Callcut, Rachael A.

Morel-Lavallee lesions (MLLs) are traumatic closed degloving injuries with operative intervention (OI), especially excisional debridement, remaining the mainstay of treatment. However, high-quality evidence describing operative techniques and outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to characterize current OI practices and associated outcomes, especially among patients undergoing excisional debridement, hypothesizing an increased risk of wound complications with this approach for MLLs. Methods This prospective (2021-2024), multicenter, observational study was conducted across 15 trauma centers and included patients diagnosed with MLL who underwent OI. The association between operative technique (eg, excisional debridement) and the primary outcome of wound complications was evaluated. Wound complications were defined as cellulitis, deep wound infection, skin necrosis, necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), and/or organized hematoma. Results Of 88 MLL patients undergoing OI, 36 (40.9%) had excisional debridement, with 4 (11.1%) limited excision to skin, 20 (55.6%) extended to subcutaneous tissue, and 12 (33.3%) down to muscle. Excisional debridement had higher rates of skin necrosis (22.2% vs. 1.9%, P = .002). Although overall rates of wound complications were statistically similar between cohorts (33.3% vs. 17.3%, P = .098), univariate analysis demonstrated excisional debridement had increased risk of wound complications (OR 2.52, CI 1.07-5.97, P = .035). Conclusion This prospective multicenter study over three years demonstrated that a fifth of MLLs undergoing excisional debridement developed postoperative skin necrosis. Excisional debridement also had a more than two-fold increased risk of wound complications compared to other OIs. These findings underscore the importance of investigating alternative operative techniques, such as incision and drainage or minimally invasive debridement methods.

Importance Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials. Objective To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of extremity arterial injuries. Design, Setting, and Participants Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data include the subset of patients with extremity injuries and were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024. Intervention The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points. Results The arterial extremity injury subset included 51 of 69 participants in V005 and 16 of 17 participants in V017. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV at day 30). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%. Conclusions and Relevance Results of analysis in the subset of patients with vascular extremity injuries in 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrated improved outcomes in the treatment of acute vascular injuries of the extremities. The analyses reported herein are limited to the subset of 67 patients with vascular extremity injuries out of 86 patients enrolled in 2 trials and excluded 19 patients with iatrogenic and torso injuries. Had these 19 patients been included in these analyses, the efficacy and safety findings could have been attenuated. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03005418 , NCT05873959