Tolwani, Ashita

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia commonly occurs in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and is associated with poor outcomes. While previous studies have examined static platelet counts and relative declines, the prognostic significance of platelet trajectory patterns before and after CRRT initiation remains unclear. This study investigates the association between platelet count trajectories and in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult patients with AKI receiving CRRT. Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic health record (EHR) data from critically ill adults (≥18 years) with AKI who received CRRT at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between January 2012 and December 2023. Platelet trajectories were assessed using mixed-effects models incorporating all platelet measurements within seven days before and after CRRT initiation. The slopes of platelet count change were categorized as descending (≤ -10 × 10³/μL/day), stable (-10 to 10), or ascending (≥ 10), creating a total of nine trajectory patterns by combining the three pre-CRRT and three during-CRRT categories. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, which was analyzed in relation to these trajectory patterns using logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, medications, and use of other organ support devices as covariates. Results: The study included 2,226 critically ill adults with AKI on CRRT, encompassing 8,569 patient-days before and 11,699 patient-days after CRRT initiation for platelet slope calculation. The median age was 59 years (IQR 48–69) and the median SOFA score at CRRT initiation was 12 (9–14). The in-hospital mortality rate was 57.8%. Before CRRT initiation, the most common trajectory was descending (46.2%), while after CRRT initiation, the stable pattern was most prevalent (58.3%). All patterns with a descending platelet trajectory during-CRRT were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.92 [95% CI: 1.16–3.21] for ascending-descending; 1.49 [1.07–2.08] for stable-descending; 1.52 [1.04–2.23] for descending-descending). In contrast, all patterns with stable or increasing platelet counts during-CRRT tended to have lower mortality. Conclusions: A descending platelet trajectory after CRRT initiation was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Key Points The Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI trial found that starting dialysis earlier for AKI resulted in a 74% higher risk of still receiving dialysis at 90 days. Among patients who likely would have started dialysis under usual practice, the risks of dialysis dependence were similar. This suggests much of the risk observed may have been due to starting dialysis (versus never starting) rather than starting slightly earlier. Background The Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI Trial showed that among critically ill patients with AKI, an accelerated KRT initiation strategy resulted in more KRT dependence at 90 days, as compared with a standard strategy. However, it is unclear whether this difference exists among participants who likely would have been treated with KRT in usual practice. Methods Secondary analysis of the Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI randomized controlled trial, analyzing participants who received more than the median number of days of KRT, which served as a proxy for high probability of requiring KRT under usual practice. Two sensitivity analyses redefined the cohort as ( 1 ) those with ≥24 hours of oliguria who received KRT and ( 2 ) those who received any KRT. Using the same statistical approach as the original trial, we calculated unadjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the exposure of randomized KRT initiation strategy (accelerated versus standard) on the outcome of KRT dependence at 90 days among survivors. Results Among the 1184 participants who received ≥6 days of KRT (670 and 514 in the accelerated and standard arms, respectively), baseline characteristics remained balanced between treatment arms. The relative risk of KRT dependence at 90 days was attenuated and nonsignificant: 1.21 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.78), compared with 1.74 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.43) in the overall trial. The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Among patients who likely would have been treated with KRT in usual practice, there was no significant difference in 90-day KRT dependence among survivors between those randomized to the accelerated and standard KRT initiation strategies. These results suggest that the harm of long-term KRT dependence may be largely due to KRT initiation (versus never initiation) rather than earlier initiation. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: NCT02568722.

AKI is a global concern with a high incidence among patients across acute care settings. AKI is associated with significant clinical consequences and increased health care costs. Preventive measures, as well as rapid identification of AKI, have been shown to improve outcomes in small studies. Providing high-quality care for patients with AKI or those at risk of AKI occurs across a continuum that starts at the community level and continues in the emergency department, hospital setting, and after discharge from inpatient care. Improving the quality of care provided to these patients, plausibly mitigating the cost of care and improving short- and long-term outcomes, are goals that have not been universally achieved. Therefore, understanding how the management of AKI may be amenable to quality improvement programs is needed. Recognizing this gap in knowledge, the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative meeting was convened to discuss the evidence, provide recommendations, and highlight future directions for AKI-related quality measures and care processes. Using a modified Delphi process, an international group of experts including physicians, a nurse practitioner, and pharmacists provided a framework for current and future quality improvement projects in the area of AKI. Where possible, best practices in the prevention, identification, and care of the patient with AKI were identified and highlighted. This article provides a summary of the key messages and recommendations of the group, with an aim to equip and encourage health care providers to establish quality care delivery for patients with AKI and to measure key quality indicators.