Citations

Abstract Background The role of sequential blood culture time to positivity (TTP) as a surrogate marker for bacterial load and as a prognostic indicator in S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) is not well established in the literature. Methods We performed a single healthcare system, multi-site, retrospective review of adult patients with positive blood culture for S. aureus between January 2019 and December 2019. Sequential TTP was defined as the TTP of the first subsequent blood cultures obtained from patients with SAB for at least 24 hours. We adapted the previously described TTP ratio of < 1.5 as the cut-off for study groups. Infective endocarditis (IE) was defined according to modified Duke’s criteria. High-grade bacteremia was defined as the growth of the organism in two or more sets of blood cultures or growth in >50% of all bottles collected. Descriptive, comparative statistics and survival analysis were performed using Python 3 and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Results A total of 602 patients with SAB were identified, and 186 patients who met the study criteria were included. Sixty-nine patients (37%) were female, and the mean age was 63.6 years. Patients with initial TTP < 12 hours had higher 30-day and 90-day mortality than those with initial TTP ≥ 12 hours. Patients with TTP ratio of > 1.5 had higher rates of cardiac prosthetic device (30 [26.1%] vs. 9 [12.7%], p = .03) and high-grade bacteremia (106 [92.2%] vs. 56 [78.9%], p = .01). In univariate analysis, history of myocardial infarction, cardiac prosthetic device, and findings of high-grade bacteremia and native valve vegetation in echocardiogram were significant predictors for a TTP ratio of < 1.5. In multivariate analysis, native valve vegetation (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.84), and high-grade bacteremia (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.13- 0.77) were independent predictors (Table 1 and 2). No differences in 30- day or 90-day survival based on the TTP ratio were seen (Figure 1). Figure 1.Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and log rank test results based on time to positivity (TTP) of initial blood cultures and TTP ratio of sequential to initial blood culture The X-axis represents the days elapsed from the initial blood culture collection. Number of patients at risk and events are given below the x-axis for each group. 30-day and 90-day survival rates were significantly lower in patients with initial TTP of < 12 hours compared with those with ≥ 12 hours. There were no statistically significant differences in survival based on TTP ratio. Conclusion In patients with SAB, a second TTP to first TPP ratio of > 1.5 was associated with higher rates of presence of the cardiac prosthetic device and high-grade bacteremia. Initial TTP < 12 hours was associated with lower survival; however sequential TTP ratio didn’t predict mortality. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.

Abstract Background Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia requires weeks of IV antimicrobial therapy for treatment with antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASP) and first-generation cephalosporins being mainstays of therapy. While effective, use of these agents in the outpatient setting requires frequent dosing along with close toxicity monitoring through the duration of therapy. Ceftriaxone is an appealing alternative given daily dosing and tolerability, but efficacy in this setting remains uncertain. We sought to review outcomes of patients who received ceftriaxone versus an ASP and first-generation cephalosporins for definitive therapy of MSSA bacteremia. Methods Following IRB approval, we reviewed medical records of a retrospective adult cohort diagnosed with MSSA bacteremia treated with ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or an ASP between January 2018 and December 2019 at Mayo Clinic campuses. Treatment was defined as the antibiotic used in the outpatient setting. The primary outcome was 90-day treatment failure, defined as a composite of mortality and microbiologic relapse. Secondary outcomes were 30-day treatment failure and individual components of treatment failure. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze for an association between ceftriaxone use and the primary outcome after adjusting for factors that may also impact outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared utilizing a log-rank test for survival between groups. Results A total of 223 patients with the accompanying characteristics met study criteria (Table 1). Thirty-seven received ceftriaxone (16.5%) and 186 (83.4%) were treated with cefazolin or an ASP. Ninety and 30-day treatment failure were higher in those treated with ceftriaxone (27%, 8.1%) compared to cefazolin or an ASP (8.6%, 3.8%). Multivariable analysis for risk of 90-day treatment failure revealed a hazard ratio of 2.91 for ceftriaxone (Table 2) and a significant difference in event-free survival for those treated with ceftriaxone compared to cefazolin or an ASP (Figure 1). Conclusion Patients receiving definitive therapy with ceftriaxone for MSSA bacteremia experienced a higher rate of 90 and 30-day treatment failure and a lower rate of event-free survival as compared to those treated with cefazolin or an ASP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Background. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of older (50–65 y) type 1 diabetics with body mass index <35 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetics with body mass index <30 kg/m2 who received simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT) versus living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). All subjects had insulin-dependent diabetes. Methods. This is a retrospective single-center study from July 2003 to March 2021 with a median follow-up of 7.5 y. Results. There were 104 recipients in the SPKT and 80 in the LDKT group. The mean age was 56 y in SPKT and 58 y in LDKT. There were 55% male recipients in the SPKT group versus 75% in LDKT. The duration of diabetes was 32 y in SPKT versus 25 y in LDKT. The number of preemptive transplants and length of dialysis were similar. However, the wait time was shorter for LDKT (269 versus 460 d). Forty-nine percent of the LDKT recipients received the organ within 6 mo of being waitlisted compared with 28% of SPKT recipients (P = 0.001). Donor age was lower in the SPKT group (27 versus 41 y). The estimated 5-y death censored kidney survival was 92% versus 98%, and 5-y patient survival was 86% versus 89% for SPKT versus LDKT. Death censored kidney and patient survival, acute kidney rejection by 1 y, and BK viremia were similar between the 2 groups. There were 17 pancreas graft losses within 1 y of transplant, the majority related to surgical complications, and it was not associated with increased mortality. Conclusions. SPKT in selected recipients aged 50 and above can have excellent outcomes similar to LDKT recipients.

AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONAre chromosome abnormalities detected at Day 3 post-fertilization predominantly retained in structures of the blastocyst other than the inner cell mass (ICM), where chromosomally normal cells are preferentially retained?SUMMARY ANSWERIn human embryos, aneuploid cells are sequestered away from the ICM, partly to the trophectoderm (TE) but more significantly to the blastocoel fluid within the blastocoel cavity (Bc) and to peripheral cells (PCs) surrounding the blastocyst during Day 3 to Day 5 progression.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYA commonly held dogma in all diploid eukaryotes is that two gametes, each with ‘n’ chromosomes (23 in humans), fuse to form a ‘2n’ zygote (46 in humans); a state that remains in perpetuity for all somatic cell divisions. Human embryos, however, display high levels of chromosomal aneuploidy in early stages that reportedly declines from Day 3 (cleavage stage) to Day 5 (blastocyst) post-fertilization. While this observation may be partly because of aneuploid embryonic arrest before blastulation, it could also be due to embryo ‘normalization’ to a euploid state during blastulation. If and how this normalization occurs requires further investigation.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONA total of 964 cleavage-stage (Day 3) embryos underwent single-cell biopsy and diagnosis for chromosome constitution. All were maintained in culture, assessing blastulation rate, both for those assessed euploid and aneuploid. Pregnancy rate was assessed for those determined euploid, blastulated and subsequently transferred. For those determined aneuploid and blastulated (174 embryos), ICM (all 174 embryos), TE (all 174), Bc (47 embryos) and PC (38 embryos) were analyzed for chromosome constitution. Specifically, concordance with the original Day 3 diagnosis and determination if any ‘normalized’ to euploid karyotypes within all four structures was assessed.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSAll patients (144 couples) were undergoing routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in three IVF clinical settings. Cleavage-stage biopsy preceded chromosome analysis by next-generation sequencing. All patients provided informed consent. Additional molecular testing was carried out on blastocyst embryos and was analyzed for up to four embryonic structures (ICM, TE, Bc and PC).MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEOf 463/964 embryos (48%) diagnosed as euploid at Day 3, 70% blastulated (leading to a 59% pregnancy rate) and 30% degenerated. Conversely, of the 501 (52%) diagnosed as aneuploid, 65% degenerated and 35% (174) blastulated, a highly significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001). Of the 174 that blastulated, the ratio of ‘(semi)concordant-aneuploid’ versus ‘normalized-euploid’ versus ‘other-aneuploid’ embryos was, respectively, 39%/57%/3% in the ICM; 49%/48%/3% in the TE; 78%/21%/0% in the PC; and 83%/10%/5% in the Bc. The TE karyotype therefore has a positive predictive value of 86.7% in determining that of the ICM, albeit with marginally higher aneuploid rates of abnormalities (P = .071). Levels of abnormality in Bc/PC were significantly higher (P &lt; 0.0001) versus the ploidy of the ICM and TE and nearly all chromosome abnormalities were (at least partially) concordant with Day 3 diagnoses.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThe results only pertain to human IVF embryos so extrapolation to the in vivo situation and to other species is not certain. We acknowledge (rather than lineage-specific survival, as we suggest here) the possibility of other mechanisms, such as lineage-specific movement of cells, during blastulation. Ethical considerations, however, make investigating this mechanism difficult on human embryos.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSMosaic human cleavage-stage embryos can differentiate into a euploid ICM where euploid cell populations predominate. Sequestering of aneuploid cells/nuclei to structures no longer involved in fetal development has important implications for preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing. These results also challenge previous fundamental understandings of mitotic fidelity in early human development and indicate a complex and fluid nature of the human embryonic genome.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)This research was funded by Organon Pharmaceuticals and Merck Serono by grants to W.G.K. W.G.K. is also an employee of AdvaGenix, who could, potentially, indirectly benefit financially from publication of this manuscript. R.C.M. is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM133747. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. D.K.G. provides paid consultancy services for Care Fertility.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERN/A.