Citations

AKI is a global concern with a high incidence among patients across acute care settings. AKI is associated with significant clinical consequences and increased health care costs. Preventive measures, as well as rapid identification of AKI, have been shown to improve outcomes in small studies. Providing high-quality care for patients with AKI or those at risk of AKI occurs across a continuum that starts at the community level and continues in the emergency department, hospital setting, and after discharge from inpatient care. Improving the quality of care provided to these patients, plausibly mitigating the cost of care and improving short- and long-term outcomes, are goals that have not been universally achieved. Therefore, understanding how the management of AKI may be amenable to quality improvement programs is needed. Recognizing this gap in knowledge, the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative meeting was convened to discuss the evidence, provide recommendations, and highlight future directions for AKI-related quality measures and care processes. Using a modified Delphi process, an international group of experts including physicians, a nurse practitioner, and pharmacists provided a framework for current and future quality improvement projects in the area of AKI. Where possible, best practices in the prevention, identification, and care of the patient with AKI were identified and highlighted. This article provides a summary of the key messages and recommendations of the group, with an aim to equip and encourage health care providers to establish quality care delivery for patients with AKI and to measure key quality indicators.

Abstract: Ten years ago, a consensus report on the optimization of tacrolimus was published in this journal. In 2017, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicity (IATDMCT) decided to issue an updated consensus report considering the most relevant advances in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacogenetics (PG), pharmacodynamics, and immunologic biomarkers, with the aim to provide analytical and drug-exposure recommendations to assist TDM professionals and clinicians to individualize tacrolimus TDM and treatment. The consensus is based on in-depth literature searches regarding each topic that is addressed in this document. Thirty-seven international experts in the field of TDM of tacrolimus as well as its PG and biomarkers contributed to the drafting of sections most relevant for their expertise. Whenever applicable, the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to a published grading guide. After iterated editing, the final version of the complete document was approved by all authors. For each category of solid organ and stem cell transplantation, the current state of PK monitoring is discussed and the specific targets of tacrolimus trough concentrations (predose sample C 0 ) are presented for subgroups of patients along with the grading of these recommendations. In addition, tacrolimus area under the concentration–time curve determination is proposed as the best TDM option early after transplantation, at the time of immunosuppression minimization, for special populations, and specific clinical situations. For indications other than transplantation, the potentially effective tacrolimus concentrations in systemic treatment are discussed without formal grading. The importance of consistency, calibration, proficiency testing, and the requirement for standardization and need for traceability and reference materials is highlighted. The status for alternative approaches for tacrolimus TDM is presented including dried blood spots, volumetric absorptive microsampling, and the development of intracellular measurements of tacrolimus. The association between CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dose requirement is consistent (Grading A I). So far, pharmacodynamic and immunologic biomarkers have not entered routine monitoring, but determination of residual nuclear factor of activated T cells–regulated gene expression supports the identification of renal transplant recipients at risk of rejection, infections, and malignancy (B II). In addition, monitoring intracellular T-cell IFN-g production can help to identify kidney and liver transplant recipients at high risk of acute rejection (B II) and select good candidates for immunosuppression minimization (B II). Although cell-free DNA seems a promising biomarker of acute donor injury and to assess the minimally effective C 0 of tacrolimus, multicenter prospective interventional studies are required to better evaluate its clinical utility in solid organ transplantation. Population PK models including CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes will be considered to guide initial tacrolimus dosing. Future studies should investigate the clinical benefit of time-to-event models to better evaluate biomarkers as predictive of personal response, the risk of rejection, and graft outcome. The Expert Committee concludes that considerable advances in the different fields of tacrolimus monitoring have been achieved during this last decade. Continued efforts should focus on the opportunities to implement in clinical routine the combination of new standardized PK approaches with PG, and valid biomarkers to further personalize tacrolimus therapy and to improve long-term outcomes for treated patients.

ObjectiveOur aim was to identify cytokines and chemokines in patients with adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) that predict changes in disease activity.MethodsMultiplexed immunoassays (Meso Scale Discovery) enabled simultaneous measurement of interferon (IFN)‐regulated chemokines and other pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines specific to differentiation of specific T‐cell and innate pathways. Cytokine scores were computed for IFNCK (IP‐10, MCP‐1), Th1 (IFNɣ, TNFα, and IL2), Th2 (IL4, IL10, IL12, and IL 13), Th17 (IL6, IL17, IL1β), macrophage (MIP‐1α, MIP‐1β, IL8), and regulatory (IL10, TNFα) factors. Spearman correlation and mixed models were used to examine whether cytokines at a previous visit predict change in disease activity at the next visit.ResultsThe study included 36 patients (16 DM and 20 JDM) with at least two visits (87 patient intervals between two visits). Mean age (SD) at inclusion was 56.9 (18.4) years for DM and 10.8 (6.6) years in JDM, 67% of patients were female, 89% Caucasian. The mean (SD) physician global, muscle and extra‐muscular disease activity Visual Analog Scale scores at inclusion were 41 (26), 36 (30), and 34 (21) mm, respectively. The change in IFN score from one visit to the next was associated with the change in physician global (P = 0.010) and extramuscular (P < 0.001) disease activity scores. Preliminary results revealed significant correlations of previous IFNCK score and IL‐6 with subsequent disease activity measures, but after adjustment for multiple visits per patient, these associations did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionThere is a potential relationship between IFNCK and other cytokine scores seen in adult and juvenile DM with future disease states.

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease affecting multiple organ systems of the body and is characterized by mutation in the gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Previous work has shown that a single dose of aβ-agonist increases cardiac output (Q) and stroke volume (SV) and decreases systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in healthy subjects. This effect is attenuated in patients with CF; however, the mechanism is unknown. Potential explanations for this decreased cardiovascular response to a β-agonist in CF include inherent cardiovascular deficits secondary to the CFTR mutation, receptor desensitization from prolonged β-agonist use as part of clinical care, or inhibited drug delivery to the bloodstream due to mucus buildup in the lungs. This study sought to determine the effects of endogenous epinephrine (EPI) and norepinephrine (NE) on cardiovascular function in CF and to evaluate the relationship between cardiovascular function and CFTR F508del mutation. Methods: A total of 19 patients with CF and 31 healthy control subjects completed an assessment of Q (C 2 H 2 rebreathing), SV (calculated from Q and heart rate [HR]), Q and SV indexed to body surface area (BSA, QI, and SVI, respectively), SVR (through assessment of Q and mean arterial blood pressure [MAP]), and HR (from 12-lead electrocardiogram [ECG]) at rest along with plasma measures of EPI and NE. We compared subjects by variables of cardiovascular function relative to EPI and NE, and also based on genetic variants of the F508del mutation (homozygous deletion for F508del, heterozygous deletion for F508del, or no deletion of F508del). Results: Cystic fibrosis patients demonstrated significantly lower BSA (CF = 1.71 ± 0.05 m 2 vs healthy = 1.84 ± 0.04 m 2 , P = .03) and SVI (CF = 30.6 ± 2.5 mL/beat/m 2 vs healthy = 39.9 ± 2.5 mL/beat/m 2 , P = .02) when compared with healthy subjects. Cystic fibrosis patients also demonstrated lower Q (CF = 4.58 ± 0.36 L/min vs healthy = 5.71 ± 0.32 L/min, P = .03) and SV (CF = 54 ± 5.5 mL/beat vs healthy = 73.3 ± 4.5 mL/beat, P = .01), and a higher HR (CF = 93.2 ± 3.9 bpm vs healthy = 80.5 ± 2.7 bpm, P < .01) and SVR (CF = 2082 ± 156 dynes*s/cm −5 vs healthy = 1616 ± 74 dynes*s/cm −5 , P = .01) compared with healthy subjects. Furthermore, CF patients demonstrated a lower SV ( P < .01) corrected for NE when compared with healthy subjects. No significant differences were seen in HR or Q relative to NE, or SVR relative to EPI. Differences were seen in SV (F (2,14) = 7.982, P < .01) and SV index (F (2,14) = 2.913, P = .08) when patients with CF were stratified according to F508del mutation (number of deletions). Conclusions: Individuals with CF have lower cardiac and peripheral hemodynamic function parameters at rest. Furthermore, these results suggest that impairment in cardiovascular function is likely the result of F508del CFTR genotype, rather than receptor desensitization or inhibited drug delivery.

Abstract Background The BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel (BioFire Diagnostics) (GIP) is a multiplex stool PCR test that detects 22 organisms. Studies in adults suggest that the diagnostic yield of the GIP in hospitalized patients is low. The utility of the GIP among hospitalized pediatric patients and indications for diagnostic stewardship of this test are not well described. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized pediatric patients who had a GIP ordered between October 2015 and October 2017. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory information was extracted from the medical record. Statistical analysis was completed using JMP Pro 13.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Results Over the 2-year study period, 193 GIPs were obtained on 155 individual pediatric patients. The mean patient age was 8 years and 59% were male. Forty-four percent of patients were immunocompromised and 21% had inflammatory bowel disease. The pediatric infectious disease (PID) team was consulted in 15% of patients at the time the test was ordered. The overall positivity rate of the GIP for one or more pathogens was 42% (Figure 1), with 76% of GIPs positive for one, 23% for two, and 1% for three pathogens. No parasitic infections were diagnosed. The GIP was more likely to be positive if GI symptom onset was prior to admission (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.004), if GI symptoms had been present for &lt; 2 weeks vs. ≥2 weeks (52% vs. 20%, P = 0.0001), and if GI symptoms were the primary reason for the hospital admission (50% vs. 32%, P = 0.012). Only Clostridioides difficile or viral pathogens were detected in patients whose symptoms began in the hospital (Figure 2). Among patients with a positive test, 40% received treatment targeted at one or more of the detected pathogens (Figure 1). Enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) and Enteroaggregative E.coli (EAEC) were never treated (Figure 3). Conclusion The GIP was positive for one or more pathogens in 42% of hospitalized children for whom the test was ordered, and led to specific therapy in 40% of those with a positive test. EPEC and EAEC were not treated. The diagnostic yield of the GIP was higher if GI symptoms were present for &lt;2 weeks, began before hospitalization, and were the primary reason for admission. The GIP was frequently obtained without guidance from the PID team. Disclosures R. Patel, CD Diagnostics, BioFire, Curetis, Merck, Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions, Accelerate Diagnostics, Allergan, and The Medicines Company: Grant Investigator, Research grant – monies paid to Mayo Clinic. Curetis, Specific Technologies, Selux Dx, GenMark Diagnostics, PathoQuest and Genentech: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee – monies paid to Mayo Clinic. ASM and IDSA: Travel reimbursement and editor’s stipends, Travel reimbursement and editor’s stipends. NBME, Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course: Varies, Honoraria. Mayo Clinic: Employee, Salary.

Abstract Background Medical trainees play a critical role in the prescribing of antimicrobials. Prescriber education is one of the CDC core elements of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Optimal strategies for educating residents about antimicrobials have not been identified; however, the common practice of teaching all classes of available antibiotics over a short period of time (usually a single 1–2 hour lecture or “bolus”) is generally not well received and likely ineffective. Methods We developed a novel antibiotic of the month (AOTM) education program (“continuous infusion”) for pediatric residents. It included a monthly 10-minute presentation by an infectious diseases physician or fellow about a single commonly prescribed antibiotic, a handout summarizing important aspects of the antibiotic and a display posted in the resident workroom. An anonymous survey was sent to all pediatric residents before and 6 months after implementation of the AOTM program. The survey consisted of questions on demographics, satisfaction with the program, and antibiotic knowledge. Responses were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Responses were summarized and reported as a proportion of total responses. Results Both pre- and post-implementation surveys were completed by 21 pediatric residents (51% response rate). Prior to the AOTM program, 55% of respondents felt very or somewhat uncomfortable about their current level of knowledge about antimicrobials and antimicrobial prescribing. Six months after initiation of the program, 86% and 76% agreed or strongly agreed that their knowledge of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance, respectively, had improved. After introduction of the program, 81% felt more comfortable or much more comfortable with antimicrobial prescribing. Fifty-seven percent had referenced the handout at some point after the teaching session and 100% agreed that the program was worthwhile continuing in the next academic year. Conclusion A continuous infusion of antimicrobial education in the form of an AOTM education program was well received among pediatric residents and increased their knowledge and comfort level with antimicrobial prescribing. Further studies to measure knowledge retention with this strategy are required. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.