Citations

e16405 Background: Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with a rising incidence and persistently poor survival outcomes. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an established standard regimen for advanced disease, however, the conventional triweekly schedule is frequently associated with significant toxicity. Biweekly dosing has been proposed to enhance tolerability while maintaining efficacy, although evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly versus standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing Biweekly versus Standard Triweekly: gemcitabine / nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary outcomes of interest included partial response, and treatment-related toxicities, specifically anemia, neutropenia, and use of growth factors. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic, and risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: A total of 1357 patients from eight observational studies were included. Comparative analysis showed no significant difference in partial response between biweekly and standard triweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.77 (95% CI 0.57,1.04, p = 0.09). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between regimens in the incidence of anemia (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 0.74–1.59; p = 0.66) or neutropenia (RR = 1.09; 95% CI 0.86–1.37; p = 0.48). however, growth factor use was significantly lower with biweekly dosing (RR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.58–0.87; p = 0.0009). Overall survival was comparable between groups RR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.71, 1.45 p = 0.93). Conclusions: Administration of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel biweekly yielded clinical outcomes and safety profiles comparable to the conventional regimen, while significantly reducing the need for growth factors as supportive care. These data suggest that a biweekly regimen could be an effective alternative; however, further prospective randomized studies are necessary to verify these findings and better understand their clinical application.

Abstract Aims To characterize global variation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) staffing, indications, and prescribed dose by country income classification and compare findings with the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation’s 2016 Global Audit. Methods and results Cross-sectional REDCap survey of Phase II/post-discharge CR programmes (May–September 2025). Outcomes were multidisciplinary team size/composition, accepted cardiac and non-cardiac indications, and centre-based CR dose. Comparisons were made across World Bank country income classifications and Audit decade (2016 vs. 2025). Of 7025 programmes identified globally, 1505 (median programme response rate = 62%/country) initiated a survey, from 90/113 (80%) countries with CR. CR was delivered by a multidisciplinary team of 7 (median; P25–P75 = 5–8; nurses, physiotherapists, cardiologists, and dietitians most common); teams were smaller in low-income countries (median = 4; P < 0.001), and physician specialty varied. Non-low-income programmes consistently accepted (≥90%) patients with acute coronary syndrome, with programmes in low-income countries less often accepting related interventions (e.g. surgery: low-income 0% vs. high-income 97%; P < 0.01), but non-cardiac indications were more frequently accepted (e.g. primary prevention, diabetes, and lung disease). Acceptance of heart failure increased compared with the previous Audit (70% vs. 87%; P < 0.001). Centre-based programmes prescribed a median of 20 h (P25–P75 = 12–30), typically two sessions/week over 8 weeks. Globally, 65 (72%) countries prescribed a median ≥12 sessions/programme. Programmes in upper-middle-income countries prescribed more sessions (median = 24, P25–P75 = 12–36; P < 0.001). Dose did not differ meaningfully between Audits (P = 0.07). Conclusion CR programmes globally are offered by small, but multidisciplinary teams. They accept guideline-indicated patients, with applicable variation by context. Insufficient dose in one-quarter of countries underscores investment need.

4500 Background: BM occur in ~30% of RCC pts and are associated with poor survival and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs). Radium-223, an alpha-emitting bone-seeking radioisotope, prolongs survival in advanced prostate cancer. A pilot study of radium-223 with VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in RCC with BM showed safety and early efficacy (McKay, CCR, 2018). Cabozantinib is a TKI that showed efficacy in BM. RADICAL (NCT04071223) was designed to investigate cabozantinib ± radium-223 in RCC with BM. Methods: This open label multicenter study enrolled RCC pts with ≥1 symptomatic BM not previously irradiated and Karnofsky performance status ≥60%. Prior therapies were allowed; non-clear cell population was limited to 20%. Randomization was 1:1 to cabozantinib with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) radium-223, stratified by osteoclast-targeted therapy (OTT), prior therapy, baseline opioid use, and IMDC risk. In Arm A, cabozantinib was 40 mg daily cycle 1, 60 mg thereafter if tolerated; radium-223 was 1.49 microcurie/kg IV every 28 days for 6 doses. In Arm B, cabozantinib was 60 mg daily. The primary endpoint was SSE-free survival (SSE-FS). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was designed with 85% power to detect improvement in 6-month SSE-FS from 65% to 78% (one-sided α=0.05), with planned interim futility analysis at 50% of expected events. Results: From 12/2019 to 9/2025, 90 pts were enrolled and evaluable for the interim analysis. Median age was 63 years; 74.4% male, 90.0% White, 83.3% clear cell histology. 11.1% were treatment naïve, 80.0% received OTT, 51.1% had baseline opioid use. IMDC risk was 16.7% favorable, 68.9% intermediate, 14.4% poor. Median cabozantinib dose was 31.4 mg (Arm A) and 40.0 mg (Arm B); median radium-223 cycles was 6. Median follow-up was 13.1 (range 0.1-49.4) months with 50 events, 17 SSEs (Arm A: 10; Arm B: 7) and 33 deaths (Arm A: 13; Arm B: 20). Outcomes are in Table. 71 pts were evaluable for response. ORR was 22.2% (Arm A), 22.9% (Arm B). Any grade treatment-related adverse events were 97.7% (Arm A), 93.2% (Arm B); grade ≥3 were 65.9% (Arm A), 56.8% (Arm B). The trial closed after interim analysis as SSE-FS did not meet the prespecified futility boundary (HR≤1). Conclusions: Radium-223 did not improve the primary endpoint of SSE-FS when added to cabozantinib but a numerical prolongation in OS was observed. Combination treatment was safe. Alternative radiotherapeutics warrant investigation in RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04071223 . Interim efficacy analysis. Arm Median(95% CI) HR (95% CI) Stratified SSE-FS A 17.9 (15.0-NE) 1.24 (0.62-2.48) B 17.6 (10.9-NE) Unstratified SSE-FS A 17.9 (15.0-NE) 0.90 (0.51-1.59) B 17.6 (10.9-NE) OS A 32.2 (17.9-NE) 0.77 (0.42-1.41) B 21.3 (12.3-NE) Stratified PFS A 11.0 (5.8-17.4) 1.39 (0.72-2.66) B 11.2 (9.0-18.5)

12010 Background: BWEL (Alliance A011401; NCT02750826) is a Phase III trial that randomizes patients (pts) with stage II-III breast cancer and body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m 2 1:1 to a 24-month (mo) lifestyle-based WLI + health education (HE) or HE alone. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of the impact of the WLI on patient-reported QOL and symptoms. Methods: The first 540 BWEL pts (randomized between 9/2016 and 7/2017) were included in this substudy that collected PROMIS 29 Profile 2.0 and Global Health scores at enrollment, 6 and 24 mos. Adjusting for baseline scores, mean physical function (predefined substudy primary outcome), global physical and mental health, fatigue and other scores were compared at 6 and 24 mos using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Positive differences in positive attributes (e.g., physical function) and negative differences in negative attributes (e.g., anxiety) represented better outcomes in the WLI arm. Results: At baseline, median BMI was 32.9 kg/m 2 (26.5 – 69.1), median age was 53 (25 - 78) years; 83.9% of pts were non-Hispanic White, 10.7% were Black and 5.9% were Hispanic. At 6 mos, the WLI (vs HE) arm had significantly better physical function (ANCOVA-based mean difference between arms 1.9 [95% CI 0.8, 3.0]; p<0.001), global physical health (2.0 [95% CI 0.9, 3.0]; p<0.001), global mental health (1.30 [95% CI 0.2, 2.4], p=0.03), social roles and activities (2.3 [95% CI 1.1, 3.6]; p<0.001), and fatigue (-1.7 [95% CI -3.1, -0.4], p=0.01) (Table). Improvements were generally maintained at 24 mos. Similar findings were seen in analyses using longitudinal mixed modeling. Conclusions: The BWEL WLI demonstrated QOL benefits for patients with breast cancer, resulting in significantly better physical function, global physical and mental health, and symptoms. Future analyses will evaluate which populations experienced the most benefit, as well as the relationships among QOL, symptoms, and weight loss. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, UG1CA189823; U10CA180820; U10CA180868; U10CA180863, CCS 707213; U10CA180888; UG1CA189858; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT02750826 . Analysis of covariance-adjusted least squares means values at 6-mos adjusted for baseline scores. QOL/Symptom Attributes HE WLI Between arm difference (95% CI)* P value Physical Function 47.1 49.0 1.9 (0.8, 3.0) <0.001 Global Physical Health 46.2 48.1 2.0 (0.9, 3.0) <0.001 Global Mental Health 48.6 49.9 1.3 (0.2, 2.4) 0.03 Social Roles and Activities 52.7 55.0 2.3 (1.1, 3.6) <0.001 Anxiety 50.2 50.0 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) 0.77 Depression 47.5 47.5 -0.0 (11.2, 1.2) 0.96 Fatigue 50.6 48.9 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4) 0.01 Sleep Disturbance 51.0 51.1 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8) 0.80 Pain Interference 51.3 50.3 -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4) 0.15 *Positive differences in positive attributes and negative differences in negative attributes favor WLI arm.

Clonal acquisition of multiple chromosomal abnormalities in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) is a hallmark of high-risk acute myeloid leukemias with complex karyotype (AML-CK). AML-CK is associated with TP53 mutations and chromosome 5q deletions (del5q); however, the drivers and clonal trajectories of aneuploid evolution in HSPCs remain unknown. We have developed a patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model in which preleukemic HSPCs clonally evolve to distinct, highly aneuploid states following transient mitotic inhibition. By tracking chromosome evolution at single cell resolution, we show that TP53-mutant HSPCs with del5q, but not TP53­ mutation alone, evolved complex chromosomal changes. Clonal evolution was marked by stepwise acquisition of numerical and structural chromosome changes seen in AML-CK patients, with individual abnormalities conferring fitness advantage. iPSC-derived aneuploid HSPCs and primary AML-CK patient samples exhibited a conserved gene expression signature marked by upregulation of PTEN, cohesins, and anti-apoptotic factor BCL2, indicative of a shared aneuploid cell state in HSPCs. Clinical BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax eradicated BCL2-dependent aneuploid clones, with resistant clones undergoing a lineage switch to upregulate alternative BCL2 factors. In summary, we demonstrate that mutant TP53 and del5q drive chromosome evolution marked by stepwise acquisition of individual abnormalities. Moreover, aneuploid HSPCs exhibit a shared gene expression state which confers unique targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities in AML-CK.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with median survival remaining approximately 12–15 months despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence are driven in part by limited drug penetration across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the persistence of brain cancer stem cells (BCSCs), highlighting the need for brain-penetrant therapeutic platforms capable of achieving sustained intratumoral delivery. Here, we developed a dendrimer-based nanotherapeutic by conjugating metformin to a fourth-generation hydroxyl-terminated polyamidoamine dendrimer (P4-MET) to enhance intracranial bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy in GBM. P4-MET exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic properties, including prolonged retention within the tumor microenvironment, and demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity against GBM cell lines relative to free metformin (f-MET). Mechanistical studies with transcriptomic profiling by RNA sequencing revealed distinct treatment-associated molecular signatures, identifying BOLA2B as the most significantly differentially expressed gene between treatment groups. Specifically, BOLA2B expression was markedly elevated in f-MET–treated cells but not so following P4-MET treatment. Given the established association of BOLA2B with mTORC1 signaling and GPX4-mediated ferroptosis resistance, these findings suggest that P4-MET may, at least in part, enhance therapeutic efficacy by modulating ferroptosis-associated pathways. In orthotopic GBM models, combination treatment with P4-MET and radiotherapy (RT) significantly prolonged overall survival and increased tumor cell death compared with either monotherapy alone, consistent with a synergistic radiosensitizing effect. Importantly, P4-MET demonstrated minimal systemic toxicity, supporting its favorable therapeutic index and translational potential. Collectively, these findings establish P4-MET as a brain-penetrant nanomedicine platform that improves metformin delivery, modulates ferroptosis-related signaling networks, and potentiates radiotherapeutic response in GBM. This study highlights the potential of dendrimer-enabled metabolic nanotherapies to overcome therapeutic resistance in malignant brain tumors.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations for staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and for the care of patients with localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussions on select 2026 updates to the guidelines regarding nonmetastatic disease: the elimination of the very-low-risk group, updates to the Principles of Active Surveillance, and caution in the use of focal therapy in newly diagnosed patients.

Abstract Introduction Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a potentially modifiable risk factor for the prevention of dementia, of which Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause. However, there is a lack of longitudinal evidence relating SDB to AD pathology &gt;20 years later. We examined the association between late-midlife SDB and late-life brain β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition—a hallmark of AD—assessed approximately 23 years later. Methods The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study initiated in 1987. Participants at two ARIC sites (Washington County, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota) with primarily White participants also completed polysomnography (PSG) in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) in 1995-98. SDB measures included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of apneas + hypopneas with ≥3% oxygen desaturation/hour of sleep), arousal index, and percentage of total sleep time in apnea, in hypopnea, and with oxygen saturation &lt; 90%. A subset of participants completed florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans through several ARIC ancillary studies (2011-2025 including the ARIC Sleep-PET study). We defined Aβ deposition as a global standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) &gt;1.2 (vs. SUVR ≤1.2). We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate relative risk (RR) of Aβ deposition by SDB, adjusting for demographics and vascular risk factors, and applied inverse probability attrition weighting to account for selective drop-out. Results Among 186 dementia-free participants (mean age=59 years at PSG and 82 years at PET scan, 58% female, 98% White), every 10% increase in total sleep time in hypopnea was associated with higher risk of Aβ deposition (RR=1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.91). When compared to no SDB (AHI &lt; 5), moderate to severe SDB (AHI ≥15) was associated with elevated Aβ deposition (RR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.22, 4.57); mild SDB (AHI 5 to &lt; 15) was not (RR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.53, 2.07). Conclusion SDB in late midlife was associated with greater risk of Aβ deposition approximately 23 years later. SDB may play a role in the early stages of AD pathogenesis. Future longitudinal studies are needed to optimize strategies for screening and treating SDB for dementia prevention. Support (if any) Supported in part by RF1AG050745.