Citations

PURPOSE Antitumor activity in preclinical models and a phase I study of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS) was observed with selinexor. We evaluated the clinical benefit of selinexor in patients with previously treated DD-LPS whose sarcoma progressed on approved agents. METHODS SEAL was a phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients age 12 years or older with advanced DD-LPS who had received two-five lines of therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo twice weekly in 6-week cycles (crossover permitted). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included for safety analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02606461 ). RESULTS Two hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled (selinexor, n = 188; placebo, n = 97). PFS was significantly longer with selinexor versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; one-sided P = .011; medians 2.8 v 2.1 months), as was time to next treatment: HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; one-sided P < .0001; medians 5.8 v 3.2 months). With crossover, no difference was observed in overall survival. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade versus grade 3 or 4 with selinexor were nausea (151 [80.7%] v 11 [5.9]), decreased appetite (113 [60.4%] v 14 [7.5%]), and fatigue (96 [51.3%] v 12 [6.4%]). Four (2.1%) and three (3.1%) patients died in the selinexor and placebo arms, respectively. Exploratory RNA sequencing analysis identified that the absence of CALB1 expression was associated with longer PFS with selinexor compared with placebo (median 6.9 v 2.2 months; HR, 0.19; P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced, refractory DD-LPS showed improved PFS and time to next treatment with selinexor compared with placebo. Supportive care and dose reductions mitigated side effects of selinexor. Prospective validation of CALB1 expression as a predictive biomarker for selinexor in DD-LPS is warranted.

Thymic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare tumor, and its characteristics remain to be clarified. Here we investigated 20 cases of thymic MEC to systematically characterize its clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 19 to 80 y), there was a slight male predilection (3:2), and 44% of the patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis. The median tumor size was 6.8 cm in diameter, 55% were pT1 tumors, and 50% were TNM stage I tumors. When 4 tumor grading systems for salivary MEC (Armed Forces Institutes of Pathology, Brandwein, modified Healey, and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering) were employed, low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade tumors accounted for 35% to 70%, 5% to 25%, and 25% to 50%, respectively. Many histologic variants were noted, and 70% of the cases were classified as nonclassic variants. MAML2 rearrangement was detected in 56% of cases, and the fusion partner was CRTC1 in all cases. CRTC1-MAML2 fusion was associated with lower pT classification and lower TNM stage. The overall survival rate of all patients was 69% and 43% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Worse overall survival was associated with higher pT stage, higher TNM stage, residual tumors, greater tumor size, high-grade tumor histology (Armed Forces Institutes of Pathology and Memorial Sloan-Kettering, but not the other 2), and with the absence of CRTC1-MAML2 fusion. Of note, none of the patients with CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-positive tumors died during the follow-up. In conclusion, the clinicopathologic and molecular findings of thymic MEC presented here are expected to contribute to the management of this rare tumor.

Introduction: Timing of clinical grading has not been fully studied in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our primary objective was to identify at which time point the clinical assessment using the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale (WFNS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is most predictive of poor functional outcome. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on the association of clinical grading determined at presentation, nadir and post-resuscitation, and poor outcome. Poor functional outcome was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1-3 at 6 months. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Results: We identified 186 consecutive patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2002 and June 2008. Patients’ mean age was 56.9±13.7 years and 63% of the patients were women. Twenty-four percent had poor functional outcome (mortality was 17%). On univariable logistic regression analyses, GCS determined at presentation (OR=0.80; p<0.0001), nadir (OR=0.73; p<0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=0.53; p<0.0001), modified Fisher Scale (OR=2.21;p=0.0013), WFNS assessed at presentation (OR=1.92;p<0.0001), nadir (OR=3.51; <0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=3.91; <0.0001), intracerebral hematoma on initial CT (OR=4.55;p<0.0002), acute hydrocephalus (OR=2.29;p=0.0375), and cerebral infarction (OR=4.84; <0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only cerebral infarction (OR=5.80; 0.0013) and WFNS grade post-resuscitation (OR=3.43;<0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. Receiving operating characteristics/area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated that WFNS determined post-resuscitation had a stronger association with poor outcome (AUC=0.90) than WFNS assessed upon admission or at nadir. Conclusions: Timing of WFNS assessment affects its prognostic value. Outcome after aSAH is best predicted by rating WFNS after neurological resuscitation.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders arising from mature T cells, accounting for about 10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. PTCL-not otherwise specified is the most common subtype, followed by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase–negative, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. This discussion section focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of PTCLs as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for T-Cell Lymphomas.

Aims Early risk stratification is essential to guide treatment in cardiogenic shock (CS). Existing CS risk scores were derived in selected cohorts, without accounting for the heterogeneity of CS. The aim of this study was to develop a universal risk score (the Cardiogenic Shock Score, CSS) for all CS patients, irrespective of the underlying cause. Methods and results Within a registry of 1308 CS unselected patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital between 2009 and 2019, a Cox regression model was fitted to derive the CSS, with 30‐day mortality as main outcome. The CSS's predictive ability was compared to the IABP‐SHOCK II score, the CardShock score and SCAI classification by C‐indices and validated in an external cohort of 934 CS patients. Based on the Cox regression, nine predictors were included in the CSS: age, sex, acute myocardial infarction (AMI‐CS), systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pH, lactate, glucose and cardiac arrest. The CSS had the highest C‐index in the overall cohort (0.740 vs. 0.677/0.683 for IABP‐SHOCK II score/CardShock score), in patients with AMI‐CS (0.738 vs. 0.675/0.689 for IABP‐SHOCK II score/CardShock score) and in patients with non‐AMI‐CS (0.734 vs. 0.677/0.669 for IABP‐SHOCK II score/CardShock score). In the external validation cohort, the CSS had a C‐index of 0.73, which was higher than all other tested scores. Conclusion The CSS provides improved information on the risk of death in unselected patients with CS compared to existing scores, irrespective of its cause. Because it is based on point‐of‐care variables which can be obtained even in critical situations, the CSS has the potential to guide treatment decisions in CS.

Abstract Stroke represents a considerable burden of disease for both men and women. However, a growing body of literature suggests clinically relevant sex differences in the underlying causes, presentations and outcomes of acute ischaemic stroke. In a recent study, we reported sex divergences in lesion topographies: specific to women, acute stroke severity was linked to lesions in the left-hemispheric posterior circulation. We here determined whether these sex-specific brain manifestations also affect long-term outcomes. We relied on 822 acute ischaemic patients [age: 64.7 (15.0) years, 39% women] originating from the multi-centre MRI-GENIE study to model unfavourable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale &gt;2) based on acute neuroimaging data in a Bayesian hierarchical framework. Lesions encompassing bilateral subcortical nuclei and left-lateralized regions in proximity to the insula explained outcomes across men and women (area under the curve = 0.81). A pattern of left-hemispheric posterior circulation brain regions, combining left hippocampus, precuneus, fusiform and lingual gyrus, occipital pole and latero-occipital cortex, showed a substantially higher relevance in explaining functional outcomes in women compared to men [mean difference of Bayesian posterior distributions (men – women) = −0.295 (90% highest posterior density interval = −0.556 to −0.068)]. Once validated in prospective studies, our findings may motivate a sex-specific approach to clinical stroke management and hold the promise of enhancing outcomes on a population level.

Abstract Background Use of inflammatory biomarkers is common practice in ulcerative colitis (UC) management1. This study examined the utility of faecal calprotectin (FCP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin biomarkers and their combination, for predicting outcomes of clinical remission and disease control (composite of clinical, endoscopic and histologic disease activity measures2) in patients (pts) with UC under therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) or adalimumab (ADA) in the VARSITY study. Methods VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial evaluating VDZ (anti-α 4β 7 integrin) vs ADA (anti-tumour necrosis factor-α) treatment in pts aged 18–85 years with moderate-to-severe UC (NCT02497469; EudraCT:2015-000939-33). Pts received either VDZ IV infusions (300 mg) on Day 1 and at Weeks (WKs) 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46 or ADA SC injections (40 mg), total dose 160 mg at WK1, 80 mg at WK2, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter until WK50. In this post hoc analysis of data from 769 pts, the probability of clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no subscore &gt;1) and disease control (pt-reported outcome-2 [PRO2, Mayo subscores of stool frequency and rectal bleeding]; Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 [endoscopic improvement], and Robarts Histopathology Index score &lt;5, [absence of histologic active disease]) were assessed at WK52 based on baseline and WK14 levels of dichotomized FCP (high-risk: ≥100 µg/g), CRP (high-risk: ≥5mg/L), and albumin (high-risk: &lt;45 g/L) including the composite of high-risk CRP and FCP termed ‘inflammatory burden’ (IB). Results In comparison with biomarkers measured at baseline, FCP at WK14 was the most predictive of WK52 clinical remission after VDZ or ADA treatment3; WK14 FCP was also predictive of disease control using a combined endpoint of PRO2, endoscopy and histologic remission/response. VDZ-treated pts with low-risk FCP (&lt;100 µg/g) at WK14 had a 76% chance of achieving WK52 clinical remission vs 35% for pts with high-risk FCP (70% vs 33% for ADA-treated pts with low and high-risk FCP, respectively). VDZ-treated pts with IB (high-risk levels of FCP and CRP) at WK14 had a 16% chance of clinical remission at WK52 vs a 57% probability for this endpoint in pts without IB at WK14; the risk difference for this composite biomarker was 42% (Table). Conclusion The addition of CRP to FCP as a composite biomarker of IB at WK14 after treatment initiation can be a useful negative predictor of pts who are likely to achieve significant long-term benefits, including remission and disease control, with VDZ or ADA treatment. References 1. Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(5):1570-38. 2. Danese S, et al. J Crohn’s Colitis 2021;15(Suppl1):S305–S305. 3. Dulai PS, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(6):S-46–7.