simulator on how hearing loss is understood by communication partners, audiologists, and medical providers/students. Methods: Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, 72 participants (communication partners, audiologists, and medical providers/residents) completed a guided trial with the hearing simulator, either one-on-one or in group settings, and subsequently completed a questionnaire regarding their experiences. The simulation trial included demonstrations of hearing loss and amplification across four listening environments: speech in quiet, in noise, at a distance, as well as listening to instrumental music. Results: Communication partners reported that they gained a better understanding of their partner’s hearing loss, with all expressing increased feelings of empathy towards their partner and individuals with hearing loss. When compared to audiologists, communication partners were significantly more surprised by the impact of hearing loss on speech understanding. Medical providers and students emphasized the value of the simulator as a counseling tool and highly recommended that other providers use the simulator with their patients. Conclusions: Simulating hearing loss can be beneficial for counseling purposes and medical training. These findings suggest that hearing loss simulation can enhance empathy and communication across clinical and educational contexts.

Abstract Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) is a biological process through which lung vascular endothelial cells (ECs) transdifferentiate into mesenchymal-like cells. EndMT has recently been implicated in the development and progression of pulmonary vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension (PH); however, its underlying regulatory mechanisms remain incompletely understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key post-transcriptional regulators of EC gene expression and cellular responses to various stimuli. Notably, microRNA-153 (miR-153) has been shown to directly target SNAI1 to modulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process closely related to EndMT and extensively studied in cancer. Whether miR-153 also participates in EndMT regulation, however, remains unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that 72-hour hypoxic exposure induces SNAI1-mediated EndMT in human lung vascular ECs. Hypoxia also increased cell proliferation and disrupted intercellular junctions, leading to enhanced endothelial permeability. Reduced miR-153 expression was observed in both hypoxia- and TGF-β1-induced EndMT, as well as in ECs isolated from PH patients exhibiting an EndMT phenotype. Similar to hypoxia, TGF-β1 promoted EC permeability. Loss of miR-153 enhanced SNAI1-mediated EndMT, endothelial survival, and permeability under normoxic conditions, whereas miR-153 overexpression attenuated EndMT induced by hypoxia or TGF-β1. However, miR-153 restoration did not completely restore endothelial barrier integrity disrupted by these stimuli. In vitro findings were validated in experimental PH model. In conclusion, miR-153 serves as a critical regulator of EndMT, maintaining endothelial identity and barrier function. Therapeutic delivery of miR-153 may therefore represent a novel strategy to inhibit EndMT and attenuate pulmonary vascular remodeling in PH.

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests irreversible electroporation (IRE) with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) when compared to SOC alone. This study evaluates the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Stage 3 PDAC patients treated with SOC plus IRE with the NanoKnife System versus SOC alone. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included two cohorts from the DIRECT registry: an IRE cohort from sites offering IRE as part of clinical care, and a comparator SOC cohort of prospectively enrolled and contemporaneous retrospective patients. Enrollment spanned 08/05/2019 to 02/05/2023, with follow-up through at least 24 months, death, or loss to follow-up. Included were 137 patients (99 IRE; 38 SOC), aged ≥18 years with Stage 3 PDAC and no progression after three months of SOC therapy. Results Median (interquartile range) time from diagnosis to enrollment was 8 (6-10) months for IRE and 4 (3-6) for SOC (p<0.0001). Median OS and PSF from enrollment were 18 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15-24) months and 9 (95% CI: 7-12) months for IRE, and 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months and 6 (5-8) months for SOC, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.009). Adverse events occurred in 80% (79/99) of IRE patients and 95% (36/38) of SOC patients; 29% (29/99) of the IRE cohort experiencing an IRE-related adverse event. Conclusions IRE was associated with improved OS versus SOC alone and may be an effective consolidative treatment for Stage 3 PDAC after three months of induction chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) are typically treated with maximal safe resection, during which neurosurgeons often monitor for neurological injury using muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) and direct wave (D-wave) neuromonitoring. The predictive value of changes in D-waves for identifying motor outcomes is underexplored. This study evaluated the utility of D-waves for predicting postoperative motor deficits. METHODS Patients who underwent resection of a primary IMSCT with mMEP neuromonitoring from 2003 to 2023 at a tertiary care hospital were identified. Patients who underwent D-wave monitoring in addition to mMEP monitoring were compared to those who underwent mMEP monitoring alone using the Mann-Whitney U-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of D-wave and mMEP monitoring for identifying new neurological deficits immediately postoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, and last follow-up were calculated. RESULTS After matching, 125 patients were included (median age 42.0 years; 57.6% male; median follow-up 34.0 months), of whom 88 had both mMEP and D-wave data. The most common pathologies were ependymoma (64.0%) and astrocytoma (17.6%). Patients who did and did not undergo D-wave neuromonitoring had similar preoperative neurological function, primary pathology, tumor grade, and tumor location. D-wave use was associated with increased gross-total resection (88.6% vs 64.9%, p = 0.002) and reduced mortality (5.7% vs 24.3%, p = 0.007), length of stay (5.0 vs 6.0 days, p = 0.033), and 30-day readmission (2.3% vs 13.5%, p = 0.013) and reoperation (1.1% vs 10.8%, p = 0.012). At the 6-month follow-up, D-wave monitoring alone was superior to mMEP and combination monitoring for detecting new motor deficits. D-wave monitoring had peak sensitivity (77.8%) and NPV (96.5%) at 6 months and peak specificity (95.8%) and PPV (76.9%) in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS D-wave monitoring was associated with reduced mortality and was more accurate than mMEP monitoring alone or combination monitoring for detecting new postoperative neurological deficits. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

This guideline has been updated. This ASCO Living Guideline is reviewed on an eight-week cycle. Please see the online dynamic version for the latest updates. Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information ( Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 ). Updates are published regularly and can be found on the ASCO Publications website .

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT) has revolutionized hematologic malignancies, yet translation to solid tumors has historically been limited. This landscape shifted significantly in 2024 with US Food and Drug Administration approvals of lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy for advanced melanoma, and afamitresgene autoleucel, an engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapy for synovial sarcoma. These approvals mark the clinical arrival of ACT for solid tumors and highlight a rapidly expanding therapeutic landscape. Beyond these indications, multiple ACT platforms including TIL, TCR, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell, CAR-natural killer, and CAR-macrophage therapies are under active clinical investigation across diverse solid tumor indications. Clinical experience to date has defined key barriers to efficacy, including impaired tumor trafficking, antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and limited cellular persistence. In parallel, rapid advances in cellular engineering are reshaping the field, with the development of armored constructs, logic-gated and multiantigen targeting strategies, innate immune–based platforms, and novel manufacturing approaches including allogeneic and in vivo cell engineering. As ACT enters clinical practice for select solid tumors, distinct toxicity profiles and logistical requirements necessitate careful patient selection and multidisciplinary coordination. Early biomarker testing, timely referral to specialized centers, and familiarity with evolving toxicity management frameworks are increasingly critical. Here, we seek to provide a practice-oriented framework for understanding emerging ACT platforms, clinical data, toxicity considerations, and implementation strategies relevant to contemporary solid tumor oncology care.