Galinsky, Kevin J

Abstract Background Use of inflammatory biomarkers is common practice in ulcerative colitis (UC) management1. This study examined the utility of faecal calprotectin (FCP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin biomarkers and their combination, for predicting outcomes of clinical remission and disease control (composite of clinical, endoscopic and histologic disease activity measures2) in patients (pts) with UC under therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) or adalimumab (ADA) in the VARSITY study. Methods VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial evaluating VDZ (anti-α 4β 7 integrin) vs ADA (anti-tumour necrosis factor-α) treatment in pts aged 18–85 years with moderate-to-severe UC (NCT02497469; EudraCT:2015-000939-33). Pts received either VDZ IV infusions (300 mg) on Day 1 and at Weeks (WKs) 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46 or ADA SC injections (40 mg), total dose 160 mg at WK1, 80 mg at WK2, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter until WK50. In this post hoc analysis of data from 769 pts, the probability of clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1) and disease control (pt-reported outcome-2 [PRO2, Mayo subscores of stool frequency and rectal bleeding]; Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 [endoscopic improvement], and Robarts Histopathology Index score <5, [absence of histologic active disease]) were assessed at WK52 based on baseline and WK14 levels of dichotomized FCP (high-risk: ≥100 µg/g), CRP (high-risk: ≥5mg/L), and albumin (high-risk: <45 g/L) including the composite of high-risk CRP and FCP termed ‘inflammatory burden’ (IB). Results In comparison with biomarkers measured at baseline, FCP at WK14 was the most predictive of WK52 clinical remission after VDZ or ADA treatment3; WK14 FCP was also predictive of disease control using a combined endpoint of PRO2, endoscopy and histologic remission/response. VDZ-treated pts with low-risk FCP (<100 µg/g) at WK14 had a 76% chance of achieving WK52 clinical remission vs 35% for pts with high-risk FCP (70% vs 33% for ADA-treated pts with low and high-risk FCP, respectively). VDZ-treated pts with IB (high-risk levels of FCP and CRP) at WK14 had a 16% chance of clinical remission at WK52 vs a 57% probability for this endpoint in pts without IB at WK14; the risk difference for this composite biomarker was 42% (Table). Conclusion The addition of CRP to FCP as a composite biomarker of IB at WK14 after treatment initiation can be a useful negative predictor of pts who are likely to achieve significant long-term benefits, including remission and disease control, with VDZ or ADA treatment. References 1. Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(5):1570-38. 2. Danese S, et al. J Crohn’s Colitis 2021;15(Suppl1):S305–S305. 3. Dulai PS, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(6):S-46–7.

Abstract Purpose: This open-label, multicenter, phase IB/II study evaluated sapanisertib, a dual inhibitor of mTOR kinase complexes 1/2, plus exemestane or fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had previously progressed on everolimus with exemestane/fulvestrant and received ≤3 (phase IB) or ≤1 (phase II) prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients received sapanisertib 3 to 5 mg every day (phase IB), or 4 mg every day (phase II) with exemestane 25 mg every day or fulvestrant 500 mg monthly in 28-day cycles. Phase II enrolled parallel cohorts based on prior response to everolimus. The primary objective of phase II was to evaluate antitumor activity by clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks (CBR-16). Results: Overall, 118 patients enrolled in phase IB (n = 24) and II (n = 94). Five patients in phase IB experienced dose-limiting toxicities, at sapanisertib doses of 5 mg every day (n = 4) and 4 mg every day (n = 1); sapanisertib 4 mg every day was the MTD in combination with exemestane or fulvestrant. In phase II, in everolimus-sensitive versus everolimus-resistant cohorts, CBR-16 was 45% versus 23%, and overall response rate was 8% versus 2%, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea (52%), fatigue (47%), diarrhea (37%), and hyperglycemia (33%); rash occurred in 17% of patients. Molecular analysis suggested positive association between AKT1 mutation status and best treatment response (complete + partial response; P = 0.0262). Conclusions: Sapanisertib plus exemestane or fulvestrant was well tolerated and exhibited clinical benefit in postmenopausal women with pretreated everolimus-sensitive or everolimus-resistant breast cancer.