Citations

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose Corticospinal tract (CST) integrity is an imaging biomarker for predicting upper extremity motor recovery, but data are limited in acute ischemic stroke patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of CST disruption on upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Methods We enrolled patients with upper extremity motor deficits within 7 days of stroke onset. Patients’ clinical status was assessed for the upper extremity Fugl–Meyer assessment motor component (UE‐FM) within 7 days of stroke and at 15, 30, and 90 days. MRI with tractography was performed within 7 days of stroke. Diffusion tensor images (DTI) were processed to produce maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion, axial, radial, and mean diffusivity. FA maps were used to assess CST asymmetry index (CST‐AI). Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, two‐sample t ‐tests for normally distributed numerical data, and Wilcoxon rank sums for non‐normally distributed numeric data were used. Results A total of 21 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 66 (±14) years and median baseline upper extremity motor component score (UE‐FM) of 42 (median) [range: 23, 53]. Baseline UE‐FM was not predictive of a 10‐point change at 90 days ( p = 0.4469). CST‐AI was predictive of recovery at 15 days ( p = 0.0373), and axial diffusivity was predictive of recovery at 90 days ( p = 0.0402). All other imaging variables did not predict recovery. Conclusion Our data suggest that upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke is impacted by CST integrity. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

ABSTRACT Introduction The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) drafted Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Endocrine Surgery (ES) to assess general surgery residents and ES fellows in core topics. Here, we examine learner and teacher concordance of entrustability ratings. Methods Fourteen EPAs were defined (10 “core”–6 with pre‐, intra‐, and post‐operative phases, four single‐phase–and four elective EPAs). Ten institutions collected three‐item micro‐assessments (MAs) of learner EPA performance using a web‐based platform, where entrustment was assessed on observable behaviors using a five‐point scale. Learner provided self‐assessment ratings, while teachers separately assigned ratings for the same activities. Spearman rank correlation tests were applied to compare learner‐teacher ratings for EPAs. Results MAs ( n = 698) were submitted between 7/2022‐9/2023. Programs submitted between 3 and 468 MAs. Among 3‐phase core EPAs, the intraoperative phase was most assessed ( n = 496), followed by pre‐ and post‐operative phases ( n = 108 and 55, respectively). Thirty‐nine single‐phase EPAs were submitted. Learner self‐assessment and teacher ratings were equivalent for 32% of pre‐operative EPAs, 53% of intra‐operative EPAs, 29% of post‐operative EPAs, and 64% of single phase of care EPAs. Spearman rank correlation between teacher and learner ratings for all phases of care combined was 0.66. Correlation was highest for the intra‐operative phase (0.73), followed by single‐phase (0.65), pre‐operative phase (0.27), and post‐operative phase (0.20). Rating concordance did not differ when high and low scores were examined independently. Learners were more prone to underestimate performance than to overestimate it when ratings were discordant. Conclusions Learners' self‐assessment and teacher ratings of endocrine surgery EPAs are strongly concordant with operative technical skills. However, learners often underestimate their performance of pre‐ and post‐operative care compared to faculty ratings when using EPAs.

Background: Cardiac fibrosis is a central pathological process that leads to worse outcomes in various cardiomyopathies. Recent evidence shows that CDCP1 (CUB domain-containing protein 1) modulates myocardial recovery by attenuating human cardiac fibroblast (HCF) proliferation. This study investigates the hypothesis that selective targeting of the CDCP1 cleavage domain can mitigate fibroblast proliferation, thereby offering a novel therapeutic approach to reducing cardiac fibrosis. Methods: A high-throughput in silico screening was performed using the Enamine compound library, focusing on structural regions that include the cleavage and adjacent sites of CDCP1 . A total of 147 candidate compounds were prioritized based on docking scores and binding stability profiles. Selected compounds were subsequently evaluated in vitro using HCF cultures seeded at 3,000 cells/well in 96-well plates. Each compound was administered at 10 μM concentration, and cell proliferation and viability were assessed by time-lapse imaging in the Incucyte® system at 24 and 96 hours. All experiments were done in triplicate with appropriate DMSO vehicle controls. Results: Compound C3 significantly reduced HCF proliferation (Fig B) to 27.3±2.4% relative to DMSO controls (99.9±0.5%, P <0.001) at 96 hours. Detailed structural modeling indicated that C3 binds to the CDCP1 cleavage site (Fig C) with a favorable Glide XP docking score of -7.66 kcal/mol. The interaction is stabilized by hydrogen bonds with Lys365 and Cys374 (Fig D), and supplementary hydrophobic interactions between aromatic rings and aliphatic groups, which contribute to a strong inhibitory effect. Conclusion: Targeting the CDCP1 cleavage domain with compound C3 effectively diminishes HCF proliferation in vitro. Therefore, these results substantiate the therapeutic potential of CDCP1 inhibition in cardiac fibrosis. Ongoing in vivo studies will explore the translational relevance of these findings.

345 Background: Pediatric febrile neutropenia (PFN) requires emergent evaluation due to risk of invasive bacterial infection. In the management of PFN, there are varying, accepted definitions for fever requiring emergency evaluation and neutropenia requiring admission. Problem statement: From September 1, 2022 - May 31, 2023, 15.1% (n = 11/73) of emergency department (ED) visits and 17.1% (n = 6/35) of admissions for PFN at Mayo Clinic Rochester may be considered unnecessary due to patients not meeting updated clinical criteria. Aim: Decrease unnecessary ED visits and hospitalizations for PFN by 50% from 15.1% to 7.5% (for ED visits) and from 17.1% to 8.6% (for hospitalizations) by 02/29/2024 without adversely impacting mortality from invasive bacterial infection. Methods: We used the DMAIC framework for process improvement. Interventions included (1) adoption of a higher fever definition for PFN, (2) adoption of a risk-stratified neutropenia definition for hospital admission, (3) provided electronic fever plans with definitions to all families, (4) re-iterated that parents call on-call provider with any concern for fever, (5) educated pediatric oncology staff on definition and management of fevers in pediatric oncology patients, and (6) educated pediatric emergency department staff on definition and management of fevers in pediatric oncology patients. Interventions were tested with rapid tests of change. Relevant clinical characteristics, variables, and outcomes for all patients from pediatric oncology were tracked for all encounters of pediatric oncology patients presenting to the ED for acute illnesses. Results: At baseline,15.1% (n = 11/73) of ED visits for PFN were considered unnecessary due to patients not meeting clinical criteria for emergency evaluation. Post-interventions, unnecessary ED visits for PFN had decreased to 3.4% (n = 1/32). At baseline, 17.1% (n = 6/35) of hospitalizations were considered unnecessary due to patients not meeting clinical criteria for admission. Post-interventions, 7.7% (n = 2/26) of hospitalizations were considered unnecessary. There were no patient deaths from invasive bacterial infection among this cohort at baseline or after interventions. Conclusions: Multiple interventions including adoption of a higher, accepted fever threshold and risk stratified neutropenia definition for PFN was associated with a reduction of unnecessary ED visits and hospitalizations for PFN without an increase in mortality from invasive bacterial infection. The projected medical expense savings of approximately $144,000-$210,000 per year.

426 Background: Testing for DPYD gene variations prior to administration of fluoropyrimidines ([FP] e.g. 5-FU or capecitabine) can determine if patients are at risk of significant toxicity and may benefit from dose reduction or elimination of chemotherapy. Barriers to testing include lack of recommendations in US guidelines for routine DPYD testing, absence of insurance coverage, and limitations in provider support. We designed an electronic health record (EHR)-based intervention to support shared decision-making (SDM) between providers and patients regarding DPYD testing. Methods: We built an EHR alert identifying all patients initiating FP without DPYD testing. The alert fired to remind providers upon signing FP. Clinical decision support (CDS) was included in the alert to help with DPYD testing selection along with an educational note template containing the incidence of DPYD deficiency, rationale for testing, test costs, and turnaround time. Interactions with the EHR were recorded to determine why providers declined ordering pharmacogenomic testing. Testing rates and results for patients initiating FP were collected from the EHR. Finally, providers were surveyed to determine the impact of the alert on conversations with patients as well as the utility of the embedded CDS and educational note template. Results: Within the first 8 months after alert activation, 34 patients completed DPYD testing of 444 starting FP (testing rate of 7.7%) vs the baseline testing rate in the 3 months prior to alert go-live of 6.8% (p = 0.86 via chi-squared analysis, two-tailed). Of the 34 patients, 5 were intermediate DPYD metabolizers. Reasons for alert dismissal per provider selection were: “Patient already tolerated prior fluoropyrimidines” (15.7%), “Patient declines” (12.9%), “Will order separately” (5.7%), “Not discussed as not appropriate” (5.3%), and “Not discussed, deferred” (60.4%). Thirty-nine providers (n = 77 eligible) responded to the survey; 22 prescribed FP in their practice and had encountered the alert. 21 (95.5%) of these reported the alert was “Very Useful” or “Somewhat Useful” and 18 (81.8%) used the DPYD testing options available in the alert. Sixteen (72.7%) discussed DPYD testing more frequently with patients as a result of the alert. Barriers to DPYD testing were “Concerned about the impact of lowering FP dosing” and “Lack of knowledge about DPYD testing”, while “Cost of DPYD testing” was scored lowest. Conclusions: Utilizing an EHR alert with embedded CDS had a positive impact on provider awareness and led to more discussions regarding DPYD pharmacogenomic testing with patients in line with current FDA recommendations. Limitations in provider knowledge regarding DPYD testing and concerns about lowering chemotherapy doses posed barriers to ordering testing. Further interventions including additional education are required.

ABSTRACT We report the optimization of a 38‐parameter spectral flow cytometry panel to identify, phenotype, and assess lineage plasticity of human regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are an indispensable T cell lineage with pleiotropic tolerogenic functions whose activities contribute critically to numerous disease settings including cancer, autoimmunity, and infectious disease, among others. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity within the Treg lineage has been appreciated, but the etiology and impact of Treg plasticity across disease states remain incompletely understood. Better tools are thus needed to deeply characterize human Treg phenotypic heterogeneity at the single cell level to advance discovery of Treg‐based biomarkers in disease and to assess the effects of Treg‐directed therapeutics. To this end, our 38‐parameter panel consists of a 13‐marker PBMC backbone module to broadly phenotype PBMCs while specifically discriminating Tregs, and a 25‐marker Treg phenotyping module to determine Treg differentiation state, activation profile, and lineage subtype. In contrast to many high‐parameter OMIPs that rely on surface staining only, we incorporated several intracellular targets in this panel. This afforded the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate binding characteristics of all antibodies in both pre‐fixation and post‐fixation and permeabilization settings; we identify several antibodies eligible for overnight post‐fixation staining that require substantially reduced titers as compared to traditional pre‐fixation staining, resulting in significant cost savings. Dimensionality reduction and semi‐supervised clustering on healthy donor PBMC‐derived Tregs profiled by our panel reveal up to 14 discrete Treg phenotypes. In sum, this panel enables deep phenotypic characterization of human Treg heterogeneity in peripheral blood specimens by spectral flow cytometry.

Abstract Objective This study aimed to understand the factors limiting access to medications for the preventive treatment of migraine and to improve access to evidence‐based preventive care. Background For decades, the effective use of medication for the preventive treatment of migraine was limited by slow onset, slow and complex dose titration schedules, modest benefits, drug interactions, frequent side effects, and very low long‐term adherence. The calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) targeted preventive medications mitigate some of these limitations and demonstrated substantial therapeutic benefits in a significant proportion of adults with migraine. The American Headache Society considers these medications among the first‐line options for migraine prevention, although access to them remains limited. The American Migraine Foundation hosted a single‐day, multidisciplinary expert panel discussion to identify barriers to optimal preventive care and developed recommendations to address them. Methods Participants identified and prioritized barriers and used a modified nominal group technique to achieve consensus on them. A series of moderated discussions in plenary and breakout sessions was used to create possible solutions. Modified nominal group technique was also employed to achieve consensus on the priorities among these barriers and to achieve whole‐group consensus on the recommendations. Ethical issues that inform access were discussed. Results Participants included eight neurologists and board‐certified headache specialists, six representatives of reimbursement decision‐makers, six employees of life sciences companies, four patient advocates with lived experience with migraine, and a medical ethicist. Among those who have consulted healthcare professionals and received a diagnosis of migraine, we identified four main barriers to accessing preventive treatment: restrictive prior authorization requirements, the perceived lack of real‐world evidence and treatment guidelines, the need for clinician education, and the need for patient education. Consensus recommendations for eliminating barriers centered on using new evidence to evaluate policies that restrict the selection of first‐line therapies, initiating/improving collaboration among stakeholders, sharing of data and best practices, and increased training. Participants agreed to explore novel definitions of the value of preventive treatment and to establish the Migraine Prevention Network to facilitate ongoing cooperation and collective action. However, due to financial limitations, staffing changes, and time constraints, post‐meeting discussions led to a shift from establishing a broad Migraine Prevention Network to forming smaller task forces focused on the top‐priority barriers (real‐world evidence and The Patient Playbook ) identified through collaborative voting among American Headache Society, American Migraine Foundation, and industry stakeholders. Conclusions Adults with migraine face multiple barriers in accessing novel migraine‐specific, CGRP‐targeted preventive treatment. Stakeholders in the delivery of care, including clinicians, reimbursement decision‐makers, life sciences companies, and patient and clinician advocates, may be able to overcome many of these barriers and improve access by working with and on behalf of patients.

Objective Prior work has identified numerous barriers to standardized outcome measurement in cleft care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy to collect standardized outcomes for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Design A one-armed, single-site pilot study of a multifaceted implementation strategy. Setting A metropolitan children's hospital. Patients Five-year-old children with CL/P. Interventions A multifaceted implementation strategy for standardized outcome measurement. Main Outcomes Measures The primary outcome measure was penetration of the intervention, defined as the proportion of children for whom the standardized measures of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes were collected. Penetration pre-implementation and 12 months post-implementation were compared. The secondary outcome was acceptability of standardized outcome measurement among providers and staff, evaluated with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Results The implementation strategy resulted in high penetration of standardized outcome measurement: measurement of aesthetic outcomes increased from 7% to 82% ( p < .0001); measurement of dental outcomes increased from 0% to 56% ( p < .0001); measurement of speech outcomes increased from 29% to 77% ( p = .0001). Acceptability of standardized outcome measurement was high, with 93% of cleft team providers and staff (n = 14/15) reporting that they somewhat or completely agreed that standardized outcome measurement met their approval, was appealing, was welcomed, and was liked. Penetration continued to improve after the implementation period, with high rates of outcome measure collection sustained for four years following implementation. Conclusions Deployment of a multifaceted implementation strategy led to substantial increases in the collection of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes among children with CL/P.

Abstract BRCA-associated homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is present in ~ 50% of high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and predicts sensitivity to platinum-based therapy. However, there is little understanding of why some patients with BRCA-deficient tumors experience unexpectedly poor outcomes. We profiled 154 tumors, enriched for patients with BRCA-deficient tumors that experienced short overall survival (≤ 3 years, n = 42), using whole-genome, transcriptome, and methylation analyses. All but one BRCA-deficient tumor exceeded an accepted HRD genomic scarring threshold. However, patients with BRCA1-deficient HGSC with a more elevated HRD score survived significantly longer. Patients with BRCA2-deficient HGSC and loss of NF1 survived twice as long as those without NF1 loss, whereas PIK3CA or RAD21 amplification defined BRCA2-deficient HGSC with exceptionally short survival. BRCA1-deficient tumors in short survivors had evidence of immunosuppressive c-kit signaling and EMT. In a large HGSC cohort (n = 1,389) including 282 individuals with pathogenic germline BRCA variants (gBRCApv), the location of the mutation within functional domains stratified clinical outcomes. Notably, residual disease after primary surgery had limited prognostic effect in gBRCApv-carriers compared to non-carriers. Our findings indicate that tumor HR proficiency in the context of therapy response and survival is not a binary property, and highlight genomic and immune modifiers of outcomes in BRCA-deficient HGSC.