Lorenc, Karen Rodriguez

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered incurable. Despite improved outcomes with novel agents, including BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and bispecific antibodies, patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) often have poor prognoses. LINKER-MM1 (NCT03761108) is a global, single-arm, Phase 1/2 study of linvoseltamab, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with RRMM who were either triple-class exposed (TCE; previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody) during ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOTs), or triple-class refractory to these therapies. Here, we present comparisons of clinical outcomes from LINKER-MM1 with those of a current, international, real-world (RW) external control arm (ECA; NCT05673967). Methods The ECA was derived from 16 academic sites of the International Myeloma Foundation International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) (N=203; 309 eligible LOTs) and compared with linvoseltamab (N=105; Phase 2 200 mg cohort). Patients in the ECA initiated ≥1 anti-MM therapy after meeting key LINKER-MM1 eligibility criteria. Weighted random sampling and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to select 1 LOT per patient and balance the ECA and trial populations on prespecified prognostic factors (Kumar S, et al. IMS 2023). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; IMWG criteria) determined by an independent central review committee (ICRC) based on myeloma laboratories. An independent data review committee reviewed comparability of cohorts and endpoint assessments prior to conducting comparative analyses. Results Median follow-up was 14.3 months for the linvoseltamab cohort (data cutoff: Jan 6, 2024) and 13.4 months for the ECA. After weighting, 15 prognostic factors were balanced between cohorts. Patients in the ECA received 68 distinct regimens, most commonly CAR T-cell therapies (11.3%) and ADCs (10.3%). After balancing the cohorts, patients in the ECA evaluable for response had ICRC-assessed ORR of 46.3% (40.8% by treating physician assessment), among whom 24.0% had very good partial response or better (≥VGPR). When including patients who died without evaluable response, ECA ICRC-assessed ORR was 44.2%. Linvoseltamab induced significantly higher ICRC-assessed ORR (69.5% vs 46.3%, odds ratio [OR] 2.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-3.69]) and rate of ≥VGPR (62.9% vs 24.0%, OR 5.37 [95% CI 3.61-8.49]) compared with ECA regimens. Conclusion Despite current use of novel therapies, there is no well-established RW standard of care (SOC) for patients with TCE RRMM treated at IMWG sites. To our knowledge, this is the first RW ECA study in MM with a high percentage of anti-BCMA therapies and response ascertainment for all patients by ICRC. Linvoseltamab induced significantly higher response rates, including rate of ≥VGPR, compared with current RW SOC therapies, highlighting its potential as a highly effective treatment in patients with TCE RRMM.

Introduction Linvoseltamab is an investigational, BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody designed for the treatment of RRMM. High objective response rates (ORR) to linvoseltamab 200 mg in the LINKER-MM1 trial (NCT03761108) were demonstrated across high-risk subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years, patients with high-risk cytogenetics, and patients with penta-class refractory status. The aim of this study was to compare ORR, overall and in key subgroups, between patients in Phase 2 of the LINKER-MM1 trial and patients in an international RW SOC external control arm (ECA). Methods The ECA was derived from a chart review of 16 academic sites across 10 countries that are part of the International Myeloma Foundation (IMF)-International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and 2 US electronic health record databases (COTA and Guardian Research Network [GRN]). Included patients initiated ≥1 anti-MM treatment after meeting key eligibility criteria of LINKER-MM1. Weighted random sampling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to select 1 line of therapy (LOT) per patient and balance the overall ECA and trial populations on prespecified prognostic factors (Kumar S, et al. IMS 2023). For ORR assessment, LINKER-MM1 and IMF-IMWG used independent central review committees per IMWG criteria, COTA used algorithmic assessment based on IMWG criteria, and GRN used physician-assessed responses. Prior to conducting comparative analyses, an independent committee of epidemiology and oncology experts reviewed the comparability of the cohorts and endpoint assessments, and approved study continuation. ORR among patients in LINKER-MM1 and patients in the ECA was compared overall and across prespecified subgroups (≥10 patients per subgroup), including age, race, cytogenetic risk score, international Staging System (ISS), presence of extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP), refractory class, bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) proportion, and number of prior LOTs. Results Median duration of follow-up was 14.3 months (data cut-off: January 6, 2024) for patients receiving linvoseltamab (n=105) and 13.6 months for the ECA (n=307; n=194, n=72, and n=41 from IMF-IMWG, COTA, and GRN, respectively). Following IPTW, 13 prognostic factors with <30% missingness were balanced between cohorts, with an effective sample size in the ECA of 197. After adjustment, ORR was significantly higher in patients who received linvoseltamab compared with patients in the ECA (69.5% vs 45.7%, odds ratio [OR] 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-4.1]) and in key subgroups with age 65-74 years (76.9% vs 48.3%, OR 3.6 [1.6-8.6]), age ≥75 years (72.4% vs 48.5%, OR 2.8 [1.1-7.4]), Black or African American race (82.4% vs 25.0%, OR 14.0 [3.0-85.4]), White race (68.9% vs 49.7%, OR 2.2 [1.3-4.0]), standard cytogenetic risk (72.3% vs 51.3%, OR 2.5 [1.3-4.8]), ISS stage III (58.8% vs 19.7%, OR 5.8 [1.5-25.2]), absence of EMP (71.6% vs 49.3%, OR 2.6 [1.5-4.6]), triple-class refractory status (68.2% vs 45.7%, OR 2.6 [1.5-4.4]), quadruple-class refractory status (66.7% vs 45.9%, OR 2.4 [1.3-4.3]), 4-5 prior LOTs (65.1% vs 40.4%, OR 2.8 [1.3-6.0]), and >5 prior LOTs (75.7% vs 36.1%, OR 5.5 [2.4-13.6]). Numerically higher (not statistically significant) or similar ORR was observed for patients receiving linvoseltamab compared with patients in the ECA with age <65 years (59.5% vs 46.8%, OR 1.7 [0.79-3.6]), high-risk cytogenetics (65.0% vs 63.1%, OR 1.1 [0.41-2.9]), ISS stage I (73.3% vs 64.6%, OR 1.5 [0.62-3.7]), ISS stage II (67.6% vs 53.5%, OR 1.8 [0.72-4.7]), presence of EMP (58.8% vs 56.9%, OR 1.1 [0.32-3.8]), penta-class refractory status (64.3% vs 48.5%, OR 1.9 [0.78-4.8]), BMPC <50% (77.0% vs 67.2%, OR 1.6 [0.61-4.3]), BMPC ≥50% (41.7% vs 36.0%, OR 1.3 [0.36-4.7]), and ≤3 prior LOTs (68.0% vs 66.4%, OR 1.1 [0.43-2.9]). Separate findings will be presented for IMF-IMWG and COTA/GRN data at the congress. Conclusions Linvoseltamab induced better ORR vs RW SOC treatments overall, and better or similar ORR in the key subgroups assessed, highlighting its therapeutic value across a range of patients with RRMM with heterogeneous risk profiles and levels of disease burden.

Background As therapeutic advances have increased life expectancy for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM), second primary malignancies (SPMs) have become an increasingly important safety consideration. Prior studies have demonstrated that treatment with alkylators, autologous stem cell transplantation, and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), specifically lenalidomide, are associated with increased risk of SPM. Pts who are triple-class exposed (TCE), defined as prior exposure to an IMiD, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), represent an increasingly large subgroup of RRMM pts. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and characteristics of SPMs in Medicare-insured pts with TCE RRMM initiating a new line of therapy (LOT). Methods Adult pts with an incident diagnosis (Dx) of MM (≥2 outpatient Dx 30-365 days apart OR ≥1 inpatient Dx AND 6 months of continuous eligibility prior to initial Dx) during the study period (Nov 14, 2006-Dec 31, 2020) who were TCE (≥1 claim each for an IMiD, a PI, and an anti-CD38 mAb) were selected from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (TCE pts were assumed to have RRMM based on exposure). The first LOT after TCE was defined as the index LOT and the associated date of initiation was defined as the index date. Pts with SPMs prior to the index date were excluded. SPMs were identified based on having ≥2 outpatient Dx of SPM (of the same cancer type) 30-365 days apart OR ≥1 inpatient Dx of SPM. Dx of SPM included Dx of invasive malignancies or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), excluding MM, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, plasma cell leukemia, non-melanoma skin cancers, or primary bone malignancies that were preceded by a Dx of bone metastases. The incidence of SPM was calculated per 100 person years (PY) of follow-up, considering only the first SPM for each pt. Cumulative incidence of SPM (with death as a competing risk) was also calculated. For pts who experienced SPM, overall survival (OS) and measures of healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs (in 2021 USD, on a per patient per month [PPPM] basis) were calculated. Results A total of 3,088 TCE RRMM pts were identified, of whom 989 had no evidence of SPM prior to the index date (Table). These 989 pts had a mean age of 75.2 years, a mean of 2.9 prior LOTs and a mean of 3.1 years since MM Dx. Over a median follow-up of 7.1 months, 166 pts (19.3 per 100 PY) experienced an SPM, including 93 (10.8 per 100 PY) with a solid tumor and 73 (8.5 per 100 PY) with a hematologic malignancy. The latter included 27 (3.1 per 100 PY) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 18 (2.1 per 100 PY) with MDS. The cumulative incidence of SPM (95% confidence interval [CI]) at 12, 24, and 36 months was 15.2% (12.8-17.9%), 19.7% (16.8-22.8%), and 23.8% (20.2-27.6%), respectively (Figure). Median (95% CI) OS from SPM Dx was 7.9 months (5.4-10.9). Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of survival (95% CI) at 12, 24, and 36 months following SPM Dx was 40.3% (31.6-48.9%), 27.6% (18.6-37.4%), and 9.5% (2.1-23.8%), respectively. Mean (95% CI) total costs after SPM were $22,514 ($19,105-$26,404) PPPM. Conclusions The incidence of SPM in Medicare-insured TCE RRMM pts is high. Many SPMs in these pts, such as AML, are life-threatening and may interfere with or prevent MM treatment. Pts with SPMs have poor survival and high HRU and costs. With increasing OS for RRMM pts due to therapeutic advancements, there is a need for effective treatments that are not associated with increased risk of SPMs.