Citations

BACKGROUND: While health systems have implemented resources to improve lipid management in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the population-level effectiveness is unclear. METHODS: Electronic health record data from patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023, across 16 US academic health systems were analyzed. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (defined by diagnosis and procedure codes) was established on or before the index date defined as the date of the most recent LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) or the last day of the study period for those without an LDL-C available. Systems were surveyed to identify lipid management programs (eg, prevention/lipid clinic, electronic health record–based tools, and lipid management algorithms). Sequential multilevel multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to (1) assess the system-level association between an LDL-C <70 mg/dL and the presence of lipid management programs, adjusting for patient-level demographic and clinical characteristics, and (2) whether system-level uptake of statin or nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy was associated with an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. RESULTS: We included 1 738 042 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (median, 88 365 per system; range, 17 086–2 48 371). About 81% of the health systems had prevention or lipid clinics. The proportion of those on statins ranged from 31.0% to 60.4% across health systems (median, 46.3%). Lower proportions were observed in the use of high-intensity statins (16.2%–33.1%), nonstatins (2.6%–8.1%), and combination lipid-lowering therapy (1.7%–6.3%). Among those with an LDL-C level available (n=890 521), 42.5% had an LDL-C <70 mg/dL, ranging 35.8% to 49.4% across systems. There was no association between the odds of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL and health system lipid management algorithm, prevention clinics/lipid clinics, or electronic health record–based tools. Neither system-level high-intensity statin utilization nor nonstatin use was associated with an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variability in lipid management resources and lipid-lowering therapy use across systems, many did not reach an LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and there was low uptake of lipid-lowering therapy. Innovative implementation strategies are needed for system-level lipid management.

Intramedullary screw fixation (ISF) of metacarpal fractures is a well-established technique. Prior techniques either involve placement of the intramedullary screw in a retrograde fashion or placement of the guidewire in a retrograde fashion before placing the screw in an antegrade fashion. While effective, previously described techniques have risks of extensor tendon irritation, articular cartilage disruption, and limited access to multiple metacarpals from a single incision. We present a novel antegrade intramedullary screw placement and antegrade guidewire technique for ISF that avoids disruption of the metacarpal head and allows for access to multiple metacarpals through a single incision. Cadaveric evaluation confirmed consistent sparing of the distal carpal row and demonstrated the feasibility of this technique across the index through small finger metacarpals. Compared with previously described methods, this technique offers improved soft tissue preservation, reduced risk of tendon scarring, and enhanced surgical efficiency. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case report; cadaveric study.

Abstract Objective To assess the role of small‐molecule calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) in the acute treatment of migraine, particularly in relation to triptan treatments. Background Triptans have established efficacy and are widely prescribed for the acute treatment of migraine. However, triptans may not be recommended for some individuals due to cardiovascular contraindications and precautions, as well as other comorbidities, and many may discontinue triptans because of inadequate or inconsistent symptom relief or poor tolerability. Several gepants are also indicated for the treatment of migraine (both acute and preventive), and their demonstrated efficacy and safety may address some challenges associated with triptans. Methods This narrative review addresses considerations for the acute treatment of migraine through summarizing literature and data from preclinical studies and clinical trials of triptans and gepants. Results We consider triptans and gepants, where available, first‐line treatment options for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans may be prescribed in the absence of contraindications, significant risk of cardiovascular disease, or risk for or history of medication‐overuse headache. In those who have contraindications or precautions for triptans, those who do not have an adequate response to triptans, and those unable to tolerate them, gepants are often an appropriate option. The efficacy and safety of gepants for the acute treatment of migraine has been established through clinical trials and open‐label extension studies and based on real‐world evidence. Gepants have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in triptan insufficient responders, perhaps because of their distinct mechanisms of action. Additionally, the safety of gepants, including relative cardiovascular safety, is supported in pivotal controlled trials and open‐label extension trials. In experimental settings and through their use as preventive treatment for migraine, gepants appear unlikely to produce medication‐overuse headache. In addition, one gepant (ubrogepant) has demonstrated efficacy in preventing headache onset when given during the prodrome, a finding that has not been demonstrated for triptans. A single‐arm, open‐label study of naratriptan given during the prodrome suggested fewer subsequent headaches, but interpretation is limited because there was no contemporaneous control group. Limited head‐to‐head clinical trials comparing gepants and triptans have not demonstrated significant differences. Prescribers of both triptans and gepants should be mindful of potential drug–drug interactions. Conclusions Key advantages of gepants include their favorable tolerability, efficacy for the acute treatment of both the prodromal/premonitory phase (ubrogepant) and the headache phase of migraine (ubrogepant, rimegepant, zavegepant), lack of cardiovascular contraindications, and lack of association with medication‐overuse headache. Disadvantages include limitations due to cost and access and CYP3A4 drug interactions for most gepants. Together, the advantages may help to optimize patient care and lead to better persistence and effectiveness in a real‐world setting. Head‐to‐head studies are needed to clarify the comparative effectiveness of triptans and gepants.

Abstract Few prospective benchmark studies exist to characterize the evolving contemporary real-world practice for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We report the patterns of first-line care and outcomes for 720 patients with systemic PTCL enrolled in 2 related prospective cohort studies, Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) from 2015 to 2020 and Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002 to 2015, both followed to 2024. The primary end points were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression model. Secondary end points included correlations of clinical and treatment factors with survival. The most common induction regimens were CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) based (70%), given as CHOP (36%), CHOP plus etoposide (23%), or CHOP-like plus novel agents (11.5%, including 5% BV-CHP [brentuximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone]). Consolidative autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 102 patients (14%). Within nodal PTCL, EFS and OS were adversely associated with International Prognostic Index 2 to 5, prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma score 1 to 4, and non–anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) subtypes. Within LEO, which captured increasing first-line etoposide and brentuximab vedotin, adding etoposide to CHOP was associated with better OS in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative ALCL. BV-CHP showed a trend toward OS improvement in ALCL. Patients failing EFS6 and EFS24 had 5-year subsequent OS of 12% and 17%, respectively. The inferior outcomes in non-ALCL subtypes and patients failing EFS6 and EFS24 highlight unmet needs with CHOP-based induction, where clinical trials with targeted therapy should be prioritized. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02736357.

Abstract Background: Treatment for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) relies on non-specific chemotherapy, underscoring the need for precision-based approaches. Our lab discovered that MALT1, the effector protein of the CARMA3-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) signaling complex, is activated downstream of several oncogenic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) implicated in breast cancer, including the thrombin (PAR1), angiotensin II (AGTR1), and lysophosphatidic acid (LPAR) receptors. When activated, MALT1 functions as a protease to cleave select protein substrates. Based on our finding that CBM activity in TNBC cells promotes tumor growth in immunocompetent but not in immunodeficient mouse models, we hypothesized that MALT1 protease activity induces a pro-tumor secretome that creates an immune-suppressed tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Methods/Results: We confirmed by western that MALT1 protease is active in multiple human and mouse TNBC cell lines. Next, to identify MALT1-dependent secreted factors, we performed transcriptomic and proteomic analyses comparing TNBC cells treated with or without MALT1 protease inhibitors. We found that several secreted factors, including GM-CSF, CXCL1, and Pentraxin 3, were reduced by MALT1 protease inhibition. To assess the functional impact of the MALT1 protease-dependent secretome, we performed media transfer experiments comparing the effects of conditioned media (CM) from TNBC cells treated with or without MALT1 protease inhibitors. To account for species differences, experiments were performed evaluating human TNBC cell CM added to human PBMCs and mouse TNBC cell CM added to murine bone marrow cells. We found that the MALT1 protease-dependent secretome reduces the expression of iNOS in both human and murine macrophages. For use in validating our findings in human TNBC clinical specimens, we developed a “MALT1 protease active gene signature” using RNA-seq analysis. Conclusions/Future Directions: Our studies indicate that MALT1 protease activity in TNBC cells promotes expression of numerous immune-suppressive factors. In both human and mouse systems, blockade of MALT1 protease alters the tumor cell secretome and promotes an increase in expression of the anti-tumor M1-like marker iNOS in macrophages. Future studies will evaluate how this change in iNOS expression impacts functional properties of TNBC-associated macrophages. We will also assess the influence of the TNBC MALT1-dependent secretome on the TIME in vivo by comparing the effects of intratumoral injection of CM from MALT1 wild-type or MALT1 protease-deficient TNBC cells. Finally, we will utilize our MALT1 activity gene signature to evaluate TNBC clinical specimens for an association between MALT1 activity and tumor immune contexture, with an emphasis on tumor-associated macrophages. Our studies could nominate MALT1 protease as a potential therapeutic target for improving anti-tumor immunity in TNBC. Since multiple MALT1 protease inhibitors are in clinical trial, our findings could be rapidly translated to improve outcomes for patients with TNBC. Citation Format: John W. Little IV, Jeffrey A. Meridew, Dong Hu, Juliana Hofstätter Azambuja, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas, Peter C. Lucas. The GPCR-MALT1 protease signaling axis drives an immunosuppressive secretome in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Immuno-Oncology Conference (AACR IO): Discovery and Innovation in Cancer Immunology: Revolutionizing Treatment through Immunotherapy; 2026 Feb 18-21; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2026;14(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B046.

Abstract The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has transformed health care, improving efficiency and chart accessibility. However, the widespread reliance on unstructured data entry and the lack of standardized documentation frameworks have resulted in significant data fragmentation across health care systems. The prevalence of unstructured data in EHRs limits their potential for clinical decision support, trial matching, real‐world evidence (RWE) generation, and quality measurement. Data fragmentation in health care triggers a cascade of challenges that ultimately compromise patient care. Clinicians face an excessive documentation burden and struggle to locate critical information buried in unstructured notes. Researchers encounter difficulties in extracting reliable clinical data. EHR vendors grapple with standardizing unstructured information for interoperability, and payers are unable to process unstructured clinical data efficiently to support value‐based care models. These challenges are particularly acute in oncology, where complex clinical elements like cancer staging, disease status, and treatment changes require precise, structured documentation. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as large language models (LLMs) and ambient listening, offer a path to automate structured data generation while reducing the workload on providers. Here, the authors propose LLM‐based workflows that balance automation with clinician verification, streamlining data entry without compromising accuracy. Realizing these benefits requires coordinated efforts among clinicians, researchers, EHR vendors, payers, and policymakers to align regulatory frameworks with AI‐driven innovations. This article outlines a strategy to enhance structured data capture within EHRs, ultimately improving patient care, research, and health care efficiency.

Abstract PURPOSE: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard of care for advanced and higher risk early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. PALLAS investigated the addition of 2 years (y) of palbociclib to adjuvant ET (ET/P) compared to ET alone in patients (pts) with stage II-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We now present overall survival (OS) with 7-y outcomes and impact of post-recurrence therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global phase III trial randomized pts to ET for at least 5 y with or without 2 y of P. Primary endpoint was iDFS; distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and OS were preplanned endpoints. Kaplan Meier estimates and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox and Fine & Gray models were performed. Post-recurrence OS was analyzed as time from first distant recurrence (DR) until death. The post-recurrence OS model adjusted for both clin/path factors (including DR-free y, DR site) and time-dependent post-DR therapy (chemo, CDK4/6i). Results: 5,796 pts enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 y. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, with a median follow-up of 82.7 months (mo), 7-y outcomes for iDFS, DRFS and OS are shown in the table. DR occurred in 781 pts (377 ET/P, 404 ET alone) with balanced pt/disease characteristics between arms. ET/P had more visceral (46% vs. 36%) and fewer non-visceral (61% vs. 68%) DR compared to ET alone (p=0.03). Unadjusted post-recurrence OS was significantly worse for ET/P vs. ET (median 22.6 vs. 27.9 mo, HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.46, p=0.04). However, receipt of any post-recurrence CDK4/6i was significantly higher on ET vs. ET/P arms (41% vs. 66%) and time to post-progression CDK4/6i initiation was significantly shorter for those in the ET vs. ET/P arms (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.61, p&lt;0.001) adjusting for region, bone/visceral DR type, DR-free time and age. Conversely, time to post-progression chemotherapy initiation was significantly longer for ET alone vs. ET/P arms (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61, p=0.01). However, after adjustment for clinical factors and post-DR treatment, the OS difference was no longer seen (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85-1.28, p=0.65). 3-mo landmark analysis showed similar effect on OS after adjusting for CDK4/6i initiation within 3 mo from DR (unadjusted HR 1.24, p=0.03 vs. adjusted HR 1.15, p=0.22). CONCLUSION: The PALLAS trial revealed significant differences in treatment post-DR that impact OS. Reduced/delayed use of metastatic CDK4/6i after adjuvant P was associated with significantly poorer OS, suggesting that patients who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i may still benefit from metastatic CDK4/6i. This has implications for optimal treatment in those who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i and warrants further study to determine if this is therapy-specific or an overarching biological effect. SUPPORT: AFT, ABCSG, NRG, PrECOG; Pfizer Citation Format: A. DeMichele, A. Dueck, M. Gnant, D. Hlauschek, M. Martin, A. Wolff, G. Rubovsky, F. Henao, O. Hahn, A. Chan, A. Brusky, P. Morris, H. Burstein, G. Huber, D. Anderson, L. Garcia-Estevez, G. Pfeiler, H. Rugo, N. Zdenkowski, S. Gampenrieder, N. Wolmark, D. Sabanathan, K. Miller, D. Cameron, E. Winer, C. Brunner, E. Gauthier, P. O’Brien, C. Fesl, E. Mayer. Adjuvant Palbociclib for ER+ Breast Cancer in the PALLAS Trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/PrE0109/BIG-14-13): Post-Recurrence Treatment and Overall Survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF7-07.

Abstract Background: PALLAS (PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study, NCT02513394) is a randomized phase III trial comparing two years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with the physician’s choice of adjuvant endocrine therapy, versus endocrine therapy alone for patients with Stage II-III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Molecular residual disease (MRD) detection via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing was a predefined biomarker analysis to identify patients at highest risk of recurrence. Methods: PALLAS participants with available tumor block, at least a baseline (pre-study treatment) plasma sample, and either whole blood or buffy coat were randomly selected from the overall study population. Plasma samples on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1), cycle 6 day 1 (C6D1), and at the end of treatment (EOT) were collected, processed, and stored. Nucleic acids were extracted from primary tumor tissue or, when primary tissue was insufficient, from post-neoadjuvant tumor tissue, provided the sample had sufficient material and tumor cellularity (&gt;25 mm2 tissue area with ≥20% tumor nuclei). Data from next generation sequencing of tumor tissue and matched normal DNA were used to create a personalized ctDNA SignateraTM assay (Natera, Inc.) for MRD assessment in the peripheral blood. ctDNA was reported as mean tumor molecules/mL (MTM/mL) of plasma. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) based on ctDNA status. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate prognosis and predictive interactions. To minimize bias, the biorepository and laboratory teams were blinded to participant identity. Results: In total, 1280 participants were randomly selected for inclusion in this preplanned ctDNA sub-study. WES and WGS are being conducted on tissue, and Signatera results will be generated. Results for association of MRD status (positive/negative) and MTM/mL with DRFI in the context of 7 year median follow up of this study cohort will be reported. Conclusions: The planned analysis is ongoing and the presented work will provide data from the first randomized phase 3 adjuvant study in HR+/HER2- breast cancer to report MRD status by treatment arm. Citation Format: H. A. Parsons, K. Ballman, E. Heitzer, M. Watson, M. Balic, D. Hlauschek, D. Renner, E. Kalashnikova, G. Steger, J. M. Balko, Y. Novik, M. Martin, A. A. Rodriguez, Z. Dayao, A. Chan, E. Nili Gal-Yam, M. C. Liu, C. Isaacs, M. Los, M. Gil Gil, B. Felder, C. Denkert, P. Fasching, F. Liu, T. O'Donnell, E. L. Mayer, M. Gnant, W. F. Symmans, A. DeMichele. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA analysis to assess molecular residual disease for prognosis and prediction of benefit from palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF3-04.

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a major clinical concern in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The PATINA phase III study showed improved PFS with palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2/endocrine therapy (44.3 vs. 29.1 months; hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; 1-sided P=0.0109). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest palbociclib may have CNS activity. We conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis to evaluate the incidence and timing of CNS progression. Methods CNS progression was defined as the emergence of new intracranial lesions per investigator assessment. Baseline CNS imaging was not mandated but recommended if symptomatic. Competing risks analyses evaluated time from registration to first CNS progression or death (CNS PFS), treating non-CNS progression as a competing event. All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis, regardless of known baseline CNS involvement. Patients with baseline CNS metastases were not censored if progression involved the CNS. A secondary analysis excluded patients with CNS metastases present at baseline. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated and compared using 2-sided Gray’s test. Results Data cutoff for this analysis was on October 15, 2024. 518 participants were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2021, 261 to the palbociclib arm and 257 to the control arm. CNS metastases at baseline were present in 11 patients in the palbociclib arm and 9 patients in the control arm. Among all randomized patients, CNS progression occurred in 35 of 261 (13.4%; 95% CI: 9.5-18.2) in the palbociclib arm and 50 of 257 (19.5%; 95% CI: 14.8-24.8) in the control arm. When excluding patients with CNS metastases at baseline, CNS progression was observed in 32 of 250 (12.8%; 95% CI: 8.9-17.6) in the palbociclib arm and 47 of 248 (19.0%; 95% CI: 14.3-24.4) in the control arm. The median follow-up for patients who were alive and progression-free was 53.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS PFS was 13.4% vs. 19.9% for palbociclib versus control (Gray’s test p=0.0386). Importantly, when the analysis was restricted to pts without evidence of CNS disease at baseline (Table 1), —the CNS benefit with palbociclib was maintained (13.0% vs. 19.2% at 36 months, Gray’s test p = 0.0378). Conclusion The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy was associated with a lower incidence of CNS metastases. Among patients without known baseline CNS involvement, the absolute reduction in CNS progression at 36 months was 6.2% in favor of palbociclib. This benefit was observed at 12 months and sustained over 3 years (Table 1). These findings suggest that palbociclib may help delay or prevent CNS involvement in HR+/HER2+ MBC, warranting confirmation in future studies. Citation Format: O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer. Central Nervous System Outcomes from the Phase III PATINA Trial (AFT-38) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF4-01.