Citations

Summary The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a 45-member international expert task force to identify circumstances supporting the deprescribing of core psychotropic medications for major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorders. Three Delphi survey rounds plus a selective literature review identified points of consensus (predefined as ≥75% agreement) about when antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing is warranted. Twenty out of 32 statements (63%) achieved consensus across seven thematic areas. In MDD, panellists favoured discontinuing antidepressants when mechanisms of action are duplicative, adequate trials produce ≤25% improvement or loss of prior efficacy cannot be regained through dose increases or augmentations. Indefinite antidepressant maintenance in MDD was favoured after three or more lifetime episodes. In bipolar disorder, antidepressant deprescribing was favoured in the setting of rapid cycling, mixed features or emerging mania/hypomania symptoms; and discouraged if prior antidepressant cessation led to relapse. In nonpsychotic mood disorders, panellists favoured deprescribing antipsychotics that caused significant weight gain or tardive dyskinesia over adding pharmacological antidotes. Deprescribing to achieve an eventual medication-free status was considered inappropriate, in bipolar type 1, but not necessarily bipolar type 2 disorder. Although individualised circumstances necessarily inform psychopharmacology management, clinical presentations that misalign with existing pharmacotherapies may signal the desirability of cautious deprescribing.

ABSTRACT Systemic AL amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia, where toxic free light chains (FLCs) lead to vital organ damage, with risk of early mortality despite effective therapies. Notably, there is a paucity of data on the incidence and predictors of early mortality in the daratumumab (Dara) era. We conducted a multi‐center retrospective cohort study to develop and validate a risk‐prediction model for early mortality (all‐cause death within 6 months) in patients treated with Dara‐based frontline regimens. We used univariate analysis to identify covariates for a logistic regression model predictive of 6‐month mortality and generated a clinical risk score. Among 339 patients across eight centers, 36 (10.6%) experienced early mortality. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors: NT‐proBN P > 5300 pg/mL (odds ratio [OR] 3.83, p = 0.006), A ge > 75 years (OR 2.96, p = 0.073), absence of t(11;14) on C ytogenetics (OR 3.0, p = 0.022), and E COG performance status (OR 1.72 per unit increase, p = 0.044). The resulting PACE score stratified patients into three risk groups with a 6‐month mortality of 1.2% (low‐risk), 11.7% (intermediate‐risk), and 50.0% (high‐risk). The PACE score demonstrated superior discrimination (C‐index 0.78) for early mortality compared to Mayo 2004 (0.69) and Mayo 2012 (0.55) staging systems. External validation confirmed robust discrimination (C‐index 0.73) with corresponding 6‐month mortality rates of 4.2%, 15.25%, and 37.04% across respective risk groups. The PACE score provides a clinically applicable tool for early mortality risk stratification in AL amyloidosis patients receiving Dara‐based therapy, and will enable improved patient counseling, clinical trial design, and identification of ultra‐high‐risk patients requiring intensive monitoring and novel therapies.

Importance There is a need for greater recognition of clinical psychopharmacology endpoints, including instances where specific psychotropic medications may become unnecessary, redundant, contradictory, or otherwise inappropriate and therefore merit deprescribing. Objective To address circumstances warranting psychotropic medication deprescribing. Evidence Review The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a panel of 45 international psychopharmacology experts who developed and completed a multiround Delphi survey and conducted a focused literature review between January and May of 2025, in order to identify areas of consensus or disagreement on key aspects of the deprescribing of psychotropic medications. These included collaborative risk-benefit assessments with patients; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors; pharmacogenomics; distinguishing redundant or conflictual from complementary mechanisms of action; managing adverse effects; assuring medication adherence; drug tolerance or tachyphylaxis; medication misuse; and the psychological context and ramifications of deprescribing. Findings Consensus was achieved on 44 of 50 final Delphi statements (88%). Panelists unanimously agreed that components of a pharmacotherapy regimen should undergo periodic review to ensure that treatments target relevant symptoms and have favorable risk-benefit ratios. Key points of consensus were that deprescribing: (1) should not occur without first assessing medication adherence; (2) merits consideration if less than partial therapeutic response is apparent, or if treatment goals have been reached and relapse prevention is not a long-term objective; (3) involves psychological ramifications that warrant attention; (4) should be followed by close clinical monitoring; and (5) risk-benefit decisions should ideally involve active patient participation within a shared decision-making model. Conclusions and Relevance Through this Consensus Statement, the Task Force identified circumstances in which the selective elimination of certain psychotropic medications may be clinically indicated. Empirical trials are needed to assess the implementation of deprescribing protocols and gauge their safe, effective, and acceptable outcomes.

Abstract Patients with multiple myeloma have an elevated risk of severe complications from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) infection. To demonstrate proof of concept for a pandemic preparedness and response network, the American Society of Hematology Research Collaborative Multiple Myeloma Program developed a prospective, decentralized study within a site-based provider network. In the COVID-19 outcomes in myeloma and the impact of vaccines (COSMIC) study, patients provided consent, permitted electronic health record data collection, completed patient-reported outcomes at baseline, day 30, and day 180 through an electronic study portal, and were compensated for participation. Clinicians at participating sites facilitated study recruitment and shared best practices monthly to accelerate study execution. The COSMIC study rapidly consented 201 patients from 8 participating sites over 4 months (22 January 2024 through 17 May 2024). Consented participants were 30 to 93 years old, with a median age of 67; 46% were female, 69% were non-Hispanic White, 17% were non-Hispanic Black, and 8% were Hispanic/Latino. Patient-reported data completion was 97% at baseline, 81% at 1 month, and 79% at 6 months. At baseline, 55% of patients reported a history of COVID-19 infection and had received a median of 4 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. For all patients, there were an additional 18 COVID-19 infections and 57 vaccines received during the 6-month observation period. There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life over time or by history of COVID-19 infection. COSMIC demonstrates the feasibility of an innovative evidence generation strategy to drive rapid accrual of patients to address an evolving area of need. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05831787.

Purpose: A variety of care pathways are offered to females with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and pelvic floor myofascial pain (PFMP), which may affect treatment outcomes. This study aims to compare care pathways and describe health care utilization and characteristics of patients with CPP and PFMP referred for physical therapy (PT) at a tertiary care center. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on females with CPP and PFMP referred for PT. Patients received PT, medication management, injection therapy, or a combination of treatments. We collected data on health care utilization, comorbidities of interest, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare patients with pre- and posttreatment PROM scores. Results: A total of 1172 patients were referred for PT treatment, but 19.5% (n = 229) did not attend any PT sessions, and only 18% (n = 211) of patients attended the recommended number of PT sessions. Comorbid urinary (48.5%, n = 569) and bowel dysfunction (43%, n = 512) were prevalent. Patients consulted with multiple providers. Most patients (57.1%, n = 669) utilized opioid medications. Less than 20% completed both pre-and posttreatment PROMs. Discussion: Care pathways vary widely for the treatment of PFMP. Low adherence to PT and a trend toward greater than 5 subspecialty appointments indicating higher health care utilization reflect the range of inconsistent patient experience likely affecting outcomes. Outcomes of care are uncharted territory. Optimal care pathways for CPP and PFMP need to be established, along with further investigation of PROMs, to determine which treatments result in effective outcomes that matter to patients.

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Gastroenterology assembled a multidisciplinary task force to evaluate the current state and future direction of artificial intelligence (AI) in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy leading to the development of consensus-based recommendations for responsible AI integration in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 32 subject-matter experts and 12 industry partners, representing diverse practice settings and expertise, conducted subgroup literature reviews across 5 key areas (endoscopy, practice management clinical applications, training and education, inflammatory bowel disease and liver disease, ethics and equity). Draft statements were developed and rated on a 5-point Likert scale using a modified Delphi process. A consensus was set at ≥70% combined agreement. Nonconsensus items were revised and revoted electronically. RESULTS: A total of 43 statements, 40 (93%) reached consensus in round 1 and the remaining 3 achieved consensus after round 2. Evidence supports computer-aided detection improving adenoma detection rate and miss rate in controlled studies, with mixed real-world impact and insufficient long-term outcomes (e.g., interval colon cancer rate). Recommendations emphasize thorough validation and reduction of bias by heterogeneous Data sets. Outside endoscopy, ambient AI scribes, natural language processing (NLP)-enabled coding, workflow optimization, and previous authorization support show potential. Training recommendations endorse a structured AI curriculum while preserving independent procedural competence to avoid deskilling. In inflammatory bowel disease and hepatology, AI could help improve diagnostic accuracy, help predict risk of disease progression, and help guide therapy. Equity, governance, and reimbursement statements call for chain-of-custody data protections, specialty-society oversight, and payment models that reward quality and cost reduction. DISCUSSION: This consensus outlines how AI can augment rather than replace clinical expertise while promoting safety, transparency, interoperability, and equity. Priorities include pragmatic and prospective trials, multi-institutional data-sharing consortia, bias mitigation, and workforce training to enable trustworthy and clinically impactful AI adoption in gastroenterology, liver, and endoscopy care.

OBJECTIVE Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond 3 months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluated prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at their institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived less than 90 days after SRS were identified and case matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. The authors modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole-brain radiation (OR 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of poor survival, whereas CNS progression before SRS (OR 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with survival < 90 days. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. CONCLUSIONS Key predictors of 90-day survival after SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurological deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.

Significance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy by reactivating antitumor immunity and improving outcomes across multiple malignancies. Yet, clinical observations and preclinical studies suggest that ICIs may increase long-term cardiovascular disease risk, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, and thrombosis. The underlying mechanisms remain incompletely defined, highlighting the need for focused investigation into the vascular consequences of immune activation. Recent Advances: ICI-induced immune activation disrupts vascular and immune homeostasis through persistent production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial dysfunction, and accumulation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Sustained T-cell activation enhances ROS generation, driving DNA damage and senescence in both endothelial and immune cells. ICIs may also promote endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) through chronic oxidative and inflammatory signaling, contributing to fibrosis, vascular stiffness, and chronic inflammation. Transforming growth factor-beta, although immunosuppressive in many contexts, can drive profibrotic and EndoMT programs within the vasculature. Other cytokines and regulators, including interleukin-17 and regulator of calcineurin 1, have been implicated in vascular remodeling, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. Critical Issues: The relative roles of ROS, mitochondrial dysfunction, cfDNA-driven inflammation, and EndoMT in ICI-associated vascular senescence remain unclear. While inflammation-induced vascular damage is well-recognized, direct ICI-specific mechanisms require stronger evidence. How senescent endothelial and immune cells influence therapy resistance and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment also remains to be defined. Future Directions: Mitochondrial and cytosolic ROS sources—arising from electron leakage during oxidative phosphorylation and NADPH oxidases activity—shape immune signaling and sustain T-cell activation during checkpoint blockade. The DNA damage response kinases ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and ATM- and Rad3-related, activated by oxidative and replicative stress, engage p53-dependent senescence pathways in endothelial and immune cells. Future studies should evaluate biomarkers such as cfDNA and thrombospondin-1 and explore senescence-targeting or redox-modulating interventions that may alleviate cardiovascular toxicity without diminishing antitumor efficacy. This review outlines mechanistic pathways linking ICIs to vascular dysfunction and senescence, integrating preclinical data with emerging clinical insights. It distinguishes established processes from ICI-specific hypotheses and identifies key gaps requiring clinical validation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 00, 000–000.

Abstract Background Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the complex interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics, and liver function. Expertise is essential for healthcare professionals managing hepatobiliary patients. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of peri- and postoperative care. Methods A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70% agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a specialist nurse, and a physiotherapist. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Six topics were addressed: thromboprophylaxis; perioperative antibiotics; prehabilitation/nutrition/mobilization; bile leak including bilioenteric anastomosis leaks; post-hepatectomy haemorrhage; and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. A patient representative reviewed the guideline. Results Searching the literature yielded 204 included publications from an initial 6514. Thirty-two statements were formulated with a median evidence level of 2. Evidence strength varied by topic with noticeably lower evidence levels in complex surgery settings and less prevalent conditions. In some topics, study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in conditional recommendations, despite high-level evidence. Notably, the weakest evidence was found for perioperative thromboprophylaxis and PHLF management. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, early postoperative mobilization, and avoidance of routine drain use. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified. Conclusion Optimizing peri- and postoperative care after liver resection remains challenging. Standardizing key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.

Importance Emergency department (ED) visits for people with dementia often involve care (including the admission or discharge decision) with lasting effects on quality of life. Home time—a claims-based measure of days alive and outside of institutional care—provides a patient-centered way to assess downstream outcomes of ED care in this population. Objective To examine variations in home time following an ED visit by patient, facility, and visit characteristics among veterans with dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants This national retrospective cohort study used US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system data sources. Participants were veterans aged 65 to 110 years with dementia with an eligible Veterans Health Administration ED visit in fiscal years 2017 (October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017) and/or 2018 (October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018). Data were analyzed from May 1, 2024, to May 15, 2025. Exposures Patient, ED facility, and ED visit factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Home time, operationalized for modeling as days not at home in the 180 days after the index ED visit. Associations between patient, ED facility, and ED visit characteristics and home time were assessed using a negative binomial model. Results The study included 51 707 veterans with dementia (mean [SD] age, 79.9 [8.59] years; 97.6% male; 52.2% married). The mean (SD) number of days not at home within 180 days was 21.7 (34.5). Of the total cohort, 4.5% never returned home in the 180 days after their ED visit, while 18.2% had all subsequent days at home. ED admission (vs discharge) disposition was the factor associated with the largest increase in days not at home (rate ratio [RR], 3.18; 95% CI, 3.08-3.29). Patient factors associated with more days not at home included very high frailty (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.33), unhoused status (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.39-1.63), unmarried status (never married: RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.16-1.32]; divorced, separated, or widowed: RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.28]), and depression (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that home time offers a patient-centered measure of post-ED outcomes for individuals with dementia. Future work should refine its application, particularly regarding the ED disposition decision, to better evaluate the long-term impact of ED care decisions.