Sims, John R.

Importance Accumulation of amyloid plaque drives pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Reduction of amyloid via amyloid-targeting therapies may result in clinical benefit. Objective To assess the correlation of posttreatment amyloid levels with clinical outcomes and biomarkers in AD. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a post hoc exploratory analysis from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, conducted June 2020 through April 2023 at 277 medical research centers/hospitals in 8 countries. A total of 8240 participants aged 60 to 85 years with early symptomatic AD with amyloid and tau pathology based on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 6504 participants were excluded predominantly due to inadequate amyloid or tau pathology. The current analysis included 1582 participants (766 in the donanemab group and 816 in the placebo group) with baseline and at least 1 posttreatment assessment. Data analysis took place from July 2024 to March 2025. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive donanemab (700 mg for the first 3 doses and 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 72 weeks, with outcomes assessed through 76 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants were categorized into 1 of 10 groups (deciles) based on their lowest amyloid value observed posttreatment. Clinical progression was assessed via changes in integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores. Plasma biomarkers measured included phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), p-tau181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Correlations between the median amyloid level in each decile were assessed with 76-week least-squares mean changes in each outcome and biomarker. Results Analyses included 1582 participants, including 766 treated with donanemab and 816 with placebo. The mean (SD) age was 72.9 (6.2) years, and 900 participants (56.9%) were female. Participants who received donanemab had lower posttreatment amyloid values than those in the placebo group. Across the trial population, lower posttreatment amyloid levels were correlated with slower clinical progression as measured by iADRS score ( R 2 , 0.73 [95% CI, 0.37-0.97]) and CDR-SB score ( R 2 , 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-0.97]) and with decreases in p-tau217 ( R 2 , 0.86 [95% CI, 0.73-0.97]), p-tau181 ( R 2 , 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]), and GFAP ( R 2 , 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-0.97]). There was no correlation between posttreatment amyloid value and NfL ( R 2 , 0.03 [95% CI, 0.00-0.54]). Conclusions and Relevance The findings in this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial demonstrating a correlation between posttreatment amyloid plaque level and clinical benefit support amyloid plaque removal as the mechanism of action for donanemab treatment and the level of amyloid plaque as a potential surrogate biomarker in amyloid-targeting therapies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04437511

e15045 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an oncogenic driver of several human cancers, including those of the anal canal, uterine cervix, and head and neck (predominantly oropharynx). Despite advancements in our understanding of HPV-related cancers, there remains an unmet need for a comprehensive biomarker-driven registry to establish correlations between biomarker detectability and clinicopathologic features in patients diagnosed and treated for HPV-driven cancers. To address this need, the NAVigate-HPV Registry has been established to systematically collect and analyze integrated biomarker and clinical data from many U.S. cancer centers. Methods: NavDx (Naveris, Inc.) is a clinically validated blood-based assay detecting circulating cell-free tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA. The NAVigate-HPV Registry is a web-based data platform based on a centrally IRB approved protocol. Participating investigators will include providers that order NavDx tests in the routine clinical care of their patients and agree to the terms and conditions for use of the registry. Eligible subjects will have or have had an HPV-driven cancer (with an initial focus on HPV-driven oropharynx cancer with confirmatory tissue testing) and have received one or more NavDx blood tests during routine clinical care. Clinical data and TTMV-HPV DNA scores will be collected at enrollment and defined intervals over five years or until death. Results: In the initial phase, the registry has enlisted participation and established a steering committee composed of a representative from each of 14 institutions. These institutions are geographically diverse centers ranging from community hospitals to clinics and academic medical facilities. An IRB protocol governing the registry will maintain ethical standards, ensuring compliance and ethical conduct throughout the registry process. Data extraction methods have been previously established to evaluate an initial cohort of 543 patients (Hanna GJ, Roof SA, et. al 2023). Conclusions: Naveris and collaborators have together successfully launched the NAVigate-HPV registry with the aim of creating a robust database linking tumor biomarker results from NavDx with clinical outcomes data for HPV-related cancers. The NAVigate-HPV database is expected to encompass more than 1,000 patients within 1 year and grow to > 5,000 patients within 5 years, serving as a powerful tool for precision cancer medicine in this patient cancer population. Establishing this registry will deepen insights into HPV-related cancers and advance diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Importance Effects of antiamyloid agents, targeting either fibrillar or soluble monomeric amyloid peptides, on downstream biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma are largely unknown in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD). Objective To investigate longitudinal biomarker changes of synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in individuals with DIAD who are receiving antiamyloid treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants From 2012 to 2019, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trial Unit (DIAN-TU-001) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, investigated gantenerumab and solanezumab in DIAD. Carriers of gene variants were assigned 3:1 to either drug or placebo. The present analysis was conducted from April to June 2023. DIAN-TU-001 spans 25 study sites in 7 countries. Biofluids and neuroimaging from carriers of DIAD gene variants in the gantenerumab, solanezumab, and placebo groups were analyzed. Interventions In 2016, initial dosing of gantenerumab, 225 mg (subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was increased every 8 weeks up to 1200 mg. In 2017, initial dosing of solanezumab, 400 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks) was increased up to 1600 mg every 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Longitudinal changes in CSF levels of neurogranin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), chitinase 3–like 1 protein (YKL-40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (NfL), and plasma levels of GFAP and NfL. Results Of 236 eligible participants screened, 43 were excluded. A total of 142 participants (mean [SD] age, 44 [10] years; 72 female [51%]) were included in the study (gantenerumab, 52 [37%]; solanezumab, 50 [35%]; placebo, 40 [28%]). Relative to placebo, gantenerumab significantly reduced CSF neurogranin level at year 4 (mean [SD] β = −242.43 [48.04] pg/mL; P < .001); reduced plasma GFAP level at year 1 (mean [SD] β = −0.02 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .02), year 2 (mean [SD] β = −0.03 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .002), and year 4 (mean [SD] β = −0.06 [0.02] ng/mL; P < .001); and increased CSF sTREM2 level at year 2 (mean [SD] β = 1.12 [0.43] ng/mL; P = .01) and year 4 (mean [SD] β = 1.06 [0.52] ng/mL; P = .04). Solanezumab significantly increased CSF NfL (log) at year 4 (mean [SD] β = 0.14 [0.06]; P = .02). Correlation analysis for rates of change found stronger correlations between CSF markers and fluid markers with Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography for solanezumab and placebo. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial supports the importance of fibrillar amyloid reduction in multiple AD-related processes of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in CSF and plasma in DIAD. Additional studies of antiaggregated amyloid therapies in sporadic AD and DIAD are needed to determine the utility of nonamyloid biomarkers in determining disease modification. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04623242

AbstractBackgroundMixed model repeated measures (MMRM) is the most common analysis approach in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. The model treats time as a categorical variable, which can be problematic when assessments occur off‐schedule, as including off‐schedule visits can induce bias, and excluding them ignores valuable information and violates the intention to treat principle. This problem has been exacerbated by clinical trial visits which have been delayed due to the COVID19 pandemic. Since MMRM entails a mean parameter for each group and visit, the model can be inefficient for longer trials of Preclinical Alzheimer’s. As an alternative to MMRM, we propose a constrained longitudinal data analysis with natural cubic splines that treats time as continuous and uses test version effects to model the mean over time.MethodWe use model selection techniques to compare the predictive value of spline models to slope models, MMRM, and models that assume a proportional treatment effect using data from several completed trials. These trials include the ADCS trial of donepezil in MCI, trials of intranasal insulin and a fyn kinase inhibitor in mild Alzheimer’s dementia, and the A4 trial of solanezumab in Preclinical Alzheimer’s. Simulation studies assess the power and Type I error of these models for trials in Preclinical Alzheimer’s, MCI, and mild dementia.ResultThe spline model with ADAS‐Cog version effect attained the best predictive value for the trials in mild dementia. The proportional model was preferred for the trial in MCI, but the proportional effect assumption was violated, and the treatment effect estimate was in the wrong direction. Considering that the spline with two degrees of freedom and version effect provide fits that are similar to MMRM in Figure 1, we concluded that two degrees of freedom appear to be sufficient to capture enough of the general trend to assess the treatment effect. AIC results from the A4 Study will be considered and included after the study is completed in Spring 2023.ConclusionThe spline model is shown to have better predictive value and precision in real datasets and has better power and Type I error control in a variety of simulation scenarios.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) prevention trials aim to intervene prior to significant neuronal loss, brain damage, and symptom onset to delay or slow cognitive decline. In dominantly inherited AD (DIAD), mutation carriers develop symptomatic AD at predictable ages with near 100% penetrance. In 2012, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit Adaptive Prevention Trial (DIAN‐TU APT) platform launched a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group trial of two anti‐amyloid‐beta monoclonal antibodies with two different antigenic targets, gantenerumab and solanezumab (NCT01760005). The DIAN‐TU scientific development, implementation of the first AD prevention trial, trial challenges and opportunities, including dose escalation, and top‐line results will be presented.MethodDIAN was established in 2008 in response to a call from the National Institute of Aging to establish a network to study DIAD and enable future clinical trials. Successive breakthroughs in understanding disease processes enabled the launch of the DIAN‐TU adaptive prevention trial, a global adaptive platform trial supporting testing multiple drugs in parallel. The DIAN‐TU partners include patients and families at risk for DIAD, global academic researchers, the NIH, Alzheimer’s Association, philanthropic supporters, the DIAN‐TU Pharma Consortium, and pharmaceutical companies with drugs being tested. Important milestones include developing a platform to enable a comprehensive efficient treatment trial for this rare population, adding tau PET as part of AMP AD, adapting dosing mid‐trial and extending the original biomarker trial to continue randomized dosing to test a cognitive endpoint until the last patient reaches 4 years, developing a disease progression statistical model and inclusion of DIAN observational data to increase the power to determine drug effects.ResultThe primary and key secondary outcomes of the DIAN‐TU trial will be presented for each therapy in the context of targeting amyloid‐beta at pre‐clinical and clinically symptomatic stages of disease.ConclusionThese results inform about AD hypotheses, timing of treatment and the prospect of slowing, or preventing AD in DIAD and sporadic AD.

AbstractBackgroundSolanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting soluble forms of β‐amyloid protein important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Three previous 18‐month double‐blind placebo‐controlled trials of low‐dose solanezumab in late‐onset sporadic AD found inconsistent benefits on cognitive and functional assessments. Dominantly‐inherited mutation‐associated AD subjects both before and after onset of symptoms form an ideal population to study potential benefits of solanezumab therapy.MethodMutation‐carrying asymptomatic (CDR 0, N=41) or mildly symptomatic (CDR 0.5 – 1, N=28) patients were treated for a minimum of 4 years and up to 7 years in a double‐blind 3 to 1 active versus placebo randomized clinical trial that measured disease progression by clinical, neuropsychological and biomarker evaluations. The trial was initiated with a dose of 400 mg every 4 weeks and escalated to 1600 mg when low dose trials in sporadic AD did not meet their primary endpoints. The primary cognitive outcome measure was DIAN‐MCE, composed of Delayed Recall Score of the International Shopping List Test, the Delayed Recall score of the Logical Memory IIa subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale‐Revised, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test total score from the WAIS‐R and the MMSE total score. Secondary outcomes included a battery of other cognitive and functional measures. The study was powered to detect delay of cognitive disease progression in the DIAN‐MCE. Biomarkers include imaging modalities (volumetric MRI, FDG, amyloid and Tau PET). CSF markers included β‐amyloid, Tau and PhosphoTau species. NfL was measured in both CSF and plasma. The study used a pre‐specified Bayesian multivariate disease progression model, which included dynamic borrowing of control subjects from the DIAN Observational study.ResultThe topline efficacy, safety and biomarker results will be reported.ConclusionThis study provides the first test of targeting soluble abeta forms in DIAD. It addresses the efficacy of early initiation of higher doses of solanezumab targeting soluble forms of amyloid as a disease modifying therapy. While these results are specific to DIAD, they have the potential to inform the application of anti‐amyloid therapy in sporadic AD.

ObjectiveTo describe management and oncologic outcomes for patients who develop locoregional recurrence (LRR) or distant metastasis (DM) following transoral robotic surgery for human papilloma virus (HPV)–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary care referral center.Subjects and MethodsA total of 286 patients with HPV‐positive OPSCC who underwent transoral robotic surgery–based treatment from May 2007 to May 2015.ResultsOf 286 patients (12.2%), 35 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 19 experienced an LRR and 16 developed a DM; 2 patients with LRR subsequently developed DM. In those patients with an LRR, 79% had T1/T2 tumors, and 47% had N0/N1 nodal disease, compared with 75% and 6% in the DM group, respectively. The median time to LRR or DM was 0.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.4‐1.0) and 1.8 years (IQR, 1.0‐2.1), respectively. Salvage treatment with intent to cure was attempted in 23 patients (16 LRR, 7 DM). The median time from LRR or DM to last follow‐up for the 18 patients who were still alive after salvage was 1.9 years (IQR, 0.4‐3.8; range, 7 days–6.2 years). Estimated cancer‐specific survival rates at 3 years following intent‐to‐cure treatment were 63% (95% CI, 39‐100; number still at risk, 5) in the LRR group and 100% (95% CI, 100‐100; number still at risk, 2) in the DM group.ConclusionOverall, LRR and DM for HPV‐positive OPSCC following transoral robotic surgery–based therapy are infrequent. In our subset of patients who underwent intent‐to‐cure treatment, cancer‐specific survival rates were favorable. Therefore, aggressive salvage treatment for LRR and DM for HPV‐positive OPSCC should be recommended for appropriate candidates.

Objectives/HypothesisDiscuss current techniques utilizing the scapular tip and subscapular system for free tissue reconstruction of maxillary defects and highlight the impact of medical modeling on these techniques with a case series.Study DesignCase review series at an academic hospital of patients undergoing maxillectomy + thoracodorsal scapula composite free flap (TSCF) reconstruction. Three‐dimensional (3D) models were used in the last five cases.Methods3D modeling, surgical, functional, and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed.ResultsNine patients underwent TSCF reconstruction for maxillectomy defects (median age = 43 years; range, 19–66 years). Five patients (55%) had a total maxillectomy (TM) ± orbital exenteration, whereas four patients (44%) underwent subtotal palatal maxillectomy. For TM, the contralateral scapula tip was positioned with its natural concavity recreating facial contour. The laterally based vascular pedicle was ideally positioned for facial vessel anastomosis. For subtotal‐palatal defect, an ipsilateral flap was harvested, but inset with the convex surface facing superiorly. Once 3D models were available from our anatomic modeling lab, they were used for intraoperative planning of the last five patients. Use of the model intraoperatively improved efficiency and allowed for better contouring/plating of the TSCF. At last follow‐up, all patients had good functional outcomes. Aesthetic outcomes were more successful in patients where 3D‐modeling was used (100% vs. 50%). There were no flap failures. Median follow‐up >1 month was 5.2 months (range, 1–32.7 months).ConclusionsReconstruction of maxillectomy defects is complex. Successful aesthetic and functional outcomes are critical to patient satisfaction. The TSCF is a versatile flap. Based on defect type, choosing laterality is crucial for proper vessel orientation and outcomes. The use of internally produced 3D models has helped refine intraoperative contouring and flap inset, leading to more successful outcomes.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 127:E8–E14, 2017