Citations

TPS8582 Background: Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1)-deficient malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is sensitive to arginine deprivation therapy with pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which also enhances the cytotoxicity of pemetrexed. The TRAP Phase 1 trial (NCT02029690) of ADI-PEG 20 combined with 1st-line pemetrexed (PEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy revealed a 94% disease control rate in non-epithelioid (biphasic and sarcomatoid) MPM subtypes characterized by a 75% rate of ASS1 loss. Thus, we plan to assess the efficacy of ADI-PEG20 or placebo combined with PEM and CDDP in patients (pts) with poor prognosis MPM in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2/3 global trial. Methods: Up to 386 good performance (ECOG 0-1) pts with non-epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma will be enrolled in a phase 2/3 adaptive, biomarker-driven study design. Biopsies will be required prior to randomization: ASS1-agnostic pts will be enrolled initially (phase 2 stage) with an option to restrict enrolment to ASS1-deficient MPM (phase 3 stage). Pts will be randomized to receive weekly ADI-PEG20 (36 mg/m2 IM) or placebo with standard doses of PEM and CDDP for a maximum of 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment. Pts who develop CDDP toxicity may be switched to carboplatin. Pts will be assessed every 6 weeks using modified RECIST (RECIST 1.1 allowed for pts with significant extrathoracic disease). The primary endpoint for the phase 2 stage will be overall response rate (ORR) with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), safety and toxicity. The phase 2 will test ORR proportions with the placebo triplet set at 15% vs. 35% for the ADI-PEG 20 triplet, with a 1:1 randomization, 80% power. After recruitment of 176 pts, the phase 2 will convert to a phase 3 study with the primary endpoint of OS. In summary, ATOMIC-Meso is the first triplet chemotherapy study to assess the role of targeted arginine deprivation in aggressive subtypes of mesothelioma. Pt accrual has commenced across the US and Asia, with enrolment due in Europe and Australia by 2nd quarter of 2017. [Trial sponsored by Polaris Group]. Clinical trial information: NCT02709512.

TPS8581 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of < 10%. At diagnosis, most patients (pts) have unresectable disease. Combination chemotherapy of cisplatin (or carboplatin as an alternative) + pemetrexed is the approved first-line standard of care. Phase 1 and 2 data suggest that targeting immune checkpoint pathways (eg, programmed death [PD]-1/PD-ligand 1 [PD-L1] and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4]) may provide benefit with acceptable safety in MPM. In pts with previously treated, malignant mesothelioma, single-agent tremelimumab (a CTLA-4 inhibitor antibody) was active but did not improve OS vs placebo. In a phase 2 study of nivo (a fully human PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody) in 34 pts with MPM that progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, 12-week disease control rate (DCR) was 50%, 5 pts had partial response, and 12 pts had stable disease. Given the data with single-agent CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors and that CTLA-4 inhibition can induce PD-L1 expression, there is reason to anticipate synergy when combining CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors in MPM. A phase 2 study assessing nivo alone and nivo + ipi (a CTLA-4 inhibitor antibody) in MPM is ongoing. CheckMate 743 (NCT02899299) is a phase 3 study that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line nivo + ipi vs chemotherapy for MPM. Methods: Approximately 600 adult pts with unresectable MPM and ECOG performance status 0–1 will be randomized. Pts are ineligible if they have primary peritoneal, pericardial, or tunica vaginalis testis mesotheliomas; have active, untreated CNS metastases; or had received prior systemic therapy for pleural mesothelioma or a prior PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor antibody. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive nivo + ipi or pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin. Primary endpoints are OS and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR), DCR, and correlation of PD-L1 expression level and efficacy (ORR, PFS, and OS). Clinical trial information: NCT02899299.

9090 Background: We identified factors associated with better OS for previously treated, PD-L1–expressing advanced NSCLC using data from KEYNOTE-010 (NCT01905657; Herbst et al. Lancet. 2016;387:1540-50), in which pembrolizumab had superior OS over docetaxel. Methods: 1033 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model on OS in the pembrolizumab arms. A set of variable selection methods was applied to 19 baseline demographic and disease characteristics, including smoking status, and identified 7 factors that contributed to OS. Data cut was September 30, 2016. Results: Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the factors in the pembrolizumab arm from the model are shown in the Table. Updated OS with an additional 6 months of follow-up from this data lock for KEYNOTE-010 will be presented. Conclusions: While the overall result of KEYNOTE-010 revealed improved OS with pembrolizumab compared with docetaxel in previously treated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced NSCLC, exploratory, post hoc multivariate analyses showed that some laboratory and tumor characteristics such as nonsquamous histology, normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, and wild-type EGFR mutation status were associated with better OS among patients treated with pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT01905657. [Table: see text]

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the effectiveness, durability, and safety of a tissue filler (dextranomer and hyaluronic acid copolymer) when injected submucosally in the nasopharynx to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in pediatric patients.Study DesignRetrospective case series.MethodsCharts were reviewed for all patients treated with injectable filler at a tertiary children's center for VPI from April 2010 through September 2013. Main outcome measures included perceptual speech assessments before and after the procedure, velopharyngeal gap size on nasendoscopy, and nasalance. Length of follow‐up, length of surgery, hospital admission, and complications were also identified.ResultsAfter injection augmentation pharyngoplasty, 93% of patients had no or mild hypernasality, 83% had resolution of nasal grimace, and 96% had resolution of audible nasal emission. Complications were minor and included mucosal infection, neck pain, snoring, and obstructive sleep apnea.ConclusionsUse of injectable filler to augment the nasopharynx is an effective, minimally invasive therapy for small or moderate‐sized velopharyngeal gaps, with shorter procedural times, easier recovery, and acceptable durability.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 126:S5–S13, 2016

Background Intracranial aneurysms ( IAs ), abdominal aortic aneurysms ( AAAs ), and thoracic aortic aneurysms ( TAAs ) all have a familial predisposition. Given that aneurysm types are known to co‐occur, we hypothesized that there may be shared genetic risk factors for IAs , AAAs, and TAAs . Methods and Results We performed a mega‐analysis of 1000 Genomes Project‐imputed genome‐wide association study ( GWAS ) data of 4 previously published aneurysm cohorts: 2 IA cohorts (in total 1516 cases, 4305 controls), 1 AAA cohort (818 cases, 3004 controls), and 1 TAA cohort (760 cases, 2212 controls), and observed associations of 4 known IA , AAA , and/or TAA risk loci (9p21, 18q11, 15q21, and 2q33) with consistent effect directions in all 4 cohorts. We calculated polygenic scores based on IA ‐, AAA ‐, and TAA ‐associated SNP s and tested these scores for association to case‐control status in the other aneurysm cohorts; this revealed no shared polygenic effects. Similarly, linkage disequilibrium–score regression analyses did not show significant correlations between any pair of aneurysm subtypes. Last, we evaluated the evidence for 14 previously published aneurysm risk single‐nucleotide polymorphisms through collaboration in extended aneurysm cohorts, with a total of 6548 cases and 16 843 controls ( IA ) and 4391 cases and 37 904 controls ( AAA ), and found nominally significant associations for IA risk locus 18q11 near RBBP 8 to AAA (odds ratio [ OR ]=1.11; P =4.1×10 −5 ) and for TAA risk locus 15q21 near FBN 1 to AAA ( OR =1.07; P =1.1×10 −3 ). Conclusions Although there was no evidence for polygenic overlap between IAs , AAAs , and TAAs , we found nominally significant effects of two established risk loci for IAs and TAAs in AAAs . These two loci will require further replication.

PurposeIn this article, the authors report reliability and validity evidence for the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS), a new test that uses dynamic assessment to aid in the differential diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).MethodParticipants were 81 children between 36 and 79 months of age who were referred to the Mayo Clinic for diagnosis of speech sound disorders. Children were given the DEMSS and a standard speech and language test battery as part of routine evaluations. Subsequently, intrajudge, interjudge, and test–retest reliability were evaluated for a subset of participants. Construct validity was explored for all 81 participants through the use of agglomerative cluster analysis, sensitivity measures, and likelihood ratios.ResultsThe mean percentage of agreement for 171 judgments was 89% for test–retest reliability, 89% for intrajudge reliability, and 91% for interjudge reliability. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis showed that total DEMSS scores largely differentiated clusters of children with CAS vs. mild CAS vs. other speech disorders. Positive and negative likelihood ratios and measures of sensitivity and specificity suggested that the DEMSS does not overdiagnose CAS but sometimes fails to identify children with CAS.ConclusionsThe value of the DEMSS in differential diagnosis of severe speech impairments was supported on the basis of evidence of reliability and validity.