Li, Feng

Abstract Biodistribution detection methods currently hold a central role in evaluating clinical potential of new drugs and nanomedicine in vivo, either through therapeutic efficacy or toxicity assays. However, the explorative nature of these methods makes it practically difficult to validate them for clinical studies to comply with regulations as determined by the Food and Drug Administration. This work proposes a new systematic comparison of biodistribution methods to facilitate clinical validation and employment in pre-clinical and early stage clinical studies. Several optical methods (detection through IVIS, confocal microscopy, fluorescence emission), direct detection methods (detection through ICP-OES), and radiation-based methods (detection through gamma counter) are systematically tested and validated on cGMP grade microparticles. The classification here proposed quantitatively highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each method, expressing them in terms of: limit of detection, recovery rate, reproducibility, and sensitivity. As a result, this quantitative evaluation of several preclinical biodistribution detection methods leads to a new rational and objective classification of biodistribution methods based on quantitative characteristics, which is essential to facilitate clinical translation of pre-clinical data collection. Their different characteristics and application-specific advantages are also discussed based in light of the results presented. Overall, this work proposes a new and rational quantitative comparison of biodistribution detection methods with the goal to provide a guide to facilitate clinical translation of on-going and future pre-clinical and early-stage clinical studies. Citation Format: Sara Nizzero, Feng Li, Alessandro Venuta, Guodong Zhang, Carlotta Borsoi, Joy Wolfram, Junhua Mai, Haifa Shen, Zheng Li, Elvin Blanco, Mauro Ferrari. Empowering preclinical studies: A systematic and quantitative analysis of biodistribution methods to facilitate clinical translation of new drugs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-019.

Extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) have been identified in all tested biofluids and have been associated with a variety of extracellular vesicles, ribonucleoprotein complexes and lipoprotein complexes. Much of the interest in exRNAs lies in the fact that they may serve as signalling molecules between cells, their potential to serve as biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of disease and the possibility that exRNAs or the extracellular particles that carry them might be used for therapeutic purposes. Among the most significant bottlenecks to progress in this field is the lack of robust and standardized methods for collection and processing of biofluids, separation of different types of exRNA‐containing particles and isolation and analysis of exRNAs. The Sample and Assay Standards Working Group of the Extracellular RNA Communication Consortium is a group of laboratories funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health to develop such methods. In our first joint endeavour, we held a series of conference calls and in‐person meetings to survey the methods used among our members, placed them in the context of the current literature and used our findings to identify areas in which the identification of robust methodologies would promote rapid advancements in the exRNA field.