Citations

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with historically poor outcomes. Induction therapy with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based regimens followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) has become the mainstay of treatment with overall response rates (ORR) of 69-87% and two-year overall survival (OS) of 66-70% reported in prospective clinical trials. Limited data are available regarding a maintenance approach with single-agent HD-MTX, particularly in patients who are not auto-SCT candidates. Herein, we describe a comparison of outcomes in patients with PCNSL who underwent HD-MTX-based induction followed by either HD-MTX maintenance or auto-SCT consolidation at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of PCNSL who received HD-MTX as part of induction therapy at Mayo Clinic between October 2010 and June 2022 were identified. Patients with prior or concurrent diagnosis of systemic lymphoma were excluded. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time from post-induction treatment initiation to relapse, progression, or death due to any cause; and OS defined as time from post-induction treatment initiation to death due to any cause. We compared baseline characteristics by post-induction therapy using descriptive statistics. The primary endpoints PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by risk scores using a log-rank test. Results: A total of 148 patients were identified (51% female, 95% white) with median age at diagnosis of 66 years (range 29-85), with 48 patients (32%) age > 70. Most patients had multifocal disease (n=89, 60%) and deep brain involvement (n=100, 70%) at diagnosis. Few had vitreoretinal (n=15, 10%) or CSF involvement (n=9, 6%) at diagnosis. Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) prognostic score for PCNSL, 35 patients (26%) scored class 3 (poor prognosis), 85 (62%) scored class 2, and 17 (12%) scored class 1. In total, 117 patients (79%) received methotrexate, rituximab, and temozolomide (MRT) induction therapy, and the remaining 31 patients (21%) received methotrexate and rituximab (MR) induction therapy (Table 1). A total of 70 patients (47%) underwent consolidation with auto-SCT and 37 patients (25%) received maintenance methotrexate. The patients who received maintenance methotrexate had higher median age of 72 versus 62 years, higher proportion of patients older than 70 (54% versus 16%, p<0.001), higher proportion of MSKCC prognostic score class 3 patients (33% versus 17%, p=0.026), and trend towards higher proportion of patients ECOG 2 or higher (41% versus 29%, p=0.109). A higher proportion of patients who underwent auto-SCT received MRT (vs MR) induction (n=64, 91%) compared to those who received maintenance methotrexate (n=24, 65%, p=0.004) (Table 1). The median follow-up for all patients was 4.5 years. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years post-induction treatment initiation, the PFS in the auto-SCT cohort was 85.8% (95% CI 77.7-94.9), 81.0% (95% CI 72.0-91.0), and 74.6% (95% CI 63.3-87.9), respectively; and the PFS in the HD-MTX maintenance cohort was 88.6% (95% CI 78.7-99.8), 72.6% (95% CI 58.8-89.8), and 72.6% (95% CI 58.8-89.8), respectively. At the same time points, the OS in the auto-SCT cohort was 94.0% (95% CI 88.4-99.9), 81.3% (95% CI 71.8-92.0), and 76.0% (95% CI 65.0-89.0), respectively; and the OS in the HD-MTX maintenance cohort was 94.3% (95% CI 86.9-100.0), 87.5% (76.8-99.8%), and 82.4% (69.0-98.4), respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in PFS (p=0.64) or OS (p=0.95) based on post-induction treatment (Figure 1). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates comparable outcomes in PCNSL between a post-induction treatment approach with maintenance HD-MTX and consolidation auto-SCT, even though baseline characteristics indicate that patients who went on to receive auto-SCT were younger and had overall better performance status. This suggests that maintenance HD-MTX is a reasonable, time-limited strategy for patients with PCNSL responding to initial induction therapy, particularly in patients who are not candidates for auto-SCT.

518 Background: Oncology has entered the digital era, accompanied by changes in patient interactions and expectations involving telemedicine. While much emphasis is appropriately placed on digital interactions with patients, little is known about modern non-digital interactions with patients in oncology practices. Methods: We analyzed Medical Oncology Pager (MOP) data from 7/1/18 – 4/14/23, during which patients had access to the electronic health record and messaging capabilities. The MOP for Mayo Clinic (Rochester) is covered by the medical oncology fellows, including after hours (6PM – 7AM). It covers consults and direct patient calls after hours and during weekends, in addition to critical results back up and inpatient oncology matters at all times. We also analyzed Medical Oncology Call Center (MOCC) data since 6/1/22, which takes inbound patient calls during working hours (7AM – 6PM) and is staffed by appointment office employees. Results: The MOP received a total of 17,679 pages during the analyzed period for a mean of 10.1 pages per day. Of these, 6,319 pages occurred after hours. The most after-hours pages were received on Fridays (n=1,091) and the least on Sundays (n=701); of those years with fully available data, 2022 had the highest volume (n=1,405) (Table 1). When comparing the MOP activity pre-pandemic (7/1/18 – 3/10/20) and intra-pandemic (3/11/20 – 4/14/23), the mean number of after-hours pages per day was relatively stable with 3.47 pre-pandemic and 3.69 intra-pandemic. Since 6/1/22, the MOCC has averaged 6,464 inbound calls per month during working hours, each of which had an average talk time of approximately five minutes. The majority of inbound calls occur on Monday mornings between 9 – 11AM, with over 6,500 recorded throughout the previous year. Conclusions: Telemedicine is multi-faceted, comprised of both digital and non-digital patient interactions. We show that many oncology patients utilize telephone communication with the healthcare system despite increased availability of digital capabilities. These data have implications for addressing the digital divide for those with limited digital access, serving older patient populations unfamiliar with digital technologies, healthcare navigation, trainee responsibilities, and resource allocation. Further work and standardization in non-digital telemedicine is necessary as it remains a pillar of modern healthcare delivery and oncology practices.[Table: see text]

Abstract In the pivotal study ECHELON-1, brentuximab vedotin (BV), doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) demonstrated superior efficacy compared with bleomycin + AVD for the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, there are minimal available data regarding the frequency of dose reductions or omission of BV during curative therapy and the potential impact on patient outcomes. In a real-world analysis, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 179 patients with stage III or IV cHL treated with frontline A + AVD from January 2010 to April 2022. Treatment consisted of up to 1.2 mg/kg of BV and standard dose AVD IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. At the time of treatment, the median patient age was 37 years, and a high-risk International Prognostic Score was observed in 46% of patients. Overall, 91% of patients received 6 cycles of AVD; 55% of patients did not receive the intended cumulative dose of BV (CDB); 28% of patients received two-thirds or less than the planned CDB. At a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.8-29), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, and the 12-month PFS was 90.3% (95% CI, 85.9-95.0). The impact of CDB on PFS was not significant (P = .15), nor was high CDB significantly associated with increased adverse events. In real-world experience, A + AVD is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced-stage cHL, including for patients with prominent dose reductions of BV.

Background: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. Methods: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. Results: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. Conclusion: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.