Citations

Abstract Background: Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 60%-90% of breast cancers. The role of AR in breast cancer largely depends on estrogen receptor (ER) status and remains controversial. In ER+ cancers, AR expression is associated with improved prognosis. Enzalutamide (ENZ), an AR antagonist, impairs AR signaling, inhibits ER+/AR+ breast cancer cell proliferation and has been shown to mitigate resistance to anti-estrogen therapies. A recent study identified that RAD140, an AR agonist, suppressed the growth of ER+/AR+ breast cancer via stimulating AR signaling, resulting in down regulation of ERα. Both AR agonists and antagonists are effective in treating ER+ breast cancers. Identifying the subgroup of patients who most likely will benefit from an individual drug is important in clinical practice. Here, we sought to characterize the relative AR to ER levels and their relationships to drug response in ER+ breast cancers.Methods: We evaluated AR and ER expression levels among 68 samples with ER+ breast cancers. On each tumor, IHC staining for AR and ER were performed and results were scored by multiplying the percentage of positive cells by the intensity. TCGA-RPPA (reverse phase protein array) dataset was used to verify AR protein distribution in ER+ cancers. We created MCF7 and T47D cells with doxycycline-inducible AR and ER expression system to manipulate the relative AR to ER ratios and determined the antitumor activity of ENZ and RAD140 by cell proliferation assays. The levels of AR and ER in cells were measured by western blot. Linear regression was used to test the association between dose-response area under curve (AUC) and AR, ER levels. Drug preference was modeled against AR/ER expression levels (AR/ER ratios) using logistic regression.Results: Among 68 ER+ breast cancers, 69.12% were AR-positive. More than 2/3 cases (48 of 68) had more ER than AR expressed. The AR to ER ratios varied from 0 to 6. In the TCGA cohort, 84.15% of 347 ER+ patients had AR/ER ratios less than 1.The range of AR to ER ratios in TCGA dataset were comparable with our data (0.004 to 4.210). In our cell line models, the AR/ER ratios were controlled between 0.19 to 4.05. We found that the AUC of RAD140 was negatively associated with AR protein levels (P=0.008) and AR/ER ratios (P=0.013), and not significantly associated with ER expression levels. On the other hand, the AUC of ENZ was significantly negatively associated with ER protein (P=0.0016) but postiviely associated with AR/ER ratio (p=0.037). Preferred treatment comparing efficacy of the two drug can be best determined at extremes of AR/ER ratios. Using clinically relevant dosages, our model predicted that ENZ (10µM) would be a preferred treatment choice and have a better treatment efficacy compared with RAD140 when the AR/ER ratio was ≤ 0.42, whereas RAD140 (1µM) would be the preferred choice with a better treatment efficacy compared with ENZ when AR/ER ratios were ≥ 3.1 The efficacy preference of the two drugs are equivocal for AR/ER ratios between 0.42 and 3.10. Conclusion: We developed preclinical models using AR and ER expression levels to predict AR-targeting drug response. The results support the use of RAD140 in AR high patients and those with an AR/ER ratio >3.10, and enzalutamide in AR low patients and those with an AR/ER ratio <0.42. Equipoise on choice of drug was found for AR/ER ratios of 0.42-3.10. RAD140 and enzalutamide are compelling candidates for monotherapy or combination with anti-estrogen therapies in ER+/AR+ breast cancer. Future clinical validation of the models and therapeutic effect is warranted. Citation Format: Lixuan Wei, Huanyao Gao, Jia Yu, Duan Liu, Huan Zhang, Thanh Nguyen, Marie R Passow, Jodi M Carter, Richard M Weinshilboum, James N Ingle, Liewei Wang. Computational modeling of androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to AR agonists and antagonists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-36.

Abstract Background Inhibition of PD-L1 with atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy has shown acceptable safety and improved survival in patients with metastatic PD-L1 positive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with TNBC who do not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of disease recurrence and death. This randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluates neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab in patients with previously untreated clinical stages II and III TNBC. Methods Women aged ≥18 years with clinical stage T2-T4c, any N, M0 primary tumor by AJCC 7th edition staging TNBC; ECOG PS 0-2; and no prior systemic therapy for the indexed breast cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to carboplatin AUC5 q 3 weeks x 4 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 q week x 12 (Arm A), or carboplatin AUC5 q 3 weeks x 4 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 q week x 12 + atezolizumab 1200 mg q3 weeks x 4 (Arm B). Surgery was 3-6 weeks following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was administered q2 weeks with growth factor support to all patients as per routine care. pCR and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) percentages are the co-primary endpoints. pCR-evaluable population includes all eligible women who have been randomized and received at least one dose of combination therapy, while the TIL-evaluable population includes all eligible women who have evaluable TIL percentage after one cycle of therapy. A sample size of 67 (22 in Arm A, and 45 in Arm B) provided 80% power at 1-sided alpha = 0.10 to detect a minimum of 15% difference in TIL and 29% improvement (40% vs. 69%) in pCR, respectively. Herein, we report pCR results in the per protocol modified intent-to-treat population (mITT), which includes all eligible patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of combination therapy. Results Sixty-seven patients were randomized between 8/2017 and 9/2019. Six patients randomized to Arm A withdrew consent; 2 of these received protocol therapy but are excluded from the mITT analyses as they are not evaluable because definitive pathology reports are not available. Median follow up is 6 months (range 0.3 - 12.6 months). Median age is 52 years (range 25 - 78). Forty-three (64.2%) were Caucasian and thirteen (19.4%) were African American. Twenty-five (37.3%) were pre-menopausal. 67.2% and 32.8% had stages II and III disease respectively. Nine (13.4%) had a germline mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. In the mITT population, 3 of 16 patients achieved pCR in Arm A - 18.8% (95% CI 4.0%- 45.6%), versus 25 of 45 patients in Arm B - 55.6% (95% CI 40.0%-70.4%); p value 0.018. pCR in those with BRCA mutations was 50% and 80% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Treatment delays were observed in 9 patients (40.9%) in Arm A, and 20 (44.4%) in Arm B; dose reductions occurred in 4 patients (18.1%) in Arm A, and in 6 (13.3%) in Arm B. There were 4 SAEs in Arm A and 10 in Arm B. One patient in Arm B had grade 3 adrenal insufficiency. One patient in Arm B died from recurrent disease during the follow-up period. Conclusions: The addition of atezolizumab to neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in an increased pCR rate in patients with clinical stages II and III TNBC. However, the pCR in the control Arm A was lower than expected, possibly due to the absence of neoadjuvant anthracyclines. The high pCR rate observed in the experimental arm of this study is similar to that observed in other neoadjuvant trials utilizing anthracyclines, taxanes, and carboplatin in TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02883062. Citation Format: Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Feng Gao, Ina Chen, Donald W Northfelt, Robert Wesolowski, Mili Arora, Adam Brufsky, Claire Dees, Cesar A Santa-Maria, Roisin M Connolly, Jeremy Force, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Sarah Larson, Elad Sharon, William Gillanders. Nci 10013 - A randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel, with or without atezolizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-09.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, and metastatic disease. Recommendations for disease monitoring and treatment of recurrent disease are also included. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel meets annually to reevaluate and update their recommendations based on new clinical data and input from within NCCN Member Institutions and from external entities. This article summarizes the panel’s discussions for the 2021 update of the guidelines with regard to systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Eosinophils protect against liver injury during orthotopic liver transplantation and other conditions of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.

468 Background: The burden of gastrointestinal (GI) disease is high, costing over $97 billion annually in the United States (U.S.) alone. Yet the methodological rigor and characteristics of trials leading to guideline development are rarely explored. In 2007, the U.S. mandated that all interventional studies (Phase II-IV) register with ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest international clinical trial database. We characterized registered GI trials to identify features associated with early discontinuation, results reporting and increased methodological rigor. Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study design with descriptive, logistic regression, cox regression, time series and survival analyses. We downloaded data for 327 075 studies registered on the Aggregate Analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2019. Trials were excluded if registered prior to 2007 (n=38 111) or for non-interventional study design (n=69 233). After applying GI specific Medical Subject Heading terms to the remaining 219 731 trials, 22 339 trials were identified for manual review. 20 548 trials were found to contain true GI content, representing over seven million patients. Primary exposure variables were trial focus (disease process, anatomical location) and funding (industry, U.S. government, academic). Results: Of the 20 548 GI trials, 6.1% were funded by the U.S. government, 35.6% by industry, and 58.3% by academic institutions. The most studied disease process was neoplasia (42.6% of trials), followed by viral hepatitis (10.8%). The majority of neoplasia trials were funded by academic institutions (60.3%) and studied colorectal neoplasms (31.5%), followed by hepatic (17.9%), pancreatic (15.5%), gastric (12.8%), esophageal (10.6%) and biliary tract (4.9%) neoplasms. U.S. government funded trials had the lowest risk of early discontinuation (adjusted Hazard Ratio 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.83, p<0.001) and the highest rates of results reporting (25%, X2 p<0.001). Among all trials, the majority did not report Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) oversight (58.6%). Only 12% of phase III trials employed a rigorous methodology, which we defined as being randomized, double blinded, multi-site, overseen by a DMC, and having enrolled ≥50 patients. Government sponsored trials had the highest proportion of trials meeting this definition (19%). Academic sponsored trials, constituting the majority of trials overall, had the lowest proportion (5.3%), in part due to not meeting the multi-site criteria. Conclusions: Despite constituting the minority of trials overall, U.S. government funded trials displayed the highest methodological rigor. Stakeholders can look to U.S. government funded trials as a model of improvement, but nevertheless must commit to increasing methodological rigor and results dissemination to strengthen trial findings that guide GI clinical recommendations.

Identification of a CD4 + helper T cell population providing in situ help to B and CD8 + T cells in the respiratory mucosa.

Abstract Aims To evaluate the impact of various smoking status on 10-year all-cause mortality and to examine a relative treatment benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to smoking habits. Methods and results The SYNTAX Extended Survival study evaluated vital status up to 10 years in 1800 patients with de novo three-vessel disease and/or left main coronary artery disease randomized to CABG or PCI in the SYNTAX trial. In the present analysis, patients were divided into three groups (current, former, or never smokers), and the primary endpoint of 10-year all-cause mortality was assessed according to smoking status. Smoking status was available in 1793 (99.6%) patients at the time of randomization, of whom 363 were current smokers, 798 were former smokers, and 632 were never smokers. The crude rates of 10-year all-cause mortality were 29.7% in current smokers, 25.3% in former smokers, and 25.9% in never smokers (Log-rank P = 0.343). After adjustment for imbalances in baseline characteristics, current smokers had a significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause mortality than never smokers [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 2.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60–3.27; P &lt; 0.001], whereas former smokers did not. PCI was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality than CABG among current smokers (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.09–2.35; P = 0.017), but it failed to show a significant interaction between revascularization strategies and smoking status (Pinteraction = 0.910). Conclusion Current smokers had a higher adjusted risk of 10-year all-cause mortality, whereas former smokers did not. The treatment effect of CABG vs. PCI did not differ significantly according to smoking status. Clinical trial registration SYNTAX: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT00114972; SYNTAX Extended Survival. ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT03417050.