Beals, Patricia

Objective Prior work has identified numerous barriers to standardized outcome measurement in cleft care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy to collect standardized outcomes for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Design A one-armed, single-site pilot study of a multifaceted implementation strategy. Setting A metropolitan children's hospital. Patients Five-year-old children with CL/P. Interventions A multifaceted implementation strategy for standardized outcome measurement. Main Outcomes Measures The primary outcome measure was penetration of the intervention, defined as the proportion of children for whom the standardized measures of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes were collected. Penetration pre-implementation and 12 months post-implementation were compared. The secondary outcome was acceptability of standardized outcome measurement among providers and staff, evaluated with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Results The implementation strategy resulted in high penetration of standardized outcome measurement: measurement of aesthetic outcomes increased from 7% to 82% ( p < .0001); measurement of dental outcomes increased from 0% to 56% ( p < .0001); measurement of speech outcomes increased from 29% to 77% ( p = .0001). Acceptability of standardized outcome measurement was high, with 93% of cleft team providers and staff (n = 14/15) reporting that they somewhat or completely agreed that standardized outcome measurement met their approval, was appealing, was welcomed, and was liked. Penetration continued to improve after the implementation period, with high rates of outcome measure collection sustained for four years following implementation. Conclusions Deployment of a multifaceted implementation strategy led to substantial increases in the collection of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes among children with CL/P.

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate a single center's experience with adult patients who had cleft lip, cleft palate, or both. The authors aimed to identify common long-term needs in this patient population and evaluated the relationship of team-based care in meeting those needs. To do so, the authors retrospectively reviewed chart records from a single private practice and tertiary referral cleft center for all patients who were ≥15 years of age and who had a history of clefts of the lip or palate, or both, from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. The authors compared the concerns of the patients who received cleft-team–based care by a single, multidisciplinary cleft team; multiple multidisciplinary cleft teams; or no formal cleft team. The authors analyzed data for 142 patients. The most common patient concerns were lip aesthetics (64%), nose aesthetics (61%), septal deviations (47%), nasal obstruction (44%), malocclusion (32%), oronasal fistulas (29%), and speech (21%). Oronasal fistulas were more commonly reported in the group of patients who had care by multiple teams (42.9%; P < .001). Malocclusion was more commonly reported in the group of patients who had care by multiple teams (50%; P = .001). The authors found that adult patients who have undergone rehabilitation for cleft lip and palate appear to have a common set of long-term needs. Multidisciplinary cleft-team–based care appears to be the most effective way to address these needs.