Panchal, Ashish R.

Background: The 2010 AHA Guidelines state rescuers should perform chest compressions (CCs) of at least 2 inches in depth for adult cardiac arrest patients. Although the pediatric guidelines recommend adjustment of CC depth based upon anteroposterior chest dimension, there is no such recommendation for adults. Purpose: To determine 1) whether prehospital providers intuitively vary CC depth in adults according to patient size and 2) whether implementation of real-time audiovisual CPR feedback (RTAVF) impacts weight/CC depth variation. Methods: CC quality data were prospectively collected prior to (9/08-4/10; Pre-feedback) and after (5/10-12/10; Post-feedback) implementation of an RTAVF system (ZOLL Medical, Chelmsford MA) from 3 EMS agencies. The RTAVF includes a visual display of absolute CC depth and gives audio prompts when depth is outside of the Guideline-recommended range. Among 363 cases of adult, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), body weight was estimated by EMS in 249 patients (study group; 66%). CPR quality data were available for all cases via code review software. Results: 168 Pre-feedback and 81 Post-feedback study group cases (mean 64±16 years, 68% male). Mean estimated body weight was 201 lbs (quartiles 161, 231; range 70-451) and was not different between groups. CC depth increased significantly with RTAVF use (Pre-feedback = 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.71-1.83 in.; Post-feedback = 2.10, CI: 2.04-2.15 in.; p<0.001). CC depth did not vary significantly by patient gender or age (p>0.4). Multivariate linear regression (r 2 =0.23, p<0.001 for model) revealed a significant increase in CC depth with estimated weight in both periods (0.07in/50lbs, p<0.001) after controlling for the presence of RTAVF. RTAVF was not an effect-modifier of the relationship between estimated weight and CC depth (p-value for interaction term=0.4). Conclusion: Although not specifically recommended in the 2010 AHA Guidelines for adults, rescuers may instinctively and/or intentionally adjust CC depth according to patient size. In this setting, weight/CC depth adjustments occurred both without and with real-time feedback. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the potential effect of size-adjusted CC depth on patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: For sudden collapse from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in adults, bystander chest compression-only CPR (COCPR) results in equivalent or better survival compared with conventional CPR with rescue breathing. However, patients who arrest from a non-cardiac cause may also receive COCPR even though rescue breathing might benefit them. We sought to determine whether lay rescuers appropriately provided COCPR or conventional CPR depending on the suspected etiology of OHCA. METHODS: Analysis of a statewide, Utstein-style registry of adult OHCA during a large-scale campaign endorsing COCPR for adults who suddenly collapse. The relationship between bystander CPR (both COCPR and conventional CPR), presumed arrest etiology, and survival to hospital discharge were evaluated. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. FINDINGS: A total of 7,652 adult OHCAs not witnessed by EMS were analyzed from 10/04 to 09/10. After exclusion of non-lay bystanders and arrests in medical facilities, presumed cardiac etiology and non-cardiac etiology OHCA totaled 4,913 and 1,202, respectively. The presumed specific non-cardiac etiologies were non-cardiopulmonary (e.g. overdose, suicide, subarachnoid hemorrhage) (57%), trauma (27%), and respiratory (16%). All-rhythm survival was 7.0% (CI: 6.3 - 7.8) for cardiac etiologies and 3.3% (CI: 2.3 - 4.3) for non-cardiac (p<0.001). Bystander CPR was provided for 33% (CI: 31.4 - 34.1) of victims with presumed cardiac causes versus 28% (CI: 25.6 - 30.7) for non-cardiac causes (p=0.002). Presumed respiratory causes of OHCA had a much lower proportion of COCPR (8.3%, CI: 4.4 - 12.2) than cardiac causes (18.0%, CI: 16.9 - 19.1, p<0.001). Survival for non-cardiac cases was: 4.4% (CI 0.9 - 7.8) for conventional CPR, 3.5% (CI: 0.9 - 6.0) for COCPR, and 3.1% (CI: 2.0 - 4.3) for no CPR (p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of a large-scale, statewide public health campaign endorsing lay rescuer COCPR for adults who suddenly collapse and are not breathing normally, bystanders were much less likely to perform COCPR on OHCA victims who might benefit from rescue breathing. Furthermore, when COCPR was performed on presumed non-cardiac cause arrest victims, there was no demonstrable negative impact on survival.

Objective: The 2010 AHA Guidelines stress the need for minimally interrupted, high quality CPR. We performed a prospective, before/after trial to determine if real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) along with scenario-based training (SBT) would 1) achieve the 2010 CPR targets and 2) improve survival from OHCA. Methods: Data obtained from EMS care forms and defibrillators (E Series, ZOLL) from 2 EMS agencies (population base-500,000). Phase 1 (P1, before): 18 months of baseline data with the RTAVF mode disabled (9/08-3/10). Interventions: 1) Guideline-based SBT of ~450 EMTs, 2) RTAVF enabled, 3) EMT post-code debriefings. Phase 2 (P2, after): 8 months following implementation of interventions (5/10-12/10). For univariate analyses we used Fisher's exact test (proportions), t-test (means) or Kruskal-Wallis test (medians). To estimate odds ratios for survival to hospital discharge we used multivariable logistic regression and assessed final model diagnostics, fit, and discrimination. Results: The final analysis included 284 adult OHCAs (P1-176, P2-108). Mean age 65.4 years (SD ± 15.3) with 66.6% males. Quality measures improved significantly from P1 to P2: Median (Interquartile range) chest compression (CC) rate-121 CC/min (109-135) to 101 CC/min (100-106), p <0.001; CC depth-1.73 in. (1.42-1.97) to 2.09 in. (1.92-2.3), p <0.001; CC fraction-66.5% (59.3-75.9%) to 84.0% (77.8-88.7%), p <0.001. All-rhythms survival increased significantly (p=0.034) from P1 to P2 (18/176, 10.2% vs. 23/108, 19.4%), an absolute survival increase of 9.2% (95% CI: 0.5%-17.9%). Crude odds ratio for survival for P2 vs. P1 was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.1-4.2) and adjusted odds ratio was 5.8 (95% CI: 1.8-18.9), after controlling for confounders including age, sex, location, witnessed arrest, initial rhythm, and therapeutic hypothermia. Survival for arrests with a shockable rhythm was 27.7% (18/65) for P1 and 53.9% (14/26) for P2 (p=0.028). Conclusion: RTAVF combined with SBT was associated with a significant improvement in the proportion of compressions meeting the 2010 AHA Guidelines. This intervention was associated with a 90% relative increase in overall survival. We believe this is the first report to show an improvement in OHCA survival by achieving the 2010 AHA CPR Guidelines.