Citations

Purpose In lung cancer, randomized trials assessing hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy seem to yield conflicting results regarding the effects on overall (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). The Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Collaborative Group decided to address the role of modified radiotherapy fractionation. Material and Methods We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer, which included trials comparing modified radiotherapy with conventional radiotherapy. Results In non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 10 trials, 2,000 patients), modified fractionation improved OS as compared with conventional schedules (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.97; P = .009), resulting in an absolute benefit of 2.5% (8.3% to 10.8%) at 5 years. No evidence of heterogeneity between trials was found. There was no evidence of a benefit on PFS (HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.03; P = .19). Modified radiotherapy reduced deaths resulting from lung cancer (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P = .02), and there was a nonsignificant reduction of non–lung cancer deaths (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.15; P = .33). In small-cell lung cancer (SCLC; two trials, 685 patients), similar results were found: OS, HR = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.02, P = .08; PFS, HR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03, P = .11. In both NSCLC and SCLC, the use of modified radiotherapy increased the risk of acute esophageal toxicity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44 in NSCLC and OR = 2.41 in SCLC; P < .001) but did not have an impact on the risk of other acute toxicities. Conclusion Patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC derived a significant OS benefit from accelerated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy; a similar but nonsignificant trend was observed for SCLC. As expected, there was increased acute esophageal toxicity.

Abstract Background: We have previously reported the results of surgical excision without irradiation for selected patients with DCIS in ECOG E5194, where the 5-year rates of local recurrence varied with age, grade, and lesion size (Hughes et al. J Clin Oncol 27:5319, 2009). New methods are needed to provide more accurate and reproducible assessment of recurrence risk. Methods: ECOG E5194 included 670 eligible patients with DCIS treated with surgical excision (≥ 3 mm negative margins) without irradiation, 228 of whom received tamoxifen. Patients had low or intermediate grade DCIS ≤ 2.5 cm, or high grade DCIS ≤ 1 cm. The Oncotype DX® assay was performed by quantitative RT-PCR using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor specimens from 327 patients (49% of the parent study). Recurrence Score® (RS) was calculated using the published algorithm. A new, prespecified DCIS Score™ was designed to predict recurrence using an optimized gene expression algorithm. The primary objective was to determine whether there was a significant association between the risk of an ipsilateral breast event (IBE) and the continuous DCIS Score in Cox models. 46 patients had an IBE (defined as ipsilateral local recurrence of DCIS [n=20] or invasive cancer [n=26]). Median follow-up was 8.8 years. Results: The 10-year IBE rates were 15.4% for low/intermediate grade DCIS and 15.1% for high-grade DCIS (as determined by central pathology review), and for invasive IBE, 5.6% and 9.8%, respectively. Comparison between local and expert grading showed substantial disagreement. Continuous DCIS Score was significantly associated with IBE (HR 2.34 per 50 units; 95% CI 1.15, 4.59; p=0.02) when adjusted for tamoxifen use (prespecified primary analysis) and with invasive IBE (HR 3.73; CI 1.34, 9.82; p=0.01). DCIS Score was significantly associated with outcome when evaluated by the prespecified risk groups (see Table). Similar results were observed with and without adjustment for tamoxifen use or for negative margin width. Features associated with IBE in multivariate models included menopausal status (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27, 0.90; p=0.02), tumor size (HR 1.52 per 5 mm; 95% CI 1.11, 2.01; p=0.01), and continuous DCIS Score (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.15, 4.89; p=0.02). The standard RS, which is calculated using thresholding of many genes unlike the DCIS Score, was not associated with IBE or invasive IBE (p &gt; 0.6). Conclusions: We have prospectively validated a multigene assay that quantifies recurrence risk and complements traditional clinical and pathologic factors in selected patients with DCIS treated with surgical excision without irradiation. The DCIS Score provides a new clinical tool for individualized selection of treatment for patients with DCIS. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-6.

Abstract Background: Unstained recuts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues are commonly collected for cooperative group studies. There is concern among pathologists that improper storage conditions can lead to antigen degradation. In an effort to quantify this effect, we compared the expression of HER1 and HER2 on two sets of identical cohort tissue microarrays (TMAs) from the N9831 HER2+ adjuvant phase III trial (NCT00005970; www.clinicaltrials.gov); one freshly cut set (cut April 18, 2011) and a second set stored at 4 degrees for over two years (cut between Nov, 2007 and Jan, 2008). Methods: The two sets of TMA slides containing 1580 tumor samples from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence. HER1 was tested with D38B1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and HER2 with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) on tumors from 695 patients (712 specimens) in the fresh TMAs and 779 patients (800 specimens) in the old TMAs in up to three-fold redundancy per specimen. Results: Frequency distributions of the expression of HER2 revealed bimodality in the fresh TMAs compared to an attenuated distribution of the old cases. The average score of the entire cohort was significantly lower in old TMAs compared to fresh cuts (paired t-test, p&lt;0.0001). Linear regression of the average HER2 scores from new TMAs versus the average scores from old TMAs showed a slope term of 0.52, which is statistically significantly different from the hypothetical value of 1 (p&lt;0.0001). Regressions between any two fresh slides showed slopes close to 1.0. Similar results were seen for HER1, but fewer positive cases made the changes less dramatic. Conclusions: The storage condition of tissue slides is a critical pre-analytical variable that can dramatically lower the score of HER1 and HER2, artificially. Thus, studies done on inadequately stored slides, either whole sections or TMAs, must be interpreted with caution. Tissue collection and analysis of biomarkers for cooperative group studies should not include unstained recuts, but rather, entire blocks or large cores from tissue blocks. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-04.

Abstract Background: Activation of oncology trials is a lengthy and complex process. Recent literature has identified numerous opportunities to improve activation timelines1, 2. The Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) has implemented several processes to identify and overcome myeloma clinical trial activation barriers within the consortium network of 14 North American cancer centers. We examined the impact of these processes preand post- implementation and also compared activation times with published clinical trial metrics data. Methods/Results: 12 MMRC-facilitated trials had sufficient trial data available for review within the study period of May 2006 to March 2009. Activation time was defined as the time from a center's receipt of the final clinical trial protocol from the sponsor, to the time the first patient was enrolled into a trial at any MMRC participating center. The earlier group (EG) of MMRC trials (n=7) required a mean of 257 calendar days for activation, comparable to the mean published data of 251 calendar days1. The more recent group (RG) of MMRC trials (n=5) required a mean of 158 calendar days for activation, representing a 38% shortening of activation time. Additionally, implementation of standardized processes and rigorous project management resulted in a reduction in activation times for all MMRC centers in a given trial from a mean of 7.5 months to a mean of 5.1 months. Improving the mean time of several several specific steps in the process including time to initial protocol review submission from receipt (EG=37 vs. RG=19 days), scientific review committee time (EG=98 vs. RG=55 days), and the time from trial opening to first patient dosed (EG=74 vs. RG=27 days) contributed to the overall decrease in activation times. The EG metrics data are comparable to published data1 for each process step. Conclusion: The MMRC member institutions have seen substantial improvements in trial activation times and are in the process of implementing additional processes to further improve protocol development and trial conduct metrics. The efficiencies and process improvements realized from application of rigorous MMRC project management resources and the standardization of contracting and other key activities may be applied in other areas of oncology clinical trials beyond multiple myeloma. With increasing numbers of new oncology agents to be evaluated and greater pressure on trial sponsors to introduce efficiencies into trial timelines, overcoming such barriers is of critical importance. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B58.

AbstractCellular and interpatient heterogeneity and the involvement of different stem and progenitor compartments in leukemogenesis are challenges for the identification of common pathways contributing to the initiation and maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we used a strategy of parallel transcriptional analysis of phenotypic long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), short-term HSCs, and granulocyte-monocyte progenitors from individuals with high-risk (−7/7q−) AML and compared them with the corresponding cell populations from healthy controls. This analysis revealed dysregulated expression of 11 genes, including IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP), in all leukemic stem and progenitor cell compartments. IL1RAP protein was found to be overexpressed on the surface of HSCs of AML patients, and marked cells with the −7/7q− anomaly. IL1RAP was also overexpressed on HSCs of patients with normal karyotype AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, suggesting a pervasive role in different disease subtypes. High IL1RAP expression was independently associated with poor overall survival in 3 independent cohorts of AML patients (P = 2.2 × 10−7). Knockdown of IL1RAP decreased clonogenicity and increased cell death of AML cells. Our study identified genes dysregulated in stem and progenitor cells in −7/7q− AML, and suggests that IL1RAP may be a promising therapeutic and prognostic target in AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.