Scolaro, John A.

Morel-Lavallee lesions (MLLs) are traumatic closed degloving injuries with operative intervention (OI), especially excisional debridement, remaining the mainstay of treatment. However, high-quality evidence describing operative techniques and outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to characterize current OI practices and associated outcomes, especially among patients undergoing excisional debridement, hypothesizing an increased risk of wound complications with this approach for MLLs. Methods This prospective (2021-2024), multicenter, observational study was conducted across 15 trauma centers and included patients diagnosed with MLL who underwent OI. The association between operative technique (eg, excisional debridement) and the primary outcome of wound complications was evaluated. Wound complications were defined as cellulitis, deep wound infection, skin necrosis, necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), and/or organized hematoma. Results Of 88 MLL patients undergoing OI, 36 (40.9%) had excisional debridement, with 4 (11.1%) limited excision to skin, 20 (55.6%) extended to subcutaneous tissue, and 12 (33.3%) down to muscle. Excisional debridement had higher rates of skin necrosis (22.2% vs. 1.9%, P = .002). Although overall rates of wound complications were statistically similar between cohorts (33.3% vs. 17.3%, P = .098), univariate analysis demonstrated excisional debridement had increased risk of wound complications (OR 2.52, CI 1.07-5.97, P = .035). Conclusion This prospective multicenter study over three years demonstrated that a fifth of MLLs undergoing excisional debridement developed postoperative skin necrosis. Excisional debridement also had a more than two-fold increased risk of wound complications compared to other OIs. These findings underscore the importance of investigating alternative operative techniques, such as incision and drainage or minimally invasive debridement methods.

Background: Successful applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare have increased interest in how it could be integrated into orthopaedic surgery. However, orthopaedics surgeons’ current use of AI and attitudes toward its incorporation remain largely unexplored. The 2025 American British Canadian Travelling Fellowship Survey on AI in Orthopaedic Surgery aimed to assess AI use, knowledge, training, and attitudes among orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: The survey was administered from May 7 to September 4, 2025 to orthopaedic surgeons across Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and North America. Questions addressed demographics, AI training and use, and attitudes toward AI. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, chi-square tests compared AI use by geography and attitudes by career stage, and linear regression explored associations between demographics, AI behaviors, and outlook on AI. Results: Among 350 participants, most were trainees (45.1%) and from North America (42.9%). AI use exceeded training, and 79.9% rated their AI knowledge as average or poor. Trainees reported significantly more favorable attitudes toward AI than late-career respondents. Higher self-rated AI knowledge and AI use in clinical and research settings were associated with a more positive outlook on the future of AI in orthopaedics. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for formal AI education, as use is widespread despite limited training, particularly among later-career surgeons. Future studies should reduce self-selection and career-stage imbalance and include additional demographic variables to improve generalizability. Level of Evidence: III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.