Citations

Abstract Background: Approximately 1% of all new cases of breast cancer (BC) occur in men. Care of male BC is largely based on extrapolation from treatment strategies and management of symptoms in women. The impact of BC diagnosis and therapy on Quality of Life (QoL) in women with BC is well documented. Comprehensive, prospective data about QoL in men treated for BC are sparse. Due to the lack of a validated male BC QoL questionnaire, we previously evaluated the QoL of the male BC using the original EORTC QLQ-C30 and breast module QLQ BR23 with “female” items replaced by male-specific items from the EORTC QoL prostate module (EORTC QLQ-PR25). The development of a validated worldwide questionnaire for male BC is sponsored by EORTC QoL Group and will be completed in cooperation with EORTC Breast Group and the International Male BC Program (a cooperation between EORTC-BCG, TBCRC, within the BIG and NABCG networks) Trial design: The evaluation of the QoL issues relevant for male BC, as well as the translation of issues into items to build the tool for QoL assessment in male BC will be carried out through four phases: 1. A systematic Literature review 2. Interviews with patients 3. Interviews with Health Care Professionals (HCP) 4. Consultation of experts in Oncology and QoL Inclusion criteria: • Histologically proven early BC or metastatic BC in male patients • Age ≥ 18 years • Ability to understand and fill out questionnaires • Written informed consent Exclusion criteria: • Other cancer in the past 5 years except non-melanotic skin cancer • Patients participating in interventional clinical studies with QoL as primary endpoint • Any condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol Aims: The study proposes to carry out an evaluation of the QoL issues relevant for male patients with BC, and translating the issues into questions to build the tool for an adequate QoL assessment in these patients. The specific aims are: 1) To carry out an evaluation of the existing EORTC QLQ-BR 45 (adapting for male BC) and for suitability of use in male BC patients 2) To carry out an evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 (adapting for male BC) for suitability of use in male BC patients 3) To provide recommendations to the EORTC on a suitable assessment approach to assess QOL in male BC Statistical methods: A systematic literature review to assess what factors are unique to male BC patients in influencing their QoL and what QoL measures exist for them will be performed. This will be conducted by reviewing all studies with male BC participants and including investigator brochures describing side effects in male BC patients, as well as by evaluating issues captured by other existing EORTC modules. The final list of potential QoL issues relevant to the male BC will be tested for relevance and importance in semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients and HCP. A total of 2-5 patients per year will be recruited from collaborating hospitals/countries. At least 40 in total will be interviewed before, during, or after treatment for male BC. At least 2 experts/country from the all collaborating centres will be included in the interview to discuss and consider the potential issues. Finally, the issue list will be translated into questions to build the tool for a QoL assessment in male BC patients. Present accrual and target accrual This study started in October 2019. A systematic literature review has been completed. Seventeen centres from worldwide are participating in the study. New centers may still join. Contact information for people with a specific interest in the trial Vesna Bjelic-Radisic E-Mail: Vesna.Bjelic-Radisic@helios-gesundheit.de Fatima Cardoso e-mail: fatimacardoso@fundacaochampalimaud.pt Citation Format: Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Fatima Cardoso, Joachim Weis, Eveline Bleiker, David Cameron, Galina Velikova, Karatzyna Pogoda, Samantha Serpentini, Kevin Punie, Rinat Yerushalmi, Erika Matos, Birgit Carly, Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic, Markus Fleisch, Zoe Luisa Probst, Sina Maria Schafer, Nicola Russell, Sofie Tombeur, Joanna Vermeij, Heidi Roelstraete, Kathryn Ruddy, Juan I Arraras, Andrew Bottomley. Adaption of the EORTC quality of life breast cancer module for male breast cancer - phase I [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-14-01.

Abstract The following guideline presents a series of recommendations based on published medical literature for use of the antinuclear antibody (ANA) test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens in the diagnostic evaluation, prognostic assessment, and monitoring of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. The guideline emphasizes the need for clinical evaluation to improve the usefulness of test results in patient management. Consideration is given to appropriate use of the generic ANA test in the initial evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of a systemic rheumatic disease, the evaluation of patients suspected of having lupus erythematosus, use in clinical situations in which the ANA test is required to establish a disease diagnosis, and identification of clinical situations in which the ANA test has little value. Sections are also devoted to recommendations aimed at improving the analytic methods used to detect and measure ANA and specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens and to the appropriate use of tests for specific autoantibodies in several disease situations that commonly occur in patients with suspected or documented systemic rheumatic diseases. Emphasis is placed on the use of these tests only in situations in which the test results can be expected to provide information necessary for clinical decision making. Those tests of limited medical usefulness and situations in which test results are likely to be misleading are also identified.

Abstract This guideline provides the recommendations of an expert panel for the clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients suspected of having a clinical condition that produces a monoclonal protein in serum or urine. The recommendations describe the clinical conditions in which a monoclonal protein should be sought, the optimal sequence of testing to diagnose and monitor these patients, and the most effective laboratory procedures.

Objective: This study aims to determine if outpatient opioid prescriptions are associated with future SUD diagnoses and overdose in injured adolescents 5 years following hospital discharge. Summary of Background Data: Approximately, 1 in 8 adolescents are diagnosed with an SUD and 1 in 10 experience an overdose in the 5 years following injury. State laws have become more restrictive on opioid prescribing by acute care providers for treating pain, however, prescriptions from other outpatient providers are still often obtained. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ages 12–18 admitted to 2 level I trauma centers. Demographic and clinical data contained in trauma registries were linked to a regional database containing 5 years of electronic health records and prescription data. Regression models assessed whether number of outpatient opioid prescription fills after discharge at different time points in recovery were associated with a new SUD diagnosis or overdose, while controlling for demographic and injury characteristics, and depression and posttraumatic stress disorder diagnoses. Results: We linked 669 patients (90.9%) from trauma registries to a regional health information exchange database. Each prescription opioid refill in the first 3 months after discharge increased the likelihood of new SUD diagnoses by 55% (odds ratio: 1.55, confidence interval: 1.04–2.32). Odds of overdose increased with ongoing opioid use over 2–4 years post-discharge (P = 0.016–0.025). Conclusions: Short-term outpatient opioid prescribing over the first few months of recovery had the largest effect on developing an SUD, while long-term prescription use over multiple years was associated with a future overdose.

PURPOSE The eastern corridor of Africa is affected by a high burden of esophageal cancer (EC), with > 90% of patients presenting with advanced disease. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been previously reported as safe and effective for palliation of malignant dysphagia in resource-limited settings; however, access is limited throughout Eastern Africa. METHODS In response to demand for palliative interventions for patients with dysphagia because of EC, the African Esophageal Cancer Consortium (AfrECC) partnered with the Clinton Health Access Initiative to improve access to SEMS in Eastern Africa. We undertook a stepwise implementation approach to (1) identify barriers to SEMS access, (2) conduct a market analysis, (3) select an industry partner, (4) establish regulatory and procurement processes, (5) develop endoscopic training resources, (6) create a medical device registry, and (7) establish principles of accountability. RESULTS Following an evaluation of market demand and potential SEMS manufacturers, Boston Scientific Corporation announced its commitment to launch an access program to provide esophageal SEMS to patients in Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi, and Zambia at a subsidized price. Parallel regulatory and procurement processes were established in each participating country. Endoscopy training courses were designed and conducted, using the Training-of-Trainers model. A device registry was created to centralize data for quality control and to monitor channels of SEMS distribution. Principles of accountability were developed to guide the sustainability of this endeavor. CONCLUSION The AfrECC Stent Access Initiative is an example of a multisector partnership formed to provide an innovative solution to align regional needs with a supply chain for a high-priority medical device.

AbstractThree sets of criteria (International Society of Amyloidosis [ISA], Palladini and Kastritis) were independently developed for staging, progression and response criteria to predict renal survival in patients with AL amyloidosis. We evaluated these criteria using a cohort of 495 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients with renal involvement using time to event competing risk analysis at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Only Palladini and Kastritis had a staging system and both predicted a higher risk of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the stage III vs stage I patients but only the Palladini model was predictive for stage II patients. At 3 months, risk of ESRD was significantly higher for Palladini and ISA renal progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8 [95% CI: 1.5–5.3, p = .001] and 2.5 [CI: 1.4–4.6, p = .004, respectively]), but renal response was not significantly protective; conversely, the risk of ESRD was not significantly higher for the Kastritis renal progression, but was significantly protective for the Kastritis renal responders (HR 0.38 [95% CI: 0.17–0.84], p = .017). Both progression and response with ISA, Palladini and Kastritis criteria were predictive of ESRD at 6 months and 12 months. While the Palladini staging criteria at baseline, and the ISA and Palladini criteria for progression at 3 months performed better than the Kastritis criteria at baseline and 3 months post‐treatment, the Kastritis criteria performed better for response 3 months after treatment. All three sets of criteria performed well at and after 6 months post‐treatment. These differences are important when choosing endpoints for clinical trials.

Objectives/HypothesisThe purpose of this study is to develop consensus on key points that would support the use of systemic bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), and to provide preliminary guidance surrounding the use of this treatment modality.Study DesignDelphi method‐based survey series.MethodsA multidisciplinary, multi‐institutional panel of physicians with experience using systemic bevacizumab for the treatment of RRP was established. The Delphi method was used to identify and obtain consensus on characteristics associated with systemic bevacizumab use across five domains: 1) patient characteristics; 2) disease characteristics; 3) treating center characteristics; 4) prior treatment characteristics; and 5) prior work‐up.ResultsThe international panel was composed of 70 experts from 12 countries, representing pediatric and adult otolaryngology, hematology/oncology, infectious diseases, pediatric surgery, family medicine, and epidemiology. A total of 189 items were identified, of which consensus was achieved on Patient Characteristics (9), Disease Characteristics (10), Treatment Center Characteristics (22), and Prior Workup Characteristics (18).ConclusionThis consensus statement provides a useful starting point for clinicians and centers hoping to offer systemic bevacizumab for RRP and may serve as a framework to assess the components of practices and centers currently using this therapy. We hope to provide a strategy to offer the treatment and also to provide a springboard for bevacizumab's use in combination with other RRP treatment protocols. Standardized delivery systems may facilitate research efforts and provide dosing regimens to help shape best‐practice applications of systemic bevacizumab for patients with early‐onset or less‐severe disease phenotypes.Level of Evidence5 Laryngoscope, 131:E1941–E1949, 2021

The recent development and clinical implementation of novel immunotherapies for the treatment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma have improved patient outcomes across subgroups. The rapid introduction of immunotherapeutic agents into the clinic, however, has presented significant questions regarding optimal treatment scheduling around existing chemotherapy/radiation options, as well as a need for improved understanding of how to properly manage patients and recognize toxicities. To address these challenges, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts in lymphoma to develop a clinical practice guideline for the education of healthcare professionals on various aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment. The panel discussed subjects including treatment scheduling, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the integration of immunotherapy and stem cell transplant to form recommendations to guide healthcare professionals treating patients with lymphoma.