Back to Authors

Kavanaugh, Arthur

Mayo Clinic

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Citations 3

Guidelines for Clinical Use of the Antinuclear Antibody Test and Tests for Specific Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens
Kavanaugh, Arthur, Tomar, Russell H., Reveille, John D. , Solomon, Daniel H. , Homburger, Henry A.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | January 28, 2021 | Volume: 124 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 71-81

10.5858/2000-124-0071-gfcuot Get It

Abstract The following guideline presents a series of recommendations based on published medical literature for use of the antinuclear antibody (ANA) test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens in the diagnostic evaluation, prognostic assessment, and monitoring of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. The guideline emphasizes the need for clinical evaluation to improve the usefulness of test results in patient management. Consideration is given to appropriate use of the generic ANA test in the initial evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of a systemic rheumatic disease, the evaluation of patients suspected of having lupus erythematosus, use in clinical situations in which the ANA test is required to establish a disease diagnosis, and identification of clinical situations in which the ANA test has little value. Sections are also devoted to recommendations aimed at improving the analytic methods used to detect and measure ANA and specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens and to the appropriate use of tests for specific autoantibodies in several disease situations that commonly occur in patients with suspected or documented systemic rheumatic diseases. Emphasis is placed on the use of these tests only in situations in which the test results can be expected to provide information necessary for clinical decision making. Those tests of limited medical usefulness and situations in which test results are likely to be misleading are also identified.
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Singh, Jasvinder A. , Bridges, S. Louis , Bannuru, Raveendhara R. , Sullivan, Matthew C. , Vaysbrot, Elizaveta E., McNaughton, Christine, Osani, Mikala C. , Parks, Deborah, Kavanaugh, Arthur, O’Dell, James R., Leong, Amye , Matteson, Eric L. , Drevlow, Barbara E., Ginsberg, Seth, Grober, James, Clair, E. William St. , Tindall, Elizabeth A., Miller, Amy S., Saag, Kenneth G. , Akl, Elie A. , Shmerling, Robert H. , Curtis, Jeffrey R. , Furst, Daniel E. , King, Charles M. , Schousboe, John T. , Grober, James, McAlindon, Timothy E. , Singh, Jasvinder A , Bannuru, Raveendhara R

Arthritis Care & Research | November 6, 2015 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-25

10.1002/acr.22783 Get It

ObjectiveTo develop a new evidence‐based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsWe conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences.ResultsThe guideline covers the use of traditional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat‐to‐target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional.ConclusionThis RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision‐making process taking into account patients’ values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Singh, Jasvinder A. , Bridges, S. Louis , Bannuru, Raveendhara R. , Sullivan, Matthew C. , Vaysbrot, Elizaveta E., McNaughton, Christine, Osani, Mikala C. , Parks, Deborah, Kavanaugh, Arthur, O’Dell, James R., Leong, Amye , Matteson, Eric L. , Drevlow, Barbara E., Ginsberg, Seth, Grober, James, Clair, E. William St. , Tindall, Elizabeth A., Miller, Amy S., McAlindon, Timothy E. , Saag, Kenneth G. , Akl, Elie A. , Shmerling, Robert H. , Curtis, Jeffrey R. , Furst, Daniel E. , King, Charles M. , Schousboe, John T. , Grober, James, Singh, Jasvinder A , Bannuru, Raveendhara R

Arthritis & Rheumatology | November 6, 2015 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-26

10.1002/art.39480 Get It

Objective To develop a new evidence‐based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences. Results The guideline covers the use of traditional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat‐to‐target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional. Conclusion This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision‐making process taking into account patients’ values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.