Citations

Abstract Background Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) rely on expert interpretation of complex clinical records. Outside major academic centers, specialist expertise is scarce, and time-consuming chart reviews extend clinic visits and delay treatment decisions, underscoring the need for automated, point-of-care phenotyping for MPN patients. Methods Patients with the ICD codes of PV, ET and MF were identified from the electronic health record. Cases were defined as patients meeting the 2017 WHO diagnostic criteria for PV, ET or MF or those with a definitive MPN diagnosis determined by a hematologist. Controls were the patients who met neither the diagnostic criteria nor had a hematologist-assigned diagnosis. Two clinicians extracted demographic, clinical (symptoms, thrombotic history), laboratory (complete blood count, serum chemistry), genetic (mutations, karyotype), bone marrow morphology, diagnostic mentions and prognostic score information from unstructured clinical notes and pathology reports. Prognostic scores included the conventional risk model for PV, the International Prognostic Score of Thrombosis (IPSET) for ET and the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), DIPSS-plus or Mutation-enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System (MIPSS-70) for MF. Discrepancies in data extraction were resolved by a consensus. A random sample of 510 patients (PV: 85, ET: 85, MF: 85, controls: 255) was split into prompt development (n=60) and test (n=450) sets for iterative workflow engineering and evaluation. The workflow included: (i) a rule-based algorithm for automated retrieval of demographic details, the first bone marrow biopsy report, the first clinical note after biopsy and the latest laboratory results within 90 days preceding biopsy (ii) a HIPAA-compliant LLM (GPT-4 turbo) for data extraction from the clinical notes and pathology reports (iii) a regular expressions-based algorithm for post-processing extracted data into structured tables, (iv) a clinician-informed source prioritization algorithm to select data from preferred sources, (v) a modified WHO-informed diagnostic characterization tool incorporating hematologist-assigned diagnoses to distinguish cases from controls and; (vi) an NCCN guidelines-based algorithm for prognostic tool selection and risk-stratification based on available data. Structured prompts were used to extract demographic, clinical, laboratory, genetic and pathological data in a zero-shot deterministic setting. The performance of automated data extraction, diagnostic characterization and prognostication was compared against the manually curated data. Accuracy and F1 scores were computed for data extraction and prognostication tasks while sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess diagnostic performance. Results A total of 450 (PV: 150, ET: 150, MF: 150) pathology reports and 50 (PV: 52, ET: 55; MF: 65) clinical notes were identified for 450 test set patients. The test set data extraction accuracy was 95% (reports: 97%, notes: 92%) for PV, 93% (reports: 92%, notes: 94%) for ET and 98% (reports: 99%, notes 97%) for MF. The test set F1 score was 0.95 (reports: 0.96, notes: 0.93) for PV, 0.95 (reports: 0.95, notes: 0.96) for ET and 0.98 (reports: 0.99, notes: 0.97) for MF. PV patients were diagnosed with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity whereas ET and MF patients were diagnosed with 100% sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of risk stratification was 100% for PV and ET and 94% for MF. The F1 score for risk stratification was 1.00 for PV and ET and 0.94 for MF. Conclusions The first-in-class automated framework successfully identified pertinent clinical information, performed accurate data extraction from unstructured records and enabled clinician-guided source prioritization for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of MPN patients. Prospective validation of the framework is required for widespread clinical implementation.

Abstract Background and Significance: CMML is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPCs) monocytic bias, leading to downstream monocyte expansion that plays a key role in disease maintenance and progression. Monocytes in CMML express high surface expression of the homing C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), which promotes malignant monocyte survival. Expansion of CCR2+ monocytic progenitors drives acute transformation in CMML and contributes to venetoclax resistance in AML. For these reasons, CCR2 is a potential novel therapeutic target in CMML and monocytic AML. The CyTAC platform was designed to enable targeting of cell surface antigens that demonstrate limited or ineffective binding to conventional therapeutic antibodies. A CyTAC is a heterobivalent small molecule that binds to both a target of choice and to a fully humanized monoclonal antibody. STX-0712 comprises a CCR2 CyTAC which potently binds to CCR2 on malignant cells, and a CyTAC humanized ADCC-enabling monoclonal antibody, which when combined eliminates target cells via enhanced effector-mediated killing in the presence of NK cells. We have demonstrated that treatment with STX-0712 ex vivo results in human target engagement and pharmacodynamic activity, and in vivo leads to depletion of CCR2 MO1 monocytes in a potent and dose-dependent manner in CMML and AML (ASH 2024). Therapeutic depletion of CCR2+ malignant monocytes presents a novel opportunity to develop a potential disease-modifying targeted therapeutic agent. We have designed a first-in-human, phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the effect of CCR2 CyTAC in patients with refractory/resistant CMML, and relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML. Study Design and Methods This is a phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter clinical trial based in the USA to evaluate STX-0712 as a monotherapy in patients with CMML and AML who have no remaining treatment options known to confer clinical benefit. STX-0712 will be administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (additional regimen schedules may be explored) until evidence of disease progression, death, intolerance to study medication, or withdrawal of consent. The study consists of a dose-escalation and dose-expansion part and includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 (refractory/resistant CMML) and Cohort 2 (relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML). Dose escalation will begin in participants with CMML using the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design, with a minimum of three patients enrolled at each dose level. Backfilling of up to two cleared dose levels will be initiated once efficacious exposure levels are reached and at least one CMML participant has achieved a complete remission (CR) or a partial remission (PR), marrow response, or clinical benefit as defined by the MDS/MPN IWG 2015 criteria. In the AML cohort, backfilling may begin once at least one participant has achieved a response defined by ELN 2022 criteria. Dose expansion will occur upon completion of dose escalation in each cohort, using a Simon 2-stage adaptive design. Approximately 47 CMML and 58 AML patients may be enrolled in this phase 1 study. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of STX-0712 and to determine the minimal safe and biologically effective dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to characterize dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and pharmacodynamic effects of STX-0712 on CCR2+ malignant cells in blood and bone marrow. Key exploratory endpoints include: (1) assessment of changes in CCR2+ tumor cells following STX-0712 dosing, (2) evaluation of candidate biomarkers, (3) characterization of T cells, B cells and NK cells at baseline and over the course of treatment, and (4) to explore the effects of STX-0712 on patient-reported outcomes using the CMML Symptoms Assessment Tool (MPN-SAF-TSS scoring system) and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) for AML. Enrollment for Cohort 1 (CMML) began in March 2025, and the study is ongoing. Clinical Trial Information: NCT06950034

Background The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an effective treatment for wide‐neck aneurysms (WNA). This study aims to identify and compare anatomical and procedural factors that predicts the aneurysm occlusion, both adequate and inadequate after WEB device treatment. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, including studies up to October 25, 2024. Data on angiographic outcomes of WEB occlusion were extracted and analyzed using R version 4.4.2 Results Nine studies (790 patients) were included. Female patients were 1.64 times more likely to achieve adequate occlusion than males (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: [1.06, 2.52], p = 0.026). Regular‐shaped aneurysms had a 2.44‐fold higher likelihood of adequate occlusion compared to irregular ones (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: [0.23, 0.74]). Aneurysm neck size was significantly smaller in the adequate occlusion group (3.9 mm vs. 4.4 mm, MD: ‐0.48 mm, 95% CI: [‐0.78, ‐0.18], p = 0.002). Maximum aneurysm diameter was also smaller in the adequate occlusion group (5.7 mm vs. 6.8 mm, MD: ‐1.13 mm, 95% CI: [‐1.69, ‐0.57], p < 0.001). Aneurysm height was also significantly lower than the inadequate occlusion group (5.4 mm vs. 6.3 mm, MD: ‐0.92 mm, 95% CI: [‐1.55, ‐0.29], p = 0.004). Conclusion Smaller aneurysm dimensions, regular shape, and female gender were associated with higher adequate occlusion rates after WEB treatment. These findings may guide patient selection strategies for optimizing aneurysm occlusion. Further high‐quality studies are needed to confirm these associations. image image

Abstract Background Onco-hypertension, the interplay between cancer and hypertension, is an emerging specialty highlighting the bidirectional relationship between carcinogenesis, anticancer therapies, and blood pressure regulation. In Pakistan, data on physicians’ awareness and management of onco-hypertension are limited, yet critical given the rising global burden of cancer (24.5 million new cases; 9.6 million deaths in 2017) and hypertension (7.6 million annual deaths) worldwide. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May to October 2023 among physicians in oncology, internal medicine, cardiology, and allied specialties across tertiary hospitals, private clinics, and teaching institutions in Pakistan. A self-structured questionnaire, covering sociodemographic, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices, was distributed online and in person. Descriptive statistics summarized respondent characteristics, and inferential tests (t-tests, ANOVA) examined associations (p < 0.05). Results Mean respondent age was 37.5 ± 7.8 years; 58% male. Specialty distribution: internal medicine (45%), oncology (16%), cardiology (17%), nephrology (8%), pulmonology (13%), and others (1%). Nearly half (49%) rated their onco-hypertension knowledge as “average,” and 62% reported challenges managing hypertensive cancer patients. Key perceived causes in previously normotensive patients were anxiety (48%) and corticosteroid use (40%). Sixty-three percent sometimes adjusted antihypertensive regimens based on cancer therapies, and 80% endorsed the necessity of interdisciplinary coordination for optimal management. Conclusion Pakistani physicians demonstrate moderate understanding of onco-hypertension with prevalent management challenges. Findings underscore the need for targeted educational initiatives, validated clinical guidelines, and structured interdisciplinary collaboration to improve cardiovascular outcomes in cancer care.

Background Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with adverse cardiac events. Although troponin elevation is a diagnostic criterion for ICI‐related myocarditis (ICIrM) and myocardial infarction, data on other causes of troponin elevation and their outcomes in ICI‐treated patients are limited. Methods All patients treated with ICI who had hs‐TnT (high‐sensitivity troponin T) measured at a multicenter institution from 2011 to 2022 were included. Clinical data, outcomes (cardiac death, heart failure (HF), major adverse cardiovascular events [myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure]), and cause of hs‐TnT elevation were assessed. Risks of cardiac events were compared across hs‐TnT elevation causes. Results Of 5423 patients treated with ICI, 1669 had post‐ICI hs‐TnT measurement (mean age 68.7±11.3 years, 58.3% male), with 1‐year follow‐up. Hs‐TnT elevation in patients with ICIrM (n=59) was associated with the highest risk for cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR], 52.7 [95% CI, 11.7–238.0], P <0.001), followed by hs‐TnT elevation due to heart failure (HR, 15.9), myocardial infarction/type 2 ischemia (HR, 11.6), and infection/sepsis (HR, 5.7), compared with those with no hs‐TnT elevation. ICIrM also carried highest risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 8.2, [95% CI, 4.4–15.3], P <0.001), followed by myocardial infarction/type 2 ischemia (HR, 8.1), heart failure (HR, 7.6), pulmonary embolus (HR, 5.1), infection/sepsis (HR, 4.1), and indeterminate cause (HR, 2.4). Among ICIrM, HsTnT value >576 ng/L best predicted risk for cardiac death and >319 ng/L for major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusions Hs‐TnT elevation after ICI therapy is associated with increased risk of cardiac events, particularly in ICIrM, and a graded prognostic association depending on the cause of hs‐TnT elevation. Identifying the underlying cause and troponin thresholds may guide risk stratification and management.

Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 97 396 patients with measured Lp(a) and HDL-C. Groups were stratified by Lp(a) (≥50 vs. <50 mg/dl) and HDL-C [low (<40), optimal (40–60), high (>60 mg/dl)]. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier curve and Cox models. Results Over a median of 5.9 years, 7794 deaths occurred. Compared to optimal HDL-C/low Lp(a) (reference), high HDL-C/low Lp(a) had the lowest mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–0.91], while low HDL-C/high Lp(a) had the highest risk (aHR: 1.55; 1.41–1.71). High HDL-C protective effect was insignificant with elevated Lp(a) (aHR: 0.98; 0.89–1.08). Sex-stratified analyses revealed divergent effects: women with high HDL-C/high Lp(a) retained the HDL-C protective effect (aHR: 0.82; 0.72–0.93), whereas men faced increased risk (aHR: 1.22; 1.05–1.42). Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) enhances mortality risk despite elevated HDL-C levels, with sex-specific differences: women retain mortality benefits from high HDL-C despite elevated Lp(a), whereas men with concurrent elevations in HDL-C and Lp(a) experienced mortality risks comparable to those with low HDL-C. Findings underscore sex-specific CV risk stratification incorporating HDL-C and Lp(a), challenging the HDL-C universal protective role.

Background and Aims: With rapid changes in the management landscape of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), this technical systematic review addresses 4 critical Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions to provide guidance to the formulation of recommendations to the 2025 AASLD practice guideline for management of CHB. Approach: The review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated across 4 key PICOs: (1) antiviral therapy for prevention of horizontal HBV transmission in high-risk groups, (2) antiviral therapy versus observation for persons in the immune-tolerant phase, (3) discontinuation versus continuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative individuals with undetectable HBV DNA, and (4) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in non-cirrhotic individuals with HBsAg clearance or co-infections with HCV, HDV, or HIV. Results: For PICO 1, limited evidence suggests antiviral therapy may reduce horizontal transmission risk, though with low certainty. PICO 2 analyses reveal uncertain benefits of treating persons in the immune-tolerant phase, with very low certainty due to heterogeneity and bias. PICO 3 analyses demonstrate that discontinuing antiviral therapy in persons who are HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV DNA increases HBsAg loss rates (OR: 12.65, 95% CI: 1.58–101.51) but carries moderate risks of virologic relapse (OR: 47.17, 95% CI: 2.79–797.35) and clinical flares. PICO 4 analyses on several cohort studies showed that in patients co-infected with HCV, HBV, or HIV, the annual incidence of HCC was higher than the level where screening becomes cost-effective, suggesting that regular liver cancer screening could be beneficial for these patients. Conclusions: Despite low certainty, the findings support shared decision-making in high-risk horizontal transmission scenarios or in treating individuals in the immune tolerance phase, caution in discontinuing antiviral therapy in virologically suppressed individuals without HBsAg loss, and tailored HCC surveillance for those with co-infection or cirrhosis.

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are at increased risk for mortality. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in terms of mortality reduction has not been established in this population. Aim: To evaluate the survival benefit of CRT, either CRT-D or CRT-P, in a large cohort of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and reduced EF. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with confirmed CA and reduced EF (<40%) between 2009 and 2023 across Mayo Clinic sites. Patients were stratified into three groups: no device, CRT with pacemaker function (CRT-P), and CRT with defibrillator function (CRT-D). CRT devices were indicated for low ejection fraction less than 40% and patients who had chronic heart failure with a wide QRS. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated, and log-rank tests were used for comparison. A secondary analysis was conducted combining CRT-P and CRT-D versus no device (EF <40%), and a tertiary analysis compared CRT-P versus CRT-D. Results: Among 184 patients [36 AL (20%), 148 ATTR (80%)], 38 (19%) had no cardiac device and EF <40%, 20 (11%) received CRT-P, and 116 (63%) received CRT-D. The median follow-up was 3.4 years (1.7, 5.0). The probability of survival was significantly higher in the CRT group compared to the no device-EF<40 group (Log Rank p=0.013; figure B). Among patients receiving CRT, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between those receiving CRT-P and those receiving CRT-D (Log Rank p=0.5; figure C). Conclusion: In patients with cardiac amyloidosis and reduced EF, CRT is associated with significantly improved survival compared to no device. No mortality difference was observed between CRT-P and CRT-D. Prospective studies are warranted.

Background: Among cardiac amyloidosis subtypes, transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) has gained increased recognition with the development of disease-specific therapies. Tafamidis, a selective oral stabilizer of the transthyretin tetramer, has emerged as an effective treatment. In the broader heart failure landscape, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have become cornerstone therapies across the ejection fraction spectrum, improving survival and reducing hospitalizations in both HFrEF and HFpEF. However, the clinical benefit of combining Tafamidis with SGLT2i in ATTR remains largely unknown. Hypothesis: Combination therapy with Tafamidis and SGLT2i provides added clinical benefits in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with confirmed ATTR cardiac amyloidosis diagnosed via 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy and treated with Tafamidis alone or with an SGLT2i across three academic centers from January 2019 to February 2025. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used, adjusting for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ejection fraction (EF), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: Among the 1,211 patients included in the 3-year follow-up analysis,946 received Tafamidis monotherapy and 265 received a combination of Tafamidis and an SGLT2i. The mean age of the cohort was 71.9 years (SD ±9.4), and 87.3% were male. A total of 142 mortality events occurred, with a higher cumulative mortality rate observed in the tafamidis-only group (16.3%) compared to the combination group (9.4%) (log-rank p = 0.042). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, combination therapy with Tafamidis and an SGLT2i was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (adjusted HR =0.576, 95% CI:0.334–0.992, p =0.04). Additionally, increasing age (HR =1.049, 95% CI:1.024–1.074, p < 0.001) was associated with higher mortality, while EF(HR =0.971, 95% CI:0.958–0.984, p< 0.001) and GFR (HR =0.975, 95% CI:0.965-0.985, p< 0.001) were with lower mortality. Conclusion: Combination therapy with Tafamidis and SGLT2i was associated with improved survival compared to Tafamidis alone in ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and guide therapy optimization.

Background: High serotonin from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can result in carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) with severe valve dysfunction, often requiring valve replacement surgery. Lutetium-177 (Lu-177), a targeted radioactive isotope therapy, is increasingly utilized in the treatment of NETs; however, there is limited data on its impact on bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) in CaHD. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with stage IV metastatic NET who underwent BHV replacement at three tertiary centers in the United States. Patients were stratified by Lu-177 therapy, administered after valve replacement. A propensity matched cohort of CaHD patients with BHV who did not received Lu-177 was curated including age, sex, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) following surgery were evaluated for progression of BHV degeneration; rise in mean gradient or increase in grade of prosthetic/periprosthetic regurgitation (grade increase of ≥1 out of 5), from first TTE following surgery (TTE1) to most recent TTE (TTE2). Analysis was performed at the level of individual valves, recognizing that some patients had more than one valve implanted. To account for changes in Lu-177 exposure over time, we constructed a time-varying Cox proportional hazards model. Accounting for non-independence of multiple valves within the same patient, a clustered Cox model was fitted using robust standard errors. Mortality was compared between patients exposed to Lu-177 therapy and those not exposed. Results: 184 patients were identified, mean age 60.4 ± 10.3 years, 53.3 % male. Of these, 16 patients had Lu-177 therapy, with 45 individual BHVs within this group. Patients in the control group had a total of 60 BHVs. Across a median of 2.09 years [0.77-5.01] between TTE1 and TTE2, BHVs exposed to Lu-177 therapy demonstrated an increased risk of BHV degeneration (HR=2.44, 95% CI 1.05–5.69, p=0.038), accounting for the time between TTE1 and administration of Lu-177 and the non-independence of multiple BHVs within the same patient. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two cohorts (p=0.440). Conclusions: BHVs in patients with CaHD exposed to Lu-177 therapy demonstrated an increased risk of degeneration. These findings suggest an association between Lu-177 treatment and accelerated prosthetic valvular deterioration, warranting further investigation and close monitoring in this patient population.