Citations

Introduction Linvoseltamab is an investigational, BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody designed for the treatment of RRMM. High objective response rates (ORR) to linvoseltamab 200 mg in the LINKER-MM1 trial (NCT03761108) were demonstrated across high-risk subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years, patients with high-risk cytogenetics, and patients with penta-class refractory status. The aim of this study was to compare ORR, overall and in key subgroups, between patients in Phase 2 of the LINKER-MM1 trial and patients in an international RW SOC external control arm (ECA). Methods The ECA was derived from a chart review of 16 academic sites across 10 countries that are part of the International Myeloma Foundation (IMF)-International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and 2 US electronic health record databases (COTA and Guardian Research Network [GRN]). Included patients initiated ≥1 anti-MM treatment after meeting key eligibility criteria of LINKER-MM1. Weighted random sampling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to select 1 line of therapy (LOT) per patient and balance the overall ECA and trial populations on prespecified prognostic factors (Kumar S, et al. IMS 2023). For ORR assessment, LINKER-MM1 and IMF-IMWG used independent central review committees per IMWG criteria, COTA used algorithmic assessment based on IMWG criteria, and GRN used physician-assessed responses. Prior to conducting comparative analyses, an independent committee of epidemiology and oncology experts reviewed the comparability of the cohorts and endpoint assessments, and approved study continuation. ORR among patients in LINKER-MM1 and patients in the ECA was compared overall and across prespecified subgroups (≥10 patients per subgroup), including age, race, cytogenetic risk score, international Staging System (ISS), presence of extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP), refractory class, bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) proportion, and number of prior LOTs. Results Median duration of follow-up was 14.3 months (data cut-off: January 6, 2024) for patients receiving linvoseltamab (n=105) and 13.6 months for the ECA (n=307; n=194, n=72, and n=41 from IMF-IMWG, COTA, and GRN, respectively). Following IPTW, 13 prognostic factors with <30% missingness were balanced between cohorts, with an effective sample size in the ECA of 197. After adjustment, ORR was significantly higher in patients who received linvoseltamab compared with patients in the ECA (69.5% vs 45.7%, odds ratio [OR] 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-4.1]) and in key subgroups with age 65-74 years (76.9% vs 48.3%, OR 3.6 [1.6-8.6]), age ≥75 years (72.4% vs 48.5%, OR 2.8 [1.1-7.4]), Black or African American race (82.4% vs 25.0%, OR 14.0 [3.0-85.4]), White race (68.9% vs 49.7%, OR 2.2 [1.3-4.0]), standard cytogenetic risk (72.3% vs 51.3%, OR 2.5 [1.3-4.8]), ISS stage III (58.8% vs 19.7%, OR 5.8 [1.5-25.2]), absence of EMP (71.6% vs 49.3%, OR 2.6 [1.5-4.6]), triple-class refractory status (68.2% vs 45.7%, OR 2.6 [1.5-4.4]), quadruple-class refractory status (66.7% vs 45.9%, OR 2.4 [1.3-4.3]), 4-5 prior LOTs (65.1% vs 40.4%, OR 2.8 [1.3-6.0]), and >5 prior LOTs (75.7% vs 36.1%, OR 5.5 [2.4-13.6]). Numerically higher (not statistically significant) or similar ORR was observed for patients receiving linvoseltamab compared with patients in the ECA with age <65 years (59.5% vs 46.8%, OR 1.7 [0.79-3.6]), high-risk cytogenetics (65.0% vs 63.1%, OR 1.1 [0.41-2.9]), ISS stage I (73.3% vs 64.6%, OR 1.5 [0.62-3.7]), ISS stage II (67.6% vs 53.5%, OR 1.8 [0.72-4.7]), presence of EMP (58.8% vs 56.9%, OR 1.1 [0.32-3.8]), penta-class refractory status (64.3% vs 48.5%, OR 1.9 [0.78-4.8]), BMPC <50% (77.0% vs 67.2%, OR 1.6 [0.61-4.3]), BMPC ≥50% (41.7% vs 36.0%, OR 1.3 [0.36-4.7]), and ≤3 prior LOTs (68.0% vs 66.4%, OR 1.1 [0.43-2.9]). Separate findings will be presented for IMF-IMWG and COTA/GRN data at the congress. Conclusions Linvoseltamab induced better ORR vs RW SOC treatments overall, and better or similar ORR in the key subgroups assessed, highlighting its therapeutic value across a range of patients with RRMM with heterogeneous risk profiles and levels of disease burden.

Abstract Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has affected treatment for node-positive (1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) less than 26. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomly assigned women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) (70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared with NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive malignant primary tumor of the central nervous system in adults, with an incidence of 3.23 per 100,000 people. Despite the existence of various therapeutic approaches, the absence of a cure and the unfavorable prognosis persist for this neoplasm, with a median survival of approximately 8-15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 6.9%. In this review, we address the epidemiology, histopathology, molecular characteristics, and treatment of GBM. We highlight the relationship of GBM with the microenvironment in the lateral ventricle wall and the cerebrospinal fluid. The location of GBM in this region results in more aggressive tumors and shorter life expectancy for patients. Understanding the malignancy mechanisms that hinder remission, treatment, and positive prognosis opens the possibility of improving diagnostic and therapeutic interventions against GBM.

Objective Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a condition that affects both genders and requires urgent surgical intervention as non-operative treatment is often associated with a poor prognosis. Studies have proven that less aggressive surgical treatments influence the outcome for female patients in the fields of several diseases. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze our results in the selective cohort of female patients with AADA to detect differences in the treatment of this group of patients. Methods Between January 2000 and July 2018, 141 adult female patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) underwent repair of the aorta in our department. A total of 75 patients received a proximal arch. replacement (group A), and 66 patients received a subtotal (replacement of the brachiocephalic trunk) and/or total arch. replacement with elephant trunk or frozen elephant trunk (group B). Results The median age in group A was 70.7 years (range 60.7–74.7 years) and in group B 66.3 years (range 55.6–71.3 years). Operation times were significantly longer in group B (total operation time: A = 286.9 min (range 225.0–341.0 min), B = 341 min (range 266.0–392 min), p = .003; cardiopulmonary bypass time: A = 189.0 min (range 139.0–138 min), B = 238 min (range 176.8–300.5 min), p < .001; circulatory arrest time: A = 27.0 min (range 21.0–37.0 min), B = 42.0 min (range 32.0–56.3 min), p < .001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding 30-day mortality (A = 24% ( n = 18), B = 19.7% ( n = 13), p = .538) and rate of reoperation (A = 13.3% ( n = 10), B = 15.2% ( n = 10), p = .757) or the preoperative characteristics. Conclusion Our study showed no significant difference in mortality rate depending on the type of operation. Based on these results, a proximal arch. replacement should be considered as the first line of operation technique if the individual situation allows. For inexperienced clinics and surgeons in particular, we recommend limited aortic repair in patients with AADA. Finally, location of the intimal tear remains the essential factor for the evaluation of the surgical treat.

ABSTRACTIn this first annual review article, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee (APSc) of the Physicians' Committee (PC) curated key apheresis literature in 2023 and presented their choices for the 10 most seminal apheresis articles. PubMed and OVID search engines were used to identify manuscripts from four topic areas: donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, education, and cellular therapy. To further identify seminal criteria, they had to present at least one of the following: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international scope, randomized controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA ninth special issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Inclusion criteria included: full‐length, peer‐reviewed, English language, and human subjects. Case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.

Abstract Background Brain tumors represent a significant global health challenge, with rising incidence and mortality impacting individuals worldwide and contributing to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. In Africa, this burden is exacerbated by limited access to advanced diagnostics, treatment options, and multidisciplinary care, compounded by the absence of standardized cancer registration and tumor biobanking. The introduction of molecular diagnostics, as outlined in the 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification, adds complexity to brain tumor management, particularly in regions with scarce resources. Methods To address these issues, the Brain Tumor Consortium for Africa (BTCA) was established in 2023, bringing together experts to improve CNS tumor diagnosis, patient care, and research. The initial project, conducted via an electronic questionnaire, aimed to assess neuro-oncology capacity across Sub-Saharan Africa. Results The study revealed significant gaps, with a limited number of institutions incorporating molecular subtyping into their diagnostic algorithms. The consortium’s efforts focus on enhancing local data use, informing public policy, and promoting collaboration to advance neuro-oncology practices in Africa. By fostering a network enlisting the expertise of collaborators in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuropathology, anatomic pathology, and medical and radiation oncology, the BTCA seeks to improve brain tumor management through better diagnostics, infrastructure, and policy advocacy. Future directions include expanding molecular diagnostic capabilities, standardizing brain tumor biobanking, enhancing data collection, and advocating for improved brain tumor care in national health agendas. Conclusions The BTCA represents a pioneering model of collaboration and innovation in addressing the unique challenges of brain tumor care in Africa.

Background: Recurrent pericarditis results from inflammasome activation and is associated with significant morbidity. Cannabidiol has been shown to block numerous inflammasome signaling pathways, including reducing transcription of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, and inhibiting secretion of IL-1β and IL-6. Aim: To assess the impact of oral pharmaceutically manufactured (P-)cannabidiol in recurrent pericarditis patients (pts). Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years) with symptomatic, recurrent pericarditis (≥2 recurrences) were eligible for this open-label, multicenter study. Eligible pts had pericarditis chest pain with a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 within 7 days prior to enrollment, together with either elevated (≥1.0 mg/dL) C-reactive protein (CRP) within the prior 7 days or prior pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac imaging. Pts had to be on chronic treatment with NSAIDs, colchicine or corticosteroids (any combination) with stable baseline (BL) doses. Oral P-cannabidiol was uptitrated to 10 mg/kg twice daily (BID), or maximum tolerated dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in NRS pain score at week 8 (WK8). A secondary efficacy endpoint among pts with elevated BL CRP was the percentage of pts with CRP normalization (≤0.5 mg/dL) at WK8. Results: 27 pts, mean age of 53 years (range 24-77), 18 of female sex, with a median of 3 prior pericarditis episodes were enrolled. CRP was ≥1.0 mg/dL in 10 pts (37%) at BL. Prior evidence of LGE was present in 21 pts (78%). At BL, 41% of pts were receiving corticosteroid therapy. The highest tolerated study medication dose was BID 10 mg/kg in 20 pts (74.1%), 7.5 mg/kg in 4 pts (14.8%), and 5 mg/kg in 3 pts (11.1%). All 27 pts (100%) completed the WK8 visit. Mean NRS score decreased by 3.7, from 5.8 at BL to 2.1 at WK8. In those with CRP elevation at BL, CRP normalized in 8 pts (80%) by WK8, with mean CRP decreasing from 5.71 to 0.31 mg/dL. Study medication was discontinued due to AEs in 2 pts (7.4%). 24 pts (89%) tolerated P-cannabidiol with a treatment response and proceeded into the 18-week extension period (EP) where background therapy is weaned. Conclusions: Among pts with symptomatic pericarditis recurrence, oral administration of P-cannabidiol led to a clinically relevant reduction in pericarditis chest pain (measured by NRS score) and in CRP. P-cannabidiol was shown to be safe and generally well tolerated, with the majority of pts reaching the target dose and continuing into the study EP.

Abstract The field of infectious diseases (ID) offers a rewarding career path and is widely viewed as an essential subspecialty in medicine. However, in recent years, these positive aspects have been overshadowed by concerns surrounding low fellowship match rates, undercompensation, and burnout. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellowship Training Program Directors Committee met in 2023, discussed the future of ID as a specialty, and sought to develop strategies to highlight the value and opportunities of ID for future generations, as well as underscore the importance of and provide tools for positive messaging to trainees about the subspecialty. This paper presents ideas generated at this meeting and is meant to serve as a reference for ID training program directors, as well as the wider ID community, in uplifting and shaping the future of the field.

Abstract Brain tumors constitute significant morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). There is no previous large-scale effort focusing on brain tumor genetics in SSA. This project aims to map out the current neuro-oncology capacity in terms of workforce and available services in SSA. This is an ongoing online survey among a cross section of neuro-oncology practitioners spread across SSA countries to capture information on the distribution, number of available neuro-oncology care practitioners, capacity for neuropathology and molecular diagnosis, management of brain tumors, cancer registration, and tumor biobanking. The survey was disseminated by the Society for Neuro-oncology in SSA (SNOSSA). There were 83 respondents representing 15 countries and 52 health institutions: 46 tertiary, 4 secondary, 1 private and 1 other. Here, we present data on the 52 institutions. The prevalence of specialties was 87% neurosurgery, 75% anatomic pathology, 69% medical oncology, 64% neurology, 60% radiation oncology, and 39% neuropathology. For radiologic evaluation, 81% of institutions were reported to have both CT and MRI, 17% CT only, and one institution neither. For molecular testing, 46% have access to IHC or NGS testing, whereas 52% were reported to have neither. A neuro-oncology tumor board was reported at 58% of institutions. A general cancer registry is available in 64% of institutions, 31% have a brain tumor specific registry and 10% have a brain tumor biorepository. This study shows that SSA has substantial potential in neuro-oncology care practice capacity and facilities. Most significant gaps remain in areas such as neuropathology and molecular testing, which makes widespread implementation of the WHO 2021 diagnosis challenging. Understanding the prevalence of CNS tumor subtypes is also difficult due to low number of brain tumor registries and biobanks in SSA. The present findings reveal strategic opportunities, especially in neuropathology, tumor registries, biobanks, and infrastructure for IHC and NGS in SSA.