Citations

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to quantify and compare the evidence on the results obtained with the surgical treatments for meniscal lesions in athletes. Methods A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science in August 2025 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies (randomised controlled trials [RCTs], non‐randomised comparative studies and case series), ≥6 patients, in the English language, on the surgical treatment of meniscal lesions in athletes. A meta‐analysis was conducted on the rate of patients returning to sport, the time to return to sport, and the rate of patients returning to the pre‐injury level of sport. Patient‐reported outcome measures, adverse events, failures and reoperation rates, as well as risk of bias and quality of evidence, were also documented. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, the Cochrane ROBINS‐I tool, and the JBI Critical appraisal checklist. The quality of evidence was assessed using a modified Coleman score and the GRADE tool. Result The mean time to return to sport was 2.1 months for meniscectomy, 5.8 months for meniscal repair, and 8.9 months for meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Statistically significant differences were observed between meniscectomy and repair and between meniscectomy and MAT (both p < 0.001). Meniscectomy showed a return to sport rate of 98.2%, meniscal repair of 96.9%, and MAT of 94.2%, while return to the same pre‐injury level of sport was reported as 84.4% for meniscectomy, 81.3% for meniscal repair, and 77.4% for MAT, with no statistically significant differences between groups. The mean modified Coleman Methodology Score for the included studies was 66.6 ± 7.0. Conclusion Meniscectomy, meniscal repair, and MAT are all able to provide high rates of return to sport in athletes. In the investigated treatment cohorts, meniscectomy presented the shortest pooled time to return to sport, followed by meniscal repair and MAT. Importantly, all treatments offered good rates of return to the same level of athletic performance. The treatment choice should be guided by an individualised, multidisciplinary approach aimed at providing a patient‐tailored treatment strategy to optimise both athletic recovery and joint preservation. Level of Evidence Level I.

Introduction In recent years collared femoral stems have been increasingly utilized in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for their ability to improve rotational stability, metaphyseal load transfer, and prevent periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF). While literature has demonstrated their benefit over collarless stems, the clinical and biomechanical implications of a postoperative collar–calcar gap (CCG) after implantation remain incompletely understood. Objective The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate existing literature around CCG in primary THA. Methods A PRISMA Scoping Review literature search was conducted across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they reported CCG incidence, subsidence, remodeling, or biomechanical performance in primary THA. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data, and clinical study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 408 studies were identified and 11 met inclusion criteria. The incidence of postoperative CCG varied from 18.7% to 53.9%. Most gaps demonstrated closure over time (66–76%). Biomechanical and finite element studies showed improved stability, reduced micromotion, and decreased periprosthetic fracture risk when direct collar–calcar contact was achieved. In contrast, stems with persistent gaps demonstrated increased subsidence (up to 19% vs 1.3%) and biomechanical behavior comparable to collarless designs. Conclusion CCG is common following THA. The majority of gaps resolve, however biomechanical evidence demonstrates that the advantages of collared stems depend on calcar contact. Preventing CCG may optimize early implant stability, though surgical technique must balance mechanical engagement with preservation of proximal femoral bone stock.

Abstract Machine learning (ML) enables adaptive immune receptor repertoires (AIRRs) analyses for biomarker identification and therapeutic development. With the majority of AIRR data partially or imperfectly labeled, unsupervised ML is essential for motif discovery, biologically meaningful clustering, and generation of novel receptor sequences. However, no unified framework for unsupervised ML exists in the AIRR field, hindering the assessment of model robustness and generalizability. Here, we present an immuneML release advancing unsupervised ML in the AIRR field through unified clustering workflows, interpretable generative modeling, integration with protein language model embeddings, dimensionality reduction, and visualization. We demonstrate immuneML’s utility in three use cases: (i) benchmarking generative models for epitope-specific sequence generation, assessing specificity and novelty, (ii) systematic evaluation of clustering approaches on experimental receptor sequences against biological properties, such as epitope specificity and MHC, and (iii) unsupervised analysis of an experimental AIRR dataset to examine potential confounding, a practice widespread in related fields but unexplored in AIRR analyses.

We previously reported initial results of the pivotal phase II trial of atezolizumab for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03141684 ). Here, we report on three additional years of observation. Fifty-three patients with ASPS received atezolizumab. Median duration of response increased to 37.0 months. Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) remained essentially as previously reported (35.8% [95% CI, 23.1 to 50.2] and 20.8 months [IQR, 7.6-not reached], respectively). ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion type was determined for 47/53 patients; ORR and mPFS were higher among the 41 patients expressing type 1 (43.9% [95% CI, 28.5 to 60.2] and 28.3 months [IQR, 9.2-not reached], respectively) than the six patients expressing type 2 (0% [95% CI, 0 to 45.9] and 7.5 months [IQR, 3.9-not reached], respectively, PFS HR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.01 to 10.2]). Eleven patients chose a per-protocol drug holiday (range, 3.5-26.4 months) after ≥2 years of treatment; two experienced disease progression during the holiday. Nine eligible patients elected to receive bevacizumab plus atezolizumab after progressing on monotherapy; ORR was 0% and mPFS was 18.5 months (IQR, 7.9-21.1) in this small cohort. Long-term results support using atezolizumab to treat ASPS, even for several years; a drug holiday with careful monitoring may be an option for some patients.

Abstract Introduction: Epoxy fatty acid (EpFA) mechanisms of hormone therapy resistance (HTR) in ER+HER2- breast cancer (BC) are poorly understood. EETs are EpFAs that contribute to BC progression and HTR by promoting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). However, it remains unclear how EETs contribute to HTR. In this study, two fulvestrant resistant (FR) subclones of the letrozole resistant (LR) MCF-7AC1 line were isolated (termed LR/FR) and were incidentally resistant to the CDKi palbociclib (PR) (termed MCF-7AC1 LR/FR/PR or multiply resistant - MCF-7AC1 MR). These HTR cell lines exhibited CYP3A4 upregulation (2.3- to 4.3-fold) and increased cellular (±)14,15-EET levels, which were suppressed by biguanide treatment (P&lt;0.05). Structure activity studies led to the design of hexyl cuban-1-yl biguanide (HCB) and fluorinated HCB derivatives C5F2-HCB and C6F3-HCB, which inhibited CYP3A4-mediated EET biosynthesis and growth of the HTR lines. HCB fluorination improved pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity. Methods: HCB and fluorinated HCBs were tested for impact on EET biosynthesis, OXPHOS, PK, and growth inhibition and reversal of hypoxia in the MCF-7AC1 MR tumor model. Results: Fulvestrant selection for MCF-7AC1 MR cell lines resulted in undetectable cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor (ERα) expression, while cyclin E1, CDK4, CDK6, CYP3A4, and c-MYC were upregulated (P&lt;0.001). MCF-7 MR cells demonstrated 1.8, 1.4, and 1.2- fold higher levels of (±)8,9, (±)11,12, and (±)14,15-EET compared to parental MCF-7 cells (P&lt;0.05). The most potent fluorinated HCB, C6F3-HCB, suppressed cellular levels of (±)8,9-EET, (±)11,12-EET, and (±)14,15-EET by 53-60% (P&lt;0.029). The MCF-7AC1 MR cells were more potently inhibited by HCBs and fluorinated derivatives compared to the MCF-7 cell line. Comparing an MCF-7 MR line vs. MCF-7, HCB exhibited IC50 values of 4.1 vs. 7.0 uM, C5F2-HCB 10 vs. 25 uM, and C6F3-HCB 5.4 vs. 12 uM (P values all &lt;0.05). C5F2-HCB exhibited the best PK and treatment of the MCF-7AC1 MR xenograft model showed reversal of hypoxia (P&lt;0.05) and transient inhibition by C5F2-HCB (P=0.025 at 20 days). P/F also transiently inhibited this model (P=0.006 at 20 days). C5F2-HCB and P/F showed synergy in vitro (CI=0.46) leading to testing of C5F2-HCB/P/F in vivo enabled by acceptable toxicity of the triplet in mice. This combination showed synergy in vivo vs. standard of care palbociclib/fulvestrant by nonparametric statistical tests (Mann Whitney; P=0.0389; Kolmogorov-Smirnov; P=0.0473), providing a pathway for possible clinical development of the combination. Conclusions: MR BC cell lines exhibit upregulation of CYP3A4 and biosynthesis of EETs, indicating a role for EETs in HTR. The C5F2-HCB/P/F exhibits activity against the highly resistant MCF-7 MR xenograft with acceptable toxicity indicating an avenue for clinical development. Citation Format: Zhijun Guo, Jianxun Lei, Christian T. Wells, Allison M. Makovec, Andrew C. Yates, Swaathi Jayaraman, John R. Hawse, Joshua A. McCarra, Qing Cao, Michael J. Pryzbilla, Brenda L. Koniar, Beverly J. Norris, Craig M. Florey, Robert J. Schumacher, Michael A. Farrar, Kaylee L. Schwertfeger, Elizabeth A. Ambrose, Henry Wong, Gunda I. Georg, Antonino D'Assoro, Matthew P. Goetz, David A. Potter. Fluorinated cuban-1-yl biguanides overcome hormone therapy resistance to standard of care fulvestrant, and palbociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB196.

Abstract Background: Pyrimidine synthesis is a therapeutic vulnerability in cancer but inhibition results in toxicity to normal cells. Differential targeting of CTP synthase 1 (CTPS1), sparing the CTPS2 isoenzyme, is a therapeutic strategy in lymphoid cancers, supported by human genetic studies, that can potentially avoid toxicity; however, CTPS2 activity may compensate in epithelial tumours. Loss of CTPS2 protein expression characterises 25% of solid tumours and is predicted to expose a synthetic lethal vulnerability to CTPS1 inhibition. Dencatistat (STP938) is a first in class oral CTPS1 inhibitor showing &gt;1,300-fold selectivity over CTPS2. In preclinical studies, CTPS2 expression was confirmed as a key modulator of response to CTPS1 inhibition, and dencatistat induced tumour regression in an in vivo model of CTPS2 negative ovarian cancer. Study design: The study comprises a standard 3+3 phase 1a dose escalation design, in which intra-patient dose escalation is encouraged, followed by a phase 1b safety expansion. The dose escalation study is recruiting participants with high grade advanced tumours who have exhausted standard of care therapy (excluding haematological cancers, salivary gland tumours and low grade tumours of any tissue). In addition, participants with high grade serous ovarian cancer whose tumours lack expression of CTPS2 (per central laboratory testing by immunohistochemistry) are eligible for backfill into cleared cohorts during dose escalation. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) will be nominated based on safety, tolerability, target engagement and early signs of clinical efficacy. The phase 1b safety expansion study will recruit participants with CTPS2 negative ovarian, lung or endometrial cancer who will receive treatment at the RP2D. Standard inclusion criteria apply; patients with ECOG performance score &gt;2 (&gt;1 for phase 1a in France) or active/symptomatic CNS metastases are not eligible. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single agent dencatistat and to determine the RP2D for further development. Secondary objectives comprise evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties and preliminary clinical activity. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of target engagement, molecular features associated with response, and determination of drug metabolites. The study opened to enrolment in the UK, France and USA in September 2024 and is currently in dose escalation (NCT06297525). The phase 1b study is expected to commence mid-2026 and will include additional centres in Spain. Citation Format: Donna M. Graham, David Sommerhalder, Douglas Orr, Rowan Miller, Neeharika Makani, David O'Malley, Ira Winer, Philip A. Beer, Karen Smith, Maureen Higgins, John R. Hawse, Xiyin Wang, Saravut J. Weroha, Christophe Massard, Patricia Roxburgh. Lack of CTPS2 expression exposes synthetic lethal vulnerability to selective CTPS1 inhibition: A phase 1 dose escalation study of dencatistat (STP938) with safety expansion in biomarker selected cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT075.

Abstract Despite long-standing interest in combining topoisomerase I (TOP1) poisons with PARP inhibitors (PARPis), the mechanistic basis for the variable and often unpredictable response to this strategy remains unclear. Early preclinical studies suggested that PARP inhibition amplifies TOP1 poison-induced DNA damage, implying broad therapeutic potential; however, emerging translational and clinical data—particularly in ovarian cancer—indicate that synergy is context-dependent and governed by tumor-intrinsic features that have not been fully defined.Here we assessed determinants of response in five HR proficient ovarian cancer (OC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) previously treated with the SN-38 prodrug etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in combination with the PARPi rucaparib (C. Nitschmann, Clin. Cancer Res. 22(2) Suppl. B50, 2016). Although all models were refractory to single-agent rucaparib, 50% exhibited enhancement of NKTR-102-induced tumor regression with the addition of rucaparib. Neither PARP1 abundance nor extent of rucaparib-mediated poly(ADP-ribose) suppression correlated with therapeutic benefit. Instead, sensitization was restricted to PDXs intrinsically responsive to NKTR-102 and was strongly associated with high levels of NKTR-102-induced TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. In further analysis, 2 of 3 resistant PDXs exhibited high levels of the ABC transporter ABCG2 despite lack of previous therapy, revealing a previously underappreciated mechanism of de novo resistance that limits effective TOP1 inhibitor activity independent of homologous recombination status. Notably, NKTR-102 response did not track with platinum/taxane sensitivity, highlighting the distinct molecular circuitry governing TOP1 poison susceptibility.Collectively, these findings demonstrate that rucaparib can potentiate NKTR-102-induced regression in tumors capable of forming abundant TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. This work identifies TOP1-DNA complex trapping and lack of ABCG2 expression as mechanistic predictors of benefit, providing an updated framework for selecting patients most likely to respond to TOP1 poison/PARPi combinations and challenging the long-standing assumption that PARP inhibition can universally resensitize tumors to TOP1 poisons. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Caroline C. Nitschmann, Karen S. Flatten, Rachel Hurley, Xiaonan Hou, Cristina Correia, Paula A. Schenider, Krista Goergen, Matthew Maurer, Ethan P. Heinzen, Ann L. Oberg, S John Weroha, Paul Haluska, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher. TOP1-DNA protein complex as a predictive biomarker for NKTR-102/Rucaparib combination therapy in PARP-inhibitor resistant ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB364.

Abstract Introduction: Epigenetic modulators may sensitize platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) to immune checkpoint inhibition by reprogramming the tumor microenvironment. Methods: We report clinical and translational findings from a phase II non-randomized study of pembrolizumab and oral azacitidine in 34 women with PROC (NCT02900560). Key eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status of 0-1, measurable disease and platinum-resistant, histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Primary endpoints included safety, tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included CA-125 response. The effect of combined epigenetic modulation and immunotherapy was evaluated by transcriptomic analyses of 72 serially biopsied tumors. Target gene expression analyses were used to identify differentially expressed genes and pathways, and bulk RNA sequencing was used for gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) and to infer T cell receptor (TCR) assemblies. Results: The combination of azacitidine and pembrolizumab was moderately well tolerated, and the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects and anemia. ORR was 2.9% and DCR was 50%; with 3 of the 27 evaluable patients attaining a CA-125 response. Differential gene expression analyses revealed an upregulation of inflammatory and cytolytic genes (FDR-adjusted p=0.005) and co-inhibitory checkpoints (p=0.005) 6 weeks on-therapy. Upregulation of interferon signaling (p=0.006), antigen presentation (p=0.003), costimulatory signaling (p=0.002), and immune cell adhesion and migration (p=0.005) pathways were prominent on-therapy, together with an increase in CD8+ T-cell density (p=0.05). GSEA analyses were concordant with these findings, showing enrichment of immune and inflammatory gene sets on-therapy and upregulation of gene sets linked to IFN-γ response, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and immunoregulatory interactions (p &lt; 10e-13). Findings were not confounded by histological subtype. TCR abundance analyses evaluating significant TCR clonotypic expansions and regressions showed that intra-tumoral TCR repertoires were reshaped on-therapy. Furthermore, patients with a CA-125 and/or clinical response showed enrichment of hallmark inflammatory gene sets at baseline (p &lt; 10e-10) and of adaptive and conserved immune response gene sets on therapy (p &lt; 10e-09). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of epigenetic modulators to reshape the tumor microenvironment of PROC toward a more inflammatory phenotype and may point to approaches to augment immunotherapy response. Citation Format: Blair V. Landon, Julia L. Boland, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Deborah K. Armstrong, Boris Winterhoff, Jaime Wehr, Akshaya V. Annapragada, Christopher Cherry, Archana Balan, Guneet Kaleka, Victor E. Velculescu, Stephen B. Baylin, Cynthia A. Zahnow, Dennis J. Slamon, Gottfried E. Konecny, John A. Glaspy, Valsamo (Elsa) Anagnostou. Pembrolizumab and epigenetic modification with azacitidine reprogram the tumor microenvironment of platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: clinical and translational findings from a phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT260.

Morel-Lavallee lesions (MLLs) are traumatic closed degloving injuries with operative intervention (OI), especially excisional debridement, remaining the mainstay of treatment. However, high-quality evidence describing operative techniques and outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to characterize current OI practices and associated outcomes, especially among patients undergoing excisional debridement, hypothesizing an increased risk of wound complications with this approach for MLLs. Methods This prospective (2021-2024), multicenter, observational study was conducted across 15 trauma centers and included patients diagnosed with MLL who underwent OI. The association between operative technique (eg, excisional debridement) and the primary outcome of wound complications was evaluated. Wound complications were defined as cellulitis, deep wound infection, skin necrosis, necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), and/or organized hematoma. Results Of 88 MLL patients undergoing OI, 36 (40.9%) had excisional debridement, with 4 (11.1%) limited excision to skin, 20 (55.6%) extended to subcutaneous tissue, and 12 (33.3%) down to muscle. Excisional debridement had higher rates of skin necrosis (22.2% vs. 1.9%, P = .002). Although overall rates of wound complications were statistically similar between cohorts (33.3% vs. 17.3%, P = .098), univariate analysis demonstrated excisional debridement had increased risk of wound complications (OR 2.52, CI 1.07-5.97, P = .035). Conclusion This prospective multicenter study over three years demonstrated that a fifth of MLLs undergoing excisional debridement developed postoperative skin necrosis. Excisional debridement also had a more than two-fold increased risk of wound complications compared to other OIs. These findings underscore the importance of investigating alternative operative techniques, such as incision and drainage or minimally invasive debridement methods.