Citations

OBJECTIVE Ruptured, large pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a significant management challenge due to high rerupture risk and the morbidity of conventional treatments. Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) has emerged as an alternative; however, evidence for its use in this specific population is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs in a dedicated pediatric cohort. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study from 21 centers analyzed outcomes for 42 pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with previously ruptured, large AVMs treated with VS-SRS. The primary outcome was complete AVM obliteration, and secondary outcomes included post-SRS hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Favorable outcome in this study was defined as obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent RIC. RESULTS At the initial SRS, the median patient age was 14.5 years, and the median AVM volume was 15.0 cm 3 ; most AVMs were high grade (Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V). With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 21 patients (50.0%). The cumulative obliteration rate was 37% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. Patients with a nidus volume of ≤ 10 cm 3 had significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates than those with a nidus volume > 10 cm 3 (log-rank test, p = 0.021). Similarly, patients treated with a prescription dose > 17 Gy showed significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates compared to those treated with a dose ≤ 17 Gy (log-rank test, p = 0.012). The cumulative 5-year incidences of hemorrhage and RICs following VS-SRS were 19% and 7%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, only larger total AVM volume was an independent predictor of a lower likelihood of favorable outcome (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.99; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter pediatric cohort, VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs provides a reasonable chance of long-term obliteration, but generally acceptable risks of post-SRS hemorrhage and RICs exist. VS-SRS should be considered as an option for pediatric patients with large, ruptured AVMs.

Objective: To develop a predictive model for pathological complete response (pCR) after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) to inform selection for watch-and-wait (W/W). Summary Background Data: Patient selection for W/W after TNT for locally advanced rectal cancer remains challenging. Methods: An ensemble of tabular foundation models was fine-tuned in adults with clinical stage II or III microsatellite stable primary rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing TNT and total mesorectal excision (TNT+TME) from 2018-2023 to predict pCR, using pre-TNT, post-TNT and pre-TME variables. This model was externally validated on patients having TNT and W/W (TNT+W/W) to predict persistent clinical complete response (pcCR; the absence of local regrowth, distant metastases, or persistent near-cCR). Area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and Brier score were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 308 patients that underwent TNT+TME (median age 56; 40% female), the model predicted pCR with an AUROC 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.77), AUPRC 0.44 (95% CI 0.35-0.57), and was well calibrated with a Brier score of 0.17 (95% CI 0.15-0.20). At external validation in a cohort of 83 patients that are being managed with TNT+W/W (median age 57; 37% female), the model predicted pcCR with an AUROC 0.69 (95% CI 0.57-0.82), AUPRC 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), and Brier score of 0.30 (95% CI 0.26-0.33), improving to 0.17 with recalibration. Conclusions: This novel predictive model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration for pCR after TNT+TME with utility in TNT+W/W for pcCR after appropriate recalibration, supporting its application for W/W patient selection.

LBA7000 Background: ~40% of DLBCL pts are not cured with first-line (1L) R-CHOP, underscoring a significant unmet need for more effective 1L regimens. Tafa (anti-CD19 mAb) + Len-R-CHOP in the phase 1b First-MIND study demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with newly diagnosed disease. frontMIND, a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, compared Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in pts with high-risk aggressive BCLs. Methods: Pts aged 18–80 y with newly diagnosed, high-intermediate/high-risk DLBCL or HGBL (IPI 3–5, aaIPI 2–3 if ≤60 y) and ECOG PS 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP or R-CHOP. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included: EFS, OS, CR, ORR, safety. Results: At primary analysis (data cutoff Oct 20, 2025), 899 pts were randomized to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (n=448) or R-CHOP (n=451); baseline characteristics were similar between arms. With a median follow-up of 35.2 mo, Tafa-Len-R-CHOP achieved a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs R-CHOP (HR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.96]; P =0.019) in the overall population; in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes (n=773), PFS HR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.88) and 24-mo PFS was 72.7% vs 62.2%. PFS benefit was observed with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP in both molecular COO subtypes, ABC and GCB (data will be presented). Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved EFS vs R-CHOP; CR and ORR were similar between arms and HR for OS was 0.85 (final OS planned at 5y) (Table). Any-grade TEAEs were similar in treatment arms (98.6% vs 97.1%); more grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (86.7% vs 76.1%). Discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in 25.7% vs 17.9% and deaths due to TEAEs in 5.9% vs 3.8% of pts for Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP. Overall, there were fewer deaths with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (18.5% vs 21.7%). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of frontMIND was met; Tafa-Len-R-CHOP resulted in a significant 25% reduction in risk of disease progression or death compared with R-CHOP, with an 8.2% difference in 24-month PFS rate in the overall population and 10.5% difference in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes. TEAEs were manageable and consistent with the expected safety profile. Tafa-Len-R-CHOP represents a potential new 1L standard of care for pts with both COO subtypes of high-risk DLBCL or HGBL. Clinical trial information: NCT04824092 . Efficacy outcomes by treatment arm.* Variable Tafa-Len-R-CHOP(n=448) R-CHOP(n=451) HR or OR(95% CI) P value PFS, # events (%) † 121 (27.0) 155 (34.4) 0.75 (0.59, 0.96) 0.019 PFS rate at 24 mo, % 71.1 62.9 − − PFS rate at 36 mo, % 67.3 60.7 − − EFS, # events (%) 154 (34.4) 191 (42.4) 0.79 (0.64, 0.97) 0.026 OS, # events (%) 82 (18.3) 95 (21.1) 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) 0.270 CR at EOT, n (%) 292 (65.2) 294 (65.2) 0.998 (0.76, 1.31) 0.987 ‡ ORR at EOT, n (%) 360 (80.4) 343 (76.1) 1.290 (0.94, 1.78) 0.120 ‡ *Investigator-assessed. † Progressive disease or death from any cause. ‡ Nominal P value.

TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .

10610 Background: The role for genetic testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients (pts) has expanded to find pts with germline pathogenic variants (PV) for therapeutic opportunities given FDA-approvals for PARP inhibitors in metastatic PCa as well as understanding familial cancer risk and opportunities for tailored screening and risk reduction. The PROMISE Registry (NCT04995198) was set up as a genetic registry to partner with PCa pts for rapid access to a new standard of care given insurance coverage and clinical implementation were initially major barriers. A second goal is to characterize disease features and treatment outcomes to inform management and provide updates about novel therapeutic clinical trials, both of which remain important to rare genetic variant carriers. Methods: PROMISE is a US decentralized prospective PCa genetic registry initiated in 2021 with initial phase to enroll and provide clinical-grade germline genetic testing (30 gene cancer-specific panel) to 5,000 PCa pts to identify ~500 PCa pts with variants of interest (pathogenic variants, PV, and variants of uncertain significance, VUS) in DNA repair genes for long-term clinical follow-up of 15 years (LTFU). Here, we report the initial phase testing results and identification of the LTFU cohort. Study design and enrollment strategy have been reported separately. Results: Between 2021-2026, 7,275 pts with any stage PCa across 50 US states self-consented to PROMISE, of which 5,674 (78%) of pts completed genetic testing, indicating feasibility of patient-directed, decentralized enrollment. We have identified 495 (8.7%) pts for LTFU. Baseline data is reported for n=367 (Table 1, will be updated at time of presentation). The most frequently observed PV/LPV variants being in CHEK2 (25%) , BRCA2 (23%) , ATM (12%) , and BRCA1 (4.6%). At the time of PCa diagnosis, the majority of LTFU pts had non-metastatic disease, with 47% of pts with Gleason>7, median PSA of 5 ng/mL, and median time from diagnosis to PROMISE GT of 25 months. Conclusions: PROMISE is a nationwide decentralized PCa genetic registry that has completed initial goal to recruit 5,000 PCa pts to offer germline genetic testing and recruit a cohort of 500 for LTFU. Data about diagnosis characteristics are reported, and analysis of ongoing disease course, treatment response/outcomes and overall survival is being collected. Clinical trial information: NCT04995198 . Long-term follow-up participant demographics. Characteristic Overall, N = 367 Age at Diagnosis (yrs) 63 (57, 69) Race N = 361 (6, nr) Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Multiracial, Other 22 (6.0%) Black or African American 22 (6.0%) White 317 (86%) Disease State at Diagnosis N = 348 (19, nr) Metastatic 46 (13%) Non-metastatic 302 (87%) Time from Diagnosis to PROMISE GT (months) 25 (4, 82) Gleason Score N = 280 (87, nr) </= 7 148 (53%) >7 132 (47%) PSA At Diagnosis (ng/mL) 5 (0, 10) (88, nr) Subjects with baseline data entered. nr=not reported. Median (Q1, Q3); n (%).

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Typically occurring in young and middle-aged individuals, untreated MS can have high rates of disability and recurrence, thereby imposing a significant burden on the patient, their family, and society. Many factors are implicated in the etiology of MS, with the relationship between Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection and the development of MS being the subject of extensive research recently. When the human body experiences a decline in immune function, it may trigger reactivation of EBV, and this reactivation is also believed to increase the risk of onset or relapse of MS. Currently, the phenomenon of cross-reactivity resulting from molecular mimicry following EBV infection (including reactivation status) is theorized as a contributing etiology. EBV-mediated abnormalities in T cells and B cells also play a key role in the development of MS. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been thoroughly understood. Meanwhile, the limited availability of effective treatment options for MS, in particular MS progression, underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MS, specifically emphasizing the relationship between EBV infection and the disease pathology. Furthermore, we introduced relevant pharmacological targets in order to propose a broader range of therapeutic alternatives for individuals diagnosed with MS.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate freedom from tumor progression and clinical outcomes in older adults with small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed by observation versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to better inform optimal management in this patient population. METHODS In this international multicenter study, patients aged ≥ 60 years with Koos grade I or II VS managed by observation or SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was conducted using patient characteristics, tumor size, and hearing assessments. Outcome measures of freedom from tumor progression, serviceable hearing preservation (SHP), and neurological function (tinnitus, vestibulopathy, House-Brackmann grade, and trigeminal nerve function) were assessed for both groups. RESULTS The observation and SRS groups each comprised 51 matched patients (median age 68 years for both). Ipsilateral serviceable hearing was observed at presentation for 35 patients in each group. The median follow-up duration was 39 months in the observation group versus 27 months in the SRS group (p = 0.5). Tumor progression was significantly lower with SRS than with observation (2% vs 52.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of 5-year freedom from tumor progression was 100% in the SRS group versus 43% (95% CI 29%–64%) in the observation group. The rate of 10-year freedom from tumor progression was 90% (95% CI 73%–100%) in the SRS group versus 20% (95% CI 8.5%–49%) in the observation group. At the last follow-up, hearing loss occurred in 42.9% of the observation group and 51.4% of those who underwent SRS (p = 0.5). The 3-year SHP rate was 68% (95% CI 53%–88%) versus 65% (95% CI 49%–85%) (p = 0.8), and the 5-year SHP rate was 53% in both groups (95% CI 36%–78% in the observation group and 95% CI 35%–79% in the SRS group, p = 0.8). The composite endpoint of tumor progression and/or worsened neurological outcome, including hearing loss, tinnitus, vestibulopathy, facial nerve dysfunction (House-Brackmann grade), or trigeminal dysfunction, demonstrated a significantly lower rate in the SRS group (17.6%) compared with the observation group (66.7%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SRS in older patients for management of Koos grade I or II VS resulted in significantly superior rates of freedom from tumor progression, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly higher rates of favorable overall radiographic and neurological outcomes than observation alone. Compared with observation, SRS might be the preferred management option in this patient population.