Citations

Background : Most older patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML cannot tolerate intensive treatment and are not eligible for curative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). 131I-apamistamab, an anti-CD45 radioimmunoconjugate, delivers high dose targeted radiation to hematopoietic cells, allowing for myeloablation and eradication of leukemic cells while sparing toxicity to healthy organs. 131I-apamistamab led induction and conditioning can thus provide these pts with access to alloHCT. Methods: The SIERRA trial (NCT02665065) is a multi-center, randomized, controlled Phase 3 study comparing the rate of durable complete remission (dCR) lasting >6 months (mos) after complete remission with/without platelet recovery (CR/CRp) between two groups: 131I-apamistamab led induction and conditioning followed by alloHCT vs physician's choice of conventional care (CC). Pts were randomized (1:1) to CC or 131I-apamistamab with fludarabine and total body irradiation (2 Gy) followed by alloHCT. CR/CRp assessment was 28-56 days post alloHCT or 28-42 days post initiation of therapy on the CC group. Pts in the CC group not achieving leukemia-free state could crossover (CO) to 131I-apamistamab. Here we report the results of a post hoc analysis to determine if the presence of various risk factors (i.e., Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) <90, HCT Comorbidity Index >3, age >65, adverse-risk cytogenetics, venetoclax failure prior to randomization) influenced achievement of dCR in pts treated with 131I-apamistamab. Results: In total, 153 pts were randomized (CC, n=76; 131I-apamistamab, n=77). All pts who received the therapeutic dose of 131I-apamistamab (n=66) underwent alloHCT vs 14 (18.2%) in the CC group. Of evaluable pts, dCR rates at 6 mos were 22% in the 131I-apamistamab group vs 0% in the CC group (95% CI;12.29, 34.73; p<0.0001). A total of 19 pts (13, 131I-apamistamab group; 6, CO) achieved dCR. Table 1 shows the pt, disease, and transplant characteristics of dCR vs. non-dCR pts. Eight of the 19 pts (42.1%) had primary induction failure and the median time to randomization from diagnosis was 5.4 mos. Approximately 50% of pts (9/19) had adverse-risk cytogenetics. Over 35% (7/19) of the pts had failed prior venetoclax and the median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1-5). A total of 10/19 (52%) pts had KPS of <90% and a comorbidity index of >3. There was no difference in the rate of dCR when stratifying by number of risk factors for a given pt (0 to 5) with 27% for pts with 0-1 risk factors, 14% for pts with 2-3 risk factors, and 11% for pts with 4-5 risk factors (p=0.251). Conclusion: Pts with R/R AML who have multiple risk factors such as adverse risk cytogenetics, age >65, venetoclax failure, high comorbidity index or poor KPS are typically not considered for alloHCT due to high transplant-related mortality and post-transplant relapse rates. 131I-apamistamab was effective in achieving durable responses in R/R AML pts irrespective of the presence of multiple risk factors and successfully enabled alloHCT in such pts due to its targeted mechanism of action.

Background: Richter Transformation (RT) refers to the development of an aggressive lymphoma in the setting of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Small molecule inhibitors (SMI), such as the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and BCL2 inhibitors (BCL2i), have revolutionized the treatment of CLL/SLL. Prior studies evaluated outcomes of patients (pts) with RT in an era where chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was typically used to treat CLL/SLL. Now that SMI are standard of care, fewer pts with CLL/SLL receive CIT, therefore we sought to determine which variables predict survival in pts who developed RT without prior CIT exposure for CLL/SLL. Methods: We conducted an international multicenter retrospective study of pts from 11 academic centers. Pts with RT occurring as large B-cell lymphoma who did not previously receive CIT (e.g., fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, chlorambucil) for their CLL/SLL were included. We collected pt, disease, and treatment (tx) characteristics. RT was categorized into 3 groups: “Concurrent RT,” defined as RT and CLL/SLL diagnosed simultaneously (within 3 months [mos]); “RT w/o prior CLL/SLL tx,” defined as RT and CLL/SLL diagnosed >3 mos apart with the CLL/SLL never treated; and “RT with prior non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL” defined as having received prior CLL/SLL tx. Overall survival (OS) was measured from RT diagnosis (Dx) and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Results: 242 pts were identified. At CLL/SLL Dx, 66% of pts had unmutated IGHV, 37% had del17p/ TP53 disruption, and 20% had trisomy 12. At RT Dx, 56% of the RT with prior non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL group had a del17p/ TP53 disruption versus 27% for the concurrent RT group and 18% for the RT w/o prior CLL/SLL tx groups. Median time from CLL/SLL Dx to RT Dx was 47 mos (range 3-394) for RT w/o prior CLL/SLL tx and 46 mos (range 4-218) for RT with prior non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL. Pts with prior non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL received a median of 1 (range 1-5) prior tx. 86% of pts previously received a BTKi or a BCL2i for tx of CLL/SLL (54% BTKi only, 5% BCL2i only, 27% both). The remaining 14% had been treated with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), steroids, lenalidomide, radiation, or alemtuzumab. 85% of pts developed RT while on active tx with SMI. Median age at RT Dx was 69 years (range 37-92). At RT Dx, 38% and 21% of pts had del17p/ TP53 disruption, and trisomy 12 in CLL/SLL tissue, respectively. At RT Dx, there was no difference in highest SUV on PET (median 16, range 2.9-65.6), LDH (median 325, range 103-8162, ULN range 180-271), largest lymph node in diameter (median 4.9 cm, range 0-17.1), Ki-67 (median 80%, range 5%-100%), rate of GCB subtype (27%), presence of MYC translocation (20%), or CLL/SLL and RT clonal relationship (81%) for those pts tested amongst the 3 groups ( Table). The most common 1 st line tx for RT was CIT with or w/o radiation and/or steroids (76%), followed by CIT plus SMI (13%), SMI single agent or combination (7%), and other (4%, which includes anti-CD20 MoAb). Median follow-up from RT Dx was 42.3 mos; the median OS for the entire cohort was 25.8 mos (95% CI: 16.8-49.1). Pts with RT after non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL had a significantly worse OS (median 8.2 mos [95% CI: 5.6-14.3]) than pts with concurrent RT (median 46.3 mos [95% CI: 23.8-96.9]) and RT w/o prior CLL/SLL tx (median 63.5 mos [95% CI: 28.3-70.3]) ( Figure). From an exploratory univariable analysis, we found RT after non-CIT tx for CLL/SLL compared to concurrent RT (HR 2.32 [95% CI: 1.55-3.46]), RT Dx age (HR for 5-year increase 1.14 [95% CI: 1.05-1.23]), del17p/ TP53 disruption (HR 2.27 [95% CI: 1.45-3.56]), and LDH (HR for 2-fold increase 1.37 [95% CI: 1.20-1.58]) were prognostic for worse OS. Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of pts who developed RT having received only SMI with no CIT for their CLL reported, thus reflecting the current treatment landscape. Despite being CIT-naïve, pts in our series who received tx for their CLL/SLL and then developed RT had a short OS, underscoring the need to develop better therapies for these pts. In contrast, as in other published analyses (Wang Haematologica 2020), pts w/o prior tx for CLL/SLL had more favorable outcomes, with a median OS of approximately 5 years. Further analysis to determine PFS and OS by tx for RT for pts who have been treated with SMI for their CLL/SLL is ongoing.

Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a rare, progressive, and often fatal protein misfolding disease. AL is caused by aberrant clonal plasma cell proliferation, where excess amounts of amyloidogenic monoclonal Free Light Chain (FLC) are produced, secreted into the circulation, misfolded and deposted as amyloid fibrils in various vital organs, such as the heart, kidney, liver, and nerves. The involed lambda (λ) FLC accounts for ~75% of all AL cases. Amyloidogenic FLCs (aFLCs) are believed to be the toxic species contributing to AL disease pathology. Specific quantification of aFLCs can provide critical guidance in clinical practice but has been hampered by the LCs sequence diversity as well as the lack of tests that are able to differentiate between circulating normal polyclonal FLCs and aFLCs. Contrary to non-amyloidogenic, aFLCs are kinetically and oftentimes thermodynamically unstable. aFLCs are prone to misfolding and formation of pathogenic conformations such as non-native structures, proteolytic fragments, soluble aggregates, and amyloid fibrils. We exploited such characteristics of aFLCs by applying limited proteolysis using Proteinase K, where less stable λ aFLC proteins readily yield a 23KDa fragment composed of the homodimeric LC constant domain (dLCCD) linked by a disulfide bond. Formation of the dLCCD fragment reveals a highly conserved, novel, cryptic epitope at the N-terminus of the fragment. We have generated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that explicitly bind to such novel epitope and developed immunoassays for the specific detection and sensitive quantification of λ aFLCs in biological samples. Western blot or Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) analyses were employed to detect and quantify dLCCD signal using the dLCCD mAbs on plasma samples from randomly selected, treatment naïve and λ-restricted cases with biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis before and after exposure to optimized proteolytic conditions. Tissue amyloid deposits of λ-type were confirmed in most AL cases. Informed consent for data and plasma sample collections were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Multiple myeloma (MM) plasma samples of unknown LC restriction type, treatment or amyloid deposits status and normal volunteer control samples were purchased from BioIVT (USA). A set of representative results based on three runs are shown in Fig. 1. As little as 2 µL of biofluid was used for each assay. Upon limited proteolysis, dLCCD signal was detected in 32 of 35 AL plasmas, including two samples from patients with AL-associated IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). Of the three dLCCD negative AL samples, one presented with monoclonal IgAλ, and two cases were bi-clonal on serum immunofixation electrophoresis. dLCCD signal was not detected in 18 of 19 MM plasma samples. Similarly, dLCCD signal was undetectable in 23 normal plasmas. Overall, the dLCCD signals detected in AL plasmas were 10x-200x above that of normal control and most MM samples (Fig. 1). The low limit of quantification of the MSD assay was ~0.4 ng/dL (1.4 pM), with >500x dynamic range, enabling sensitive and robust quantification of λ aFLCs in biosamples. Analysis of Proteinase K recognition potential of the cleavage site of 389 λ LC sequences from the AL-Base, a database of amyloidogenic LC sequences (https://wwwapp.bumc.bu.edu/BEDAC_ALBase/) predicted that the dLCCD assay can detect λ aFLCs in up to 99% of λ AL patients, irrespective of the FLC sequences. This was confirmed with the 100% detection rate of the dLCCD signal in a validation cohort of 35 additional monoclonal λ-restricted AL samples. In summary, we have developed a quantitative blood-based immunoassay that is sensitive and highly specific for λ aFLC irrespective of the protein sequences. The preliminary data demonstrates the potential of our assay for AL diagnostics. Additional clinical applications for future exploration will include (i) monitoring and early detection of AL amyloidosis in plasma cell dyscrasias (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, MM, and smoldering MM) and lymphoproliferative disorders, including LPL; and (ii) clinical management of patients with AL amyloidosis via the assessment and monitoring of minimal residual disease and therapeutic responses. The utility of the dLCCD assay in the quantification of λ aFLCs in bi-clonal AL cases warrants further investigation.

Abstract Background: DS-8201a is a HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugate with a topoisomerase 1 (top1) inhibitor payload. Preclinical evidence suggests that inhibiting PARP can potentiate top1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity. However, the clinical activity of combined top1-inhibiting chemotherapy and PARP inhibition has been limited by toxicity. We hypothesized that targeted delivery of a top1 inhibitor via DS-8201a may reduce systemic toxicity while maintaining synergistic cytotoxic activity in combination with olaparib. This combination is being investigated in the ongoing phase 1 trial CTEP #10355 (NCT04585958) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors expressing HER2. We present the safety analysis of pts enrolled to Module 1 (Mod 1) of dose escalation (continuous olaparib). Preliminary efficacy results are explored. Methods: Accrual was limited to pts ≥18 years old with advanced or recurrent solid tumors expressing HER2, defined as HER2 IHC ≥1+ (local testing allowed) or amplification of ERBB2 by NGS or ISH. In Mod 1, pts received DS-8201a IV once every 3 weeks and olaparib twice daily (BID) continuously in a 3+3 dose escalation design. Dose Level 1 (DL1) of Mod 1 evaluated DS-8201a dosed at 4.4mg/kg with olaparib 100mg BID Days 1-21. Dose Level 2 (DL2) of Mod 1 evaluated DS-8201a dosed at 5.4mg/kg with olaparib 100mg BID Days 1-21. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of combined DS-8201a + olaparib as graded by CTCAE v5. Secondary objectives include assessment of clinical activity as measured by objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR; partial response [PR] + complete response [CR] + stable disease [SD] ≥6 months [mo]), median progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: As of 30-Nov-2022, 10 pts were treated in Mod 1, with median age of 62.5 years. 10% were Asian, 10% were African American, and 80% were white. 40% had endometrial cancer and 60% had ovarian cancer. 6 of 7 pts treated on DL1 were DLT-evaluable, of which 1 patient experienced a DLT of Grade (G) 4 neutropenia. All 3 pts in DL2 were DLT-evaluable, and each experienced a DLT (2 pts with G4 febrile neutropenia, 1 pt with G4 neutropenia). Most common TRAEs in Mod 1 included: ANC decrease (60% G4, 20% G3, 20% G1/2), platelet count decrease (20% G4, 20% G3, 40% G1/2), and anemia (70% G3, 20% G1/2). All Mod 1 pts required dose holds, dose reductions, and/or discontinuation of olaparib. Of the 10 pts in Mod 1, 40% achieved a RECIST response (1 CR, 3 PR). 40% had SD lasting ≥6 mo, for a CBR of 80%. Median PFS is estimated at 7.4 mo (95% CI 4.7mo-not reached), with 7 patients alive and progression-free at 6 mo. Conclusion: Continuous dosing of olaparib in combination with DS-8201a yielded an unacceptable safety profile and dose escalation in Mod 1 was not continued. An alternative dosing schedule was initiated in Module 2 (Mod 2) evaluating DS-8201a IV every 3 weeks and olaparib BID Days 8-14; accrual to Mod 2 is ongoing. There is preliminary evidence of clinical activity of this combination. Citation Format: Elizabeth K. Lee, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Cheryl A. Pickett, Niya Xiong, Su-Chun Cheng, Madeline Polak, Hannah Sawyer, Martin Hayes, Ursula A. Matulonis, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos. A phase 1 study of DS-8201a in combination with olaparib in HER2-expressing malignancies (CTEP #10355): Results of module 1 dose escalation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B041.

Abstract Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by a germline mutation in the TP53 gene that confers an increased risk of developing cancers, including brain tumors. There is continued need to understand how LFS diagnosis impacts clinical management and outcomes of gliomas. We report the clinical course of two patients from our Neuro-Oncology. Patient 1 is a male who was diagnosed with a low-grade astrocytoma, IDH1 mutant at age 20 status post gross total resection. Given radiographic concern for tumor progression, he underwent re-resection 8 years later. Pathology showed gliosis with TP53-mutant cells. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was positive a germline TP53 mutation, consistent with LFS. He is currently in surveillance 12 years after diagnosis without need for radiation or chemotherapy. Patient 2 is a female who was diagnosed with glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated at age 40. She was asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis as the tumor was found during routine screening. She underwent gross total resection, radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. She is now 5 years from last treatment without recurrence. These cases illustrate the clinical spectrum of glioma in LFS. Both patients have had prolonged periods of survival without progression, even accounting for respective tumor type. Patient 1 was only diagnosed with LFS after radiographic concerns for progression. Using NGS to diagnosis LFS was clinically important, as previous reports have shown greater propensity for malignant transformation of low-grade glioma in LFS. Patient 2 was diagnosed with glioblastoma during screening and has had no recurrence. This highlights the value of early diagnosis and treatment of gliomas in patients with LFS, even if asymptomatic at discovery. Further research is needed to understand the clinical spectrum of glioma in LFS and to optimize the care of this unique patient population.

AbstractCancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium’s conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Background Electronic health record–linked portals may improve health-care quality for patients with cancer. Barriers to portal access and use undermine interventions that rely on portals to reduce cancer care disparities. This study examined portal access and persistence of portal use and associations with patient and structural factors before the implementation of 3 portal-based interventions within the Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium. Methods Portal use data were extracted from electronic health records for the 12 months preceding intervention implementation. Sociodemographic factors, mode of accessing portals (web vs mobile), and number of clinical encounters before intervention implementation were also extracted. Rurality was derived using rural-urban commuting area codes. Broadband access was estimated using the 2015-2019 American Community Survey. Multiple logistic regression models tested the associations of these factors with portal access (ever accessed or never accessed) and persistence of portal use (accessed the portal ≤20 weeks vs ≥21 weeks in the 35-week study period). Results Of 28 942 eligible patients, 10 061 (35%) never accessed the portal. Male sex, membership in a racial and ethnic minority group, rural dwelling, not working, and limited broadband access were associated with lower odds of portal access. Younger age and more clinical encounters were associated with higher odds of portal access. Of those with portal access, 25% were persistent users. Using multiple modalities for portal access, being middle-aged, and having more clinical encounters were associated with persistent portal use. Conclusion Patient and structural factors affect portal access and use and may exacerbate disparities in electronic health record–based cancer symptom surveillance and management.

Introduction: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a fibroblastic tumor with malignant potential that is underpinned by a recurrent inv12(q13q13)-derived NAB2::STAT6 fusion. Breast and axilla are uncommon locations for this entity. Methods: Records of two academic institutions were electronically searched for breast and axillary SFTs. Clinical and pathologic data were reviewed. Literature review for breast or axillary SFTs was performed. Present study and previously reported tumors were stratified using five SFT risk models: original and modified Demicco metastatic risk, Salas local recurrence risk, Salas metastatic risk, and Thompson local recurrence risk. Results: Five patients with breast or axillary SFT were identified. Median age was 49 years, and median follow-up (available for four patients) was 82 months. Three patients showed no evidence of disease, and one developed recurrence. Literature review identified 58 patients with breast or axillary SFT. Median age was 54 years, and median follow-up (available for 35 patients) was 24 months. Thirty-one patients showed no evidence of disease, three developed recurrence, and one developed metastasis. Original and modified Demicco models and Thompson model showed the highest sensitivity; original and modified Demicco models and Salas metastatic risk model demonstrated the highest specificity. Kaplan–Meier models were used to assess recurrence-free probability (RFP). Original and modified Demicco models predicted RFP when stratified by “low risk” and “moderate/intermediate and high risk” tumor, though sample size was small. Conclusions: While many SFTs of breast and axilla remain indolent, a subset may develop recurrence and rarely metastasize. The modified Demicco risk model demonstrated optimal performance characteristics.