Citations

AbstractLarge observational data networks that leverage routine clinical practice data in electronic health records (EHRs) are critical resources for research on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data normalization is a key challenge for the secondary use of EHRs for COVID-19 research across institutions. In this study, we addressed the challenge of automating the normalization of COVID-19 diagnostic tests, which are critical data elements, but for which controlled terminology terms were published after clinical implementation. We developed a simple but effective rule-based tool called COVID-19 TestNorm to automatically normalize local COVID-19 testing names to standard LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) codes. COVID-19 TestNorm was developed and evaluated using 568 test names collected from 8 healthcare systems. Our results show that it could achieve an accuracy of 97.4% on an independent test set. COVID-19 TestNorm is available as an open-source package for developers and as an online Web application for end users (https://clamp.uth.edu/covid/loinc.php). We believe that it will be a useful tool to support secondary use of EHRs for research on COVID-19.

Purpose This article uses two case studies to illustrate clinical decision making using the best available evidence to approach the assessment and intervention for children with childhood apraxia of speech. The cases represent children seen in the authors' clinical practice, with personal information altered or omitted to protect the identity of the individuals. The case discussions exemplify choices that may be made for children of different ages, highlighting common elements across ages, as well as treatment aspects that may differ by age. Conclusions While research regarding best practice for assessment and treatment for childhood apraxia of speech has not been conclusive and, in fact, at times has been equivocal, there is empirical evidence from which to develop a rationale for assessment and treatment decisions. Accountability is important even as decisions are being made based on the best available evidence. In each case study, modifications in treatment depended on data that allowed the clinician to evaluate the children's response to therapy and adapt accordingly.

e19136 Background: Patient reported side effect bother is needed to understand tolerability of cancer drugs. We examined whether increase in side effect bother from baseline to cycle 7 as measured by a single item (GP5) from the FACT-G, “I am bothered by side effects of treatment”, was associated with early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in a multiple myeloma (MM) trial. Methods: Data were drawn from the induction phase of ECOG ACRIN E1A06, a two arm, phase 3 trial conducted in patients with untreated MM. The induction phase occurred over twelve, 28-day cycles. GP5 was assessed at registration and cycle 7. ETD was defined as completion of less than 12 cycles of treatment. We tested whether increase in side effect bother on the GP5 from baseline to cycle 7 was associated with months to ETD in two ways. At each timepoint, GP5 was rated with these response options: “Not at all”, “A little bit”, “Somewhat”, “Quite a bit”, “Very Much”. First, we stratified Kaplan Meier curves by patients with versus without substantially increased side effect burden from registration to cycle 7 on the GP5, defined as an increase of > 2 response categories; Cox regression was used to calculate a hazard ratio. Second, we fit a joint model of the GP5 change trajectory on months to ETD that substituted the estimated slope of a longitudinal logistic regression model into the hazard function of a Cox model. In this model, GP5 was dichotomized as 0 = “Not at all/”A little bit”; 1 = “Somewhat”/ “Quite a bit”/ “Very Much”. Results: 159 patients were followed during induction for a median of 11 months (range: 0.2-16.0). 10 patients (6%) reported a substantial increase on GP5 from registration to cycle 7. After 16 months, these patients had a significantly higher hazard of ETD as estimated by Kaplan Meier methods: 40% experienced ETD vs. 24% of patients without substantial GP5 increase [hazard ratio (HR): 3.08 (95% CI: 1.18-8.02)]. In the joint model, the effect of GP5 on hazard of ETD was larger [HR: 9.56 (95% CI: 2.41-37.82)]. Conclusions: This study found initial evidence that increase in side effect bother as measured by the GP5 predicts ETD and may therefore reflect treatment intolerability in cancer drug trials. The effects found in this study will be tested for replication in additional ECOG-ACRIN trials with diverse designs, treatments, and cancer types. Clinical trial information: NCT00602641 .

e19132 Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General has an item about patient tolerability of treatment: “I am bothered by side effects of treatment” (GP5). We examined the predictive value of this single item for early treatment discontinuation in clinical trials. Methods: GP5 level prior to protocol therapy (rated using a 5-point Likert scale) and treatment start/end dates and off treatment reason data at each treatment phase were drawn from five phase III clinical trials conducted by ECOG-ACRIN. In the present analysis, GP5 was dichotomized as 0 = “Not at all”/“A little bit” and 1 = “Somewhat”/“Quite a bit”/“Very Much”. Early treatment discontinuation was defined either as receiving less than protocol specified cycles of treatment when maximum cycles specified in the protocol (E1A06 induction, E1912 induction, E1609 induction, E1105 induction, E5103 adjuvant), analyzed using logistic regression via odds ratio [OR]), or treatment cessation for reasons other than progressive disease or death when treatment continued until progression or intolerability (E1A06 maintenance, E1912 maintenance, E1609 maintenance, E1105 maintenance), analyzed using Cox proportional hazard model via hazard ratio [HR]. Results: GP5 prior to treatment was significantly associated with early discontinuation of E1A06 maintenance, E1609 maintenance, E1912 maintenance, and E1912 induction. No significant association was found for other therapies examined in the study. Conclusions: High GP5 level prior to treatment is associated with higher likelihood of early treatment discontinuation in patients who have received previous treatment. The limited predictive value of GP5 for treatment naïve patients is more limited, serial on-treatment assessment should be considered in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00602641 . [Table: see text]

3531 Background: ctDNA has emerged as a promising biomarker for noninvasive monitoring of treatment response and disease progression in many tumor types. However, the clinical use of ctDNA in patients with HCC has not been established. Here, we evaluated longitudinal and personalized detection of ctDNA for monitoring the treatment response to atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) in patients with unresectable HCC not previously treated with systemic therapy. Methods: A subset (n = 48) of 104 patients with HCC who enrolled in Arm A of GO30140 (NCT02715531; Phase 1b) and received atezo + bev treatment were included in this study. These patients had 10 CR, 11 PR, 12 SD and 15 PD per IRF-assessed RECIST 1.1. Serial plasma samples were collected at baseline (Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), during treatment (C2D1, C4D1) and at disease progression. Somatic mutations in individual tumors were identified via whole exome sequencing of archival tumor tissues or fresh biopsies collected before treatment. Personalized ctDNA assays (Signatera 16-plex multiplex PCR next-generation sequencing assay) specific to each patient’s tumor mutational signatures were successfully designed for 47 of 48 patients. Results: At C1D1, a median of 25.7 ng of cell-free DNA was extracted from 2-mL plasma samples. ctDNA was detected in 45 of 47 patients (96%), with a median of 70.6 mean tumor molecules/mL of plasma (MTM/mL) and a median of 1.8% mean variant allele frequency (mean VAF) in plasma. Higher ctDNA levels detected at C1D1 appeared to be associated with increased tumor burden ( P < 0.03). Dynamic changes in ctDNA levels post-treatment were associated with response at C4D1. ctDNA status changed from positive at baseline to negative in 7 of 10 CR (70%), 3 of 11 PR (27%), 1 of 11 SD (9%) and 0 of 11 PD (0%) patients. Longer PFS was observed in patients whose ctDNA became undetectable post-treatment. The median PFS in patients with ctDNA present vs cleared at C4D1 was 6.5 months and not reached, respectively (HR, 12 [1.7-93], log-rank P < 0.00029). Conclusions: Our study showed that Signatera, a personalized and tumor-informed ctDNA assay, could be used as a sensitive method for detecting ctDNA in patients with unresectable HCC. More importantly, our results illustrate the promise of ctDNA as an emerging biomarker that may potentially help to monitor treatment responses and disease progression in patients with HCC.

TPS3161 Background: VV1 is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human IFNβ to enhance cellular anti-tumor immune responses and tumor selectivity, and the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) for virus tracking by SPECT imaging. Cancer cells are often hyporesponsive to IFNβ, enabling the efficient spread of VV1 and resulting in increased oncolysis. Differently from other oncolytic viruses, VV1 is suitable for both intra-tumoral (IT) and/or intra-venous (IV) administration. Despite considerable anti-tumor activity with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) among some malignancies, long term survival and overall cures remain elusive. Prior Ph 1 studies have shown significant anti-tumor activity among several malignancies when VV1 was administered either as monotherapy or in combination with a CPI, despite progression on prior CPI monotherapy. Furthermore, pre- and post-treatment biopsy evaluations after VV1 treatment have demonstrated T cell infiltration and inflammation in both IT injected and non-injected lesions. Among IV treated patients (pts), IFNβ was detectable in the serum correlating with viral replication, making it an effective biomarker. C is a high-affinity potent human IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Though approved for use in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, C has shown anti-tumor activity, similar to other CPI, in several other indications. Therefore, VV1 and C could be an attractive combination for the immunotherapy for several solid tumors. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of VV1 in combination with C in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The Ph 2 Simon 2 stage five-arm study of IV administration VV1 in combination with IV C will enroll pts with advanced NSCLC, HCC, melanoma & endometrial cancer. Enrolled pts with NSCLC & melanoma will be recent CPI-progressors, whereas enrolled HCC & endometrial cancer will be CPI-naïve. The study’s objectives include assessment of preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, & immuno-regulatory activity of the combination. Pts will receive IV VV1 once on D1 and IV C once every 3 weeks until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Pts enrolled in one melanoma cohort will also receive IT VV1 administered to palpable lesions. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. The null hypothesis of each cohort’s ORR will be tested versus a one-sided alternative yielding a Type I error rate of 5% and power of 80%. Cohorts will be expanded based on signal of activity. Clinical trial information: NCT .

Background and Aims Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) was previously associated with a single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs7175922 in aromatase (cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1 [CYP19A1]). We sought to determine whether genetic variants and metabolites in the estrogen signaling pathway are associated with POPH. Approach and Results We performed a multicenter case‐control study. POPH patients had mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mm Hg, pulmonary vascular resistance >240 dyn‐sec/cm−5, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg without another cause of pulmonary hypertension. Controls had advanced liver disease, right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure <40 mm Hg, and normal RV function by echocardiography. We genotyped three SNPs in CYP19A1 and CYP1B1 using TaqMan and imputed SNPs in estrogen receptor 1 using genome‐wide markers. Estrogen metabolites were measured in blood and urine samples. There were 37 patients with POPH and 290 controls. Mean age was 57 years, and 36% were female. The risk allele A in rs7175922 (CYP19A1) was significantly associated with higher levels of estradiol (P = 0.02) and an increased risk of POPH (odds ratio [OR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12‐4.91; P = 0.02) whereas other SNPs were not. Lower urinary 2‐hydroxyestrogen/16‐α‐hydroxyestrone (OR per 1‐ln decrease = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.16‐3.57; P = 0.01), lower plasma levels of dehydroepiandrosterone‐sulfate (OR per 1‐ln decrease = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.56‐3.85; P < 0.001), and higher plasma levels of 16‐α‐hydroxyestradiol (OR per 1‐ln increase = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.61‐2.98; P < 0.001) were associated with POPH. Conclusions Genetic variation in aromatase and changes in estrogen metabolites were associated with POPH.

Aim The aim of this is to identify the gene expression profiles indicative of reversible versus irreversible injury in experimental (murine) renal artery stenosis (RAS). Method Two‐kidney‐one‐cuff hypertension was established by placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene cuff on the right renal artery (N=18). Sham surgery was performed by manipulating the right renal artery without cuff placement (N=6). To determine potential reversibility, the cuff was removed at 7 days (7D cuff‐off, N=6) and 14 days (14D cuff‐off, N=6) after initial RAS surgery. In a control RAS group, the cuff was left in place for 28 days (28D RAS, N=6). Kidneys were harvested at 28 days for assessment of atrophy and fibrosis. Renal blood perfusion and oxygenation were measured using 16.4T MRI. RNASeq analysis was performed on all the groups at 28 days following initial surgery. Results Following cuff placement, intra‐renal perfusion was reduced by 65% (p<0.0001 vs. baseline). In the 7D cuff‐off group intra‐renal perfusion was restored to baseline values after cuff removal, whereas in the 14D cuff‐off group perfusion was not significantly improved following cuff removal. In the 28D RAS group the reduction in perfusion was maintained throughout the study period. The 7D cuff‐off group had a significantly lower % atrophy (7 ± 2.2%, p=0.0042) and % area of interstitial fibrosis (0.57 ± 0.08 %, p<0.0001) compared to 28D RAS group (atrophy 66 ± 13%, area of fibrosis 7.79 ± 0.89 %). The 14D cuff‐off group had severe atrophy (56 ± 16.6%) and interstitial fibrosis (5.05 ± 1.22%) similar to that seen in 28D RAS group. RNASeq analysis data were normalized to appropriate sham controls in all the groups and was performed at 28 days following initial surgery. Induction of greater than Log2 ratio >2 and p values < 0.00001 were considered significant (following adjustment for multiple comparisons). Fibrosis associated genes were differentially regulated in the 7D cuff‐off compared to the 14D cuff‐off and 28D RAS group (table ). Conclusion We conclude that cuff removal at 7 days is associated with relative preservation of renal structure, indicating that renal injury at this point is reversible. We have identified a number of fibrosis associated genes that are differentially regulated in the 7D cuff‐off group versus 14D cuff‐off group. Further analysis will determine the functional relevance of these differentially regulated genes. Support or Funding Information This project was funded by National Institutes of Health, NIAID R01 AI100911. Values of Log 2 Ratio Genes 7D Cuff‐off vs Sham 14D Cuff‐off vs Sham 28D RAS vs Sham COL1A1 0.96 2.62 2.23 COL1A2 0.79 2.07 1.91 COL3A1 1.26 2.60 2.35 MMP12 1.24 2.85 2.95 MMP14 1.34 2.70 2.55 MMP19 2.89 3.86 4.05 MMP2 1.55 3.49 3.22 MMP7 6.96 9.22 9.59 MTOR −0.46 −1.67 −2.06 SERPINE1 1.25 3.37 2.35 TGFB1i1 0.44 1.46 1.53 TGFB2 0.82 1.83 1.97 TGFB3 0.59 1.91 1.99 TGFBi 0.98 1.88 2.02 KLF15 −0.90 −1.76 −2.60 UBD 4.49 6.23 6.18 TIMP1 2.94 5.30 5.16 TIMP2 0.50 1.46 1.52 TIMP3 −0.35 −1.26 −1.36 HSPB1 0.16 2.00 2.13 HSPB8 1.51 2.26 2.30 CCL2 3.44 4.89 4.31 CCL12 2.88 3.71 4.12 SERPINE1 1.25 3.37 2.35 SERPINE2 1.17 2.39 2.35 SERPINF1 2.02 2.76 3.11 SERPINF2 −0.51 −2.03 −2.71 SERPING1 1.15 1.81 2.09 CLU 1.45 2.54 3.07 STC1 0.45 1.99 2.12 SPP1 1.75 3.06 3.37

PURPOSE Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common during adjuvant chemotherapy and may persist. TAILORx provided a novel opportunity to prospectively assess patient-reported cognitive impairment among women with early breast cancer who were randomly assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (CT+E) versus endocrine therapy alone (E), allowing us to quantify the unique contribution of chemotherapy to CRCI. METHODS Women with a 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 enrolled in TAILORX were randomly assigned to CT+E or E. Cognitive impairment was assessed among a subgroup of 552 evaluable women using the 37-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire, administered at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The FACT-Cog included the 20-item Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale, our primary end point. Clinically meaningful changes were defined a priori and linear regression was used to model PCI scores on baseline PCI, treatment, and other factors. RESULTS FACT-Cog PCI scores were significantly lower, indicating more impairment, at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months compared with baseline for both groups. The magnitude of PCI change scores was greater for CT+E than E at 3 months, the prespecified primary trial end point, and at 6 months, but not at 12, 24, and 36 months. Tests of an interaction between menopausal status and treatment were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION Adjuvant CT+E is associated with significantly greater CRCI compared with E at 3 and 6 months. These differences abated over time, with no significant differences observed at 12 months and beyond. These findings indicate that chemotherapy produces early, but not sustained, cognitive impairment relative to E, providing reassurance to patients and clinicians in whom adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated to reduce recurrence risk.