Roosa, Jason

Background: During CPR in animals, chest compressions (CC) may produce passive volumes large enough to provide adequate ventilation. In humans, this mechanism may explain why continuous CCs have been associated with improved survival. We quantified the volume of passive ventilation during emergency department (ED) CCs to determine if compression-only CPR (COCPR) provides clinically significant gas exchange during resuscitation. Methods: In an urban ED, continuous flow and volume of air exhaled through an endotracheal tube were measured during the CC phase of manual CPR (between ventilations) with NICO monitors (Philip/Respironics) and recorded using LabView (National Instruments). Gas exchange with CC was quantified using Matlab (Mathworks) as the area under the flow curve (figure). CC quality was measured using accelerometer-based technology (R Series, ZOLL Medical). Results: Eight patients (6 male) aged 37-83 yrs [median age 51 yr (IQR 43-56)] who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) and were transported and treated with CC in the ED were included. A total of 548 CCs [median depth 1.89 in (IQR=1.66, 2.29), median rate 128 CC/min (IQR=122-134) were analyzed over 30 min of CPR. Median tidal volume per CC was 17.3 mL (IQR=5.9-22.4). This was considerably less than measured dead space in all patients (median 118mL, IQR=93-143), regardless of CC depth. The figure illustrates a typical tracing in which ventilation volume dwarfs any passive ventilation occurring with CC. Conclusion: Late in CA, passive ventilation occurring during CCs appears to produce considerably less gas exchange than calculated dead space. The effectiveness of passive ventilation during early stages of CPR, when chest and lung compliance are greater, remains unknown. However, these findings suggest that the benefits of COCPR strategies may be related to reliably higher CC fraction and/or prevention of the negative effects of hyperventilation rather than from any passive ventilation.

Background: The 2010 AHA Guidelines state rescuers should perform chest compressions (CCs) of at least 2 inches in depth for adult cardiac arrest patients. Although the pediatric guidelines recommend adjustment of CC depth based upon anteroposterior chest dimension, there is no such recommendation for adults. Purpose: To determine 1) whether prehospital providers intuitively vary CC depth in adults according to patient size and 2) whether implementation of real-time audiovisual CPR feedback (RTAVF) impacts weight/CC depth variation. Methods: CC quality data were prospectively collected prior to (9/08-4/10; Pre-feedback) and after (5/10-12/10; Post-feedback) implementation of an RTAVF system (ZOLL Medical, Chelmsford MA) from 3 EMS agencies. The RTAVF includes a visual display of absolute CC depth and gives audio prompts when depth is outside of the Guideline-recommended range. Among 363 cases of adult, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), body weight was estimated by EMS in 249 patients (study group; 66%). CPR quality data were available for all cases via code review software. Results: 168 Pre-feedback and 81 Post-feedback study group cases (mean 64±16 years, 68% male). Mean estimated body weight was 201 lbs (quartiles 161, 231; range 70-451) and was not different between groups. CC depth increased significantly with RTAVF use (Pre-feedback = 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.71-1.83 in.; Post-feedback = 2.10, CI: 2.04-2.15 in.; p<0.001). CC depth did not vary significantly by patient gender or age (p>0.4). Multivariate linear regression (r 2 =0.23, p<0.001 for model) revealed a significant increase in CC depth with estimated weight in both periods (0.07in/50lbs, p<0.001) after controlling for the presence of RTAVF. RTAVF was not an effect-modifier of the relationship between estimated weight and CC depth (p-value for interaction term=0.4). Conclusion: Although not specifically recommended in the 2010 AHA Guidelines for adults, rescuers may instinctively and/or intentionally adjust CC depth according to patient size. In this setting, weight/CC depth adjustments occurred both without and with real-time feedback. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the potential effect of size-adjusted CC depth on patient outcome.