Citations

Abstract Lung cancer has the highest mortality across all cancers in the world. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly mutated in lung adenocarcinomas from Asian non-smoking females. These tumors usually respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), but the outcomes vary in different patients. Though EGFR T790M, amplification of MET and other mechanisms have been shown to confer EGFR-TKI resistance, the molecular mechanisms in around 30% of patients are still unknown. To uncover novel candidate pathways of EGFR-TKI resistance, we analyzed the whole exome mutation profiles of pre-treatment, EGFR T790M-free lung adenocarcinomas with typical activating mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions). Amongst 19 non-responding (NR) tumors without significant shrinkage after gefitinib or erlotinib treatment, 67 cancer-related genes showed coding region non-synonymous single nucleotide variations (SNV) or insertion-deletions (indels) but they were not detected in 22 responding tumors. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed 14 of the 67 genes were involved in the EGFR and WNT signaling network (false discovery rate q=1.14 e-8 for EGFR and q=4.3 e-9 for WNT), including well-known TKI resistance-related genes PIK3CA, PTEN and NF1. Notably, ARID1A, which encodes a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex, showed nonsense mutations in 2 NR but not responding tumors, which were validated by Sanger sequencing. More than 40% of ARID1A mutations in lung adenocarcinomas recorded in COSMIC were nonsense mutations or frameshift indels. Loss of function mutations of ARID1A have also been reported in various cancers, together suggesting ARID1A might be a tumor suppressor but its involvement in EGFR mutant lung cancers is unknown. To investigate the potential role of ARID1A, its expression was first studied using Kaplan-Meier plotter. Low expression of ARID1A is associated with significantly better overall survival than high expression level in lung adenocarcinoma patients (p=8.5 e-7). To test whether loss of ARID1A could cause TKI resistance, ARID1A was knocked down by shRNA in HCC827 lung cancer cell line harboring EGFR exon19 deletion. MTT cell viability assay using gefitinib showed increase of IC50. Western blot assay further showed ARID1A knockdown increased phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473. Together, the findings suggest loss of ARID1A could lead to EGFR bypass and promote activation of the downstream PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to EGFR TKI resistance. Overall, our findings suggest EGFR-TKI resistance mutations could be detected before TKI drug selection. Resistant gene mutations present in pre-treatment tumors could help to predict the treatment response. More specifically, our study identified a promising gene list involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, and suggested ARID1A loss could be a novel EGFR-TKI resistance mechanism. Citation Format: Xuyuan Gao, Hang Xu, James CM Ho, Oscar SH Chan, Feng Xu, Junwen Wang, Victor HF Lee, Vicky PC Tin, Zhijie Xiao, Siqi Wang, Judy WP Yam, Maria P Wong. EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas mutation profiles reveal ARID1A might be a novel tyrosine kinase resistance pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-196.

Abstract Biodistribution detection methods currently hold a central role in evaluating clinical potential of new drugs and nanomedicine in vivo, either through therapeutic efficacy or toxicity assays. However, the explorative nature of these methods makes it practically difficult to validate them for clinical studies to comply with regulations as determined by the Food and Drug Administration. This work proposes a new systematic comparison of biodistribution methods to facilitate clinical validation and employment in pre-clinical and early stage clinical studies. Several optical methods (detection through IVIS, confocal microscopy, fluorescence emission), direct detection methods (detection through ICP-OES), and radiation-based methods (detection through gamma counter) are systematically tested and validated on cGMP grade microparticles. The classification here proposed quantitatively highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each method, expressing them in terms of: limit of detection, recovery rate, reproducibility, and sensitivity. As a result, this quantitative evaluation of several preclinical biodistribution detection methods leads to a new rational and objective classification of biodistribution methods based on quantitative characteristics, which is essential to facilitate clinical translation of pre-clinical data collection. Their different characteristics and application-specific advantages are also discussed based in light of the results presented. Overall, this work proposes a new and rational quantitative comparison of biodistribution detection methods with the goal to provide a guide to facilitate clinical translation of on-going and future pre-clinical and early-stage clinical studies. Citation Format: Sara Nizzero, Feng Li, Alessandro Venuta, Guodong Zhang, Carlotta Borsoi, Joy Wolfram, Junhua Mai, Haifa Shen, Zheng Li, Elvin Blanco, Mauro Ferrari. Empowering preclinical studies: A systematic and quantitative analysis of biodistribution methods to facilitate clinical translation of new drugs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-019.

Abstract Background: PD-L1 blockade with durvalumab (D) is approved as second-line therapy in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Adding CTLA-4 blockade with tremelimumab (T) may improve responses, particularly in pts with low PD-L1 expression. Here we report safety and efficacy in the mUC cohort of the dose-expansion phase of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study of D+T in pts with advanced solid tumors (NCT02261220). Methods: Pts with platinum-refractory mUC received D 20 mg/kg + T 1 mg/kg Q4W for 4 months, followed by D 10 mg/kg Q2W for a total of 12 months of treatment. The primary objectives were safety in the mUC cohort and antitumor activity in the subgroup with tumor cell and immune cell PD-L1 expression <25% (assessed by SP263 IHC assay). Secondary objectives included antitumor activity per RECIST v1.1 in other subgroups. Results: As of Oct 20 2017, 168 pts received treatment and had ≥24 weeks' follow-up. Median age was 65.5 yr (range, 35-85), 78.0% were male, 81.0% had visceral metastases (32.1% liver metastases) and 32.1% had received >1 prior line of chemotherapy. Median duration of follow-up was 11.6 mo. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 75.6% of pts and were Grade 3-4 in 28.6%. One pt died due to a treatment-related AE (pulmonary hemorrhage). Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of therapy in 11.9% of pts. Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 35/168 (20.8%) including 4 CRs. Responses occurred early (median 1.8 mo) and are durable (median DOR not reached, range 1.9-24.9 mo). At 6 months, the PFS rate was 25.4% and the OS rate was 60.9%. Median PFS was 1.9 mo and median OS was 9.5 mo. Clinical activity was seen regardless of PD-L1 status, but patients with either tumor or immune cell expression ≥25% had numerically higher response rates (29.4% vs 15.1%) and 6-month OS rates than those with <25% expression (Table). Conclusions: D+T had a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity and survival rate in previously treated mUC regardless of PD-L1 status. Response and survivalPD-L1 ≥25% (n=68)PD-L1 <25% (n=86)PD-L1 unknown (n=14)Total (N=168)Confirmed ORR (CR+PR)(95% CI), %29.4 (19.0-41.7)15.1 (8.3-24.5)14.3 (1.8-42.8)20.8 (15.0-27.8)Ongoing ORR, %60.092.310074.3Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD≥24 weeks) (95% CI), %32.4 (21.5-44.8)24.4 (15.8-34.9)42.9 (17.7-71.1)29.2 (22.4-36.7)Median PFS, months (95% CI)3.5 (1.9-3.7)1.8 (1.8-1.9)4.9 (1.8-NE)1.9 (1.8-3.4)PFS 6-month rate, %26.122.638.525.4Median OS, months (95% CI)*18.9 (8.1-NE)8.0 (4.8-10.0)16.4 (7.3-16.4)9.5 (8.1-18.9)OS 6-month rate, %66.451.991.760.9NE, not estimable *Should be interpreted with caution due to limited follow-up at data cutoff Citation Format: Arjun V. Balar, Amit Mahipal, Enrique Grande, Victor M. Villalobos, Sebastien Salas, Taek Won Kang, Se Hyun Kim, Thomas Powles, Frank Tsai, Aung Naing, Albiruni Razak, Yohann Loriot, Ji Youl Lee, Sang Joon Shin, Rafael Morales-Barrera, Natasha Angra, Feng Xiao, Shaad Abdullah, Michiel S. Van der Heijden. Durvalumab + tremelimumab in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112.

Abstract Background: This is an update of the safety and efficacy of durvalumab monotherapy in pts with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) from an ongoing, phase 1/2 open-label study (NCT01693562). Methods: Pts received 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks up to 12 months or until unacceptable toxicity, progression, or starting another anticancer therapy. Pts were stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression (Ventana PD-L1 [SP263] Assay [PD-L1 cutoff: ≥25% of tumor cells and/or immune cells with membrane staining]) and treatment line. Results: As of the data cutoff (16Oct2017), 201 UC pts with Stage IV disease received treatment, with a median follow-up of 16.9 months (range, 0.4-37.7). Across treatment lines, objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review was 17.4% (95% CI, 12.4, 23.4) in all pts; 27.5% in the PD-L1 ≥25% group vs 5.8% in the PD-L1 <25% group. The responses have been durable regardless of PD-L1 status, with the median duration of response not yet reached in the PD-L1 ≥25% group and 12.2 months in the PD-L1 <25% group. Responses lasted ≥12 mo in 62.9% of responders (max 25.7+ mo). Overall, median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI, 6.9, 15.7); 19.8 months in the PD-L1 ≥25% group vs 4.8 months in the PD-L1 <25% group (Table). Pts previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy also reported similar durable responses. At least one treatment-related AE was reported in 120 pts (59.7%), including fatigue (39 [19.4%]), decreased appetite and rash (18 [9.0%] each), and diarrhea (16 [8.0%]). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 19 (9.5%) pts; 6 (3.0%) treatment discontinuations and 2 (1.0%) deaths were attributed to treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, durvalumab continues to show durable clinical activity in UC pts, especially in the PD-L1 ≥25% group with an acceptable toxicity profile. PD-L1 ≥25%PD-L1 <25%PD-L1 unknownTotalAll UCn=102n=86n=13N=201Confirmed ORR, %27.55.815.417.4(95% CI)(19.1, 37.2)(1.9, 13.0)(1.9, 45.4)(12.4, 23.4)CR, %7.83.57.76.0PR, %19.62.37.711.4Median DoR, monthsNR12.2NRNR(min, max)(2.7, 25.7+)(8.6, 21.7+)(14.5+, 14.6+)(2.7, 25.7+)Median PFS, months (95% CI)1.9 (1.4, 2.7)1.4 (1.3, 1.5)2.8 (1.4, NE)1.5 (1.4, 1.8)6-month PFS rate, %28.68.625.220.412-month PFS rate, %22.37.125.216.2Median OS, months (95% CI)19.8 (9.3, NE)19.8 (9.3, NE)4.8 (3.3, 8.1)NR (4.9, NE)10.5 (6.9, 15.7)6-month OS rate, %67.645.869.258.912-month OS rate, %57.629.561.546.6 Citation Format: Peter O'Donnell, Christophe Massard, Bhumsuk Keam, Sang-We Kim, Terry Friedlander, Myung-Ju Ahn, Michael Ong, Michael Gordon, Marcus Butler, Scott Antonia, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Martin Gutierrez, Sumati Gupta, Alexander Spira, Alexandra Drakaki, Michele Maio, Feng Xiao, Natasha Angra, Shaad Abdullah, Thomas Powles. Updated efficacy and safety profile of durvalumab monotherapy in urothelial carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT031.

AbstractBackground: Biomarkers of tobacco exposure have a central role in studies of tobacco use and nicotine intake. The most significant exposure markers are nicotine itself and its metabolites in urine. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the performance of laboratories conducting these biomarker measurements.Methods: This report presents the results from a method performance study involving 11 laboratories from 6 countries that are currently active in this area. Each laboratory assayed blind replicates of seven human urine pools at various concentrations on three separate days. The samples included five pools blended from smoker and nonsmoker urine sources, and two additional blank urine samples fortified with pure nicotine, cotinine, and hydroxycotinine standards. All laboratories used their own methods, and all were based on some form of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Overall, good agreement was found among the laboratories in this study. Intralaboratory precision was good, and in the fortified pools, the mean bias observed was < + 3.5% for nicotine, approximately 1.2% for hydroxycotinine, and less than 1% for cotinine (1 outlier excluded in each case). Both indirect and direct methods for analyzing the glucuronides gave comparable results.Conclusions: This evaluation indicates that the experienced laboratories participating in this study can produce reliable and comparable human urinary nicotine metabolic profiles in samples from people with significant recent exposure to nicotine.Impact: This work supports the reliability and agreement of an international group of established laboratories measuring nicotine and its metabolites in urine in support of nicotine exposure studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(9); 1083–90. ©2018 AACR.