Citations

Abstract Introduction: Hypothyroidism is implicated in the pathophysiology and clinical course of mood disorders. This study aimed to investigate the association between TSH and severe depression. Methods: The historical cohort included all consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) who had a TSH and PHQ-9 questionnaire data within 6 months of index visit, between October 2016 and July 2019, at the University of Utah Health. Data on demographics, hypothyroidism, TSH, PHQ-9, thyroid hormone replacement (THR), and antidepressant medications were extracted electronically. T-test and chi-square were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively. Logistic regression and one-way ANOVA were used to evaluate the association between TSH and depression severity. A sub-group analysis was performed among mood disorder patients without a diagnosis of overt hypothyroidism, comparing euthyroid patients (TSH 0.3-4) and patients with sub-clinical hypothyroidism based on TSH 4-10. Results: The cohort included 26,722 patients, mean age 46.3 years, 79.5% Caucasian, 68% females, and mean BMI 30. Mean PHQ-9 score was 8.2, 10% patients had severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥20), and 51% were on antidepressants and 26% on mood stabilizers. Mean TSH was 2.85, 19% patients had a diagnosis of hypothyroidism, and 20% patients were on THR. Patients with severe depression were more likely to have a higher mean TSH (p=0.06), be on antidepressants (p= <0.0001), and have a higher BMI (p=0.0003). There was a positive correlation between TSH and PHQ-9 score (p= 0.04). TSH was associated with severe depression, odds ratio 1.006 (1.003-1.009), after adjusting for potential co-variates. Hypothyroid patients who were on THR had a lower mean PHQ-9 score (p= <0.0001) as compared to hypothyroid patients not on THR. Patients with TSH from 7-10 had a higher PHQ-9 score as compared to those who had a TSH from 4-7 (p= <0.003). Conclusion: Severe depression was associated with higher TSH. Subclinical hypothyroidism with TSH above 50th percentile was associated with higher PHQ-9 scores. Future RCTs should evaluate the effect of THR in (a) patients with severe depression and (b) patients with mood disorders who have subclinical hypothyroidism.

Introduction Cervicogenic headache (CH) is a chronic headache that is referred to the head from the cervical spine that typically starts or worsens with neck movement. The pain typically presents posteriorly with anterior radiation. Nociceptive input from structures innervated by the upper three cervical spinal nerves can theoretically exacerbate primary headache disorders like migraine. We present three cases of CH related to C1-C2 joint arthropathy that significantly improved after treatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibodies initiated for chronic comorbid migraine. Case Descriptions We describe a case series of 3 patients with co-morbid CH and migraine that were treated with CGRP antibodies. All three patients had significant improvement in their migraines with C1-C2 joint injections and subsequently CGRP antibodies provided a greater than 50% benefit in each patient preventing the need for repeat injections. Conclusions The diagnosis of CH in patients is confirmed when treatment of the cervical spine lesion alleviates pain significantly. While CH itself has not been shown to be associated with elevated serum CGRP as has been demonstrated in migraine, animal models of osteoarthritis have shown reduction of hyperalgesia with galcanezumab. An upregulation in CGRP related to nociceptive input from degenerative changes in the cervical spine could lead to potentiation and sensitization which could potentially respond to systemic administration of CGRP antibodies. As a result, the presence of features suggestive of CH in patients with migraine may be a predictor of a positive response to CGRP antibodies. For patients with comorbid migraine and CH, CGRP antibodies could prevent the need for invasive injection treatments.

AbstractBackgroundKaryotype determination has a central role in the genetic workup of pregnancy loss, as aneuploidy (trisomy and monosomy) and polyploidy (triploidy and tetraploidy) are the cause in at least 50% of first trimester, 25% of second trimester, and 11% of third trimester miscarriages. There are several limitations with the current approaches of obtaining a karyotype using traditional cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization with a limited number of probes, and chromosomal microarray. These include culture failure, incomplete results, lower sensitivity, and longer reporting time.MethodsTo overcome current limitations, a novel molecular assay is developed with a Standard Resolution Interphase Chromosome Profiling probe set which is a variation of the recently developed High Resolution probe set. It generates a molecular karyotype that can detect all major changes commonly associated with pregnancy loss. Initial familiarization of signal patterns from the probe set was used, followed by validation of the method using 83 samples from miscarriages in a blind study from three different laboratories. Finally, the clinical utility of the method was tested on 291 clinical samples in two commercial reference laboratory settings on two different continents.ResultsThe new molecular approach not only identified all the chromosome changes observed by current methods, but also significantly improved abnormality detection by characterizing derivative chromosomes and finding subtle subtelomeric rearrangements, balanced and unbalanced. All Robertsonian translocations were also detected. The abnormality rate was 54% on clinical samples from commercial laboratory 1 and 63% from laboratory 2.ConclusionThe attributes of this method make it an ideal choice for the genetic workup of miscarriages, namely (1) near 100% successful results, (2) greater sensitivity than conventional chromosome analysis or FISH panels, (3) rapid reporting time, and (4) favorable comparisons with chromosomal microarray.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) or stress-induced cardiomyopathy is also popularly referred to as “broken heart syndrome” or “apical ballooning syndrome”. [...]

Purpose Painful oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to test the efficacy of doxepin hydrochloride in the reduction of radiotherapy-induced OM pain. Patients and Methods In all, 155 patients were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-related OM pain. Patients received a single dose of doxepin or placebo on day 1 and then crossed over to receive the opposite agent on a subsequent day. Pain questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Patients were then given the option to continue doxepin. The primary end point was pain reduction as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1. Results Primary end point analysis revealed that the AUC for mouth and throat pain reduction was greater for doxepin (−9.1) than for placebo (−4.7; P < .001). Crossover analysis of patients completing both phases confirmed that patients experienced greater mouth and throat pain reduction with doxepin (intrapatient changes of 4.1 for doxepin-placebo arm and −2.8 for placebo-doxepin arm; P < .001). Doxepin was associated with more stinging or burning, unpleasant taste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse. More patients receiving doxepin expressed a desire to continue treatment than did patients with placebo after completion of each of the randomized phases of the study. Conclusion A doxepin rinse diminishes OM pain. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in the management of OM.

BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid β (Aβ)‐42, total‐tau (T‐tau), and phosphorylated‐tau (P‐tau) demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements between studies, and between and within laboratories. The Alzheimer's Association has initiated a global quality control program to estimate and monitor variability of measurements, quantify batch‐to‐batch assay variations, and identify sources of variability. In this article, we present the results from the first two rounds of the program.MethodsThe program is open for laboratories using commercially available kits for Aβ, T‐tau, or P‐tau. CSF samples (aliquots of pooled CSF) are sent for analysis several times a year from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Mölndal campus of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Each round consists of three quality control samples.ResultsForty laboratories participated. Twenty‐six used INNOTEST enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits, 14 used Luminex xMAP with the INNO‐BIA AlzBio3 kit (both measure Aβ‐(1‐42), P‐tau(181P), and T‐tau), and 5 used Meso Scale Discovery with the Aβ triplex (AβN‐42, AβN‐40, and AβN‐38) or T‐tau kits. The total coefficients of variation between the laboratories were 13% to 36%. Five laboratories analyzed the samples six times on different occasions. Within‐laboratory precisions differed considerably between biomarkers within individual laboratories.ConclusionsMeasurements of CSF AD biomarkers show large between‐laboratory variability, likely caused by factors related to analytical procedures and the analytical kits. Standardization of laboratory procedures and efforts by kit vendors to increase kit performance might lower variability, and will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers.