Citations

Introduction Patients (pts) with progressive disease after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy are unlikely to derive additional benefit from current salvage immunochemotherapies, and survival declines significantly with each subsequent treatment. Pts with refractory disease following second-line therapy have worse outcomes, with reported overall response rates (ORRs) of 1% to 14% and overall survival (OS) of 5 months (Blood. 2017;130[16]:1800-1808). While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a preferred strategy in the second- and third-line settings, pts with R/R disease following CAR-T experience dismal survival, with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as low as 3 and 5 months, respectively, and no agreed standard of care post CAR-T (Blood. 2022;140[24]:2527-2529). The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) was conducted in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or CAR-T. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory disease, or prior CAR-T. Methods In these subgroup analyses of ECHELON-3, eligible pts had 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, disease refractory to the last prior therapy, or prior exposure to CAR-T. Pts could qualify for ≥1 subgroup and were analyzed separately. Refractory disease was defined as stable or progressive disease as best overall response to last line of treatment or relapse ≤6 months from the end of treatment. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with rituximab (R; 375 mg/m2) q3w and lenalidomide (Len; 20 mg) once daily. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. P values are descriptive. Results In total, 230 pts were enrolled in ECHELON-3 from April 2021 to November 2023, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 0.1-31.5 months). Overall, 94 pts with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=48) or placebo+Len+R (n=46). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-not estimable) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.8 months) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.317-0.977; P=.0388). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.6 months) with BV+Len+R vs 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.0 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.279-0.764; P=.0020). ORR was 68.8% (95% CI, 53.7%-81.3%) with BV+Len+R vs 43.5% with placebo+Len+R (95% CI, 28.9%-58.9%; P=.0216); complete response (CR) rate was 52.1% vs 13.0%, respectively. Additional data for pts by lines of therapy received will be presented. In total, 194 pts with disease refractory to the most recent systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=98) and placebo+Len+R (n=96). Median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.3 months) with BV+Len+R vs 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.5 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.396-0.808; P=.0015). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.4 months) with BV+Len+R vs 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.363-0.712; P<.0001). ORR was 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.0%) with BV+Len+R vs 29.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P<.0001); CR rate was 34.7% vs 11.5%, respectively. Overall, 67 pts who received prior CAR-T were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=32) and placebo+Len+R (n=35). Median OS was 15.6 months with BV+Len+R vs 4.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.75). Median PFS was 3.0 months with BV+Len+R vs 1.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) with BV+Len+R vs 25.7% (95% CI, 12.5%-43.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0014); CR rate was 37.5% vs 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes, including CR and OS, in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, disease refractory to prior treatment, or prior CAR-T. This treatment benefit was generally consistent with that observed in the overall ECHELON-3 study population. Therefore, BV+Len+R has the potential to address an unmet need for effective and tolerable therapy in heavily pretreated pts, as described above.

Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is very aggressive, with a historically low complete response (CR) rate (Blood. 2017; 130[16]:1800-1808). Recent research has focused on achieving complete and durable responses in this population, which translate to improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results from the randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, and objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with lenalidomide (Len) and rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (n=67). Methods Pts in the study were randomized (1:1) to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with R (375 mg/m2) and Len (20 mg) once daily. In these subgroup analyses, eligible pts had a BOR of CR and some ended study treatment and received any subsequent anticancer therapy. BOR was assessed by investigators according to the Lugano 2014 classification. Duration of response was defined as the time from the start of the first documented CR to the first documented tumor progression per Lugano 2014 or death. Pts who initiated a subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapy were censored at the most recent prior response assessment. Subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapies were defined as any systemic therapy received after the end of study treatment. P values are descriptive. Results Of the 112 pts in the BV+Len+R group, 45 (40.2%) had a BOR of CR. Of the 118 pts in the placebo+Len+R group, 22 (18.6%) had a BOR of CR. The median duration of CR was 18.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 months-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs not reached (NR) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.527; 95% CI, 0.200-1.389; P=.1891). The median time to CR was 1.58 months (range, 1.2-7.3 months) with BV+Len+R and 1.61 months (range, 0.7-4.6 months) with placebo+Len+R. With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median OS in pts with a BOR of CR was 31.5 months (95% CI, 20.3 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 1.044; 95% CI, 0.331-3.298; P=.9407). Median PFS in pts with a BOR of CR was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR (95% CI, 5.4 months-NE) in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 0.6333; 95% CI, 0.256-1.567; P=.3198). Results of NR in the placebo+Len+R group are likely attributable to limited follow-up and small sample size. Additional data on baseline characteristics of pts who had CR will be presented. Of the 45 pts with CR in the BV+Len+R group, 42 (93.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Of the 22 pts with CR in the placebo+Len+R group, 17 (77.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions BV doubled the CR rate in pts with R/R DLBCL compared with placebo, and outcomes in pts with CR were durable, with only 6.7% of pts treated with BV+Len+R receiving subsequent systemic anticancer therapy, compared with 22.7% of pts treated with placebo+Len+R receiving subsequent therapy. Overall, BV+Len+R demonstrated a survival benefit in the ECHELON-3 study and is a promising option to achieve complete and durable responses in third- or later-line therapy for pts with R/R DLBCL.

Background. Study of myeloid neoplasms (MN) has been rapidly transformed by genome characterization. Gene mutations have been reported to influence disease phenotype and risk of disease progression, and the evaluation of mutational status can provide valuable insights to improve the decision-making process. In this international study, we evaluated the clinical impact of mutational screening in patients with CMML, which is characterized by significant clinical and genomic heterogeneity, including a substantial proportion of patients with poor outcomes and unmet needs. Currently, only limited molecular information has been incorporated into CMML classification and prognostication. Methods. We retrospectively collected 3182 CMML patients. We used MOSAIC, an AI-based framework for multimodal analysis in rare cancers (PMID: 38875514) to develop innovative, molecular-based tools for classification and prognostication. An independent validation of the results on 516 prospectively collected patients was performed. Results. Bayesian Networs and Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were used to identify genomic associations and define a CMML molecular classification. We identified 11 clusters with distinct clinical and genomic features, including splicing machinery, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures (i.e., AML-like and TP53 mutations). Up to 15% of patients showed clear genomic overlap with other MN. Importantly, extensive multi-color flow cytometry on T lymphocytes, NK and myeloid cells (BD FACSymphony A5 Cell Analyzer) revealed specific immunologic and inflammation signatures associated with molecular subgroups. We then integrated molecular and clinical information to build an international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS). We assessed the performance of different statistical and AI-based methods; L1-penalized Cox Model resulted as the best performing method. Selected features included hematological parameters (WBC, Hb, PLT and marrow blasts), cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutations in 10 genes (ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, NRAS, RUNX1, SETBP1, STAG2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1). By Bayesian thresholds optimization, we identified 5 risk classes (i.e., very-low, low, intermediate, high and very-high) with median overall survival (OS) ranging from 99 to 9 months (P<.001), and median leukemia-free survival (LFS) ranging from 210 to 18 months (P<.001). iCPSS provided better patient discrimination across all clinical endpoints compared to currently available prognostic tools, with a Concordance Index (CI) for OS of 0.75 versus 0.62-0.64, respectively. Notably, compared to available scoring systems, up to 40% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk classes by the iCPSS. External validation on an independent prospective cohort confirmed that the performance of iCPSS is superior to existing prognostic models (CI for OS 0.71 vs 0.54-0.61, respectively) To demonstrate the clinical utility of iCPSS, we focused on 753 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In multivariable analysis, iCPSS stratified the probability of OS post-HSCT (P<.001) and identified groups of patients with different probabilities of disease relapse, ranging from 9% to 62% (P<.001). We employed a clinical- and genomic-based decision support system (PMID: 38723212) to determine the optimal timing of HSCT. Preliminary analyses indicated that higher-risk patients according to iCPSS (i.e., intermediate, high, and very high) benefit from an immediate HSCT strategy. Lower-risk patients (i.e., very low and low) had life expectancy maximized with delayed HSCT. Modeling decision analysis using iCPSS compared to conventional scores, resulted in a change in transplantation policy for a significant proportion of patients (up to 25%). Conclusion. Molecular information significantly improves the classification of CMML patients, providing a basis for refining diagnostic boundaries with other MN and for a more rational inclusion of patients in clinical trials. The iCPSS demonstrated superior performance over currently available scoring systems and improved HSCT decision making process.

Introduction Patients with lower-risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) experience shortened survival and significant unmet medical need due to limited disease-modifying treatments. The NLRP3 pathway is activated in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and in the marrow microenvironment in myeloid neoplasms, contributing to ineffective hematopoiesis and clonal progression. DFV890, a small molecule NLRP3 inhibitor, blocks IL-1β and IL-18 secretion and pyroptotic cell death. Thus, DFV890 may disrupt the smoldering inflammation and provide disease-modifying benefits to patients by restoring normal hematopoiesis and suppressing clonal myeloproliferation. Methods This open-label, phase 1b, multicenter study evaluates DFV890 in patients with very low, low, or intermediate risk MDS per revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) criteria and low or intermediate-1 risk CMML per CMML-specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS) criteria (NCT05552469). The study comprises 2 parts: dose optimization and dose expansion. Eligible patients ≥18 years, with ECOG performance status ≤2, carrying a diagnosis of (a) IPSS-R-defined LR-MDS or (b) CPSS-defined LR-CMML, and have failed to respond to or not tolerated established first-line therapies as defined in the protocol. Key exclusion criteria include previous treatment with agents targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1 pathway. DFV890 is administered orally twice daily (BID) for a minimum of 24 weeks (6 cycles of treatment) until treatment discontinuation. In the dose-optimization part, patients are randomized to receive either low- or high-dose, stratified by indication. Primary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability and determine the optimal for DFV890. Secondary objectives include assessment of pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of preliminary efficacy of DFV890 based on hematologic improvement (Garcia-Manero, Blood 2023). Exploratory objectives include assessment of peripheral cytokines and genetic alterations in blood and bone marrow, and patient-reported symptoms. Results As of April 15, 2024, 39 patients (median age, 74 years) with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range: 1-5) were treated with DFV890 in the dose-optimization part. Based on an 8-week screening period, 8 patients (20.5%) were RBC transfusion independent at baseline. Eighteen patients received low dose (17 with LR-MDS; 1 with LR-CMML), and 21 patients received high dose (18 with LR-MDS; 3 with LR-CMML). At data cutoff, 10 (25.6%) patients had discontinued treatment. Median duration of exposure was 10.7 weeks (range, 0.6-42.0 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) leading to study drug discontinuation were only reported in the high dose arm (2 patients, grade ≥3 neutropenia, n=1 and blood bilirubin increased, n=1). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 10 patients (25.6%), with 4 (10.3%) experiencing grade ≥3 TRAEs (anemia [n=2], neutropenia, and rash [n=1 each]). No serious AEs related to DFV890 were reported. Peripheral cytokines were assessed as a marker of preliminary activity. Decrease in plasma IL-18 and IL-1RA levels observed in most patients, with a higher frequency in the low dose arm (IL-18 decreased in 8/8 patients in low dose arm vs. 4/7 in high dose arm; IL-1RA in 7/8 vs. 5/7), potentially due to less frequent dose interruptions. Changes in serum IL-6 levels were more heterogeneous; notably, among the patients with complete mutation and biomarker data, both patients with mutations in TET2 showed dramatic decreases in serum IL-6; IL-18 and IL-1RA also decreased in those patients. In addition, out of 8 patients who were transfusion-independent at baseline, 6 reported an increase in hemoglobin with treatment, 4 of whom with an increment >10% from baseline. Updated data including hematologic response assessment according to IWG will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions Preliminary findings from this ongoing study show a favorable safety profile in patients with LR-MDS and LR-CMML, in line with prior human studies with DFV890. Analysis of peripheral cytokines and hematologic parameters showed early indications of activity in a subset of patients, particularly those with mutations in TET2 and those transfusion independent at baseline. These findings will require confirmation with longer follow-up and in the dose expansion phase of the study.

TPS6585 Background: Despite improved outcomes with azacitidine (AZA) and venetoclax (VEN) in newly diagnosed (ND) unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML), only a subset of patients (pts) respond (CR 37%; CR/CRi 66%) and long-term survival remains inadequate (mOS <15m, DiNardo NEJM 2020). The measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was 41% in AZA-VEN treated pts in VIALE-A which was associated with improved survival (Pratz JCO 2022). CD123 is expressed on the majority of AML blasts and leukemic stem cells while minimally expressed on normal hematopoietic stem cells (Kovtun Blood Adv 2018). Pivekimab sunirine (PVEK, IMGN632) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a high-affinity CD123 antibody, cleavable linker, and an indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer (IGN) payload. The IGN payload alkylates DNA and causes single strand breaks without crosslinking. IGNs are designed to have high potency against tumor cells, while demonstrating less toxicity to normal marrow progenitors than other DNA-targeting payloads. Clinical data from the first 50 pts in the dose expansion cohorts 1 and 2 with ND AML demonstrated a 76% (22/29) MRD negativity rate (by flow cytometry, negativity threshold <0.1%) (Daver ASH 2023), supporting the continued enrollment of the PVEK+AZA+VEN triplet and further evaluation of the regimen’s antileukemia activity and safety in consideration of potential registration-enabling trials. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study of PVEK administered in a combination with AZA+VEN in pts with ND CD123-positive (CD123+ by flow cytometry or IHC) AML, with no prior treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA). Pts will receive the recommended phase 2 dose of PVEK 0.045 mg/kg IV as a < 30-minute outpatient infusion on day 7, AZA 75 mg/m2 SC or IV daily on days 1 to 7, and VEN 400 mg PO daily for up to 28 days in a 28-day cycle. During cycle 1, a bone marrow evaluation at or around day 21 is required to inform VEN dose duration. Current eligibility criteria for continued enrollment of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy include age ≥ 75 years old, or age < 75 years old with ECOG 2-3, or at least one defined comorbidity. The primary study objectives are to assess antileukemia clinical activity (composite CR [complete remission] rate, overall response rate, duration of remission) and MRD-negativity rates. Key secondary objectives are safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. The PVEK+AZA+VEN triplet in pts with ND unfit AML is currently enrolling across sites in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and USA. Clinical trial information: NCT04086264 .

LBA7005 Background: Despite recent advances, there remains a need for novel therapies for pts with R/R DLBCL. BV, an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, has shown efficacy and safety when combined with lenalidomide (len) and with rituximab (R) in heavily pretreated populations (Bartlett 2022; Ward 2022). The double-blind, global phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) compared BV with R+len (R2) vs R2 in pts with R/R DLBCL who are ineligible for HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy. Here, we present results from the interim analysis (IA) for overall survival (OS). Methods: Pts with R/R DLBCL received BV+R2 or placebo+R2 (randomized 1:1). Pts received BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo q3w, R (375 mg/m2) q3w, and len (20 mg) qd. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR) rate. The preplanned IA was performed at 134 OS events with a prespecified efficacy boundary of 2-sided P=0.0232. Results: 230 pts were randomized: 112 to BV+R2 and 118 to R2; all but 2 pts (both in R2 arm) received ≥1 dose of study drug. Median age was 71 yrs (range, 21-89), 56.5% were male, and 10.9% had an ECOG of 2. Median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 2-8); 29% had prior CAR T-cell therapy and 68% were CD30- (<1% CD30 tumor expression). At median follow-up of 16.4 months (mos) (range, 0.1-31.5) (cut-off: January 22, 2024), median OS was 13.8 mos (95% CI: 10.3-18.8) with BV+R2 vs 8.5 mos (95% CI: 5.4-11.7) with R2 (HR 0.629; 95% CI: 0.445-0.891; P=0.0085); OS benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Median PFS was 4.2 mos (95% CI: 2.9-7.1) with BV+R2 vs 2.6 mos (95% CI: 1.4-3.1) with R2 (HR 0.527; 95% CI: 0.380-0.729; P<0.0001). ORR was 64.3% (95% CI: 54.7-73.1) with BV+R2 vs 41.5% with R2 (95% CI: 32.5-51.0; P=0.0006); CR rate was 40.2% vs 18.6%, respectively. In CD30+ vs CD30- subgroups, ORR/CR was 72.2%/38.9% vs 60.5%/40.8% with BV+R2, respectively, and 50.0%/26.3% vs 37.5%/15.0% with R2, respectively. Efficacy analysis including cell of origin will be presented. The safety profile of BV+R2 was tolerable vs R2: Grade (Gr) ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 88% vs 77%, serious TEAEs were 60% vs 50%, and Gr 5 TEAEs were 12% vs 8%, respectively. Most common TEAEs were neutropenia (46% vs 32%), anemia (29% vs 27%), and diarrhea (31% vs 23%). Rates of peripheral neuropathy for BV+R2 vs R2 were 31% vs 24% (all Gr) and 6% vs 2% (Gr 3). Median treatment duration was 3.6 mos with BV+R2 vs 2.0 mos with R2. Conclusions: Treatment with BV+R2 triplet, compared to R2, demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in all key efficacy outcomes including OS in high-risk subgroups, with manageable safety. This triplet regimen represents a novel treatment option for pts with heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL. Clinical trial information: NCT04404283 .

ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P &amp;lt; .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P &amp;lt; .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.

Background: Bystander CPR (BCPR) strongly influences survival from OHCA yet is provided in a minority of cases. The AHA has promulgated guidelines on provision of pre-arrival Hands-Only dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR (TCPR) instructions to increase the proportion of arrests receiving early BCPR; however, the impact of those guidelines is unknown. Objective: Evaluate the impact of implementing the TCPR guidelines on: recognition of OHCA by 911 dispatchers, time from call receipt to start of TCPR instructions, time to first chest compression (CC), prehospital ROSC, survival, and favorable neuro outcome (FNO). Methods: Dispatch audio records of OHCA in 3 large dispatch centers in Arizona (10/10-3/13) were reviewed using a standardized time-stamp methodology. Data were entered into a structured TCPR database linked to EMS and hospital outcome data. Intervention: Implementation of a 3.5-hour staff training and a guideline-based change in dispatch protocol. Results: There were 860 pre-implementation (P1) and 799 post-implementation (P2) cases. A total of 1265 cases met inclusion criteria. Outcome data collection and linkage is ongoing: ROSC, survival and neuro outcomes were available in 26%, 24% and 22% of cases, respectively. The proportion of cases receiving TCPR increased: P1 (28.7%); P2 (49.9%, p<0.001). Median time to beginning TCPR instructions decreased significantly: P1 (153 sec); P2 (129 sec, p<0.001) as did median time to first CC: P1 (198 sec); P2 (162 sec, p<0.001). Outcomes - see Table. Conclusion: The implementation of the AHA pre-arrival TCPR guidelines was associated with a significant improvement in the time-to-CPR instructions and time-to-first CCs and rate of provision of telephone-assisted bystander CPR. This small, preliminary analysis of prehospital ROSC, survival, and FNO revealed higher, but statistically non-significant, rates after the interventions.

Background: CPR quality is closely linked to outcome in cardiac arrest. The AHA 2010 Guidelines recommend monitoring CPR quality performed by healthcare providers both inside and outside the hospital. However, most EDs currently do not monitor CPR quality. The goal of the present investigation was to assess the quality of CPR performed in an urban ED and determine the influence of training and real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) on CPR quality and patient outcome. Methods: CPR quality was monitored using an R Series defibrillator (ZOLL Medical) during the treatment of adult cardiac resuscitation attempts. During phase 1 (P1; 11/2010-11/2012), real-time audiovisual chest compression feedback was disabled. During phase 2 (P2; 11/2012-3/2013), clinicians underwent a 60 minute didactic/hands-on CPR training session after which the RTAVF and the ECG artifact filtering feature were enabled. CPR quality data (fraction, depth, rate, release, peri-shock pause) were reviewed using Code Review software (ZOLL Medical). Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon-signed rank test were employed. Results: A total of 44 OHCA patients were treated in P1 (mean age 57±18 yrs, 59% male) and 24 in Phase 2 (mean age 63±15 yrs, 88% male). The majority of patients (89% P1; 96% P2) suffered prehospital arrest and were transported to the ED. Chest compression (CC) depth increased from 1.8±0.5 inches in P1 to 2.3±0.4 in P2 (p<0.001), with the percentage of compressions exceeding 2 inches more than doubling from 36% in P1 to 79% in P2 (p<0.001). CC release velocity increased from 1.25±0.36 inch/sec in P1 to 1.69±0.28 in P2 (p<0.001). No significant differences were identified in CC rate (125±12 cpm P1 vs. 121±15 cpm P2, p=0.3) or CC fraction (82% P1 vs. 87% P2, p=0.1). Pre-shock pause (11.5±10.4 sec P1 vs. 8.0±6.2 P2, p=0.4) and post-shock pause (5.2±3.4 sec vs. 3.8±0.6, p=0.9) were statistically similar in P1 and P2. Conclusion: The bundle of real time audiovisual CPR feedback and training were associated with an improvement in chest compression depth and recoil and closer adherence to guidelines for CPR quality in this large urban ED.

Background: During CPR in animals, chest compressions (CC) may produce passive volumes large enough to provide adequate ventilation. In humans, this mechanism may explain why continuous CCs have been associated with improved survival. We quantified the volume of passive ventilation during emergency department (ED) CCs to determine if compression-only CPR (COCPR) provides clinically significant gas exchange during resuscitation. Methods: In an urban ED, continuous flow and volume of air exhaled through an endotracheal tube were measured during the CC phase of manual CPR (between ventilations) with NICO monitors (Philip/Respironics) and recorded using LabView (National Instruments). Gas exchange with CC was quantified using Matlab (Mathworks) as the area under the flow curve (figure). CC quality was measured using accelerometer-based technology (R Series, ZOLL Medical). Results: Eight patients (6 male) aged 37-83 yrs [median age 51 yr (IQR 43-56)] who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) and were transported and treated with CC in the ED were included. A total of 548 CCs [median depth 1.89 in (IQR=1.66, 2.29), median rate 128 CC/min (IQR=122-134) were analyzed over 30 min of CPR. Median tidal volume per CC was 17.3 mL (IQR=5.9-22.4). This was considerably less than measured dead space in all patients (median 118mL, IQR=93-143), regardless of CC depth. The figure illustrates a typical tracing in which ventilation volume dwarfs any passive ventilation occurring with CC. Conclusion: Late in CA, passive ventilation occurring during CCs appears to produce considerably less gas exchange than calculated dead space. The effectiveness of passive ventilation during early stages of CPR, when chest and lung compliance are greater, remains unknown. However, these findings suggest that the benefits of COCPR strategies may be related to reliably higher CC fraction and/or prevention of the negative effects of hyperventilation rather than from any passive ventilation.