Citations

e19112 Background: We sought to study the longitudinal QOL, financial burden and perception of care (PoC) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoma (LYM) enrolled on CTs vs. those receiving standard care (Non-CT). Methods: QOL was evaluated using the FACT-G questionnaire (baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6 & 12 months). Financial burden was evaluated using 10 questions adapted from the MEPS survey and PoC was evaluated using 6 questions adapted from the CAHPS survey (baseline, 3, 6 & 12 months). Results: 35 (28%) of 123 enrolled patients were treated on CTs. Demographics, QOL and financial burden are shown in the Table. Baseline QOL scores were similar in CT vs non-CT groups. Age, gender and self-reported performance status were significantly associated with baseline QOL, while lines of therapy & cancer type were not. There were no significant differences in change in QOL vs. baseline in patients treated on CTs vs. non-CTs at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months from baseline, including the total FACT-G score and the subdomains of functional, physical, emotional and social well-being. Within each group, there was a decline in QOL over the first 3 months, specifically physical WB, which gradually returned to baseline. Baseline answers to financial burden questions were similar, except patients on CTs reported less need for taking extended time-off from work (22% vs. 46%, p = 0.02). The only statistically significant difference in individual Qs over 1 year was ‘worry about having to pay large medical bills’ at the 6-month timepoint (CT: 0%, non-CT: 52%, p = 0.01). Using a composite score from 4 MEPS questions, financial burden over time was lower in the CT group, though the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in PoC at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months in the two groups based on answers to each of the six questions adapted from the CAHPS survey. Conclusions: Over 1 year, patients on CTs experienced a similar QOL and perceived their care to be similar as non-CT patients. Financial burden was lower in the CT group, though differences were not statistically significant. [Table: see text]

e14100 Background: Only 3-5% of adult cancer patients in the US enroll in clinical trials. Patients with organ dysfunction are often excluded from clinical trials, regardless of specific drug metabolism or relative function of the organ. The ASCO and the US FDA recommend modernizing criteria related to baseline organ function and comorbidities. In hematological malignancies, often the disease itself is the reason for organ function derangement. In order to better inform clinical trial eligibility and improve participation in the future, we evaluated the impact of baseline organ function on the potential eligibility for clinical trial enrollment for real world patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Methods: Consecutive, newly diagnosed lymphoma patients were offered enrollment from 2002-2015 into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence. This analysis is based on 1270 DLBCL patients receiving immunochemotherapy. Baseline organ function parameters were identified from the exclusion criteria for hemoglobin, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count, creatinine, and bilirubin reported in recent frontline trials in DLBCL (Table). Abstracted clinical labs from the MER were used to determine the percent of patients that would be excluded based on the criteria. Results: We determined that 11-23% of MER DLBCL patients receiving standard of care frontline therapy would have been excluded in the various trials utilizing baseline organ function alone (Table). Hemoglobin and renal function had the greatest impact on exclusion. Conclusions: Current national and international (phase II and III) trials are excluding up to 23% of patients from clinical trial participation based on organ function alone in DLBCL. These data will be useful in future clinical trial development to meet ASCO recommendations to increase trial accrual, while balancing the drug toxicities and patient safety. An online tool was developed based on these results to aid future trial development. [Table: see text]

e14092 Background: Current methods to assess trial sites for clinical trial participation are onerous, with unnecessary redundancies and no-value steps that impact research site resources and clinical trial participation. This project sought stakeholder feedback on recommendations to transform industry sponsor and contract research organization (CRO) processes for evaluating sites for trials. Methods: An ASCO task force developed recommendations to improve the feasibility assessment process and standardize and centralize questions and forms. A survey was conducted with sites, industry trial sponsors, and CROs to obtain feedback and assess buy-in for the recommendations. Results: Respondents were from 28 oncology research sites (19 academic, 9 community-based), 8 sponsors, and 4 CROs. All stakeholders agreed that the current process is burdensome (93% sites, 90% sponsors, 100% CROs), standardization will improve the process (86% sites, 87% sponsors, 75% CROs). All agreed a centralized portal will reduce burdens (93% sites, 100% sponsors, 75% CROs) and expedite trial start-up (89% sites, 100% sponsors, 75% CROs). Site certification was a viable option for sites (86%) and CROs (75%), but less so for sponsors (57%). Most respondents preferred a two-tier model: 1) a short site questionnaire followed by a pre-study visit for new interactions, and 2) only a pre-study site visit or a teleconference if there is an existing relationship. The greatest benefits were time savings, expedited start-up, reduction in personnel resources, and cost savings. The greatest barriers to adoption were buy-in and alignment from sponsors/CROs and insufficient information about site or protocol. Top predictors of a site’s success on a trial were physician engagement, available patients, and site experience. Conclusions: Site feasibility assessments are important for all stakeholders to establish trial suitability. However, current methods impose tremendous burdens on site resources (reported by authors elsewhere). While this sample is limited, the proposed process and standardization changes show promise to reduce burdens and costs for all stakeholders and expedite patient enrollment onto clinical trials.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted all aspects of clinical care, including cancer clinical trials. In March 2020, ASCO launched a survey of clinical programs represented on its Cancer Research Committee and Research Community Forum Steering Group and taskforces to learn about the types of changes and challenges that clinical trial programs were experiencing early in the pandemic. There were 32 survey respondents; 14 represented academic programs, and 18 represented community-based programs. Respondents indicated that COVID-19 is leading programs to halt or prioritize screening and/or enrollment for certain clinical trials and cease research-only visits. Most reported conducting remote patient care where possible and remote visits and monitoring with sponsors and/or contract research organizations (CROs); respondents viewed this shift positively. Numerous challenges with conducting clinical trials were reported, including enrollment and protocol adherence difficulties with decreased patient visits, staffing constraints, and limited availability of ancillary services. Interactions with sponsors and CROs about modifying trial procedures were also challenging. The changes in clinical trial procedures identified by the survey could serve as strategies for other programs attempting to maintain their clinical trial portfolios during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, many of the adaptations to trials made during the pandemic provide a long-term opportunity to improve and transform the clinical trial system. Specific improvements could be expanded use of more pragmatic or streamlined trial designs, fewer clinical trial–related patient visits, and minimized sponsor and CRO visits to trial programs.

Abstract Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who undergo high dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and achieve a complete response (CR) have a superior overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Thus achieving a CR is an important goal of therapy with ASCT. Cyclophosphamide has significant activity against MM and is often used in high doses prior to ASCT for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. We hypothesized that high dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) may further improve CR rates in patients undergoing ASCT. Methods: The Mayo Clinic myeloma transplant database was searched for patients without circulating myeloma cells who had stem cell mobilization with hematopoietic growth factor (HGF) alone or HDC followed by HGF. Relevant demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were abstracted. The main outcome studied was the impact of HDC on CR rates and time to progression (TTP) to myeloma. Results: We identified 201 patients without circulating myeloma cells. Of these, 127 were mobilized with HDC and HGF and 74 with HGF alone. The two cohorts were similar with respect to age, gender, isotype, B2M, plasma cell labeling index, cytogenetics, conditioning regimen, disease status at time of transplant with no statistically significant differences between the two cohorts. CR rates were 37.4 and 41.3% (p=0.6115) for patients mobilized with HDC/HGF and HGF respectively. TTP was 19.9 and 17.6 months (p=0.6039) respectively. The median number of collection sessions for patients mobilized with HDC/HGF was 2 (1–10) and those mobilized with HGF was 4 (1–10) (p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis for TTP, cytogenetics and achieving a CR were the only independent variables (p=0.0012 and p<0.0001). Conclusion: HDC for autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection reduces the number of collections necessary to support HDT/ASCT. However, HDC does not increase CR rates or improve on TTP for patients undergoing ASCT.

Abstract The IgVH mutation status is an independent predictor of time to treatment and survival in CLL. However, the biological basis of this difference is unknown. Clinical use of the IgVH mutation status as a prognostic marker is limited due to the technical difficulties of assessing this feature. As such, we probed for differences in protein expression by CLL cells with unmutated (UM) vs mutated (M) IgVH using phage peptide display libraries (PDPL). Methods: PDPL consists of phages engineered to express random peptides (7-mer) on the coat protein. From approximately 2x1011 phages displaying all possible permutations of 7-mer peptide, we selected phages binding to UM cells by incubation with 106 UM cells and elution of bound phages. Then, from numerous phages initially binding to UM cells, we subtracted phages binding to M cells by multiple incubations with M cells (106). Thus, the phages that bound only to UM cells were selected. The procedure was repeated multiple times to increase selection specificity. The peptide sequences displayed by selected phages were evaluated. We identified phage targets on UM cells by immunoprecipitation (IP) of CLL protein with specific phage and by sequencing of precipitated protein. The expression of target protein in CLL cells was confirmed by immunobloting and flow cytometry. Results: Sequencing of phages from the 3rd round of selection (UM v. M) revealed several peptides, with the most predominant being FPSAHFL. IP identified the cellular target for FPSAHFL as vimentin, an intermediate filament protein involved in cell motility and activation. The level of vimentin expressed by CLL cells varied between patient samples (n=15). UM CLL cases were found to express higher levels of vimentin (the mean MFI was 1002; SD 381), than cases of M CLL (mean MFI 547; SD 109), p=0.0128. To evaluate the prognostic significance of vimentin, we assessed vimentin expression by flow cytometry in a separate subgroup of 40 CLL patients. Archived cell samples collected between 6/2000 – 6/2001 were used. The median follow up was 81 months (40–233). Vimentin expression (MFI) as a continuous variable was a risk factor for a shortened time to treatment (TTT) with a proportional hazard ratio of 4.152 (95% CI 1.33–15.220, p=0.0317). Using MFI closest to the median (and rounded to 2 decimal places) as a cutoff, we stratified patients in high (n=21) and low (n=19) vimentin expression groups. The median times to treatment (TTT) in patients with high vs low level expression of vimentin were 2.8 and 12.9 years respectively, p=0.0025 (Fig.). Conclusion: Using novel proteomic technology, we found that CLL cells with unmutated IgVH expressed higher levels of vimentin than CLL cells with mutated IgVH. A high-level of vimentin expression defined by flow cytometry appears to be associated with high-risk disease. Validation of these findings could allow for the vimentin level to be used as a surrogate marker for expression of unmutated IgVH in CLL. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: Angiogenesis has been found to be an important regulator in the disease progression of both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. In solid tumors, the balance of pro and anti-angiogenic factors appears to be a critical factor in tumorigenesis, with disturbance in favor of angiogenesis promoting tumor growth and metastasis. This observation led to the concept of an “angiogenic switch” where pro-angiogenic influences outweigh anti-angiogenic factors. Patients with CLL have detectable levels of plasma and cellular pro and anti-angiogenic cytokines as well as abnormal neovascularization in the marrow and lymph nodes. Limited studies of pro-angiogenic cytokines have suggested that inter-patient variation in serum/plasma and cellular levels of these markers may have prognostic implications. We evaluated pro- and anti-angiogenic cytokines in a large sample of patients with CLL to evaluate the presence of angiogenic switching and its implications for disease progression. Methods: In a prospective, longitudinal study, we analyzed the serum/plasma, intracellular(determined by flow cytometry), and CLL B cell secreted (24 hour medium values) levels of pro-angiogenic cytokines (VEGF, bFGF) and an anti-angiogenic cytokine (Thrombospondin [TSP]) in 311 patients with previously untreated CLL. VEGF:TSP and bFGF:TSP ratios were calculated to evaluate for evidence of angiogenic switching (higher ratio suggests a pro-angiogenic phenotype). The relationship of angiogenic cytokines to Rai stage, IgVH gene mutation status, % CD38 protein expression, and time to treatment (TTT) from the date of sample were evaluated (median follow-up=11 months). Sequential samples were available on >90% of patients and were evaluated to assess if changes in levels of angiogenic cytokines occurred in patients requiring treatment. Results: Serum, cellular, and secreted levels of VEGF, bFGF, and TSP showed no correlation with Rai stage, IgVH gene mutation (continuous variable), or % expression of CD38 (continuous variable). However, among patients with Rai stage 0-II disease, individuals with lower TSP levels (<75 percentile, p=0.007) or higher bFGF:TSP ratios (continuous variable; p=0.003) had shorter TTT (Figure 1). Similar relationships for a shorter TTT were also observed for secreted TSP levels (p=0.007) and the cellular bFGF:TSP ratio (p=0.009). On analysis of sequential samples, no clear difference in serum, cellular, or secreted levels of VEGF, bFGF, TSP, VEGF:TSP, or bFGF:TSP occurred among those who required treatment. Conclusions: Angiogenic cytokines appear to have prognostic significance in patients with previously untreated early stage CLL. Importantly, we report the original observation that the ratio of bFGF (pro-angiogenic) to TSP (anti-angiogenic) correlates with time to treatment as a continuous variable. This result provides further evidence that angiogenic switching relates to clinical progression in CLL. Longer follow-up of this cohort is needed to fully define the prognostic implications of angiogenic cytokines in CLL and determine if integration of these markers with other prognostic parameters improves risk stratification for early stage patients. Survival According to Serum Thrombospondin Level Survival According to Serum Thrombospondin Level

Abstract Background: The presence of circulating myeloma cells (CMC) detected by flow cytometry at the time of diagnosis of multiple myeloma is associated with a shortened response to therapy and reduced overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that the presence of CMC at the time of stem cell collection prior to high dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) would identifies a cohort of patients with a high risk of rapid progression. Methods: The Mayo Clinic myeloma transplant database was queried for patients who were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and hematopoietic growth factors. CMC was determined using flow cytometry by gating on a population of CD38 bright and CD45 negative cells. The impact of CMC on OS and time to progression (TTP) and its role in the context of established prognostic parameters was evaluated. Results: Of 246 patients with MM undergoing ASCT, 95 had CMC. Patients with CMC had significantly higher plasma cell labeling index, adverse cytogenetics, B2-M and resistant disease. Complete response (CR) rates post transplant were 32% and 36% for patients with and without CMC (p=0.5034). OS was 33.2 and 58.6 months (p=0.0052) while TTP was 14.1 and 22 months respectively (p=0.0005). Figure Figure On multivariate analysis, CMC remained an independent prognostic factor in a model that included cytogenetics and disease status at time of transplant (p=0.0314). A prognostic system based on the presence or absence of CMC and karyotype abnormalities was developed. Patients with neither, one or both parameters had a median, OS of 55, 48 and 21.5 months respectively (p<0.0001) while TTP was 22, 15.4 and 6.5 months for the same groups (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The presence of CMC at the time of HDT and ASCT is an independent prognostic factor. The combination of CMC and cytogenetics provides a simple yet powerful scoring system that stratifies patients and guides their management.

Abstract Background: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone (SBP) is a localized collection of monoclonal plasma cells that is potentially curable with local radiation therapy but associated with a high risk of progression to multiple myeloma. We hypothesized that an abnormal immunoglobulin free light (FLC) ratio at diagnosis may be a prognostic indicator of transformation risk. Methods: We identified a cohort of 133 patients with SBP for whom stored serum taken at the time of diagnosis was available. The diagnosis was ascertained and serum FLC determined in 126 patients. Results: From this cohort, 48 patients have progressed to myeloma and the median time to progression among those who progressed was 1.9 years. On univariate analysis, age (p<0.001), gender (p=0.035), abnormal FLC ratio at diagnosis (p=0.009) and persistence of serum or urine M-protein after therapy (p=0.0070 were all associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) and time to progression to multiple myeloma. Progression by Normal FLC(0.26–1.65) Progression by Normal FLC(0.26–1.65) On multivariate analysis, an abnormal FLC ratio retained its independence in a model that includes age at diagnosis but lost its significance when combined with persistence of the serum or urine M-protein. However, serum or urine M-proteins are not detectable in a significant number of patients with SBP and therefore not informative. Conclusion: The FLC ratio at the time of diagnosis of SBP is a powerful predictor of risk and a useful aid to management of patients with this condition.

Abstract Background: Recent literature suggests that statins may have anticancer potential. This effect is thought to be mediated through 2 primary mechanisms - impairment of protein prenylation and interference with the formation of cholesterol-rich lipid microdomains, or “lipid rafts” within the cell membrane. Both of these processes are critical for signaling activity of numerous proteins important for lymphomagenesis and tumor survival. Recent data, however, suggest that statin use may directly inhibit rituximab binding to CD20 and therefore rituximab efficacy. These findings raised significant concerns about statin use during rituximab treatment. Here we report on statin use and clinical outcome in a cohort of FL and DLBCL treated patients, most of whom were treated with rituximab containing regimens. Methods: 293 newly diagnosed FL patients and 228 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were prospectively enrolled in our Lymphoma SPORE registry from 9/2002 through 6/2007. Pathology was centrally reviewed. All patients were followed for retreatment, progression-free and overall survival. Statin use at the time of diagnosis and time of initial treatment was abstracted from the medical record. An event was defined by disease progression, retreatment, or death due to any cause. Results: 19% of FL patients and 22% of DLBCL patients were on statins at diagnosis; 16% and 19% were on statins during treatment, respectively. Initial therapy for the FL patients was observation (40%), R-CHOP (19%), R-CVP (12%), rituximab alone (8%), CVP (7%), RT (6%), and other (8%). All DLBCL patients received rituximab with CHOP or a CHOP-like regimen. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 3–73), 109 (37%) and 65 (29%) of FL and DLBCL patients had an event; 19 (6%) and 46 (20%) of FL and DLBCL patients died, respectively. After adjusting for FLIPI, grade, and initial therapy type, statin use at diagnosis was associated with better event-free survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34–0.95, p=0.03) in FL patients. Statin use during treatment in FL patients was also associated with better event-free survival, though not statistically significant (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.39–1.16, p=0.15). The improvement in EFS for FL patients was consistent across initial therapies, including observation. Statin use was not associated with IPI-adjusted overall survival or event-free survival in DLBCL (all p > 0.50). Conclusions: Statin therapy does not appear to be associated with inferior clinical outcome in DLBCL treated with rituximab and CHOP or CHOP-like therapy. Therefore direct inhibition of rituximab binding to CD20 may have limited clinical significance or/and may be overcome by inhibitory impact of statins on cell signaling. The latter possibility is supported by our observation that statin use is associated with improved event-free survival in follicular lymphoma. Figure Figure Figure Figure