Baas, Becky S.

Objective This study aimed to compare longitudinal cephalometric growth, speech outcomes, and secondary surgeries after 1-stage versus 2-stage palatoplasty in patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design Retrospective single-institution cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic craniofacial center. Patients/Participants Sixty-eight patients with non-syndromic UCLP treated between 1992 and 2015 who underwent primary palatal repair and had long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up. Forty-eight underwent 1-stage palatoplasty, and 20 underwent 2-stage palatoplasty. Interventions One-stage palatoplasty versus staged palatoplasty with initial soft palate repair followed by delayed hard palate closure. Main Outcome Measures Longitudinal cephalometric measurements at approximately 10 and 16 years, speech outcomes at 5, 10, 13, and 16 years, oronasal fistula, velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery, and need for continued speech follow-up after age 10. Results Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 4.4 years. Linear fixed-effects modeling showed significant age-related worsening in sagittal skeletal relationships in both groups, including decreases in sella-nasion-A point angle (SNA), A point-nasion-B point angle (ANB), and Wits appraisal, without significant effects of palatoplasty strategy or age-by-strategy interaction for key sagittal outcomes. Speech outcomes were comparable between groups across all timepoints, including hypernasality, nasal emission, compensatory articulation, intelligibility, and Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) scores. Rates of secondary velopharyngeal surgery and continued speech follow-up after age 10 did not differ significantly. Oronasal fistula occurred more frequently after 2-stage palatoplasty than 1-stage palatoplasty (30% vs 9%, P = .02). Conclusion One-stage and 2-stage palatoplasty demonstrated similar long-term growth and speech outcomes through adolescence. Two-stage repair was associated with a higher oronasal fistula rate but not greater secondary velopharyngeal or speech burden.

A retrospective review of multidisciplinary velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) Clinic records from 2010 to 2024 was completed. Inclusion criteria for the review were diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and documented evaluation for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). Adequacy of velopharyngeal closure and perceptual judgment of resonance were identified as primary outcome measures. Surgical interventions and speech outcomes were also described. This review identified 74 children who were diagnosed with CAS and evaluated for VPD in the VPI Clinic. For the subset (n = 50) of children who had surgical intervention, speech therapy, and long-term follow-up, all had improved velopharyngeal closure and resonance.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate comorbidity prevalence and patterns in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and their relationship to severity. Method: In this retroactive cross-sectional study, medical records for 375 children with CAS ( M age = 4;9 [years;months], SD = 2;9) were examined for comorbid conditions. The total number of comorbid conditions and the number of communication-related comorbidities were regressed on CAS severity as rated by speech-language pathologists during diagnosis. The relationship between CAS severity and the presence of four common comorbid conditions was also examined using ordinal or multinomial regressions. Results: Overall, 83 children were classified with mild CAS; 35, with moderate CAS; and 257, with severe CAS. Only one child had no comorbidities. The average number of comorbid conditions was 8.4 ( SD = 3.4), and the average number of communication-related comorbidities was 5.6 ( SD = 2.2). Over 95% of children had comorbid expressive language impairment. Children with comorbid intellectual disability (78.1%), receptive language impairment (72.5%), and nonspeech apraxia (37.3%; including limb, nonspeech oromotor, and oculomotor apraxia) were significantly more likely to have severe CAS than children without these comorbidities. However, children with comorbid autism spectrum disorder (33.6%) were no more likely to have severe CAS than children without autism. Conclusions: Comorbidity appears to be the rule, rather than the exception, for children with CAS. Comorbid intellectual disability, receptive language impairment, and nonspeech apraxia confer additional risk for more severe forms of CAS. Findings are limited by being from a convenience sample of participants but inform future models of comorbidity. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22096622

Motor learning principles guide treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Previous studies found children to benefit from higher-intensity conditions; however, they did not control for the total amount of therapy time. The aims of the article are to examine the effects of high versus low treatment frequency in intervention for CAS in German-speaking children. An alternating single-subject design with multiple baselines was applied to compare frequent, short sessions with fewer, longer sessions in terms of speech production accuracy in four children with CAS while keeping the total therapy time constant. We administered a version of integral stimulation treatment. Despite inter-individual differences, changes under both treatment conditions showed similar positive trajectories for all four children. Untreated control targets also improved across participants and conditions. Maintenance and generalization to untreated targets were observed two weeks and three months post treatment, independent of treatment intensity. Our results show no significant advantage of more intensive treatment when the total therapy time is held constant. This study contributes to the evidence base for the use of integral stimulation in treating children with CAS, and in particular those who speak languages other than English.

Purpose Assessing children with hearing loss and co-occurring medical disorders can be challenging. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to highlight multidisciplinary decision making and evaluation considerations when assessing communication skills of children with hearing loss and co-occurring disorders: velopharyngeal insufficiency, childhood apraxia of speech, and autism spectrum disorder. Method Case examples are described to illustrate multidisciplinary decision-making processes for assessing the communication skills of children with hearing loss who have co-occurring velopharyngeal insufficiency, childhood apraxia of speech, or autism spectrum disorder. Conclusions Clinicians must have knowledge of speech sound development, language development, and social communication for differential diagnosis and treatment planning for children with hearing loss and co-occurring disorders. A team-based approach is recommended when assessing and treating children with hearing loss. Speech-language pathologists and audiologists should feel comfortable recommending other professionals to help with differential diagnosis and treatment considerations when appropriate. Continued assessment and monitoring by a multidisciplinary team for individuals with hearing loss is recommended across the life-span.

Objective: To compare language and audiological outcomes among infants (<9 and <12 mo) and older children receiving cochlear implantation (CI). Study design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Patients: Pediatric patients receiving CI between October 1995 and October 2019. Intervention: Cochlear implantation Main Outcome Measures: Most recent language and audiological assessment scores were evaluated by age group. Results: A total of 118 children were studied, including 19 who were implanted <9 months of age, 19 implanted 9 to <12 months of age, and 80 implanted 12 to <36 months of age. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.4 ± 5.0 years. Most recent REEL-3 receptive (88 ± 12 vs. 73 ± 15; p = 0.020) and expressive (95 ± 13 vs. 79 ± 12; p = 0.013) communication scores were significantly higher in the <9 months group compared to the 9 to <12 months group. PLS and OWLS auditory comprehension and oral expression scores were significantly higher in the <12 months group compared to the 12 to <36 months group. The difference in NU-CHIPS scores between <12 and 12 to <36 months was statistically significant (89% ± 6 vs. 83% ± 12; p = 0.009). LNT scores differed significantly between <9 and 9 to <12 months (94% ± 4 vs. 86% ± 10; p = 0.028). Conclusions: The recent FDA expansion of pediatric CI eligibility criteria to include infants as young as 9 months of age should not serve as a strict clinical cutoff. Rather, CI can be pursued in appropriately selected younger infants to optimize language and audiological outcomes.

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the effectiveness, durability, and safety of a tissue filler (dextranomer and hyaluronic acid copolymer) when injected submucosally in the nasopharynx to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in pediatric patients.Study DesignRetrospective case series.MethodsCharts were reviewed for all patients treated with injectable filler at a tertiary children's center for VPI from April 2010 through September 2013. Main outcome measures included perceptual speech assessments before and after the procedure, velopharyngeal gap size on nasendoscopy, and nasalance. Length of follow‐up, length of surgery, hospital admission, and complications were also identified.ResultsAfter injection augmentation pharyngoplasty, 93% of patients had no or mild hypernasality, 83% had resolution of nasal grimace, and 96% had resolution of audible nasal emission. Complications were minor and included mucosal infection, neck pain, snoring, and obstructive sleep apnea.ConclusionsUse of injectable filler to augment the nasopharynx is an effective, minimally invasive therapy for small or moderate‐sized velopharyngeal gaps, with shorter procedural times, easier recovery, and acceptable durability.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 126:S5–S13, 2016

PurposeIn this article, the authors report reliability and validity evidence for the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS), a new test that uses dynamic assessment to aid in the differential diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).MethodParticipants were 81 children between 36 and 79 months of age who were referred to the Mayo Clinic for diagnosis of speech sound disorders. Children were given the DEMSS and a standard speech and language test battery as part of routine evaluations. Subsequently, intrajudge, interjudge, and test–retest reliability were evaluated for a subset of participants. Construct validity was explored for all 81 participants through the use of agglomerative cluster analysis, sensitivity measures, and likelihood ratios.ResultsThe mean percentage of agreement for 171 judgments was 89% for test–retest reliability, 89% for intrajudge reliability, and 91% for interjudge reliability. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis showed that total DEMSS scores largely differentiated clusters of children with CAS vs. mild CAS vs. other speech disorders. Positive and negative likelihood ratios and measures of sensitivity and specificity suggested that the DEMSS does not overdiagnose CAS but sometimes fails to identify children with CAS.ConclusionsThe value of the DEMSS in differential diagnosis of severe speech impairments was supported on the basis of evidence of reliability and validity.