Citations

Abstract Background: Limited information existed about the distributions of microbial etiology and drug-resistance with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in China, partly attributing to the antibiotics abuse in rearing livestock for Chinese farmers in recent decades. Moreover, the relevant guidelines have not been updated for at least a decade.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in Zhongshan Hospital (Shanghai, China). All consecutive cases of severe CAP diagnosed in Respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) and Emergency ICU were included. We assessed the microbial etiology features and multidrug-resistance (MDR) status. The risk factors were used by multivariate analyses for outcomes.Results: One hundred and twelve adults with severe CAP in ICUs, mean age of 65.7±15.1 years were studied. Etiological diagnoses were established in 76 (67.9%) cases; Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequent pathogen in 27 (35.5%) cases followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (n=15, 19.7%) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (n=9, 11.8%); While Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=3, 3.9%) was ranked the 6 th in the study. The majority of pathogens were the MDR and the 30-days mortality rate was 43.8% in severe CAP patients. Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR, 6.88; 95%CI, 1.13-41.83), Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)≥5(OR, 12.30; 95%CI, 1.79-84.55) was associated to death.Conclusions: The study indicates a change in the usual pattern of microbiol etiology of severe CAP and the MDR emerged in the majority of pathogens over a decade in eastern China. Enhanced control of using antibiotics to reduce the acquired resistance is urgent.

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with varying survival outcomes depending on the presence of certain genetic abnormalities. Common abnormalities include trisomies, translocations involving the chromosome 14, and amplifications or deletions of chromosomes 1, 13, and 17. t(11;14), occurring in 15% of patients with myeloma, had been considered a standard risk abnormality, but recent data suggest inferior outcome. This is important as new therapeutic options such as the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has been shown to be particularly effective in t(11;14) patients. Methods: This was a multicenter study to identify the outcomes of patients with t(11;14), using a retrospectively assembled cohort. Patients with MM diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 with t(11;14) identified on FISH performed within six months of diagnosis, and with treatment details available and if alive, a minimum of 12 months of follow up, were enrolled. Results: The current analysis includes 1216 patients; median age of 62.56 years; 58.7% male. The median follow-up from diagnosis for the entire cohort was 51.9 months; 69.1% of the patients were alive at the last follow up. ISS stage distribution included: Stage I (35.7%), Stage II (34.0%) and Stage III (15.1%), data was missing for the rest. The distribution of concurrent FISH abnormalities included: trisomies (3.5%), del 13q (13.3%), 1q amp (8.8%), and del 17p or monosomy 17 (5.8%). Initial regimen included: 27.2% had an immunomodulatory (IMiD), 45.9% had a proteasome inhibitor (PI), 17.7% had both, and 9.0% had no novel agent. The drug classes by line of therapy are shown in Table 1. An early stem cell transplant (defined as within 12 months of start of first line treatment) was used in 49.4% of patients. The median time to next treatment (TTNT) after starting initial treatment was 26.6 (95% CI: 23.9 to 29.2) months. The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis for the entire cohort was 95.1 (95% CI: 85.9 to 105.9) months; 4-year estimates for those diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2009, and from January 2010 to December 2014 were 77.5% and 78.6%, respectively. The median OS for those with any one high risk FISH lesion (del 17p/ 1q amp) was 67.5 (55.2, 97.1) versus 101.7 (89.7, 107.3) months. Patients with early SCT (within 12 months of diagnosis) had better OS: 108.3 (103.8, 133.0) vs. 69.8 (61.5, 80.3) months. Conclusion: Patients with t(11;14) without high risk FISH abnormalities have an excellent survival. Patients receiving a PI + IMiD combination and those receiving autologous SCT as part of initial therapy had best survival. Though numbers are limited, patients in the later lines receiving newer drugs such as venetoclax and daratumumab had high response rates and durable responses. Disclosures Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Bittrich:Celgene: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding; Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Europe: Other: N/A; SANOFI Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, N/A, Research Funding; University Hospital Wuerzburg: Employment; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Travel Funding; AMGEN: Other: Travel Funding; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Funding; Wilhelm Sander Foundation: Research Funding; German Research Foundation (DFG): Other: N/A; University of Würzburg: Other: N/A. Goldschmidt:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reece:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ludwig:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; PharmaMar: Consultancy; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Mangiacavalli:celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen cilag: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding. Kastritis:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria. Yee:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy. Raje:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Rosta:Cornerstone Research Group: Employment. Haltner:Cornerstone Research Group: Employment. Cameron:Cornerstone Research Group: Employment, Equity Ownership. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Abstract Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important consolidation treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, even in the era of novel agents. The prolongation of plateau-phase induced by ASCT is generally attributed to intensive cytoreduction. However, ASCT generates inflammation and profound lymphodepletion, which may result in hitherto unexpected immunological effects. To investigate potential immunological contributions to myeloma control after ASCT, we developed preclinical models of transplantation for MM using Vk*MYC myeloma that generates bony lytic lesions, a serum M band and marrow plasmacytosis that are hallmarks of clinical disease. Myeloma-bearing B6 recipients underwent myeloablative conditioning and were transplanted with naïve B6 bone marrow (BM) grafts with or without T cells from donors that were myeloma-naïve (SCT) or had low M bands at the time of harvest to mimic ASCT. Surprisingly, we demonstrate the broad induction of T cell-dependent myeloma control with enhanced median survival in recipients of grafts containing T cells compared to T cell depleted (TCD) BM alone (SCT= 91 days and ASCT > 100 days post-transplant vs TCD BM alone= 44 days; p<0.0001). Myeloma was most efficiently controlled when recipients were transplanted with memory T cells (CD44+) from autologous grafts (median survival: ASCT-CD44+ T cells >90 days post-transplant vs. CD44─ T cells = 50 days; p = 0.0006). Importantly, T cells adoptively transferred from recipients surviving > 120 days (MM-primed) protected secondary recipients compared to T cells from naïve donors (median survival: MM-primed > 120 days post-transplant vs 65 days naïve T cells; p = 0.0003). Furthermore, MM-primed CD8 T cells were restricted in TCR repertoire and provided protection in a myeloma clone-specific fashion, indicative of a tumor-specific T cell response. Despite this immune-mediated control of myeloma after SCT, progression still occurred in the majority of recipients. We phenotyped CD8+ T cells from the BM of MM-relapsed, MM-controlled and MM-free (that had never seen myeloma) mice 8 weeks after SCT. Expression of the inhibitory receptors, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) on BM CD8+ T-cells strongly correlated with myeloma cell number (r = 0.729, p<0.0001 and r = 0.796, p<0.0001 respectively). Additionally, the co-stimulatory/adhesion receptor CD226 (DNAM-1) was markedly downregulated as myeloma progressed (r = - 0.865, p<0.0001), as was interferon-γ secretion (r = - 0.76, p = 0.0022). t-SNE analysis confirmed an irreversible exhaustion signature at myeloma progression, characterized by the absence of DNAM-1 and co-expression of PD-1, TIM-3, TIGIT together with CD101 and CD38. Immune-checkpoint inhibition (CPI) early post-SCT, using antibodies against PD-1 or TIGIT facilitated long-term myeloma control (median survival in both treatment arms > 120 days post-SCT vs. 60 and 68 days respectively; p <0.05). Furthermore, TIGIT blockade limited CD8+ T cell exhaustion, increased CD107a and IFNγ secretion and expanded a memory CD8+ T cell population in the BM. Genetic deletion of either IFNγ or the IFNγ receptor from the donor graft resulted in dramatic myeloma progression after SCT. Consequently, treatment with a CD137 (4-IBB) agonist early after SCT profoundly augmented CD8+IFNγ+GranzymeB+ T-cell expansion in the BM, such that majority of treated animals eliminated myeloma and survived long-term. These data provide insights into an unappreciated mechanism of action of ASCT whereby myeloma immune-equilibrium is established and suggest that combination with immunotherapeutic strategies is a rational approach to generate long term disease control. Disclosures Smyth: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Research agreement; Tizona Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: In the pivotal FIRST trial, at the pre-specified planned analysis for progression-free survival (PFS), treatment (Tx) with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous) improved outcomes for transplant-ineligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) compared with melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT), as well as Rd for 18 cycles (Rd18; Benboubker, NEJM 2014). Rd18 was added as a third arm to investigate whether Rd continuous Tx would control progression of NDMM longer than Rd18. Here, we present the final analysis of the overall survival (OS) data from the trial. Methods: Transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM were randomized 1:1:1 to Rd continuous (with lenalidomide given on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles until disease progression), Rd18 (with lenalidomide given on days 1-21 of eighteen 28-day cycles), or MPT (twelve 42-day cycles); both Rd18 and MPT were 72 weeks in duration. The primary endpoint was PFS and the key secondary endpoint was OS; the primary comparison was Rd continuous vs MPT. Other secondary endpoints included time to second therapy (TTST) and safety. Time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2) was an exploratory analysis. Response assessment used for PFS and PFS2 analysis was determined by investigators based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: At the time of cutoff for the final OS analysis (January 21, 2016), 52 of the 535 pts in the Rd continuous arm and none of the pts in the Rd18 (n = 541) and MPT (n = 547) arms continued to receive Tx. The median follow-up for surviving pts was 67.0 months (range, 0-86.8 months). In the pre-specified final OS analysis for the primary comparison, a statistically significant advantage in OS was shown with Rd continuous over MPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.92; P = .00234; Table). OS for Rd continuous vs Rd18 was evaluated (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.20). In this updated analysis, a PFS advantage continued to be seen for Rd continuous vs MPT (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.79; P < .00001) and vs Rd18 (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.81). Median TTST was longer for Rd continuous vs MPT (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73; Table). More pts in the Rd18 and MPT arms started second-line therapy (n = 377 and 381, respectively) compared with the Rd continuous arm (n = 299). Pts received a variety of Tx at progression, with bortezomib-based regimens the most common in the Rd continuous (n = 179; 59.9%), Rd18 (n = 208; 55.2%), and MPT (n = 170; 44.6%) arms. Pts who received bortezomib after Rd continuous or Rd18 had better outcomes than those who received it after MPT. PFS2 for Rd continuous was improved vs MPT (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86.3%, 80.2%, and 88.7% of the 532, 540, and 541 pts in the safety populations of the Rd continuous, Rd18, and MPT arms, respectively; the most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (29.5%, 26.5%, and 44.9%) and infections (31.6%, 21.9%, and 17.2%), and no new safety signals were seen compared with earlier analyses. Study discontinuation was most commonly due to disease progression and was less common in the Rd continuous vs Rd18 and MPT arms (50.7% vs 66.9% and 61.6%, respectively). Discontinuation due to AEs was similar across the Rd continuous, Rd18, and MPT arms (12.0%, 13.1%, and 13.9%). Solid tumor second primary malignancies (SPMs) occurred in 6.0, 6.9%, and 5.9% of pts, and hematologic malignancies occurred in 0.8%, 0.4%, and 2.6% of pts in the Rd continuous, Rd18, and MPT arms, respectively. Conclusions: Rd continuous significantly prolonged PFS and OS, and improved other secondary endpoints compared with MPT in transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. Rd continuous also showed a PFS benefit compared with Rd18, delaying the time to next Tx. PFS2 outcomes suggest that Rd does not induce resistant relapses. Few hematologic malignancies occurred in the Rd arms, and the incidence of SPMs was similar between Rd continuous and Rd18. Rd continuous remains a standard of care for transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. Disclosures Facon: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel and expense, Speakers Bureau. Dimopoulos:Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research Funding. Belch:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cavo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ludwig:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Delforge:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cavenagh:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Geraldes:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De La Rubia:Amgen, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. White:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Attal:janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Houck:Celgene: Employment. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria; Bristol: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Benboubker:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Lung cancer (LC) is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Whereas smoking and other environmental factors strongly increase LC risk, multiple genetic variants also contribute to risk in smokers. Furthermore, among smokers, some families have been identified with an abnormally high prevalence of LC, suggesting that unknown genetic factors can greatly increase LC risk in smokers. The typically short survival after LC diagnosis impedes collection of detailed genotypic information on any single large family pedigree, impairing the identification of putative high-risk factors. Therefore, the Genetic Epidemiology of LC Consortium has collected epidemiological and genetic data from a number of families with high numbers of LC cases from eight different sites across the US. In this study, we have obtained whole exome sequences (WES) from 290 members of 28 families, including 66 LC cases. We used a gene-based approach to allow for the possibility that different families may contain different variants of the same gene. Variants were filtered for i) allele frequency, ii) functional effect using combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD), and, iii) affecting a gene with either a known or suspected role in cancer. We further selected variants based on their segregation in family pedigrees in a pattern consistent with a large effect on LC risk. Candidate LC risk genes were then identified as those represented in at least two families by the same or different variants. We further culled the list of genes by requiring the presence of at least one rare, functional variant enriched in the WES of 1060 cases relative to 899 controls from the Transdisciplinary Research on Cancer of the Lung consortium. This analysis narrowed our results to two genes, one being E2A, a member of the E family of bHLH transcription factors. Whereas loss-of-function mutations in E2A drive lymphoid cancers, the E2A protein also participates in an oncogenic heterodimer with TWIST1 that promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and is implicated in multiple cancer types. Furthermore, the E2A/TWIST1 heterodimer is the primary TWIST1-containing complex implicated in oncogenesis, and silencing of E2A in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines results in oncogene-stimulated senescence and apoptosis. Our data identified three distinct E2A variants present in all 10 sequenced LC cases in the 5 families in which those variants are found. Finally, two of these E2A variants are located only 57 nucleotides from each other, immediately adjacent to sequences encoding a transcription activation domain, suggesting that both variants alter the same specific protein function. These data identify E2A variants as likely high risk factors for LC in smokers and validate our general approach for identifying genetic factors with a large impact on LC risk. Citation Format: Claudio W. Pikielny, Anthony M. Musolf, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, yafang Li, Ming You, Richard Wilson, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Ambrose I. Granizo-Mackenzie, Yanhong Liu, Ramaswamy Govindan, James McKay, Rayjean Hung, John K. Field, David C. Christiani, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Christopher I. Amos. Familial studies identify variants in the E2A transcription factor as putative risk factors for lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-053.

Abstract Lung cancer is the deadliest and most frequently diagnosed type of tumor worldwide, with 1.6 million deaths reported annually. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of all lung cancer cases and carries a poor 5-year survival rate below 15%. Prognoses remain dismal due to the large number of patients diagnosed with advanced stage disease and the development of resistance to current therapies. A better understanding of acquired drug resistance will help to circumvent the progression of lung cancer and make significant strides in improving NSCLC patient treatment. Our recent work demonstrates that dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr 32000 (DARPP-32) and its amino-terminally truncated splice variant (t-DARPP) promote lung tumor growth in orthotopic mouse models. IHC staining of 62 human lung adenocarcinoma tissues showed that t-DARPP expression is elevated with increasing tumor (T) staging score, which represents the size of the primary tumor and whether it has grown into nearby areas, as a metric of tumor progression and growth. Correspondingly, a computational biology analysis of 513 lung adenocarcinoma patients revealed upregulation of t-DARPP isoform expression correlates with advanced T stage and is associated with poor overall survival. We identified a novel physical interaction between DARPP-32 and inhibitory kappa B kinase-α (IKKα) that promotes NSCLC cell migration through activation of non-canonical NF-κB2 signaling. It has been shown that DARPP-32 overexpression inhibits gefitinib-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer and t-DARPP contributes to the trastuzumab resistance phenotype in breast cancer. Our recent findings suggest DARPP-32 and t-DARPP overexpression in NSCLC promotes resistance to specific molecular targeted inhibitors by enabling tumor cells to evade apoptosis via Akt- and Erk-dependent cell survival mechanisms. Current ongoing studies are focused on manipulating expression of DARPP-32 isoforms in lung tumor cells to prevent resistance to targeted therapies in NSCLC patients. Citation Format: SK Kayum Alam, Matteo Astone, Ping Liu, Li Wang, Abbygail M. Coyle, Erin N. Dankert, Dane K. Hoffman, Stephanie R. Hall, Wei Zhang, Rui Kuang, Anja C. Roden, Aaron S. Mansfield, Luke H. Hoeppner. Molecular mechanisms of non-small cell lung cancer growth and drug resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 873.