Citations

Background: Patients with spina bifida are living longer and more productive lives; however, many continue to experience functional limitations in adulthood. This study evaluated long-term functional progression and ambulatory status using the combined Myelomeningocele Functional Classification (MMFC) and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), and examined factors associated with long-term changes. Methods: A retrospective review at a tertiary care rehabilitation center identified 168 patients with spina bifida. MMFC and FMS classifications were recorded at initial and final visits. A subgroup of ambulatory patients who underwent 3D-gait analysis was analyzed to assess the relationship between MMFC, body mass index (BMI), and functional speed (FS) using multiple linear regression. Results: The average follow-up was 15±10.31 years. The mean age at final follow-up was 20 years (range, 5 to 52), with 52% of patients being male. Fifty-two percent of patients were ≥18 years of age at final follow-up. Within the MMFC1 cohort, 48% used wheelchair mobility (FMS 1,1,1) at initial presentation; this increased to 80% at final follow-up. Eighty percent of the MMFC2 patients were able to complete the 50-yard walk test at initial classification, whereas only 60% were able to complete it at final follow-up. Within the MMFC3 cohort, there was a decline in patients requiring no external support (FMS 6,6,6) from 90% to 78%. All MMFC4 patients maintained an FMS of 6,6,6. A statistically significant relationship was found between functional speed (FS) and MMFC (with MMFC4 faster than MMFC3 and MMFC2) ( P =0.01414). Conclusions: Long-term follow-up demonstrates that functional classification may decline over time in MMFC1 to 3 cohorts, whereas MMFC4 remains stable. In addition, within individual cohorts (MMFC1 to 3), there was also a decline in FMS and functional walk testing. A positive and statistically significant relationship was observed between gait analysis FS and MMFC, and a negative and statistically significant relationship was observed between BMI and MMFC. The combined use of MMFC and FMS provides a structured framework for longitudinal functional assessment in patients with spina bifida. Level of evidence: Level III.

Abstract Background Sleep disturbances are common in Alzheimer's disease and have been reported in its preclinical stage. A detailed characterization of sleep disruption across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum is required to clarify its role as a potential therapeutic target and to evaluate the utility of sleep-related biomarkers. Methods Sleep architecture was characterized through detailed spectral and temporal analysis of the slow-wave activity using polysomnography across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum . Participants included: cognitively unimpaired individuals without abnormal Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers (n = 30), cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers (n = 45), and individuals with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (n = 41). Associations between slow-wave features and longitudinal cognitive performance were tested in cognitively unimpaired participants. Sex differences were also explored. Results A stepwise increased wake after sleep onset and latency to rapid eye movement sleep was observed, alongside reduced spectral power of slow-wave activity and a progressive flattening of slow-waves across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum in both sexes. In cognitively unimpaired individuals, higher slow-wave slope and greater peak-to-peak amplitude were associated with better cognitive trajectories over time. Conclusions Sleep macro- and microarchitecture are altered early and progressively deteriorate across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum . Slow-wave features relate to cognitive trajectories in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease, with exploratory analyses suggesting stronger associations in men. These findings support slow-wave morphology as a candidate non-invasive marker for future sleep-based intervention studies.

Introduction The introduction of the purpose‐built single‐port (SP) robotic platform has allowed for the advent of regionalized minimally invasive surgical approaches for robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP), including the extraperitoneal and transvesical techniques. This study sought to develop a best practice consensus on the key principles, patient selection, surgical techniques, expected clinical outcomes, and learning curves pertaining to SP‐RARP. Methods A modified Delphi consensus was developed by a panel of experts, consisting of a 33‐item questionnaire, with each statement rated using a binary Likert scale (‘agree’ or ‘disagree’). The survey was distributed via email to all practicing SP‐RARP surgeons across the USA and Europe. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a given statement. Results A total of 53 surgeons participated in the Delphi Consensus across the two rounds. Of 33 statements, 28 (84.8%) reached agreement in the first round. The remaining consensus was achieved in the second round, involving 35 surgeons, and with one additional statement. The panel agreed that, although are no absolute contraindications to SP‐RARP, the preference towards specific SP‐RARP techniques should remain guided by the individual patients and surgical expertise. Although the SP extraperitoneal technique is recommended to pursue pelvic lymph node dissections, the panel agreed that transvesical SP‐RARP showed promise in promoting shorter hospital stay, faster recovery of urinary continence, and utility in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery. Consensus was also reached on the need for a structured training pathway, with most recommending beginning with extraperitoneal SP‐RARP before advancing to the transvesical approach. Conclusion This Delphi consensus demonstrates broad agreement among experienced SP surgeons in the USA and Europe, forming the foundation for future research on the clinical utility and necessary training pathways for SP‐RARP. Nevertheless, empirical validation based on clinical data from large cohort studies remains important.