Citations

PURPOSE SJMB03 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00085202 ) was a phase III risk-adapted trial that aimed to determine the frequency and clinical significance of biological variants and genetic alterations in medulloblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients 3-21 years old were stratified into average-risk and high-risk treatment groups based on metastatic status and extent of resection. Medulloblastomas were molecularly classified into subgroups (Wingless [WNT], Sonic Hedgehog [SHH], group 3, and group 4) and subtypes based on DNA methylation profiles and overlaid with gene mutations from next-generation sequencing. Coprimary study end points were (1) to assess the relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival (PFS), and (2) to estimate the frequency of mutations associated with WNT and SHH tumors. Clinical and molecular risk factors were evaluated, and the most robust were used to model new risk-classification categories. RESULTS Three hundred thirty eligible patients with medulloblastoma were enrolled. Five-year PFS was 83.2% (95% CI, 78.4 to 88.2) for average-risk patients (n = 227) and 58.7% (95% CI, 49.8 to 69.1) for high-risk patients (n = 103). No association was found between ERBB2 status and PFS in the overall cohort ( P = .74) or when patients were stratified by clinical risk ( P = .71). Mutations in CTNNB1 (96%), DDX3X (37%), and SMARCA4 (24%) were most common in WNT tumors and PTCH1 (38%), TP53 (21%), and DDX3X (19%) in SHH tumors. Methylome profiling classified 53 WNT (17.4%), 48 SHH (15.7%), 65 group 3 (21.3%), and 139 group 4 (45.6%) tumors. A comprehensive clinicomolecular risk factor analysis identified three low-risk groups (WNT, low-risk SHH, and low-risk combined groups 3 and 4) with excellent (5-year PFS > 90%) and two very high-risk groups (high-risk SHH and high-risk combined groups 3 and 4) with poor survival (5-year PFS < 60%). CONCLUSION These results establish a new risk stratification for future medulloblastoma trials.

Objectives We analyzed growth rates of benign ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas to understand what percentage would show a volume doubling time (DT) of less than 3 years, between 3 and 5 years, or greater than 5 years. Methods We retrospectively reviewed pathology records (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019) to find all surgically excised ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas. Imaging records were then reviewed to identify those that had been confidently identified with ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography at least twice before surgical removal, with at least a 60‐day interval between studies. Three orthogonal measurements were recorded on the first and last imaging studies on which the mass was detected, with volume calculations by the prolate formula (product of 3 measurements multiplied by 0.52). The volume DT was calculated and grouped into 1 of 5 categories: (1) DT of less than 1 year; (2) DT of 1 to 3 years; (3) DT of 3 to 5 years; (4) DT of 5 to 10 years; and (5) no growth (any mass with a DT >10 years or showing a decrease in volume). Results A total of 102 of 536 cystadenomas and 44 of 227 cystadenofibromas met inclusion criteria. Of the 146 tumors, 40 (27.4%) had a DT of less than 1 year; 38 (26.0%) had a DT of 1 to 3 years; 22 (15.1%) had a DT of 3 to 5 years; 10 (6.8%) had a DT of 5 to 10 years; and 36 (24.7%) showed no growth. Conclusions A total of 53.4% of ovarian serous cystadenomas/cystadenofibromas have a DT of less than 3 years; 15.1% have a DT between 3 and 5 years; and 31.5% have a DT of greater than 5 years or show no growth.

Abstract Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) drive many outpatient encounters and, despite being predominantly viral, are associated with high rates of antibiotic prescriptions. With rising antibacterial resistance, optimization of prescribing of antibiotics in outpatients with RTIs is a critical need. Fortunately, this challenge arises at a time of increasing availability of novel RTI diagnostics to help discern which patients have bacterial infections warranting treatment. Effective implementation of antibiotic stewardship is needed, but optimal approaches for ambulatory settings are unknown. Future research needs are reviewed in this summary of a research summit convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America in the fall of 2019.

Abstract Introduction Statin-associated side effects prevent a substantial proportion of patients from being adequately treated with statin therapy and achieving adequate LDL-C reductions. Phase 3 trials showed that inclisiran, a new siRNA, durably lowers LDL-C by ≥50% on top of maximally tolerated statin therapy. Purpose To evaluate inclisiran's tolerability and LDL-C lowering effects among individuals who were not receiving statin therapy mainly because of statin intolerance. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) with LDL-C &gt;70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. The primary efficacy endpoints were % change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 and time adjusted % change in LDL-C from baseline after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Absolute LDL-C reductions were secondary endpoints. This analysis included individuals who were not on statin therapy at baseline. Results The trials included 252 (7.9% of the pooled trial populations; mean age 68; male 62%; lipid-lowering therapy 28%). AE rates and LDL-C reductions are shown in the Table. Overall, 12 (4.7%) patients had myalgia (4.8% in the inclisiran groups, 4.7% in the placebo groups). There were 8 discontinuations in the inclisiran groups (6.5%) and 3 in the placebo groups (2.3%). The placebo-adjusted mean reduction in LDL-C at Day 510 was 45.8%, an absolute reduction of 68.0 mg/dL (p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion Among statin intolerant individuals in ORION-10 and 11, inclisiran potently and durably lowered LDL-C with an adverse event profile comparable to placebo. Inclisiran may represent a new and potent therapeutic option for patients with elevated LDL-C unable to tolerate statins. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Abstract Introduction Inclisiran, an investigational siRNA, has been shown to effectively and durably lower LDL-C in Phase 3 trials. Inter-individual variability in LDL-C reductions has been documented for statin therapy and ezetimibe. Purpose To evaluate the inter-individual variability in LDL-C lowering with inclisiran. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) who had LDL-C &gt;70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. Co-primary endpoints were the LDL-C reduction from baseline to Day 510 and the time adjusted average % change in LDL-C reduction after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Measures of response variability were pre-specified secondary endpoints. This analysis examines the inter-individual variability of LDL-C reductions at day 510 using pooled data from both trials. Results The analysis included 3178 individuals (92% on statins). At Day 90, 97% of inclisiran-treated patients had an LDL-C reduction. At Day 510, the median percent reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline was 57.3% in the inclisiran group (interquartile range, 44%-70%). An LDL-C reduction ≥50% was reached by 1359 (86.6%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 97 (6.2%) placebo patients at any visit (odds ratio [OR] 97.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76–126). An LDL-C reduction ≥30% was reached by 1523 (97.0%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 371 (23.7%) placebo patients (OR 104.5, 95% CI 76–143). At Day 510, 921 patients (65.1%) in the inclisiran group had a reduction ≥50% in LDL-C compared to 34 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group, and 1228 (86.8%) had a reduction ≥30% compared to 148 (10.5%), respectively. Among placebo-treated patients, there was a substantial proportion with notable increases in LDL-C at Day 510 (figure). Conclusion In Phase 3 trials, inclisiran on top of maximally tolerated statins provided reliable, consistent and durable reductions in LDL-C. A large percentage of subjects randomized to inclisiran achieved substantial reductions (&gt;50%) in LDL-C and nearly all achieved at least a 30% reduction suggesting inclisiran is potentially a promising novel therapy for patients needing sustained LDL-C reductions. Waterfall plot of pooled trials Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Abstract Introduction Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels contribute to the total burden of circulating atherogenic lipoprotein levels and are associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. LDL-C underestimates risk in patients with elevated TG. Therefore, 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines recommend apoB or non-HDL-C as secondary lipid goals for patients with TG &gt;150mg/dL. Purpose To assess the impact of inclisiran on apoB and non-HDL-C goal attainment across a range of TG levels among patients with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). Methods The ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials included 3178 patients with ASCVD and LDL-C &gt;70mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins randomized to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Pre-specified secondary endpoints were placebo-corrected changes in lipids at Day 510. For this analysis patients were stratified by TG quartiles at baseline within each trial. The proportion of individuals attaining apoB &lt;55 mg/dL or non-HDL-C &lt;70mg/dl within each trial were assessed across TG strata and the likelihood of goal attainment within TG strata assessed using logistic regression. Results In ORION-10, TG quartiles were ≤94, 94 to ≤128, 128 to ≤181 and &gt;181mg/dl respectively and in ORION-11 corresponding values were ≤101, 101 to ≤135, 135 to ≤183 and &gt;183mg/dl. As compared to placebo a significantly greater proportion of patients randomised to inclisiran attained apoB goals within each TG strata (Table). Similar results were observed for non-HDL-C. Conclusion Among patients with ASCVD on maximally tolerated statin and high TG levels, attainment of apoB and non-HDL-C secondary lipid targets was more likely with inclisiran than placebo. Inclisiran may be a useful therapeutic option for patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Introduction: The American College of Cardiology developed the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) AFib Ablation Registry to assess prevalence, demographics, procedural management and outcomes of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AFib) ablation procedures. The objective of this registry’s first presentation is to summarize initial AFib Ablation Registry data regarding patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, and in-hospital adverse events and outcomes in those undergoing AFib ablation enrolled in the registry. Methods: Data were tabulated and summarized with simple proportions for categorical data, and mean ± standard deviation for continuous data. Results: A total of 31,345 patients who underwent AFib ablation were included in the registry (mean age 65.0 ± 10.4, 65.2% male, 57.6% paroxysmal AFib), with ablations performed at 120 hospitals, by 501 physicians. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of was 2.6 ± 1.6, and mean HAS-BLED score was 1.1 ± 0.9. Successful pulmonary vein isolation was able to be achieved in all veins in 94.5% of patients. The prevalence of any complication during procedural admission was 3.1%; the most common were hematoma (0.5%) and pericardial effusion requiring intervention (0.42%). The mean length of stay during the index admission (days) was 1.4 ± 7.6, and in-hospital death prevalence was 0.04% [FIGURE] . Conclusions: In conclusion, the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry is a large, national, multi-center, prospective cohort study to describe events outside the clinical trial or research setting, demonstrating successful pulmonary vein isolation in the majority of patients and a low prevalence of adverse events. Future studies from the registry will be able to help support and develop evidence-based guidelines for AFib ablation treatment and optimize patient outcomes.

Introduction: Despite a later onset in life than males, ASCVD is the leading cause of death in females, additionally mortality is higher compared to males. Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of CVD risk factors may contribute to this difference. Inclisiran is a novel siRNA that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis and lowers LDL-C. Three Phase III placebo-controlled trials evaluated efficacy and safety of inclisiran in patients with HeFH (ORION-9), ASCVD (ORION-10, -11) and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11). Objective: To assess the impact of sex on the efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran. Methods: Patients from each trial were categorized by sex. The co-primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 and time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C from baseline after Day 90 up to Day 540. Secondary efficacy and safety parameters were assessed over 18 months. Results: Of a total 3660 patients, 1190 (32.5%) were females and 2470 (67.5%) were males. At baseline, females were less likely to receive statins [high-intensity statins] (90% [70%] vs 93% [76%]), or have ASCVD (73.6% vs 90.3%), were more likely to have ASCVD-risk equivalent (26.4% vs 9.7%) vs males. The efficacy of inclisiran vs placebo in both co-primary endpoints was similar in both sexes. Females had higher LDL-C at baseline (122.9 mg/dL vs 105.8 mg/dL) and (secondary endpoints) placebo-corrected mean absolute reduction in LDL-C at Day 510 (62.6 vs 54.0 mg/dL, P <0.05) and time-adjusted reduction from Days 90 to 540 (59.0 vs 51.5 mg/dL, P <0.05) with inclisiran were greater in females than males. Most AEs were similar between inclisiran vs placebo for both sexes except for injection-site AEs that were higher in the inclisiran arm than placebo (females 9.4% vs 0.2%, males 2.8% vs 0.9%; Table). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran was generally similar in both sexes, except for more inclisiran injection-site AEs (mainly mild) vs placebo, which were more frequent in females.

Objective:To address variance in clinical care surrounding sporadic vestibular schwannoma, a modified Delphi study was performed to establish a general framework to approach vestibular schwannoma care. A multidisciplinary panel of experts was established with deliberate representation from key stakeholder societies. External validity of the final statements was assessed through an online survey of registered attendees of the 8th Quadrennial International Conference on Vestibular Schwannoma.Study Design:Modified Delphi method.Methods:The panel consisted of 16 vestibular schwannoma experts (8 neurotology and 8 neurosurgery) and included delegates representing the AAOHNSF, AANS/CNS tumor section, ISRS, and NASBS. The modified Delphi method encompassed a four-step process, comprised of one prevoting round to establish a list of focus areas and three subsequent voting rounds to successively refine individual statements and establish levels of consensus. Thresholds for achieving moderate consensus, at ≥67% agreement, and strong consensus, at ≥80% agreement, were determined a priori. All voting was performed anonymously via the Qualtrics online survey tool and full participation from all panel members was required before procession to the next voting round.Results:Through the Delphi process, 103 items were developed encompassing hearing preservation (N = 49), tumor control and imaging surveillance (N = 20), preferred treatment (N = 24), operative considerations (N = 4), and complications (N = 6). As a result of item refinement, moderate (4%) or strong (96%) consensus was achieved in all 103 final statements. Seventy-nine conference registrants participated in the online survey to assess external validity. Among these survey respondents, moderate (N = 21, 20%) or strong (N = 73, 71%) consensus was achieved in 94 of 103 (91%) statements, and no consensus was reached in 9 (9%). Of the four items with moderate consensus by the expert panel, one had moderate consensus by the conference participants and three had no consensus.Conclusion:This modified Delphi study on sporadic vestibular schwannoma codifies 100% consensus within a multidisciplinary expert panel and is further supported by 91% consensus among an external group of clinicians who regularly provide care for patients with vestibular schwannoma. These final 103 statements address clinically pragmatic items that have direct application to everyday patient care. This document is not intended to define standard of care or drive insurance reimbursement, but rather to provide a general framework to approach vestibular schwannoma care for providers and patients.