Citations

e17500 Background: Metastatic head and neck cancer is a diagnosis with poor prognosis and very little in terms of available active therapy. Until recently the mainstay of therapy was chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. The regimen of cetuximab (C), platinum (P) and 5FU has a response rate(RR) of 36% in the first line setting, and a PFS of 5.6 months and OS of 10.1 months. In the setting of post first line therapy immunotherapeutic agents (IO) have average RR of 15% and median OS of 8 months. Methods: We studied all patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer who were treated with an IO at our institution between May 2016 and July 2018 evaluating their entire history of therapy. 19 patient were treated with IO at our institution in the designated period of whom 9 received nivolumab (N) and 10 received pembrolizumab ( P ). Patients treated on trials were excluded. Patients who received less than 1 cycle of therapy were also excluded. 7 of the 19 patients received an IO in the first line setting after being refractory or resistant to platinum containing definitive therapy, 7 received the IO after a cetuximab (C) containing first line regimen, 1 patient received IO in second line but was naïve to C and 4 received IO in the third line setting. Results: 3 of 19 patients treated with IO had partial response, there were no complete responses, 6 patients had stable disease as their best response and 10 patients progressed at the time of their first evaluation. 11 of 19 patients received additional therapy post IO. 10 patients received taxane based therapy 5 of whom the taxane was combined with C. Of the 5 patients who received a taxane and C combination 2 had CR, 2 had PR and one had PD. Of the 5 who received other taxane regimens, 1 had PR 1 had SD and 1 had PD, 2 expired prior to their first evaluation. The patient who received a non taxane regimen all had progressive disease. Of the 4 responding patients to C regimens 1 had SD during IO therapy and 3 had PD. The longest response duration to a C regimen post IO was 628 days. Conclusions: We observe an unusual response rate among patients treated with a combination of taxanes and cetuximab after IO therapy. This finding may relate to a modifying effect of IO on sensitivity to subsequent therapy. This observation merits further investigation.

Blood pressure (BP) varies over time within individual patients and across different BP measurement techniques. The effect of different BP targets on the concordance between BP measurements is unknown. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate concordance in: 1) clinic BP and ambulatory BP, 2) clinic visit-to-visit variability and ambulatory BP variability and 3) initial and repeat ambulatory BP. We also sought to evaluate whether treatment assignment of intensive vs standard BP target affected these relationships. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ancillary study obtained ambulatory BP readings in 897 SPRINT participants at the 27 month follow up visit and 203 consecutive repeat ambulatory BP readings taken an average of 9.8 months later. There was poor agreement between clinic systolic BP and daytime ambulatory systolic BP (limits of agreement in Bland-Altman plots of -21 to 34 mm Hg in the intensive treatment group and -26 to 32 mm Hg in the standard treatment group). There was poor agreement between clinic visit-to-visit variability (coefficient of variation) and ambulatory BP variability (coefficient of variation of a 24 hr ambulatory BP) with correlation coefficients for systolic BP <0.16. While there was a high correlation between ambulatory BP at 27 months and repeat ambulatory BP (r ~0.56), there was significant variability between repeat ambulatory BP assessments (limits of agreement of -27 to 21 mm Hg in the intensive group and -23 to 20 mm Hg in the standard group). In conclusion, irrespective of treatment target, we found low concordance in BP and BP variability between clinic BP and ambulatory BP, and additionally between repeat ambulatory BP assessments. These results reinforce the need for multiple guideline adherent BP measurements prior to clinical decision making.

BACKGROUNDAlthough posthospitalization care transitions programs (CTP) are highly diverse, their overall program thoroughness is most predictive of their success.OBJECTIVETo identify components of a successful homebased CTP and patient characteristics that are most predictive of reduced 30‐day readmissions.DESIGNRetrospective cohort.PATIENTSA total of 315 community‐dwelling, hospitalized, older adults (≥60 years) at high risk for readmission (Elder Risk Assessment score ≥16), discharged home over the period of January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2013.SETTINGMidwest primary care practice in an integrated health system.INTERVENTIONEnrollment in a CTP during acute hospitalization.MEASUREMENTSThe primary outcome was all‐cause readmission within 30 days of the first CTP evaluation. Logistic regression was used to examine independent variables, including patient demographics, comorbidities, number of medications, completion, and timing of program fidelity measures, and prior utilization of healthcare.RESULTSThe overall 30‐day readmission rate was 17.1%. The intensity of follow‐up varied among patients, with 17.1% and 50.8% of the patients requiring one and ≥3 home visits, respectively, within 30 days. More than half (54.6%) required visits beyond 30 days. Compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to exhibit cognitive impairment (29.6% vs 46.0%; P = .03) and were more likely to have high medication use (59.3% vs 44.4%; P = .047), more emergency department (ED; 0.8 vs 0.4; P = .03) and primary care visits (4.0 vs 3.0; P = .018), and longer cumulative time in the hospital (4.6 vs 2.5 days; P = .03) within 180 days of the index hospitalization. Multivariable analysis indicated that only cognitive impairment and previous ED visits were important predictors of readmission.CONCLUSIONSNo single CTP component reliably predicted reduced readmission risk. Patients with cognitive impairment and polypharmacy derived the most benefit from the program.

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) refers to a group of genetic disorders involving the connective tissues. Type IV EDS impairs type III collagen that is responsible for vessel integrity. Patients with type IV EDS are susceptible to vascular and visceral complications, including aortic aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, dissections, and spontaneous rupture of internal organs. Treating aneurysms with open surgery versus endovascular techniques each carry a unique risk-to-benefit ratio that must be applied to each individual carefully. We present a patient with type IV EDS who presented with a rapidly growing inferior mesenteric artery aneurysm. The patient was treated with a percutaneous endovascular technique using coils and n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue.

ObjectiveLaryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is resource‐intensive disease. The cost‐effectiveness of LTS treatments has not been adequately explored. We aimed to conduct a cost‐effectiveness analysis comparing open reconstruction (cricotracheal/tracheal resection [CTR/TR]) with endoscopic dilation in the treatment of LTS.Study DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingTertiary referral center (2013‐2017).Subjects and MethodsThirty‐four LTS patients were recruited. Annual costs were derived from the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University. Cost‐effectiveness analysis compared CTR/TR versus endoscopic dilation at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $50,000 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) over 5‐ and 10‐year time horizons. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated with deterministic analysis and tested for sensitivity with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.ResultsMean LTS costs were $4080.09 (SE, $569.29) annually for related health care visits. The major risk factor for increased cost was etiology of stenosis. As compared with idiopathic patients, patients with intubation‐related stenosis had significantly higher annual costs ($5286.56 vs $2873.62, P =. 03). The cost of CTR/TR was $8583.91 (SE, $2263.22). Over a 5‐year time horizon, CTR/TR gained $896 per QALY over serial dilations and was cost‐effective. Over a 10‐year time horizon, CTR/TR dominated dilations with a lower cost and higher QALY.ConclusionThe cost of treatment for LTS is significant. Patients with intubation‐related stenosis have significantly higher annual costs than do idiopathic patients. CTR/TR contributes significantly to cost in LTS but is cost‐effective versus endoscopic dilations for appropriately selected patients over a 5‐ and 10‐year horizon.

Abstract Objectives Working Group 2 was convened to address topics relevant to prosthodontics and dental implants. Systematic reviews were developed according to focused questions addressing (a) the number of implants required to support fixed full‐arch restorations, (b) the influence of intentionally tilted implants compared to axial positioned implants when supporting fixed dental prostheses ( FDP s), (c) implant placement and loading protocols, (d) zirconia dental implants, (e) zirconia and metal ceramic implant supported single crowns and (f) zirconia and metal ceramic implant supported FDP s. Materials and methods Group 2 considered and discussed information gathered in six systematic reviews. Group participants discussed statements developed by the authors and developed consensus. The group developed and found consensus for clinical recommendations based on both the statements and the experience of the group. The consensus statements and clinical recommendations were presented to the plenary (gathering of all conference attendees) and discussed. Final versions were developed after consensus was reached. Results A total of 27 consensus statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 24 clinical recommendations based on the combined expertise of the participants and the developed consensus statements. Conclusions The literature supports the use of various implant numbers to support full‐arch fixed prostheses. The use of intentionally tilted dental implants is indicated when appropriate conditions exist. Implant placement and loading protocols should be considered together when planning and treating patients. One‐piece zirconia dental implants can be recommended when appropriate clinical conditions exist although two‐piece zirconia implants should be used with caution as a result of insufficient data. Clinical performance of zirconia and metal ceramic single implant supported crowns is similar and each demonstrates significant, though different, complications. Zirconia ceramic FDP s are less reliable than metal ceramic. Implant supported monolithic zirconia prostheses may be a future option with more supporting evidence.

Introduction: Aneurysm rupture is associated with high mortality and morbidity, including both intracranial aneurysms (IA) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Despite potential preemptive treatment in those identified prior to IA or AAA rupture, the evidence for whom to screen remains limited. IA and AAA share both environmental and genetic risk, and prior cost-effectiveness models suggest the potential efficacy of screening in these high-risk individuals. We hypothesized that reciprocal screening in those presenting with IA for AAA would yield positive results. Methods: The BAAS study sought to establish the co-prevalence of IA and AAA. In this arm of BAAS, we recruited patients presenting with IA and screened them for AAA using abdominal ultrasound (aU/S) at two sites: Mayo Clinic and the University of Virginia (UVA). All participants underwent a detailed interview to collect demographic, radiographic, and clinical data. At UVA, participants also received genetic counseling. Results: At Mayo Clinic, we enrolled and screened 81 consecutive patients with aSAH (3 patients with known AAA were excluded) with 3 (3.7%) positive aU/S for AAA. At UVA, we recruited 195 consecutive patients presenting with ruptured or unruptured IA and completed screening aU/S in 178 (93%). Only one (0.6%) had an AAA. Conclusion: The lower positive screening at UVA (0.6%) which enrolled both ruptured and unruptured IA compared to the 3.7% positive results at Mayo suggests that future efforts to identify who with IA might benefit from AAA screening should focus on those with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Introduction: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture has a mortality rate of 64% and intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture has a mortality rate of 50%. Despite the high mortality rates, early detection and treatment of these vascular lesions prior to rupture can prevent devastating clinical outcomes, underscoring the need to identify high-risk populations for screening. Current evidence demonstrates shared genetic and environmental risk factors for both AAA and IA. Methods: The BAAS study sought to establish the co-prevalence of AAA and IA. In one arm of BAAS, we recruited patients presenting with AAA and screened them for IA. All participants underwent a detailed interview to collect demographic, radiographic, and clinical data and also had genetic counseling. Results: Of the 126 individuals with an AAA enrolled, 65% (82/126) completed the MRA. Difficulty with logistics of obtaining the research MRA with long distance travel to clinic was the principal reason for failure to obtain MRA. We identified 20.7% (17/82) with one or more IA, including 21 aneurysms found during systematic screening. IA ranged in size from 1.5-14 mm (height) x 1.4-7 mm (width) and varied in location. 9.5% (2/21) had a maximum diameter of 7 mm or more. One participant with a positive MRA underwent early coil embolization with the remainder undergoing continued clinical surveillance. Of the 15 individuals completing the genetic counseling screening, two underwent recommended clinical genetic testing, revealing one negative screen and one variant of unknown significance in the MYH11 gene. Conclusion: Consistent with our prior cost effectiveness models, these prospective data support the clinical utility of routine screening for IA in patients presenting with AAA.

Abstract Background: A number of cohort studies have collected Scope mouthwash samples by mail, which are being used for microbiota measurements. We evaluated the stability of Scope mouthwash samples at ambient temperature and determined the comparability of Scope mouthwash with saliva collection using the OMNIgene ORAL Kit. Methods: Fifty-three healthy volunteers from Mayo Clinic and 50 cohort members from Bangladesh provided oral samples. One aliquot of the OMNIgene ORAL and Scope mouthwash were frozen immediately and one aliquot of the Scope mouthwash remained at ambient temperature for 4 days and was then frozen. DNA was extracted and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was PCR amplified and sequenced using the HiSeq. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Results: The overall stability of the Scope mouthwash samples was relatively high for alpha and beta diversity. For example, the meta-analyzed ICC for the Shannon index was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.96). Similarly, the ICCs for the relative abundance of the top 25 genera were generally high. The comparability of the two sample types was relatively low when measured using ICCs, but were increased by using a Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) to compare the rank order of individuals. Conclusions: Overall, the Scope mouthwash samples appear to be stable at ambient temperature, which suggests that oral rinse samples received by the mail can be used for microbial analyses. However, Scope mouthwash samples were distinct compared with OMNIgene ORAL samples. Impact: Studies should try to compare oral microbial metrics within one sample collection type.